Classic Film Review: Beatty the Lady Killer, “All Fall Down” (1962)

World War II inspired Italian cinema to reinvent itself through Neo-Realism.

The sharp decline of The British Empire after the war caused playwrights and filmmakers to plunge into “Kitchen Sink” dramas with working class grit and adult themes.

The French found even more grit and sex and brio via the youth movie movement that became “Nouvelle Vague,” the French New Wave.

But while Hollywood sobered up for a bit after the war as the public finally lost its taste for musicals, the studio system went to war with TV by diving into widescreen spectacle and embracing the too-taboo-for-TV subjects of sex, depravity, alcoholism, family dysfunction and mental illness.

The late ’50s and early ’60s had their share of Westerns and war movies. But “serious” films from the mainstream studios grappled with disaffected youth and juvenile delinquency, race and sex sex, sex.

It was grand time to adapt Tennessee Williams plays and William Faulkner novels. And that’s where “All Fall Down” (1962) came into the picture, a John Frankenheimer melodrama based on a critically-acclaimed novel by James Leo Herlihy, scripted by the Pulitzer Prize-winning playwright William Inge.

“All Fall Down” is an all-star hand-wringer about a too-handsome-to-ignore wayward son (Warren Beatty), the family that created-“indulged” him and which he avoids, and the younger sibling, played by Brandon de Wilde, who idolizes him.

In cinematic shorthand, it’s “Hud” (1963) without horses, “Psycho” without the shower. It’s just not nearly as good.

The film begins with cliches and great promise and winds down until it ends with another cliche, this one almost comically indefensible. But the cast and the sordid “Peyton Place” undercurrent, Belle Epoch Americana with the soiled sheets pulled back, makes it worth a look.

Aspiring writer teen Clinton (de Wilde) gets off a bus in the Florida Keys, coincidentally a favorite haunt of Tennessee Williams at the time. He’s come there to be with his older brother, to buy into a fishing boat the sibling mentioned in a letter or phone call. But asking around this sordid, slowly-rotting world of fishermen, sailors on leave, strip joints, tourists and hookers about brother Berry-Berry earns rebuffs and “nothing to brag about” warnings.

Berry-Berry is in jail. Clint learns that from the prostitute his brother beat-up to land himself in the clink.

Coincidentally, the $200 Clint brought with him is exactly the bail Florida law enforcement decides will spring Berry-Berry, who barely thanks the kid before he’s attracted the attention of an older woman who invites him to join her for a yachting cruise to the Bahamas.

Berry-Berry is a head-turner, and the women who don’t salivate on first sight at him are the ones who merely gawk and flirt and invite him places.

Next thing we know, the black and white melodrama’s abandoned its most colorful setting — Marathon Key and the old Seven Mile Bridge are among the locations fleshing out “Key Bonita” (Key West) — as Clint is sent back home to Cleveland.

The sons were encouraged by their old leftish agitator turned realtor dad (Karl Malden) to call them by their first names. Father Ralph’s a gregarious drunk. Mother Annabel (Angela Lansbury) dotes on both and smothers them with her mothering, a favorite filmed “social ill” of the era.

They talk longingly of the prodigal son, who we see drift from job to job, woman to woman, Florida to Kentucky to his old Ohio home as the idolizing younger brother ditches school and scribbles scribbles scribbles in notebooks.

And then the daughter. Echo (Eva Marie Saint), of mother’s dearest friend, a pretty and pretty unconventional 30something “spinster,” comes to visit and modern viewers start the mental countdown to where this tawdry tale is sure to be going.

Continue reading →
Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Documentary Review: “Oscar shoo-in,” “Generational Masterpiece,” “You Can See Everything?”

I trust that there is no financial or ethical penalty for having little urge to rush out and see a mini-series length docu-drama/”documentary” on Elizabeth Holmes, the Theranos huckster and Millennial villain du jour.

The “You Can See Everything” hype around the “performances,” mystery and investigative “storytelling” in this Nathan Fielder/Lance Oppenheim binge-in-one-sitting movie almost matches the hoopla the media ginned-up with Holmes, who dolled-up nicely and made a great magazine cover going up, promoting her “most important invention ever” blood-test gadget, and coming down as her whole house of fraud collapsed around her.

Her case has been litigated. Her personality — unnerving, unblinking eyes, “change the world” or “get that money” ambition and rep as a smart cookie who refuses to apologize for over-selling her “visionary” aspirations — has been been dissected, condemned and sent-up in an Emmy winning Hulu series starring Amanda Seyfried, “The Drop-Out.”

Barring some Martha Stewart “singling out a woman for punishment” story angle, what exactly is the point?

But this Nathan Fielder, Lance Oppenheim film, with Fielder (the series “Nathan For You” and “The Rehearsal” were his) as on-camera interrogator, accuser, close friend and confidante, pokes around the edges of the nature of “truth” and “fact.” Competing agendas of storyteller and subject come into play, and we start to wonder who is pulling whose leg here?

