Movie Review: An early history of Islam via “The Lady of Heaven”

“The Lady of Heaven” is a faith-based historical drama that relates the early history of Islam through a series of bedtime stories a woman tells a little Iraqi boy who’s just been orphaned by ISIS fanatics.

The idea is to use the tragedy of that child (Gabriel Cartade) as a parable for a “different Islam” than the one he’s seeing play out right before his eyes. Laith watches ISIS militants accost his mother over their desire for him to become a “soldier” someday soon, accuse her of heresy and his late father of letting him learn “an infidel’s song” they hear him singing.

Later, ISIS thugs storm into his house and murder mother in front of him. He barely escapes their clutches and is rescued by a soldier (Oscar Salem) who brings him home. To comfort little Laith, the soldier’s mother (Denise Black) tells him of the pious and kind daughter of Muhammed, Fatima, who advocated tolerance, forgiveness and kindness and is presented here as an alternate path Islam might have taken after her father’s death.

The film’s point of view is one we hear often in the West. It’s the argument that ISIS, radical fundamentalists, Saudi Wahhabists and suicide bombers sanctioned by other sects have hijacked Islam and turned it into a global brand for violent intolerance in the name of religion.

Following the example of Muhammed’s flesh-and-blood daughter could change that.

The most daring thing about “The Lady” is that is comes right out and makes the case that this “hijacking” happened from the start. Is that just Westernized spin, or does any sober reading of the conflict in which Islam was born show it as preaching “peace and harmony” while waging jihadist invasions and conversion by force of arms?

That’s a fascinating minefield to walk into, because as the flashbacks to the seventh century in mother Bibi’s story make clear, preachers and lieutenants in Muhammed’s retinue proclaim they will “protect all — Muslim, Jew and non-Muslim” when they come to Medina, and the viewer can plainly see that they mean “Except for, uh, the PAGANS.”

Pagans here are depicted as eat-the-hearts-of-our-enemies fanatics hellbent on smothering Islam in the crib. As the Arab-on-Arab religious wars begin, violence all but takes over a movie about “The Lady of Heaven.”

We see Muhammed’s movement come closest to collapse in the Battle of Uhud, where single combat with a Goliath-sized giant is just the opening salvo, and his soldiers lose heart when they think he’s been killed. That battle is “Gladiator” bloody, as any fight with razor sharp scimitars would be.

The mass executions, with conversions to Islam sparing some condemned to death, that accompanied Muhammed’s conquest or “liberation” of Mecca is left off camera. We just see his followers circling the Kaaba, the holiest place in Islam and allegedly built by the prophet Abraham (Ibrahim) and predating Muhammed’s faith by centuries.

One break from the strife and violence concerns Fatima’s marriage. Muhammed gives her to his chosen successor, Imam Ali. Her requested dowry? Not cash, but “Intercession for sinners, so that they might enter heaven.”

Shockingly, the rumor that Muhammed’s third wife Aisha (also digitally rendered) poisoned him is depicted in one of Bibbi’s stories. That plays as something straight out of Greek mythology, not the founding myth of a modern religion.

And there’s no sugar coating the bloody-minded and treacherous power struggle to control the movement that began years before Muhammed’s death and exploded after his passing.

The Kuwaiti London-based Sheikh Al-Habib wrote the script, which is heavy on history woven into anecdotes, thin on the preaching that would “convert” Laith into a love-thy-enemies/tolerate others exemplar of the New Muslim. As for narrative drive, let’s just say a lot of combat, shouting matches, intrigues and backstabbing passes before our eyes without a whole lot of organization.

This Islamic history as parable may play as “new” and intriguing to the uninitiated, but the movie’s something of a muddle.

“The Lady” is so much in the background of many of these homilies Bibbi passes on that it’s hard to see little Laith taking heart or renewed faith in the religion of his birth from these stories. His mother was named “Fatima,” so that helps.

But watching and hearing these sometimes-confusing anecdotes and the revolving cast of characters as a non-Islamic Westerner, one has to marvel at the popularity of any faith that seems this Byzantine, tribal, vengeful and violent. Of course it’s not like Christianity hasn’t spilled a lot of blood with its adherents waving the bloody shirt as vigorously as those of any other faith.

I feel safe saying “The Lady of Heaven” is respectful and not obviously Islamophobic, and while it pays lip service to non-violence, the filmmakers don’t go overboard trying to make the religion’s founding myths less violent than history tells us they were.

It’s hard to make out much that would pass for an “agenda” in this production by the British-based Enlightened Kingdom. As much strife as there is about interpretations of Muhammed, his biography, death and the struggles over his succession, I’m not deep enough into the subject to ascertain a Sunni or Shia bias.

Eli King is the credited director. Is he the Australian-born Egyptian actor, or some other Eli King? That’s not clear. With Islam’s reputation for intolerance of not just criticism, but filmed depictions of its early history, I shouldn’t be surprised if that’s a nom de plume.

What is known is that the production got around Islamic edicts about “idolization” or literal depictions of Muhammed, his family and chosen successor through digital trickery and simple camera angles. A Jim Henson’s Creature Shop veteran was brought in to consult on that. Figures such as The Prophet and Fatima are seen in shadows, from behind, totally-covered in a burqa and gloves, or played by soft-focus digitally-altered actors.

Yes, we see their faces, a cinematic first. The effects are pretty impressive if the acting isn’t.

Let’s hope no one gets the Salman Rushdie/Charlie Hebdo treatment over this, as no expense was spared to avoid offense in that regard. I haven’t read of any threats of violence.

Still, Pakistan tried to ban social media mentions of the film and online access to its trailer. Iran’s news agency has pushed a boycott of “The Lady,” which was filmed in the Republic of Georgia and London.

