Movie Review: The Peter Pan who would be “The King of Pop” — “Michael”

Most reviews are in and the furor has abated a bit even as Spike Lee has weighed in on the “Elephant in the Room” missing from the new “Michael” Jackson biopic by Antoine Fuqua.

But fans are still showing up in droves. And as I was off the clock and out of the country when it opened, I ducked in to catch “Michael” before checking out this week’s new releases on Thursday night.

Lee’s got a point, that Fuqua’s film, scripted by three-time Oscar nominee John Logan (“Aviator,” “Hugo,” “Gladiator”), is perfectly within its rights (and the family’s all-controlling “permission”) to dwell on the rise of a superstar rather than the child abuse allegations that dominated the circus that was Jackson’s final decades.

End your movie early enough and maybe the too-forgiving fans will forgive that most mortal of sins. You also dodge the sham marriages, bizarre public blunders, lawsuit settlements and an ongoing moral, ethical and public releations nightmare of the “Neverland Ranch” era.

But “Michael” is so “authorized” that it calls attention to its myriad shortcomings. All the rough edges and much of the “reality” is rubbed off as we get little to no sense of how this pop music pixie took over the culture with iconic tunes and legendary dance moves, a towerinng and terribly damaged and flawed former child star whose lesser sins included billing himself “The King of Pop.”

I mean, he was. But did he ever say that he wouldn’t name his breakout solo LP “Michael” because “It sounds too egocentric?” I doubt it.

“Michael” takes us from the controlling, abused childhood young Michael (Juliano Valdi) endured — a childhood stolen by his greedy, abusive father Joseph (Colman Domingo, excellent as always, but restrained) — in the ’60s to his break from his Jackson Five brothers and manager/father for solo superstardom, his triumphs and trials and accidents in the early to late ’80s.

But comparing this infuriatingly shallow picture to recent bio-pics of Whitney Houston, James Brown, Freddie Mercury, Charlie Parker, Bob Dylan, Elvis and Johnny Cash just underscores its shortcomings.

All but erasing Janet Jackson, never ever “explaining” who the “man in the mirror” or the image “behind the curtain” was, this is far and away the shallowest of the recent musical bio-pics lot.

Logan relies on one all-seeing observer, Jackson’s longtime (’76-96) ex-cop security guard, “fixer” and confidante Bill Bray (KeiLyn Durrel Jones) as something of a framing device, but Fuqua won’t even commit to that.

Jaafar Jackson’s uncanny impersonation of the sweet-seeming, airy not-of-this-world voice and signature dance moves is uncanny. And there is one great laugh than only those who lived through the world of ’80s American pop will get.

“If I’m not here to receive these ideas,” a hard-working Michael declares, “God might give’em to PRINCE!”

Domingo’s on pointe as a classic credit-hogging stage parent, forever reminding the “genius” of his brood who “got us out of Gary (Indiana).

But Nia Long, playing Jackson’s supportive mom, barely registers, a problem in the writing and the passive performance. Miles Teller similarly makes zero impression as the manager who takes over and helps Michael break ties with his father.

If you sit there wondering who is playing the famous CBS Records chief (Walter Yetnikoff) who, at Michael’s prodding, forced MTV to integrate and play Michael’s “short films” (music videos), it’s a barely recognizable Mike Myers, who has little to work with and underwhelms even doing the bare minimum.

Larenz Tate is nobody’s idea of a Berry Gordy (Motown’s guiding genius). And so on down the line.

I kept looking for some flesh and bone depiction of Jackson’s discipline, the work behind the “genius” that borrowed dance moves at a street gang “Beat It” dance rehearsal and gave the world the Moonwalk. A lot more of his creative interaction with Quincy Jones (Kendrick Sampson) — pivotal to his rise to the summit — was in order.

It’s one thing to leave out the making of a pedophile, problematic subject matter on several levels. It’s quite another to leave out Janet, to skim over the recording of “Beat It” and limit “Thriller” to the John Landis music video shoot. It’s quite another to simply serve up an uncanny skin-deep caricature of the guy.

I remember listening to an NPR program’s search for the reasons the Black community in particular never canceled or gave up on Jackson, no matter how twisted his story got. A single band-aid on the nose is meant to symbolize his extensive plastic surgery and skin bleaching efforts to erase his race.

Where is the Jackson of that famous Springsteen anecdote, about meeting the pop icon backstage at Live Aid in ’85, sipping beers just like another one of the rock and pop “guys?”

The “His Story Continues” end title here hints that maybe the family will relent as Lionsgate cries out for a sequel to cover Jackson’s final years. Who’ll they get to play Oprah? Priscilla? Miss Janet if you’re Nasty?

Fuqua’s a better director than this and Logan’s a better writer than “Michael” shows. Now that everybody’s delivered a blockbuster out of this troubled man of mystery, maybe there’ll be money to try something more serious.

They managed the hard part — finding the perfect title character. Now comes the even harder part, doing their subject justice.

Rating: PG-13, “thematic material,” smoking and profanity

Cast: Jaafar Jackson, Nia Long, Miles Teller, Larenz Tate, Juliano Valdi, KeiLyn Durrel Jones, Colman Domingo and Mike Myers.

Credits: Directed by Antoine Fuqua, scripted by John Logan. A Lionsgate release.

Running time: 2:07

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Series Review: A “Grand(ish) Tour” returns… as a “clip show”

We all knew, or perhaps hoped, it would come to this.