Who do we believe, the adjudicated liar and fraud, or the side-eyeing, confidence-violating all access to “everything” in Holmes and partner Billy Evans’ lives filmmaker? Fielder, an Andrew Garfield/Dermot Mulroney-ish camera presence who listens, hears and tries and tries to trip up his subject, isn’t automatically trustworthy. But he knows that Holmes and Evans picked him to speak to, after a years-long media blackout, for a reason.

Is it because he’s done serio-comic films on “business scams?” Or is it the fact that he’s plainly out of his depth (and knows it) about the “science” of what Holmes claimed and still clings to as her goal even as her company burned through fortunes failing to achieve it?

In a documentary which tracks the last free (pre-prison) 2023 month of Holmes’ life, the nature of filmed “truth” is rehashed as we ponder the impact of a camera and crew on the many supposedly “intimate” conversations between subjects and interrogator. Pulling back to reveal that crew, seeing boom microphones in shots exposes (not for the first time) the lie that every “fly on the wall” documentary lives by.

At least Fielder and Oppenheim have fun with that. Check out the edits of where Fielder’s eyes go when he’s stuck watching “good looking guy” Evans takes a shower. Of course he looked!

Evans is the principal villain in this story of villainy on a huge financial scale. He wasn’t the older-man “partner” that a very young Stanford dropout Holmes hooked-up with to found and build Theranos into a multi-billion-dollar “save the world” company that accomplished nothing of the sort. Evans is the rich (ish) control her/control-the-message “partner” who sought her out AFTER infamy, and who “fell in love” with Holmes without realizing “who she was.”

Fielder speaks for all of us viewers when he probes and picks at that lie and several other holes in Evans’ and Holmes’ stories.

“What’s your definition of a lie,” he asks out of exasperation of this woman who is either “sincere” or “the most manipulative person who ever lived?”

Filmgoers and journalists can appreciate Fielder’s dogged efforts to get to some sort of objective “truth” about who or what Holmes and Evans are and put that in a documentary. A New York Times story quote that suggested Holmes admitted to playing “a character I made up” for the public, investors and the media proves hard to track down, even though Evans insists they have their own tapes that prove it’s a lie and the Times has had myriad credibility problems in recent years.

And then, halfway in, “You Can See Everything” introduces a wild card, bringing in the Emmy-winning star of that “hurtful” caricatured portrayal of Holmes,Seyfried, to ponder and analyze and leap to new conclusions about the “real” Holmes and pitch in to help Fielder get around some limitations of interviewing his now-incarcerated subject.

Should the actress feel guilty for the imprisoned mother of two’s plight? Or does “It’s just TV” excuse the limits of her own search for “truth?”

The film is fascinating for the clues Fielder and Oppenheim let us overhear or experience as they seek “answers” about who Holmes is and “how she operates.” A damning aside uttered by her businessman father detonates like a bomb, and the exhausted despair in her mothers’ unguarded eyes speaks volumes.

We see Evans working tirelessly and with increasing irritation and bravado in focusing the “message” the couple is trying to send. But where is that infamous “first partner” during the Theranos implosion, Sunny Balwi? His presence is sorely missed, especially since Evans and Holmes are seen cooking up a pitch for a new “AI” oriented version of the failed “cloud” backed gadget that landed her in prison.

There is no credited “screenwriter.” There probably should be, seeing as how some of what Fielder reports is reconstructed from remembered conversations and a lot of things (trying to get the truth out of The New York Times) that happen off camera, and Seyfried is “performing” this material.

Fielder and Oppenheim (“Primetime”) have caught grief for crossing ethical lines in their manipulations and pursuit of their non-journalistic “truth.”

I wasn’t surprised enough by anything shown here to buy into any “generational masterpiece” hype surrounding “You Can See Everything.” But perhaps that has more to do with one’s “generation.” Yes, the curtains are pulled back on such documentaries and on feature film or TV series “interpretations” of real life people reduced to “characters” for our entertainment. Others have covered that ground before.

Hell, there’s a 36 year-old episode of “Columbo” that dealt with exposing “instant” blood analysis fraud.

The snippets of “The Drop-Out” mini-series sampled here whet the appetite for watching or revisiting that, just as a need for glib closure on something “You Can See Everything” tries to posit as an ongoing “mystery.”

Because there’s no getting around the fact that as a motion picture, “You Can See Everything” is a bit of a slog. It’ll play better as a streaming experience you can pause and even rewind for clarity, than as a seamless story told in 174 minute documentary form.

Thank heavens Seyfried shows up, even if we never quite figure out if she’s playing herself, Fielder’s scripted sounding board or just an actress showing how to make a dull, doe-eyed fraud a riveting screen villain.

Rating: R, full frontal nudity, profanity

Cast: Elizabeth Holmes, Nathan Fielder, Billy Evans and Amanda Seyfried

Credits: Directed by Nathan and Lance Oppenheim. An A24 release.

Running time: 2:54

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Leave a comment

Movie Review: Beware What Lies in Wait in “Wildwood”

A grab bag of themes and tropes of fantasy fiction are brought into play in the wildly ambitious “Wildwood,” the latest stop-motion animated marvel from Laika Studios, the folks who gave us “Coraline” and “ParaNorman.”