It’s rated R, as it is every bit as violent as “The Passion of the Christ,” although few have as much of a passion for making violence visceral and personal as Mel Gibson.

With scores of faith-based films about Christianity hitting movie screens every year, the sheer novelty of “The Lady of Heaven” makes it worth seeing, just as background on a religion most of us know very little about. That’s where the film excels, even if the many obstacles the production had to get around distracted one and all to the extent that they somewhat botched the messaging.

Rating: R for strong/bloody violence

Cast: Denise Black, Oscar Salem, Gabriel Cartade, digitally altered actors portraying Muhammed, Fatima, Aisha and Imam Ali

Credits: Directed by Eli King, scripted by Sheikh Al-Habib. An Enlightened Kingdom release.

Running time: 2:21

About Roger Moore

Movie Critic, formerly with McClatchy-Tribune News Service, Orlando Sentinel, published in Spin Magazine, The World and now published here, Orlando Magazine, Autoweek Magazine
This entry was posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Movie Review: An early history of Islam via “The Lady of Heaven”

  1. From the review I can tell that the movie does not show why lady Fatima is nicknamed The Lady of Heaven?

    Prophet Mohammed said: ‘The light of Lady Fatima was Created before the creation of the earth and the sky’. So, one of the people said, ‘O Prophet of God! So, she isn’t a human being?’ He said: ‘Fatima is a human Hourie’. They said, ‘O Prophet of God! And how is she a human Hourie?’ He said: ‘God Mighty and Majestic Created her from His Light, before He Created Adam, when there were spirits. When God Mighty and Majestic Created Adam, she was presented (as a light unto Adam’ (for the recognition of God). It was said, ‘O Prophet of God! And where was Lady Fatima?’ He said: ‘She was in a receptacle beneath the Base of the Throne’. They said, ‘O Prophet of God! What was her food?’ He said: ‘The glorification and the extollation of Holiness , and the proclamation of Oneness , and the praising. When God Mighty and Majestic Created Adam and Extracted me from his lineage, and God Mighty and Majestic Loved to Extract her from my lineage, He Made her to be in an apple in the Paradise, and Jibraeel came to me with it’. He said to me: ‘The greetings be unto you, and Mercy of God and His Blessings, O Muhammad!’. I said: ‘And upon you be the greetings and Mercy of God, O Jibraeel!’. He said: ‘O Muhammad! Your Lord Conveys you the Greetings!’ I said: ‘The Greetings is from Him, to Him return the greetings’. He said: ‘O Muhammad! This here is an apple from the Paradise. God Mighty and Majestic has Gifted it to you’. I took it and pressed it to my chest. He said: ‘O Muhammad! God, Majestic is His Majesty is Saying to you: “Eat it!”’ I split it, and I saw light shining, and I was alarmed from it. He said: ‘O Muhammad! What is the matter you are not eating? Eat it and do not fear, for that light is of Al-Mansoura in the sky, and in the earth she is called Fatima’. I said: ‘My beloved Jibraeel! And why is she named as ‘Al-Mansoura’ in the sky, and in the earth as ‘Fatima’?’ He said: ‘She is named as ‘Fatima’ in the earth because she will be pulling her Shias(Followers) from the Fire, and her enemies are pulled away from her love, and she is ‘Al-Mansoura’ (The Helped one) in the sky, and that is the Word of God Mighty and Majestic: and on that day the beleviers shall rejoice [30:4] With the Help of God. He Helps the ones He so Desires to, [30:5] – meaning Fatima’s help the ones loving her’’..

    Source: Bihar Al-Anwaar – Volume 43.

    Regards

    • Roger Moore says:

      The full quotation you listed is definitely omitted. And there’s so little of her life story folded in I don’t that any of that was referenced.

      • The problem is that those who call themselves Muslims and Shiites do not believe in the correctness of most of what is stated in the books.
        While the Prophet Muhammad always repeats that he and his family are the first creation of God and that they existed before the creation of even the heavens, the earth and the planets, and that they are the means between the creatures and God.
        Lady Fatima showed her divine authority and appeared in the state of Portugal in 1917 and moved the sun from its place in front of all who attended
        But her virtue was hidden and the incident was attributed to another person
        I am very sad because no one talks about the virtues of the fourteen infallibles.

  2. asad says:

    I found this review very Islamophobic and Moore lied about the conquest of Mecca that Muhammad massacre people who did not convert to Islam. If you don’t know anything about the history (as you said) please shut your mouth and don’t spread lies and just do your movie criticism. Every history books say the opposite of this. even you didn’t read the Wikipedia you reference. Shame on you!

    • Roger Moore says:

      I’m no expert, I’ve read a bit and read a bit more connected to the events depicted in the film. But I don’t have blinders on about this subject either. Maybe you should do a little reading. The Wikipedia reference lists executions.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conquest_of_Mecca
      And then there’s the other killings sanctioned or ordered by Muhammed.
      https://wikiislam.net/wiki/List_of_Killings_Ordered_or_Supported_by_Muhammad
      Several commenters have put words in my mouth, as if multiple religious-leader ordered executions is not a “massacre,” again a word I didn’t use. I guess, to you, if it’s not “a massacre” it’s no big deal?

      I wish you could see how that historical record is all quite jarring to an outsider, or anybody who remembers how many New Testament figures ordered others killed, starting with Jesus. There was no “Palm Sunday Massacre” or even execution, save for the self-sacrificing prophet who took that donkey ride. There was no body count run up by Buddha.
      My review merely points to the film leaning into that historic Islamic “brand,” and addressing it.
      And as virtually everyone commenting here has failed to see the movie and would rather argue theology, I am closing the comments.

Comments are closed.