Our three blokey blokes, those petrolheads from “Top Gear” and “The Grand Tour,” finish their run of pricey car porn, play-racing and wild motoring — car trips, motorcycle quests, boat passages, bridge building — “adventures” in a British home for OAPs — Old Age Pensioners.

It’s “2040,” is the premise, and they’re in this nursing home — forgetful, wizened, gray and paunchier than ever — to replay the Amazon version of their “greatest hits.”

“The Grand(ish) Tour” is a clip show farewell to the Amazon series that was itself a curtain call to their nearly two decades of BBC motoring mayhem on “Top Gear.”

Jeremy Clarkson, James May and Richard Hammond have grown old and plump (ish, in Hammond and May’s cases) before our eyes in two and a half decades of TV car reviewing, racing, testing and stunting.

Now, under the pretext of Amazon’s “teeny tiny print” in their contract, they’re back after wrapping up their series with a fond farewell, to sum up the GT years with a trio of “greatest hits” clips programs — scary moments, funny failures and a lot of Clarkson’s John Bull blustering and carbon consuming myopia.

“The Grand Tour” started with an over-the-top “Drive Tribe” celebration of their new endeavor, after Clarkson has one too many run-ins with the BBC and got himself fired. They roared in on their chariots of choice to a desert rendezvous with their gear head, petrol head, rat rodder, bikers and fellow travelers fans, serenaded by The Hot House Flowers covering “I Can See Clearly Now the Rain is Gone.”

Considering the tantrums and international incidents these Brit jingoists caused at the BBC, that was the height of irony, and not just a peak moment that Clarkson now admits their follow-up series would never top.

The gimmick of these clip shows — three are planned, we’re told — is that they’re all retired together in a home somewhere in Blighty, with a certain unnamed racing driver glimpsed in the background in a nearly magnanimous moment where Clarkson admits to being taught to drive fast, drift, etc.

As on the series, Clarkson holds forth and the clips burnish his cultivated image of a driver’s driver, a heedless “More POWER” speed demon and a car nut with little understanding of how to fix even the older, simpler beaters the lads drove across Africa, South America and all points in between.

They note the big misstep they took early in their last series, a giddy action pic bit of business driving and shooting through fake terrorists with a fake Queen E. (“Did you come far?”) in the backseat.

“Nobody wants to see us having fun,” was the revelation that widely-panned outing told them. If was the comical “suffering” and moments of terror — Hammond crashing, time and again, and peeing himself on a boat trip across the China Sea, May getting punk rear-ended as a running gag, Clarkson bullheadedly blundering through this bit of road or that section of track.

Pieced together, and taken in tandem with the still-bingeable BBC “Top Gear” archives available on several free streaming services, a new question about their group dynamic emerges.

Why did Hammond and May never rebel against Clarkson’s scenery-chewing, blustering dominance?

Yes, Clarkson and Andy Wilmon conceived the re-imagining of the original show (which dates from @1979) and its gimmicks, merely adapting them to Amazon when they crossed over. Yes, that show’s entertainment-meets-supercars conceit made them all rich and famous.

But the show didn’t really work until they found those magic second and third legs of the stool. May and Hammond became just as important and a lot more watchable as the series progressed — Captain Slow and Wee Richie Crashes-a-Lot landing laughs, extolling the virtues of their choices of rides on these assorted “tours” and epic drives.

“Top Gear” has foundered since these three left because recapturing that trio’s chemistry has proven impossible.

But what’s obvious, watching the “GT” clips, the old “Top Gears” and now this show as that Hammond and May are still pitched as Clarkson’s inferiors and willing to play along as his stooges, with the permitted insults they’re allowed to throw his way.

Why?

They started calling themselves dinosaurs long ago, and that finally seems to fit as the three play-act out a “forced” series of reminiscences. With gas prices skyrocketing and the planet literally cooking, it all seems a tad more heedless and foolish than it did back then when they first started their high octane hijinks.

I’ve enjoyed most of the shows, almost all of the road trips and even “Clarkson’s Farm,” which is an amusing follow-up for the most restless, wreckless and headstrong of the three to try.

But May is still the one you’d most like to have a conversation with and the handiest to have along on a classic car ride, Hammond the most likeable TV-friendly “presenter” of the lot and best potential drinking buddy.

And Clarkson? He’s aged into the ultra conservative, entitled, self-unaware geezer many of those early “Top Gear” episodes promised, full of opinions, not necessarily adept at defending them, quick with the insult and determined to limit those directed at him that make it on television.

I stumbled back across the most revealing aside involving him just as “Top Gear” was on the rise, an early pre-global-phenomenon “Top Gear” where Guns-N-Roses guitarist Slash was the hapless “Star in a Reasonably Priced Car” guest, forced to drive a manual econobox with the steering and gear shift on “the wrong side” around their track.

This was when the show was lucky to get other (obscure to the rest of the world) 0BBC presenters and radio hosts on as “celebrity” guests, and this guitarist — on tour and willing to come in to give the plucky little show a taste of international celebrity — even covered the Allman Brothers tune “Jessica,” (“Top Gear’s” theme song long before Clarkson finished his first carton of ciggies) for the closing credits.

Over that closing music, Clarkson insecurely insults Slash’s driving as opposed to his guitar playing as an aside to his “mates.” Producer Wilmon chose to put that churlish quip in the show.

That outed them both as pricks-of-a-feather, plainly meant for each other, a ride-or-die pair who lied to the BBC about Clarkson’s Falklands War license plate stunt during the infamous Argentina to Tierra del Fuego road trip, the “real” reason the BBC was looking for an excuse to fire him.