It’s another tale of a tween girl facing what her parents warned her about and all they didn’t tell her, of loss and acceptance of that loss and learning when to take responsibility for something awful, and when one gets to blame your parents.

Yes, it’s a bit like “Coraline,” with world-building and themes that rival “The Chronicles of Narnia,” “Lord of the Rings” and “The Owls of Ga’hoole.” It opens with a suicide, plunges into hostage taking and murder and boils over into sprawling and bloody combat pitting the enslaved or marginalized against the powerful and pitiless.

So, a children’s movie? Kind of, but with all that’s wrestled into this somewhat cluttered jumble, it plays more coherently to an older animation/anime fan.

Pru (voiced by Peyton Elizabeth Lee) has grown up with the cautionary fairy tales her hippy parents (Maya Erskine and Jake Johnson) tell her baby brother about the unknowns terrors of “The Impassable Wilderness” that borders their corner of Oregon.

She figures she’s outgrown that nonsense, their granola diet and Dad’s passion for knitting and mom’s love of craft fairs. Thus one more warning about not going “outside” when she tasked with babysitting toddler Mac is ignored.

But her heedless hurdle through Portland on her bike, towing the tyke in her no-safety-features-red-wagon, doesn’t just run her into fantasy gaming nerd Curtis (Jacob Tremblay), who’s still into stuff she’s “outgrown.” It puts the baby in peril. A crowd of crows snatch him from a playground.

“Murder of crows,” the nerd corrects her as they dash off in pursuit, unable or unwilling to get adult help. When the crows disappear into the woods, Pru drags Curtis in with her. And that’s when things get really weird. The talking, bickering, armed and uniformed coyotes are their first clue.

Pru’s kid brother has been kidnapped on purpose. And she and Curtis have plunged into an ivy-overgrown combat zone, with mystics and peasant “bandit” barbarians and “Avian” allies in owl and eagle form, an oppressive, Kafkaesque totalitarian state and a rogue Dowager Governess Alexandra (Carey Mulligan) pulling strings, making mayhem and arming for war.

Laika mainstay Travis Knight — he directed “ParaNorman,” “Kubo and the Two Strings” and “Missing Link” — presides over a stop-motion fantasy-adventure decorated with sweeping CGI augmented settings and effects. So as tactile as the animated characters and settings sometimes are, it looks more like “Flushed Away” (by Aardman) than “Coraline.”

His voice cast is so immersed in their characters than you can only pick out the most distinct — Awkwafina and Charlie Day do supporting characters, Angela Bassett is a regal eagle “general” — stand out. Oscar winner Mahershala Ali, Jemaine Clement, Richard E. Grant and even Tom Waits are harder to ID.

That’s not really an issue here. But what is has to be the general “grab bag” clutter of the story, the various agendas of this “principality,” species or neighborhood and the murky messaging not really corrected by closing act proclamations of “what this was all about.”

The occasional droll character and odd bit of banter — “Why DID you bring me here?” “Altruism.” — doesn’t fend off the boredom that sets in for the later acts.

Laika was launched on “Coraline” and the talents of the great animator Henry Sellick (“The Nightmare Before Christmas”). Knight’s “ParaNorman” is still his best film, with “Wildwood” closer to his comedy “Missing Link” in its labored storytelling, if not its epic ambition.

At least the Oregon-based artists of the studio were able to tell a tale set closer to home, among the magical forests, artisans and unreconstructed hippies of Portlandia.

Rating: PG-13, suicide, combat violence, profanity

Cast: The voices of Peyton Elizabeth Lee, Carey Mulligan, Awkwafina, Jacob Tremblay, Richard E. Grant, Tantoo Cardinal, Jake Johnson, Maya Erskine, Amandla Stenberg, Tom Waits, Charlie Day, Len Cariou, Jemaine Clement, Mahershala Ali and Angela Bassett,

Credits: Directed by Travis Knight, scripted by Chris Butler, based on the novel written by Colin Meloy and illustrated by Carson Ellis. A Laika production released by Fathom Entertainment.

Running time: 2:10

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Movie Review: “Couples Weekend”

A good cast giving it their all is the best recommendation of “Couples Weekend,” an otherwise “serviceable” relationship comedy with dark undertones.

Actress (“The Office,””Shrinking”) turned TV director Nora Kirkpatrick makes her feature writing and directing debut with a four-hander that throws two couples together for a long holiday weekend at a mountainside rental cabin and introduces cheating into the mix.

And even though she paints her players into a corner that pretty much guarantees a talky, squishy, unsatisfying conclusion, Josh Gad, Alexandra Daddario, Ashley Park and Daveed Diggs keep things interesting. Kind of.

Daddario (of TV’s “Mayfair Witches”) and Diggs (“Hamilton,” “The Boys” ) play writer/editor Debs and her National Geographic photographer husband Josh. She’s struggling with the frustrations of producing a follow-up novel to her debut, and he’s grown distant, possibly because of her always being on edge.

Gad (“Beauty and the Beast,” “Adulthood”) is funds manager Mitch, somewhat content with his good-money/low cachet job and his “hit the jackpot” cook and cookbook author wife Melanie (Park, of “Joy Ride” and “Emily in Paris”).

Besties-since-college Mitch and Debs stumble across Melanie and Josh cheating. And don’t tell them.

The dynamic shifts from two couples gossiping over the foibles of their friends to Mitch begging Debs to “Just give me time to think about it” and Debs barely controlling her need for a furious confrontation.

The script dips its toe into what one really needs and gets and expects from a relationship, and pokes fun at the way married couples know which sore spots to poke.

There’s nothing deep and little that’s all that original to all this, except perhaps in a “Gen Y goes through it” sense.

But Gad and Daddario hurl themselves at these roles and this material, and Diggs and Park do their best with “reaction shot” roles.

Kevin Pollack shows up as the wizened rental-owner/handyman who has been through marriages and is thus the “sage” in this situation. The character’s as underwritten as everybody else.

Things should turn more interesting, here and there, but Kirkpatrick struggles to make that happen.

As “Couples Weekend” unwinds and winds down when it should be winding up, one can at least appreciate that there’s a little entertainment value in character tropes trotting through relationshippy, rom-com/sex comedy cliches. Just not that much.

Rating: R, profanity, alcohol abuse, smoking

Cast: Alexandra Daddario, Josh Gad, Daveed Diggs, Ashley Park and Kevin Pollack.

Credits: Scripted and directed by Nora Kirkpatrick. A Vertical/Voltage release on Amazon

Running time: 1:36

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Documentary Review — Remembering “SCTV: The Greatest Show You’ve Never Heard Of”

It wasn’t “live TV” comedy.

The cast was, to a one, contemporaries of the Americans and Canadians in the first cast of “Saturday Night Live.” But “SCTV” came on years later, and was sporadically on the air years after the original “SNL” cast moved on.

Which figures into funnylady Kathryn Hahn’s comparison of the two in “SCTV: The Best Show You’ve Never Heard Heard Of.”

“‘SCTV’ is like your older, ‘cooler’ cousin out smoking cigarettes in the back” of any family reunion.

This documentary was first announced back in 2018, with Martin Scorsese directing and Jimmy Kimmel producing and hosting “An Afternoon with SCTV” as a reunion show, with clips. Kimmel is still here as a producer. And the reunion, filmed by director Jason Hehir (ESPN’s Jordan doc series, “The Last Dance”) proves to be revealing and poignant.

It was shot in 2025, shortly before star Catherine O’Hara’s death, shortly after the death of original cast member Joe Flaherty and long after founding fathers John Candy and Harold Ramis’s passing. And Andrea Martin kind of breaks your heart when she leads the others into recalling a flourish of glory, the cast hearing the audience of TV stars, insiders and bigwigs at the 1982 Emmys, roaring in laughter at Eugene Levy as a barely mobile version of an ageing crooner who insists on still starring in TV “specials” — “Perry Como, Still Alive.”

The cast never knew if it was working, Martin says. “We didn’t think anyone was watching,” Levy adds. They did this cut-rate, always-failing show, off and on for half a dozen seasons over eight years just “to see if we could make each other laugh.” Here was proof, at last, that other people thought it was a hoot.

Veteran “SNL” writers Bob Odenkirk and Conan O’Brien sing the show’s and especially the performers’ praises. This cast could be stunning impressionists, from Levy’s Perry Como to O’Hara’s mean riff on American network favorite Joey Heatherton, and the most spot-on Katharine Hepburn (again O’Hara) you’ll ever see.

It’s a wonder Merv Griffin and Dick Cavett survived being cut to ribbons by Rick Moranis.

We hear a fresh version of the story of how Moranis and his new sparring partner Dave Thomas improvised this “throw away” “Canadian content” sketch, The McKenzie Brothers of “The Great White North,” into the series’ first culture-shifting bit. And we hear how hard that was on the rest of the cast, struggling to hold up their funny end of the stick while those two “hosers” were getting magazine covers, a stand-alone movie and all the attention.

Odenkirk praises the series for its “conceptual” comedy conceit — each episode following part of the broadcast day of small town Mellonville’s one-TV station “network” — with daffy owner Guy Cabellero (Flaherty), program director Edith Pickney (Martin) presiding over, hyping or apologizing for assorted weird chat shows, screwy newscasts and comic solo and duet acts featuring the cast.

Candy played an outsized, blustery and “famous” version of himself, Johnny LaRue, a “big star” by Mellonville standards. Flaherty dressed as vampire Count Floyd to host spooky movies. Films and TV shows and commercials were sent up, one after the other.

If you’ve never seen the most serious rival to “Saturday Night Live,” the old episodes are archived on Netflix for fresh viewings of O’Hara’s many big screen impersonations, Martin’s almost-cruel riff on a tragic singer’s songbook of downers (inspired by Connie Francis), Levy and Candy’s hilarious Lawrence Welk era polka band with a TV show (a side hustle for their travel agency), Candy and Flaherty’s “Farm Film Report” and Thomas and Moranis as outlived-his-shelf-life Bob Hope and Woody Allen, trying to find a way to make a movie together.

Catch phrases? “Take OFF, eh? Y’HOSER.” “It’ blowed-up, blowed-up REAL good!”