Clarkson’s perfected “watch this John Bull in a china shop fail,” his version of villain watching (A British Kardashian, he is). And his Gentleman Farmer fantasy is fun, even if you don’t buy the proposition that being backed by one of the world’s wealthiest companies and his own celebrity, that he could ever “fail.” Maybe he’ll figure out the error of climate change denial ways and repent.

May’s post “Grand Tour” shows have been entirely too pedantic and narrowly British in their focus — even the travelogues. I haven’t seen much of Hammond’s attempts at finding a fresh hit.

“The Grand Tour” gave them and Hammond and May a fun if repetitive few-years-long send-off. “Grand(ish) Tour” reminds us that there were highlights, and almost as much filler as the BBC shows, and a dire accident or two as well.

We the fans have gotten old with them, so there’s something to be said for the sentimentality of one last round of “Clarkson, you pillock” and the like.

But a clip show is still a clip show, and unless one or two of the three cares to go all George Takei on their egomaniac Captain Kirk, it’s hard to see much point to this, unless there really is “fine print” or somebody needs the money.

Rating: TV-MA, profanity

Cast: Jeremy Clarkson, Richard Hammond and James May.

Credits: Created by Andy Wilmon and Jeremy Clarkson. An Amazon Prime release.

Running time: 3 (presumably) episodes @80 minutes each.

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

BOX OFFICE: “Mortal Kombat II” vs “Devil Wears Prada 2” is a Dead Heat

Whatever the Summer of 2026 holds in store, the spring of this movie going year has been positively littered with temporary blockbusters, a few of them with “legs.”

From “Project Hail Mary” to “Super Mario Galaxy,” to the more unexpected smashes “Micheal” and “The Devil Wears Prada 2,” business at the movies is rebounding, and not just thanks to spiking ticket prices.

This second weekend of May sees the latest iteration of the video games-turned-movies “Mortal Kombat” series, “Mortal Kombat 2,” clearing a very healthy but not spectacular $40 million. It could reach into the mid-$40s, and it’ll pretty much have to. As Deadline.com points out, last weekend’s smash, “The Devil Wears Prada 2” is still making bank, with $42-45 million looking like its second weekend tally.

As “Prada 2,” an adult fashionista romance sequel to a movie that opened 20 years ago, earned $76 million on its opening weekend, a lowish week-to-week drop of 45% is something serious to brag about.

There have been four “Mortal Kombat” movies, and the novelty of this one is that it has Karl Urban in the role of the washed-up-action-movoie hero, dropping zingers and out of his depth in “real” martial arts brawls with demigods out to destroy “Earthrealm.” He helps a little, but not much. Every single one of these video game adaptations has had story problems that overwhelm the production values and “acting.” They’ve all sucked.

But reviews don’t sink or float these movies, and Urban is the reason this one is getting more lightly panned than the earlier incarnations.

“Prada” box office was overestimated in the early part of last weekend, and it may fall off enough to give New Line a weak weekend “Kombat” win.” The movie — with little known supporting players — “only” cost $80 million or so to make.

“Michael” has been the big surprise of the spring. It’s on track to make another $35 million this weekend, a third place finish that puts it well on its way to $250 million, just in North America. Most everything bad everybody has said about it is true, but also true is Spike Lee’s defense that a superficial gloss on a story that ends before Jackson’s life became a tabloid freak show of sham marriages, stunts and lawsuits over his pedophilia is a valid approach to his life.

Maybe they’re saving that for the sequel. Who’ll play Oprah?

But Jaafar Jackson’s impersonation in the title role is uncanny– the voice, the hair, right down to the perfectly-placed band-aid symbolizing Jackson’s many race-erasing medical procedures. I hope to get around to writing a review on it today.

Fourth place goes to a family film with a bit of an edge. “The Sheep Detectives” is about sheep trying to solve the murder of their shepherd (Hugh Jackman), but it surprisingly gets into imparting wisdom about death and dying and faith and — being British — it doesn’t shy away from discounting religion for the fairy tale it is.

The “mystery” is kind of a dud and the picture kind of plods, I thought. But hard-pressed-for-laughs or not, it’s playing, got decent enough reviews overall and might hit the $15 million mark by midnight Sunday.

The new Billie Eilish concert doc, “Billie Eilish: Hit me Hard and Soft — The Tour” looks like it’ll take fifth with an $8-9 million weekend. She’s still a “thing,” I guesss, so go figure. Those aren’t exacly Beyonce/Tay-Tay concert doc numbers, though.

Sixth place looks to be a race between the March release that just won’t fade away, “Project Hail Mary,” and a fast-falling animated “Super Mario Galaxy” sequel.

“Hokum” and a collection of low-drawing also-rans look to fill out the top ten.

I’ll update this as more Sat. and Sunday data comes in.

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Movie Review: Same ol’ “Mortal Kombat,” but Urban adds a little Humor — “Mortal Kombat II”

Video game fans seem to never tire of film adaptations of beloved big screen throwbacks to their misspent youth. The movies are often plotless, just collections of quips and a parade of indifferently tied-together scenes with this or that beloved character, a few even played by big name stars as “Lara Croft,” “Minecraft,” “Street Fighter,” this or that “Mario Brother” “come to life.”

Invariably, they don’t “come to life,” and that’s a problem for those of us who haven’t devoted enough screen time to this interactive “content.”

“Mortal Kombat II” isn’t appreciably different from any of the other “Mortal Kombats” — which have generated four big screen adaptations and a couple of TV series. In the 30-plus years since this first Paul W.S. Anderson (LOL) adaptation, stars have come and gone, as has Anderson. Pretty much. The original game maker went bankrupt and yet here we are.

This latest iteration of the franchise is jokier, bloodier and far more littered with F-bombs. The production values are higher, with CGI sets, psychotronic effects, lavish costumes and makeup and decent fight choreography that occasionally hides which actors have the moves and who needs the most digitally assisted stuntmen helping out.

Characters fight to the death, but no “death” is permanent. I know Josh Larson, playing Aussie wisecracker Kano, is grateful for the work. But the upshot of that is that the stakes start out low and stay low. There’s no reason to invest in a character’s fate because he or she can be video-game reborn.

And Karl Urban’s better at dry, catch-phrases and one-liners than anybody else who played the martial arts actor sucked into a fight to the death to save “Earthrealm” from whatever extraterrestrial threat faces it this time.

This Johnny Cage wears Rayban Wayfarers. And he goes by “Johnny F—ing Cage,” thank you.

Johnny’s a ’90s action movie has-been trapped in fan convention hell when he’s summoned to join “Blondie” (Jessica McNamee), Jax (Mehcad Brooks), Liu Kang (Ludi Lin) and others in Lord Raiden’s (Tadanobu Asano) Earth-defending corps.

Martyn Ford plays the super-dooper supervillain Shao Kahn, a towering, helmeted hulk armed with a warclub the size of a data center. Adeline Rudolph is the daughter of a vanquished foe he’s raised to be his champion, trained by petite fury Jade (Tati Gabrielle).

The old pros in the cast (Urban, Hiroyuki Sanada) don’t let the boredom or embarassment show. Much. But nobody seems invested in the characters or in what they’re doing with them. Well, maybe Lawson.

Urban gets most of the one-liners, from Johnny’s on-screen catch phrase “It’s show time,” to cracks about “Transformer arms” Jax, “Big Trouble in Little China” settings and an old martial arts actor’s eagerness to cite his credentials.

“Hey, I got a SATURN Award for ‘Best Fight in a Feature Film!'”

Lawson’s return means Urban has to share the “Pennywise” and “Spirit Halloween” zingers. At heast the New Line Cinema checks cleared, right?

A sample of Johnny’s ’90s movie career — the snap of his sunglasses preceding every “It’s SHOW time” — is about as compelling as the movie that movie within a movie turns out to be.

I laughed a few times, but this pile of cluttered, poorly organized exposition interrupted by CGI brawls isn’t going to headline screenwriter Jeremy Slater’s resume.

And director Simon McQuoid? Well, somebody’s got to be the new Paul W.S. Anderson.

Rating: R, graphic, bloody violence, lots of profanity

Cast: Karl Urban, Adeline Rudolph, Tati Gabrielle, Jessica McNamee, Martyn Ford, Mehcad Brooks, Ludi Lin, Lewis Tan, Max Huang, Tadanobu Asano, Josh Lawson, Chin Han and Hiroyuki Sanada.

Credits: Directed by Simon McQuoid, scripted by Jeremy Slater. A New Line Cinema release.

Running time: 1:56

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Movie Review: “The Sheep Detectives” hunt for Suspects when their Shepherd is Offed

I can’t say much for the plot of “The Sheep Detecives,” a children’s murder mystery about talking, crime-solving sheep from those sheep-and-murder mad Brits. The “murder mystery” isn’t particularly mysterious and its solution leaves a lot to be desired.

And for a kids’ film, the sheep jokes that land are few and far between.

But there’s a serious subtext or two tucked in this tale of a devoted shepherd (Hugh Jackman) who dies under mysterious circumstances, with his generally dim, in deep denial flock the only chance his killer might be brought to justice.

Screenwriter Craig Mazin wrote much of TV’s “Chernobyl” and plenty of “The Last of Us” episodes, and he gently leans on questions of life and death and how sheep might face the reality that they don’t just “become clouds” when they pass on.

And give credit to director Kyle Balda, who counts a “Minions” and “Despicable Me” as well as the Dr. Seuss enviro-parable “The Lorax” among his credits. He gets pathos out of a movie with CGI sheep and dogs, no easy task.

Jackman plays shepherd George, a bit of a curmudgeon in the tiny hamlet of Benbrook (Surrey, Oxfordshire, Hertfordshire and Buckinhamshire provided locaions). He shuns church but tolerates the vicar (Kobna Holdbrook-Smith). feuds with a fellow shepherd (Tosin Cole) and despises the local butcher (Conleth Hill).

But he dotes on his sheep — running his small farm from a parked caravan (camper trailer), reading murder mysteries to his flock by night.

“They’re all special,” he writes/narrates in a letter. But Lily? She’s the smartest. Lily, voiced by Julia Louis-Dreyfus, is the one who can always guess “whodunit” from these formulaic stories they’re read.

But one dark and stormy night, George dies. He’s found in the pasture, and Mopple (voiced by Chris O’Dowd) has to explain to Lily that he’s not “playing a game” or sleeping. He’s dead. She may be the smartest, but Mopple is “the wisest.” He’s the one who remembers everything the sheep decide is too unpleasant to face and recall themselves.

As the old ram Sir Ritchfield (Patrick Stewart) notes, “Sheep are not meant to remember such things.”