Martin Short, like Robin Duke and Tony Rosato, a later seasons member of the ensemble, marveled that any of this got on the air south of the 49th Parallel.

“Will it play in Des Moines,” the onetime Ed Grimley, Jerry Lewis and Jackie Rogers Jr. remembers wondering? “I don’t know.” And neither he nor anybody much cared.

When NBC’s Brandon Tartikoff tried to get them to make the show more “family friendly” for a Sunday night prime time slot, Levy’s remembered for famously snapping “NO.” And that was that. They did it their way.

Lorne Michaels doesn’t appear here, except in recollection. He “auditioned” the main members of the cast and was “very rude” in his dismissal of comic legends in the making Candy, Levy et. al. One of the things the “Lorne” documentary leaves out is anecdotes like this, how much of a snobbish prick the Canadian turned into when “SNL” blew up.

“SCTV” producer Andrew Alexander comes off as a much nicer guy, mocked by his cast, struggling to get the show back on the air every time it was canceled, moving it to Edmonton, Alberta for most of its glossier, later seasons, with the makeup and wardrobe crew earning tearful appreciations from the cast.

Behind the scenes footage gets at how TV production (and filmmaking) savvy the cast became as performers turned to writers (under head writer Ramis for a bit, Dave Thomas for a bit) and learned what shot-and-edit combos could make something funnier.

You won’t find much dirt on this likable lot, or even a fresh reminder for what an insufferable, insecure jerk Milton Berle was (sent up by J.K. Simmons in the film “Saturday Night”) at the Emmys.

Tom Hanks was a big fan and remembers “analyzing” in depth why the show’s comic bits worked with his early-career “Bosom Buddies” co-star Peter Scolari. Hahn, Fred Armisen and Bill Hader break up laughing at the assorted sketches and players that inspired their comedy careers.

Levy and Martin are the historians, the rarely-seen Moranis and his pal Thomas are the best storytellers. And O’Brien and Odenkirk are the deepest “analysts” here, with O’Brien going so far as to say “I wouldn’t wanna know” anybody who doesn’t “get” and “revere” “SCTV.”

Fair enough. But the cast themselves admit that the first couple of seasons are pretty much “unwatchable” and “not ageing well,” and not just because of the high school theater cheap production values.

The show was written, rehearsed, staged and taped, so it was never “Live” in the “Saturday Night” sense. It always lacked that “live,” “working without a net” energy. Sketches often ran too long, well past having any post Python absurdist point and not every character “played,” things that live audiences tell you in a flash.

But “a live audience can be a trap,” O’Brien insists. And having sketches that were written and performed just once, with “everything they wrote” ending up on the air — no “rehearsal audience” or last minute Lorne Michael cuts — let some of the strangest, most “out there” bits gets on the air.

“Leave it to Beaver” gone to seed, anyone? A “Mayberry” with the perviest Floyd the Barber (Levy) ever? John Candy as “Yellowbelly,” “the biggest coward in the West,” shooting anybody who mocks his cowardice in the back?

No, it was never as “young” and druggie and hip and frenetic as “Saturday Night Live.” There’s no substitute for that live show energy, with a live band and guest hosts’ in over their heads. The better comparison for “SCTV” was always the gold standard for sketch shows, “Monty Python’s Flying Circus,” whose entire universe was its main cast (no guest stars) and was shot and edited on film.

“SCTV” was smart, edgy and sometimes mean, and produced memorable, witty bits. But beloved as it is, there just weren’t as many winners as there were on the full run of “Python” or the first five seasons of “SNL.” That’s why it helps to remember Martin Short’s maxim, that only about 20 percent of any comedy act, show, etc. really “works.”

Some nights you’re Johnny LaRue, a “big star” on a roll. Some nights you’re Bobby Bittman (Levy), maybe “the worst comic in the world.” But most of the time you’re just praying it “blowed up good,” you’re just Bob and Doug, fryin’ up some back bacon, slurping your way through “two-fours” of Molson’s and affably waiting for what comes next and hoping somebody’s watching. Eh?

Rating: TV-14

Cast: Andrea Martin, Eugene Levy, Rick Moranis, Martin Short, Dave Thomas, Catherine O’Hara, Joe Flaherty, Tom Hanks, Kathryn Hahn, Conan O’Brien, Bill Hader, Fred Armisen, Bob Oedenkirk and Andrew Alexander.

Credits: Directed by Jason Hehir. A Netflix release.

Running time: 1″28

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

BOX OFFICE: “Clayface” and “You Can See Everything” fight for 1st, “Wicker” cracks Top 5, “Hunger Games” Awaits

It’s Halloween Weekend, the calm before the “Hunger Games” storm. So who’s going to the movies?

Not a lot of us, it turns out. But that makes it a great weekend to catch up on titles we’ve missed, pearls that will pass on as they lose their screens to the “Holiday” blockbusters to come.

“Clayface” will probably repeat as #1, as it’ on track to clear $10 million. But DC comic book movies are, by and large, a different breed and brand than Marvel on screen. “You Can See Everything” has been out-earning it on weekdays, and is also on track to hit $10 million or so, per Deadline.com.