The local human cop (Nicholas Braun) may be nobody’s idea of a Miss Marple or Inspector Morse. It’ll be up to Lily to convince dopey Constable Tim that this was a murder and who the best suspects might be.

That pastor and other shepherd and butcher are on the list. Hotelier Beth (Hong Chau) was sweet on the shepherd and resented the scented letters he was sending to some woman named Rachel.

And then Rachel shows up, with George’s biting and brittle big city attorney (Emma Thompson) in tow. It turns out Rachel was the man’s daughter and stands to inherit a lot.

Constable Tim and cub reporter Elliot (Nicholas Galtizine) will need some prodding by their wooly helpers if this killer is to be caught.

The narrative trots through the tired tropes of the genre — “The killer always returns to the scene of the crime!” — without enough wit to compensate for the tedium.

The sheep — voiced by everyone from Regina Hall to Brett Goldstein and Bryan Cranston — can be funny. But this is no “Sean the Sheep” animation. Thompson’s cutting remarks earn more grins than all the sheep jokes put together.

Cranston voices Sebastian, the reclusive dominant ram in this flock, a bitter survivor who knows more about their fate than the average sheep could bear.

“Go back to your hay and dandelions and your naps” is his advice. Sebastian drolly explains church to his flock as a place where humans believe God, who is both a “lamb” and a “shepherd,” dwells.

The film is sweetest when the characters touch on death, the impermanence of life and the role memory plays in keeping dead loved ones alive.

But anyone who comes expecting funny folks Louis-Dreyfus, O’Dowd,” Stewart, Cranston and “Ted Lasso” veteran Goldstein to serve up ovine wisecracks and wit will be sorely disappointed. And treating kids to this downbeat dramedy/”mystery” has a whiff of forcing them to watch “Matlock” or “Murder She Wrote” re-runs with grandma.

Rating: PG, death and the afterlife, or lack of it, are discussed

Cast: Hugh Jackman, Hong Chau, Nicholas Braun, Tosin Cole, Molly Gordon, Nicholas Galitzine and Emma Thompson, with the voices of Julia Louis-Dreyfus, Chris O’Dowd, Bryan Cranston, Regina Hall, Brett Goldstein and Patrick Stewart.

Credits: Directed by Kyle Balda, scripted by Craig Mazin, babed on a novel by Leonie Swan. An MGM/Amazon release.

Running time: 1:49

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Netflixable? The “Son-in-Law” — His Corrupt Rise and Fall

Movies like “Son-in-Law” force the viewer to ponder the difference between “confused” and “confusing” narratives.

Critics use “confusing” when we’re willing to give the filmmakers the benefit of the doubt about tangled and unconventional plotting. “Confused” puts the blame squarely on whoever cooked up this muddled, meandering mess.

“Son-in-Law” is the tale of the rise and fall of a Mexican American — born in San Diego, sent to Mexico to live with an aged uncle for the “discipline” the old man might pass on — who thinks big, marries money and entangles himself in the corruption often associated with Mexico’s narco-politics.

“El Yerno,” as it is titled in Spanish speaking countries, begins in the fictive present, when it all comes bloodily crashing down on Attorney General José Sánchez (Adrien Vazquez). Then it bounces back to 2019, when things started to go wrong, then back to 1985 when the eager-to-fit-in kid took his first chance at impressing a girl by bringing drugs to her birthday party, and then we jump to “20 Years Later.”

This all happens in the first seven or eight minutes. We barely have time to get used to an actor of one age before another leaps into the role, and making heads of tails out of any of it announces itself as the problem that smothers this picture in the cradle.

“Ten years later” and “three years after that” are to come as we see a young man with a passion for transportation — he drops out of law school to drive his uncle’s ancient VW taxi — who sleeps with the sister of his best friend, the senator’s son.

When José gets Lucia (Verónica Bravo) pregnant, Jose finds himself the voiceless “executive vice president” of the family’s bus transit company, the poor stepchild to their shipping empire. He spies the corruption, cozies up to a cartel kingpin, El Lobo (Jero Medina) and finds his way to power by flattering and bucking up his all-powerful in-laws’ political enemy (Rodrigo Virago), literally driving him to power.

The movie, in Spanish and English, struggles to juggle its dispirate elements, losing track of the central anti-“hero’s journey” from working class cabbie to Transporation Minister of the fictional state of Albacruz all the way to Attorney General and perhaps beyond.

He gets that last title because he’s the only one “stupid enough to take the job” in a state run by three warring cartels. José is cynical enough to play the game as corrupt “peace maker,” and the implication is that he’ll cheat, lie, steal and fake assassination attempts when it suits his purposes.

Maybe the best reason for the faked attempt is getting his wife and daughter out of the country by convincing them of “the danger.”

We see the story from José’s point of view, but we never know where we or the movie stand with him. He’s in prison, cooperating with (American) authorities, turning the tables on his in-laws, manipulating his wife, conning assorted cartels and getting things done due to native cunning.

But his daughter’s quinceanara? That’s another matter altogether.

The most famous credited screenwriter here is James Schamus, who has made a mint out of scripting “Eat, Drink, Man, Woman” and “The Wedding Banquet,” and then presiding over remakes of these Ang Lee classics for other cultures and other audiences. He also wrote Marvel’s first crack at “Hulk,” and even though the Mexican co-writers have credits like “This is Not a Comedy” and “Technoboys,” let’s assume this was largely a mess of Schamus’s making.

Not fair, probably. He’s not working with Ang Lee this time and even though director Gerardo Naranjo’s best credit, “Miss Bala,” was 15 years ago, Schamus took the money and kept his name on the credits.

Whoever is primarily to blame, “Son-in-Law” starts out confused and stays confusing almost to the can’t-come-soon-enough closing credits.

Rating: TV-MA, bloody violence, sex, profanity

Cast: Adrien Vazquez, Jero Medina,
Verónica Bravo, David Gaitán and Rodrigo Virago

Credits: Directed by Gerardo Naranjo, scripted by James Schamus, Gabriel Nuncio and Aleandro Aljete. A Netflix release.

Running time: 1:43

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Leave a comment

Movie Review: A Period Piece as Dated as its Period — “The Choral”

The writing and directing duo who brought “The Madness of King George (The Madness of George III),” “The History Boys” and “The Lady in the Van” first to the London stage, and then to the screen skip the whole West End part of the equation for “The Choral,” a World War I homefront drama about art transcending politics and nationality and sexuality.

Playwright and screenwriter Alan Bennett’s script grapples with a lot more than that in this quaint and overreaching but sometimes quite moving story.

It’s about a (fictional) working town’s chorus and the choirmaster that The Choral’s sponsor, an industrialist who fancies himself a better baritone than he is, hires to take over for their next oratorio.

That choirmaster is the exacting Dr. Guthrie, played with sympathy and almost self-destructive resolve by Ralph Fiennes. And what factory-owner/alderman Duxbury (veteran character actor Roger Allam) and his singing/politicking mate Fytton (funnyman Mark Addy) and the gossips of town fret about is the fact that Dr. Guthrie spent years of his career in Germany “by CHOICE!”

It’s 1916, and patriotism is still the dominant emotion in a populace not yet shocked and numbed by the horrendous human cost of World War I. Any man who celebrates German composers and culture and art is suspect.

The fact that he doesn’t prefer the company of women is another matter altogether.

But when the choirmaster who was to guide the troupe through Bach’s “The Passion of St. Matthew” enlists to “do my bit,” this chorus is in a fix. Guthrie, with a trusted pianist (Robert Emms) in tow, will have to do.

Bach was German, Guthrie points out in more than one argument with Duxbury & Co. Eventually, he turns their jingoism around on them to pursue permission to do a more modern and more British choral work, Sir Edward Elgar’s “The Dream of Gerontius.”

No, I’ve been to and recorded choral concerts and worked in classical music public radio for years and I’ve never heard or heard of it either.

The conceit Guthrie and his ensemble come up with is to alter the oratorio’s poetic and symbolic intent to one that suits the moment — a horrific war and its grim cost to those young men fighting it.

But first they’ve got to get through auditions, round up undrafted male factory workers as basses and baritones. They also contend with the very real but also melodramatic lives of working class folk who sing on stage or for the Salvation Army (Amara Okereke), pine (Emily Fairn) for a lover missing in action (Jacob Dudman) while aware of the attentions a fellow chorus member (Taylor Uttley) and the like.

Socialist politics, homophobic rumor-mongering, the dread of the draft or eagerness to “serve” and a small city sex worker with a patriotic heart of gold all enter the fray.

Simon Russell Beale steals his scene as the grand and “uniformed” Elgar, “the greatest living English composer,” who drops in to see how his least successful choral work is faring in this outing. He charms the lovely young Black soprano (Okereke) whose voice stands out in the cast, but also betrays his own myopia about how he wants his work produced.

The film’s oh-so-delicate treatment of what used to be poetically labeled “the love that dare not speak its name” (homosexuality) is emblematic of “The Choral’s” main shortcoming.

Bennett & Co. grapple with several subtexts, subplots, politics and “issues” and never get a grip on any of them. The treatment of the gay subtext is so delicate as to make this play like a film dancing around that subject back in the less “out” 1980s.

The story arc of building up to “The Big Show” is so formulaic as to feel trite. The delicate treatment of the assorted subplots dooms almost all of them to an unsatisfying conclusion.

Fiennes is fine, but even his performance leaves us craving more than the script has him give.

Charming romantic threads collide with dissonant ones and in the end, little seems resolved even in subjects as black and white as “War is Bad” and “Prejudice is ignorance.”

It’s a grand looking production and a well-cast, well-acted and high-minded film. But Hytner and Bennett have conjured up a Big Show and an Important Statement, and so cluttered the narrative that they lose track of which statements they’re serious about making.

Rating: R, profanity, sexual content

Cast: Ralph Fiennes, Roger Allam, Amara Okereke, Mark Addy, Roxanne Morgan, Emily Fairn, Alun Amrstrong, Jacob Dudman and Taylor Uttley.

Credits: Directed by Nicholas Hytner, scripted by Alan Bennett with contributions by Stephen Beresford. A Sony Pictures Classics release.

Running time: 1:53

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Movie Review: A Stand-up Comic’s last “line” of defense — “Is This Thing On?”

The trailers to “Is This Thing On?” had me hyped to catch it during its awards season run.


Will Arnett, one of the funniest actors to hold a SAG card, playing a midlife crisis character who copes by trying his hand at stand up? A movie directed by and also-starring Bradley Cooper? Oscar winner Laura Dern as the wife our would-be stand-up is letting get away?

But you could guess why the film instantly vanished from “For your consideration” the moment its brief and limited theatrical run (which led to me missing it in theaters). The “tell” was in the stand-up scenes sampled in the trailers. And the dead give away is the title, that old stand-up’s line about a joke or comic bit that flopped, blaming the sound system.