“Clayface” opened just over $24 million, so that’s a respectable if not “good” 60% falloff, weekend to weekend. The Elizabeth Holmes/Theranos fantasia/doc “You Can See Everything” opened in a few cities to great numbers, opened wide last weekend to over $19 million, and is on pace to slack off 40-45% or so if it clears $10 million. Both will flirt with $11.

The animated “Wildwood” from Studio Laika and Fathom and FilmNation is plugging along and set to make $7 million or so, good enough for third place on a weak weekend.

Black Bear’s period piece sex satire https://rogersmovienation.com/2026/10/30/movie-review-a-wicker-skarsgard-is-catnip-to-the-ladies-in-this-sex-farce-fable-from-jolly-olde/“Wicker” is opening wider and will hit the top five in fourth place, $4-$5 million. It’s earning mixed notices, and I’m not the only critic to see it as clever but it just doesn’t play.

“Streetfighter” may be spent, but it’s still got enough gas to hold onto fifih ($3.5 million) on a weekend with not much new going on.

A new BTS “World Tour” concert doc may sell 240,000 tickets, nationwide. $3 million, sixth place.

“Resident Evil” ($2.3,, seventh) is holding on better than “Other Mommy” ($2.25, eighth, but it’ll be close).

“The Only Living Pickpocket in New York” is the best of the weekend’s limited-release-going-wider offerings. I can’t imagine it’s an awards’ contender. But with legendary New York character players John Turturro, Steve Buscemi and Giancarlo Esposito in it, maybe. It should clear $2 or close to it and come in ninth.

This weekend’s sensation from the Subcontinent is “Aadrasha Kutumbam House No. 47,” which has enough screens in enough Indian diaspora cities to pull in $1.6 million or so.

There’s a Halloween/Christmas horror tale — slasherish, splattery “Christmas at the Kringles,” that’s not making much of a mark as a new release. Less than $1 million? That won’t crack the top ten.

“Sense and Sensibility” and “Verity” are among the titles exiting the top ten.

Check back here as I’ll update these figures as the weekend progresses.

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Movie Review: A “Wicker” Skarsgård is Catnip to the Ladies in this Sex-Farce Fable from Jolly Olde

“Wicker” is a satiric sex farce that teeters by on a tightrope, never quite tumbling into hilarity but often swooning and even scoring bawdy laughs spun out of the ludicrous, fairytale situations and “Sex Habits of the Elizabethans” setting.

The tone in this adaptation of a fable is wry and raunchy but never quite side-splitting. The casting couldn’t be better, with Oscar winner Olivia Colman as a lovelorn, smelly Fishmonger who hires a basket-weaver (Peter Dinklage) to “weave me a husband.”

Who plays this hunky, ginger-haired (branched) “Wicker” man? Alexander Skarsgård, the king of oddball, often inhuman and freakish casting (“Murderbot,” “Mute”), of course.

But the giggles are few and a tad too far between, even if Colman & Co. do their Python-lite damnedest to deliver, at least on their side of the camera.

In an unnamed, color-blind-casting village from the tail-end of the Tudor era, The Fisherwoman (Colman) is subject to scorn in a community where her wares may be wanted but her smell keeps many at arm’s length.

We meet her on a day when the dullish young Bottle Washer (Gustav Lindh) is to marry a doctor’s daughter (Marli Siu) via a bizarre Church of England sanctioned “collar” (neck shackle) ceremony that underscores wives as “property,” as “man and woman become man and his wife.”

Our Fishmonger is half-amused, but when the basket weaver’s woven, trick eggs are handed out to the village maidens by the bridge, she gets the one with the “prize” inside. Much merriment is made over her being “the next to wear the matrimonial collar.”

So she spends her savings on hiring that weaver to make her a spouse. He turns out to be not just tall, woody and handsome, but inadvertently soulful in how he talks to his new, break-the-bed lusty bride.

“You’re the reason I live and breathe,” he says, which is quite literally true. “Without you I would never have seen the sun set on the ocean.” Just as true.

But all that romantic talk, and the fact that he’s handy around the house — mending the roof, fish traps and the bed that their love-making breaks most every night — unsettles the unsatisfied wives and shows up and annoys the assorted “simple creatures” (louts) they’re married to.

That spells trouble, the basket-weaver senses, in this “village of blind-eyed ground moles.”

Elizabeth Debicki of “The Great Gatsby” and “Tenet” is queen bee among the wives, the doctor’s (Richard E. Grant) daughter and tailor’s (Nabhaan Rizwan) wife. She sews dissent and has no trouble stirring up gossip.

The menfolk resent having to undertake all this “talking” with their wives.

“I’m an Innkeeper,” Kiell Smith-Bynoe bellows, “not a minstrel!”

And that gossip tears at the insecure Fishmonger wife and her relationship with her guileless, grateful and kind husband.

Things kind of go wrong in the way some performances are pitched, with our Tailor’s Wife having many of her sharp edges rubbed off. Other wives bitch and moan but have few too scenes or lines to make much of an impression.

And the men, from those named for their professions — Baker, Butcher, et al — to “The Drunk” — are drawn dully and lack any edge to their performances as well.

Limiting the conflict to the new couple narrows the scope of the mayhem that abruptly erupts in the third act.