“Is this thing on?”

Arnett was never a stand-up comic. Nor was Cooper. And these two co-wrote the script (With Mark Chappell coming in to, we guess, “joke it up?”).

Almost nothing in the many stand-up scenes that show our angsty hero, Alex Novack (Arnett) trotting out his and his wife’s (Dern) marital woes, failings and the like plays as funny. Cutting to eager and growing crowds’ laughter at this material is a lie. Watching Alex rise from “open mike” sessions to paid gigs with set after set staggering through awkward pauses, confessions and the like is not a viable or realistic rising career arc.

And that mutes the impact of everything else in the film — the couple struggling to break up or make up, the advice from comic veterans (Amy Sedaris, Chloe Radcliffe, James Tom, Reggie Conquest), the “straying,” the dopey actor bestie (Cooper) finally getting a big break on a Western series and the caring parents (Ciaran Hinds, Christine Ebersole) who blame their son for letting Ms. Right get away.

More’s the pity, as Cooper manages to wring a lot of sensitivity and “feels” out of this family dynamic — a drifting, “lost” husband and father struggling to find himself, his place in the marriage and his standing with wife and their kids, somebody who could use a little therapy and decides airing his failings on late late night comedy club stages.

That sweet streak helps but never prevents the narrative from becoming an unwieldy jumble as Alex talks on stage about sleeping with other women and his wife is meant to be tempted by a longtime client, inexplicably played by footballer/pitch-man Peyton Manning.

At some point, Alex’s wife and his dad finally get around to checking out his set. Which is revealing, but never ever “funny.”

Cooper’s not a bad director. But this material and this milieu evade him. All that research he did into Leonard Bernstein and he couldn’t glean more from his stand-up visits than this? Maybe watch Seinfeld’s brilliant documentary about the work and the fragile, brittle and defensive people who struggle to do it, “Comedian?”

Arnett’s funny. No doubt about it. But he needs material to work with, and “Is This Thing On?” doesn’t deliver it.

Rating: R, drug use, sexual references, lots and lots of profanity

Cast: Will Arnett, Laura Dern, Bradley Cooper, Andra Day, Amy Sedaris, Sean Hayes, Christine Ebersole, Peyton Manning and Ciaran Hinds.

Credits: Directed by Bradley Cooper, scripted by Bradley Cooper, Will Arnett and Mark Chappell.

Running time: 2:01

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Movie Review: A Romantic Melodrama in a Minor Key — “Two Pianos”

The great ones make it look effortless, with their mere presence in a role affirming the story’s unimpeachable reality.

Charlotte Rampling started her career in the ’60s, came into her own in the ’70s (“Farewell, My Lovely”) and by the early ’80s (“The Verdict”) any sense of artifice had vanished from her performances.

Her subtlety, unhurried timing and understated performances invite us in, getting across the verisimilitude of every classic character from Dickens or Chekhov, making us come to her and believe her as a Russian spy trainer in “Red Sparrow,” callous abbesse or inscrutable conjure woman of “Dune.”

We see her play with sensitivity and the assurance of a legendary Chopin concert pianist in “Two Pianos.” We don’t need to see her fingers soulfully manipulating the keys, but we do. Her eyes and expressions have already made the sale.

Rampling never strikes a false note, even if the multi-handed and frankly melodramatic script of Arnaud Desplechin’s (“My Golden Days,” “King and Queen”) latest, has its atonal and dischordant moments.

The screen legend plays the aged mentor of a once-promising pianist who returns from teaching in Japan to join her for what she’s decided will be her “farewell” concerts.

Mathias (François Civil, D’Artagnan in the recent French “Three Musketeers” movies) is the brooding sort, devoted to his demanding, self-described “monster” of a mentor Elena and to his long-suffering agent Max (Hippolyte Girardot) but someone who walked away from it all to teach.

He’s barely renewed both acquaintances when a chance encounter with a former lover (Nadia Tereszkiewicz) makes him faint and her flee the scene of the fainting.

As Lyon isn’t a gigantic city, he is later haunted by the sight of her little boy, a dead ringer for Mathias at age eight.

We start to get a sense of why he says (in French with English subtitles) “I broke my life in two.” The imperious Elena’s orders that he “focus” and Max’s pleas that this “full house, cloaked in contempt” that awaits him means he has to be good enough to “crucify them” will be ignored as fragile Mathias crawls into a guilty bottle or three.

The sensitivity of the performances adorn this coincidence-riddled romance with some magical moments in between the eye-rolling turns of the plot.

A sudden trauma, a Jewish funeral, misguided sex, a concert that may or may not come off and the bizarre suggestion there might be a happy ending in all this messiness are folded into a scenario that is far less convincing than the actors starring in it.

Civil, a composer and actor, looks comfortable at the keyboard even as Mathias struggles with guilt, the knowledge of unfulfilled potential and hangovers when he is supposed to perform.

Tereszkiewicz struggles to master the script’s tricky demands of playing a flighty woman ill-prepared for reopening old emotional wounds or facing new ones.

But old pros Girardot (“The French Dispatch,” “Mama Weed”) and Rampling renew the tale’s connection to reality and our commitment to “Two Pianos” every time they join a scene.

It may be straight-up melodrama, from its lone, corny, over-explaining flashback to the cliched drunk tank our hero finds himself in to the grim hysteria of an ambulance ride. Desplechin’s film still strikes enough of the right notes to be entertaining.