And writers-directors Alex Huston Fisher and Eleanor Wilson can’t wring laughs out of players who aren’t famously funny. Colman, Grant and Dinklage deliver. Skarsgård works. Nobody else is up to their level.

The sex jokes, about “wood” and “clams” and such, with matrimonial rituals that include the groom wearing a codpiece, blindfolded, as a goat eats a symbolic carrot out of his crotch, lack the Python absurdity they were meant to have.

It’s kind of fun, and timeless in its message. But lacking the edge and anarchy this sort of sex-based satire demands renders “Wicker” as instantly forgettable as its title and about as durable as that which its title character is woven from.

Rating: R, sexual content, nudity, profanity and bodily function gags

Cast: Olivia Colman, Alexander Skarsgård, Elizabeth Debicki, Marli Siu, Kiell Smith-Bynoe, Emily Lloyd-Saini, Phil Daniels, Nabhaan Rizwan, Richard E. Grant and Peter Dinklage.

Credits: Scripted and directed by Alex Huston Fisher and Eleanor Wilson, based on a fable by Ursula Wills. A Black Bear/Topic Studios release.

Running time: 1:45

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Movie Review: Turturro Broods and Schemes as “The Only Living Pickpocket in New York”

The one thing that keeps you on the edge of your seat for the sober-minded thriller “The Only Living Pickpocket in New York” is the suspense over how good the finale will be. Because so much that’s preceded it — from the casting to the down-market Bronx settings, the music (Bobby Short and “You’re a Native New Yorker”) to cruel youth vs. world-weary age conflict at the heart — is damned near perfect.

The is a genre picture brimming with character and grit. And it soon becomes clear that the finale will be the only chance that writer-director Noah Segan (“Blood Relatives” has to blow it. Which he kind of does by overreaching, sentimentalizing and stripping away mystery from all that’s come in the first 80 minutes by trying too hard to tidy things up in the end.

John Turturro has that rare role worthy of him as Harry, a veteran thief who rides the (subway) rails and prowls the streets picking out his next mark. Harry’s good at blending in — salt and pepper hair, beard and overcoat. We’re introduced to him by following that first mark through the opening credits. When the well-heeled Manhattanite stands next to the wrong tall Italian on the subway, it’s bye-bye billfold.

But this is the 2020s. It’s a cashless society. Stolen phones are only worth anything to “the Chinese guy” on the edge of the Village. Watches? Who needs them, and who will pay top dollar for genuine Swiss movement when a look-alike knockoff is as near as the next street corner.

Steve Buscemi is Harry’s wizened pawnbroker/fence Ben, the one who reminds him he’s a dinosaur and that street pickings aren’t worth what they once were.

Harry runs into a former protege (Victoria Moroles) who is all about cyber hustles these days. “You gotta learn new tricks,” she says. Nope. There’s nothing like “the old ‘five finger discount,'” the master pocket picker insists.

Harry’s taking care of his catatonic wife (Karina Arroyave), and generously tipping nurses’ assistants and neighbors who pitch in. He knows how this city works. A homeless person he asks for directions has her hand out. So does everybody else.

Then his shrinking world is upended when he sets up and breaks into a pretty boy’s (Will Price of TV’s latest “Goosebumps,” and “Eleanor the Great”) ’69 Barracuda. Harry’s not just good at picking pockets.

But rummaging through that kid’s gym bag turns up a pistol — a tell. There’s also a wad of cash and a flash drive, which Old School Harry knows nothing about and Ben, with his Radio Shack era pan shown PC, has no means of opening.

Might the streetwise pickpocket be a match for the “Ivy” educated punk running his own gang, a kid from a Jersey “family” that’s not to be trifled with? Harry’s lack of tech savvy and his routines make him far too easy to track down. Now everybody in his world is in the same fix he is.

An intimate, edgy New York tale like this one would count itself lucky to land Turturro or Buscemi to give it authenticity. Here, actor-turned-director Segan (he was the cop in “Knives Out”) and producer Rian Johnson get both, with the great Giancarlo Esposito as a playful, retirement-ready cop who’s crossed paths with Harry enough to joke around with him on the subway as he shows him cards with criminal suspects’ photos on them to see if Harry might inform on where they are.

Price is something of a “find” — playing a good-looking college man too polished to be openly sadistic, but blunt about Harry’s fate if that flash drive isn’t back in his hands, pronto. “Dylan” is scary not because he’s violent and tough, or because he’s connected enough to have a crew to do his dirty work, but too smart to leave everything to a bunch of mugs.

Turturro’s Harry is a criminal with a humanity that comes with age, returning cash-free wallets via mailboxes, not begrudging his victims’ modern ways of avoiding cash with an “Even suckers get a day off, sometimes.” Heartless Dylan is amoral, impulsive, violent youth incarnate — capable of anything to get what’s his and not be made a sucker by a pickpocket who might be in AARP.

Segan’s lean, compact thriller takes care of business for a solid 80 minutes. And then he introduces new characters, flashback plot twists and scene after scene that simply does not have to be here, unless the financing was dependent on squeezing in an actual Oscar winner with three guys who ought to have one themselves.