Rating: unrated, sex, nudity, alcohol abuse, smoking

Cast: François Civil, Nadia Tereszkiewicz, Hippolyte Giradot, Jeremy Lewen, Alba Gaïa Bellugi, Anne Kessler, and Charlotte Rampling

Credits: Directed by Arnaud Desplechin, scripted by Arnaud Desplechin, Kamen Velkovsky, Ondine Lauriot dit Prévost and Anne Berest. A Kino Lorber release.

Running time: 1:55

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Leave a comment

Movie Review: Make “Animal Farm” Great Again?

George Orwell’s parable of totalitarianism earns a Trump era updating in a new animated “Animal Farm,” this one backed by Angel Studios and not the CIA.

Actor turned “Venom” sequel director and the one-and-only “Gollum” in J.R.R. Tolkienland Andy Serkis and screenwriter Nicholas Stoller “(“Bros” and TV’s “Platonic”) take a big swing at Orwell’s tale, and a big risk.

Their film is about the unjust trap of consumer capitalism, cult of personality politics and the same human foibles that Orwell always warned us about in our “leaders.” And releasing it on May Day just underscores that “Animal Farm” was never a condemnation of socialism, despite 75 years of conservative spin.

It doesn’t all work, and some key elements are lost any time you mess with a classic plot. But if there’s an agenda in this “Farm,” it’s that good but misguided people (animals here) have to admit they’ve been had before their deeply-flawed, criminally cruel idols can be brought down. And calling out their stupidity is no way to lead, either.

The trouble on Manor Farm isn’t just animal cruelty and animal enslavement by drunken abusive Farmer Jones (one of a couple of charaacters voiced by Serkis). The bank is seizing the property over the mortgage he can’t pay.

That’s the last straw for the animals there, with Snowball (Laverne Cox) the pig figuring out that the livestock are being rounded up for slaughter and not “a vacation,” as simple workhorse Boxer (Woody Harrelson) and the simpleton sheep (Jim Parsons voices one) believe.

Snowball leads the revolt, with her promising pupil pig Lucky (Gaten Matarazzo) at her side. Porcine lout Napoleon (Seth Rogen) and his lacky Squealer (Kieran Culkin) sort of go along with the coup de critters, even if they didn’t figure any of this out on their own.

The animals rout the humans, embrace “freedom” and listen as idealist/agitator Snowball lays out new “rules” to live by.

“Four legs good, two legs bad” may not take into account the chickens and ducks, but it separates the livestock from those who prey on them — men.

“No animal shall sleep in a bed…wear clothes…or drink ‘naughty juice.”

Everything is to be shared — work, shelter and food. And above all else, “All animals are equal.”

If you remember the story arc, it doesn’t take some pigs long to cheat, steal, back-stab and sell-out on their way to “but some are more equal than others.”

Rogen’s Napoleon is an imposing dunce who mocks those smarter than him as he preys on the most gullible. He recruits and grooms the farm’s Dobermans to be his enforcers. Pigs are a separate class under the regime he establishes when he deposes Snowball for insisting that they save grain for the winter to come rather than heedlessly eating and doing whatever you want and calling that “freedom.”

“You animals are all too stupid to understand” your shortsightedness is never going to win any converts.

Lucky is left behind to see every “rule” twisted or broken, every historical fact about Napoleon’s shortcomings and the peril he puts first one group and then another under is gaslit out of mind.

Cynical donkey Benjamin (Kathleen Turner) sees the unfolding disaster and shrugs it off as the natural, flawed way creatures look out for themselves and not their neighbors. Boxer just relishes the work and their collective, brotherly labor, with him taking on the lion’s share.

Little shots at the hype of commercialism are slipped in. Calling the eggs they sell “The best in the county” isn’t wrong. “It’s not lies, it’s hope,” Squealer rationalizes. Napoleon’s gaslighting and lying, laughing and coercing plays as very Evening News familiar in Rogen’s voice-acting. There’s even a hint of a faked assassination attempt, for those slow to pick up the analogy.

Glenn Close plays a self-serving capitalist robber baron in a Cybertruck-knockoff limo. Steve Buscemi voices a weasely banker who gets into business with the dictator class pigs, who lord over the farm in landlord class luxury, leaving the other animals to starve.

One thing that’s sorely missing in this alteration of the story arc is much of the optimism that comes after the workers of the farm unite and throw off their chains.

The first animated “Animal Farm” made overt Soviet references in how the critters look, speak, scheme and betray their people and their own alleged Marxist ideals. But the filmmakers gave the Stalinesque Napoleon Winston Churchill’s jowl and voice for a reason.

The story was never about socialism. It was about taking care who you allow to “rule” you, and understanding that race, class and heirarchy are all exploited to get you to give power often to the wrong people.

One thing the Serkis film makes clearest — “personalities” that flatter and pander to you while holding “them” in utter contempt aren’t rare. They’re human/animal nature. And the message here is that sooner or later, everybody — even their most ardent duped supporters — figures that out.

Rating: PG, animated violence, a fart joke

Cast: The voices of Gaten Matarazzo, Woody Harrelson, Laverne Cox, Seth Rogen, Kieran Culkin, Steve Buscemi, Andy Serkis, Jim Parsons, Kathleen Turner and Glenn Close.

Credits: Directed by Andy Serkis, scripted by Nicholas Stoller, based on George Orwell’s novel. An Angel Studios release.

Running time: 1:34

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Movie Review: Make “Animal Farm” Great Again?