I still loved the adult nature of the story — older people with grave responsibilities and shortcomings like falling into dangerous, out-of-step-with-our-surveillance-state times habits, generosity, loyalty, family neglect and self-preservation that keep coming back to bite them where it hurts.

“You old guys. You’re all about keeping your word.”

“That’s what makes it valuable.”

The acting is in-the-pocket, all up and down the line. Bit players like Echaka Agba, Kelvin Yan Hee, Mark Cayne and Lori Tan Chinn make vivid, lived-in impressions in tiny roles, as does Aida Turturro.

But watch this little gem of a thriller and tell me I’m wrong about the contortions the script undertakes to get to a few last twists and deliver a couple of extra, pithy conversations. If the fade to black with Bobby Short singing “I Happen to Like New York” had happened five minutes sooner, this would’ve been a jewel of this year’s awards season.

Rating: R, suggestions of violence, profanity

Cast: John Turturro, Steve Buscemi, Will Price, Victoria Moroles, Tatiana Maslany, Giancarlo Esposito and Jamie Lee Curtis

Credits: Scripted and directed by Noah Segan. A Sony Pictures Classic release.

Running time: 1:26

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Patrick Stewart: 1940-2026, Eight Decades of Pure Class

Who didn’t live this guy?

Patrick Stewart classed up everything he showed up in, on the stage and on screens big and small. He made small screens large just with his presence and movies feel important, even when they weren’t.

It’s been fun, over the decades, to come across pre “Star Trek” turns of his in supporting roles in classics like”Excalibur” and lesser fare. He started standing out in middle age, and he had a long one.

His working class upbringing meant he had a steeper hill to climb than many an upper class, hyphenated surnamed colleague He sprinted up that hill, Royal Shakespeare Company, films, TV, icon status.

If his Trek years taught us anything, it was that he could take the work seriously and himself not so much. His becoming bosom buddies with Ian McKellen during their “Godot” years, with chat show appearances, pranks and staged photos , were just joyous.

I only interviewed him once, before that late life career bounce that “X-Men” gave him. He was talking up “Masterminds,” which he made tolerable simply by his presence.

He ennobled “Picard” and “Logan” with much more than his formidable manner. He showed us his Lear in many films and many guises in his latter years.

Sir Patrick was an advocate for domestic abuse victims and, with partner in crime Sir Ian, a playful champion of tolerance.

He came to the rescue during COVID by reging us with the Bard’s sonnets.

We should all age into dotage with such grace, gravitas and good humor.

An actor’s life it was, and as well acted and lived as any of his era. Let the tears flow and the curtain calls be many. He was one of a kind.

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Leave a comment

Movie Review: “The Awakening,” a “Predator” knock-off you can Nap Through

Four different guys are credited with writing and directing “The Awakening,” a vengeful nature spirit takes its revenge thriller from Colombia.

Man, the video village on that set must’ve been…entertaining. Just judging from the finished film, y’understand.

It’s a “Predator” knock-off with commandos hunting a “terrorist”/”freedom fighter” (Carlos Mariño) in the jungle, only to run afoul of the ancient jungle spirit “Mobuya,” who literally turns everything around them into a murderous menace.

The jungle itself is their enemy.

Troopers are snatched skyward, out of the frame, by deadly vines, pierced by darts and arrows that seem to spring from tree limbs, dismembered by this and gutted by that.

And that tale, of a shrinking squad of tac’d-out super troopers (no future U.S. governors Schwarzenegger or Ventura in this version) is intercut with flashbacks to 1547 and an earlier company of invaders — conquistadors, with Native guides, slaves and priests — who faced a similar fate.

All that effort to tie two stories from the past and present together is for naught as the plot is utterly predictable once the killing starts, once one embattled soldier notes “There were some caves back there” (in Spanish with English subtitles) where they might be able to hide until communications are restored and they can be evacuated.

Fat chance of that, right? “Nobody’s coming to look for us!”

The sound effects include the what seems to be background noise of tribes chanting and milling around as they gather for an attack, and the production values aren’t bad.

The flashback scenes are less convincing than the present day perils, and any terror or suspense those perils might provide are undercut by the switching back and forth between timelines.

And the performances are uniformly colorless, although the novelty of including a female trooper (Andrea Olaya) is noted.

The problem began with the cumbersome, derivative screenplay, and matters couldn’t have been helped by having so many people advocating and arguing for their vision of the project even after filming started.

In Los Estados Unidos we say “Too many cooks…” In Latin America, it’s “Muchas manos en un plato hacen mucho garabato.” Either way, it’s must-skip cinema — “Vamos a saltarnos esta película, muchachos y amigas.”

Rating: unrated, graphic violence, Native nudity

Cast: Claudio Cataño, Alejandro Buitrago, Héctor Sánchez, Andrea Olaya,
Jorge Enrique Latorre, Hilda Ruiz and Carlos Mariño

Credits: Directed by Jaime Osorio Marquez, Federico Durán and José Luis Rugeles, scripted by Jaime Osorio Marquez, Federico Durán and Guillermo Escalona. A Well Go USA release.

Running time: 1:36

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment