Movie Review: A Hole Even “Digger” Cruise Can’t Shovel His Way Out Of

One has to appreciate the huge swing four-time Oscar winner Alejandro G. Iñárritu and his Oscarless star Tom Cruise took with their climate crisis and culture satire “Digger.” But it’s still a swing and an epic miss.

The director of “Birdman, or the Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance” and four other credited writers try to make sense of their send-up of a larger-than-life eco-villain, the poisonous yet comical guilt religion bears in conservative politics and the role of “art” in telling and selling “the story” that we need to believe in for nothing to get done, or for great things to be achieved.

Every story has to have a villain, and art’s role — even in catastrophes — is to make us look in the mirror when we see him or her.

Cruise shows his age and a notable paunch as “Digger” Rockwell, a third generation Texas oilman and thus the grandson of the patriarch who found oil with “a ten cent shovel,” which hangs over a mantle in Digger’s production-designed-to-death mansion.

We piece together bits about his life through the course of the film — his instincts, his bullying, control-freak style, the bluster that comes with trying to pose as the Smartest Guy in the Room even when dealing with one’s problematic “experts.”

Those are the folks telling him his drilling “in a national park” in Greenland was ill-advised and remains so even after he’s struck oil. Because the planet’s oceans are warming and methane gas is bubbling to the surface all over, especially in the Arctic.

Backroom deals with his pal, the ailing President (John Goodman) and stirring up doubt about half a century of climate science keep Digger going — a “drill, baby, drill” fanatic with a wife as an afterthought and a daughter doing Third World non-profit work of some sort.

His increasingly corpse-like cat is his boon companion, and he’s not shy about flying in “the world’s foremost feline health expert” to keep Maggie alive for even a day or two longer. Not if the doc gives him bad news, though.

“Between two weeks…and five minutes” is his prognosis.

Digger’s got his virtues of the oil business patter down pat. Buzzwords like “jobs” that he’s creating, “freedom” from cold, freedom of movement, with value for stockholders a part of that bargain. As to the downside? Well, “God” put this oil on Earth for us is a good enough comeback for doubting rubes.

When the worst case happens and a massive chunk of ice shelf cracks off, Mr. Snakeskin Boots and Bolo tie ,”I know what I’m doin'” changes his tune.

“Mister President, there was just no WAY t’see it comin’….out of the BLUE,” etc.

The vulgarian in the White House, surrounded by a company of old white men (and one young white Christian nationalist preacher), knows that Digger knew and has known for years that the oil barron was racing against time to destroy the climate before the money to pay him for destroying it ran out.

All that’s left is “involuntary manslaughter charges on a massive scale” as Europe cannot be “panicked” by warning of the iceberg-driven tsunami to come.

There are clever touches to the production and design of all this, and the first arresting bit of direction is showing the “Situation Room” comically, graphically reacting to the mass carnage that Big Oil wreaks on coastal Europe.

We don’t see the havoc ourselves. Not until later, anyway.

The plot dives headfirst into the Big Speech about what hypocrites we all are for bitching about oil, then lurches into a play about this calamity and the one man most responsible for it.

Cruise and Riz Ahmed — playing a government scientist Digger recruited to work for him and whose warnings were met with deaf ears and then silenced when he changed jobs — give marvelously over the top and afraid to go over-the-top performances.

Digger Rockwell is a 60something variation on Cruise’s cocksure men’s movement hustler in “Magnolia” with a big helping of his volcanically overbearing studio chief in “Tropic Thunder.” But potbelly and butt-crack shots aside, the guy is never charming enough to be magnetic, never funny enough to be a caricature.

Jesse Plemons, Sophie Wilde and Emma D’Arcy are all part of the “Fossil Fools” stage production put on as the planet drowns.

Sandra Hüller plays Digger’s sister, a family rival with a Germanic accent. Michael Stuhlbarg is the ineffectual vice president made a fall guy looking to pass that title on to someone else And you might recognize character actor Burn Gorman as one of the members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in the Sit-Room scenes, reprising that role for their staged restaging.

If you think this review has coherence problems, wait until you see the movie. Which no one will, because “Digger” isn’t as funny or as obvious as “Don’t Look Up,” and manages to be a bummer on several levels.

So one can appreciate the attempt, even if at some point we wonder if we’re seeing a version of our director and co-writer every time this cynical, self-destructive superrich fool blurts out “I know what I’m doing,” when it’s obvious he doesn’t. Not here, anyway.

Rating: R, profanity

Cast: Tom Cruise, Riz Ahmed, John Goodman, Sandra Hüller, Sophie Wilde, Jesse Plemons, Emma D’Arcy, Michael Stuhlbarg and Burn Gorman.

Credits: Directed by Alejandro G. Iñárritu, scripted by Sabrina Berman, Jez Butterworth, Alexander Dinelaris, Nicolás Giacobone and Alejandro G. Iñárritu. A Warner Bros. release.

Running time: 2:09

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Classic Film Review: The Duke, Quakers and the Original “Angel and the Badman” (1947)

John Wayne was on the cusp of his career peak when he struck off on his own and produced and starred in “Angel and the Badman,” a project written and directed by James Edward Grant, who’d become Wayne’s confidante and go-to screenwriter in later decades.

They made this burly Western for B-movie specialists Republic Pictures in what might be said to be Wayne’s “last B Western,” and one of his best Bs.

He was breaking free from his overbearing mentor, John Ford, if only for a moment. He wasn’t yet tying his fate to the tastes of action auteur Howard Hawks. But he, Grant & Co. filmed in Ford’s favorite “Monument Valley” locations and included players who’d become famous as members of Ford’s stock company — Bruce Cabot and Hank Worden among them.

And Wayne saved a plum part for Harry Carey, a star character actor from early silent Westerns who gave Wayne a lot of his moves, poses, wardrobe choices and the like — many of the ingredients that came to define Wayne’s onscreen persona.

Sprawling, violent and serio-comic, with lots of Western lore, Western tropes and Western “types,” “Angel and the Badman” would kickstart a stretch in which Wayne would take on a string of roles that would redefine him for all time.

And as it’s been remade for stars Zachary Levi, Meg Fraser and Tommy Lee Jones (in the Harry Carey role), I thought I’d get around to it.

John Ford fans quickly evolve into Western snobs, with only a few other filmmakers (Hawks, most prominently) meriting our attention. But “Angel” would prefigure “Shane” and “Three Godfathers,” inspire Harrison Ford and Peter Weir’s “Witness” and pay homage to Ford in scenes, shot selection and composition.

If Grant was no John Ford, he and The Duke damned sure knew how to imitate him. At times, it seems all that’s missing is an accordion and a rendition of hymns like “Shall We Gather at the River?”

The sentimental story picks up our “Badman” (Wayne) after he’s escaped some bit of violence. Falling off his saddle at the Worth Ranch, he insists on going to the town telegraph office to get off a land claim message before he collapses, bloodied, into the care of young Penny (Gail Russell, a delighful foil for him).

The Worths (Irene Rich, John Halloran, with Stephen Grant, the writer/director’s son, as little Johnny) are Quakers, kind-and-helpful by faith. They bring the notorious Quirt Evans (Wayne) back to life.

Pretty soon the man named for something you whip horses and boys with is throwing his weight around to “help out,” and yet softening, just a little, in the presence of righteous pacifists.

“Each human being has an integrity that can be hurt only by the act of that same human being and not by the act of another human being.”

But trouble is on the way from the desperado Laredo (Cabot), He has history with Quirt, and a beef with the guy.

“Hey, why don’t we just bust in?”

“Because bustin’ through doors with Quirt Evans on the other side ain’t my idea of a healthy pastime.”

The script meanders a bit, with Quirt alternately courting and then matchmaking for darling Penny, laying low and then starting saloon brawls, fighting rustlers over a herd that he may want to rustle himself, mooning over Penny and sparking with “dance hall gals” and sometimes even listening to the aged marshal’s (Carey) sage advice.

“Only a man that carries a gun ever needs one.”

This isn’t a great Western, but it covers a lot of bases and a lot of ground. It’s sentimental and sweet, downright cute when it isn’t violent. And it’s gorgeously atmospheric thanks to the dusty locations and livestock — cattle, horses and actors — trotted through them.

If you’re going to remake a John Wayne “classic,” it’s probably a better idea to pick his last B-movie than to aim for “True Grit” — unless you’re the Cohen brothers, and Jeff Bridges is signed on.

Rating: “approved,” violence, sexual inuendo

Cast: John Wayne, Gail Russell, Irene Rich, Joan Barton, Bruce Cabot and Harry Carey.

Credits: Scripted and directed by James Edward Grant. A Republic Pictures release now in the public domain and free on Tubi, Roku, Pluto, other free streamers.

Running time: 1:40

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Movie Review: An “Angel and the Badman” in which Tommy Lee Jones plays Neither

“Angel and the Badman” is a remake of a classic John Wayne Western of the 1940s, with Oscar-winner Tommy Lee Jones in the role of the cagey marshal in this corner of the mythic West and EveryVillain Neal McDonough as the dogged gang leader out to recover stolen loot.

In the title roles? Meg Fraser, a relative newcomer (she had a supporting role in the TV romance “The Perfect Match”) is the pious, kindly and smitten “Angel.” And Zachary Levi is “The Badman,” a role Wayne himself played in the first film he ever self-produced.

Take a minute to get your head around that last credit. The once and forevermore Shazam, co-star of “Harold and the Purple Crayon,” plays a hardened criminal named Quirt, wounded and staggering onto a ranch where Christian charity prevails.

Levi seems miscast as a two-fisted, self-preserving/self-serving outlaw even if he’s far from awful — “just shy of adequate,” I’d say — in trying to fill the Duke’s boots.

The film around him? Director Julio Quintana did “The Long Game” and “Blue Miracle,” and probably didn’t have the Angel Studios budget to make an “authentic” looking, sounding, smelling and feeling Western.

Getting the dust and grime and horse and human sweat and blood and leather and sunbaked, wind-worn starkness of the era on film costs time and money. Making the pistol fire hard, metallic and loud is extra effort. Everything about this “Angel and the Badman” looks tidy, freshly-Maytag’d and pressed.

We see our heroine, Penny, trying to hitch a horse to a plow, and I’d swear I saw the Restoration Hardware price tag still on it.

The story, for those who’ve never seen the James Edward Grant original film, is about an outlaw who shoots it out and gets away from his original gang. He stumbles onto a ranch where the Worths (Jean Louise Kelly plays the widowed mother, Melissa Chambers the cussedly-cute matriarch and Barrett Ellis Luca is Penny’s kid-brother Johnny) take him in.

The ol’doc (Manny Greenfield) advises the good Christian folks to steer clear of this outlaw named for something he was beaten with as a child.

The marshal (Jones) and his deputy (Sean Bridgers) have tracked this outlaw, recovered his stolen “Confederate gold” and hope to round up Laredo (McDonough) and his whole gang. He enlists Penny to spy on Quirt and take notes as he recovers.

As she is smitten with the tall, scarred and gu-tshot stranger, she doesn’t.

Quirt recovers just in time to do a boon for the Worth women and little Johnny. He stares down the bully rancher up the valley into releasing the water he’s dammed up in an effort to dry out his neighbors.

The byword in both films is “treat everyone with kindness,” and darned if that sorry excuse for an oligarch (John Pyper-Ferguson) doesn’t soften. Just like Quirt.

But what about the outlaws? Can they be converted, fended-off or arrested to save Quirt and the Worths from the fate we’ve seen other innocents face?

The original “Angel and the Badman” came out and named the Worths and their kind “Quakers,” pacifists with a little boy a little too interested in guns for his own good. The film prefigured “Shane” and was one inspiration for the Harrison Ford/Peter Weir blockbuster “Witness.”

The “mining claim” at issue among the outlaws is replaced with “Confederate gold,” and the “Society of Friends” connection is erased here, along with much of the 1947 film’s edge (not all of it) and most of its grit.

McDonough is practically dapper in the saddle — spotless, crisp duds and hat. But he brings his usual blood-in-the-eye simmer to the role of a man determined to tidy up unfinished business. The fact that Laredo has a cough and needs mercury speaks volumes.

And Jones, who just turned 80 and is probably taking his last turn in the saddle, is adorably ornery as an old man whose face has weathered a lot more years, whose height has shrunk and whose voice has gone up an octave or so — Walter Brennanish.

But Levi single-handedly lowers the stakes here as he’s naturally more jokey than menacing.

The picture around him — freshly-painted house, “new” looking barn and what not — doesn’t take us back to The Old West so much as drop us in on a role-playing game — “Westworld” with Shazam as a Shootist.

Love the fact that Angel Studios found one more ride for Tommy Lee, and making McDonough part of their studio rep company is just smart business. But this one doesn’t compare to the 1947 film, and even without the comparison, doesn’t measure up to the message it never-quite-decides to send.

Rating: PG-13, violence

Cast: Zachary Levi, Meg Fraser, Neal McDonough, Sean Bridgers, Jesús Carús, Maurice Green, Jean Louise Kelly, Melissa Chambers and Tommy Lee Jones.

Credits: Directed by Julio Quintana, scripted by Jaime Hernandez, Kevin M. Townsend and Christopher Tuffin, based on the 1947 film written and directed by James Edward Grant. An Angel Studios release.

Running time: 1:37

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Leave a comment

Classic Film Review: “El Cid” (1961 — Still a Stiff?

Yup.

That’s the answer to the rhetorical question posed by that bad-pun headline.

Honestly, I’ve never understood any of the adoring or merely “tolerant” reviews of “El Cid,” a corpse of a corpse-on-horseback “history.”

Charlton Heston, at his Big Man Standing Out from the Scenery early ’60s peak, wilts and was never worse in the title role.

Sophia Loren, whom Heston spent the ’90s praising as “a FORCE of NATURE,” is miscast and misused.

The spectacular Spanish locations — unspoiled castles, beaches, hills and plains filmed during the Franco era’s long economic fascist nap — pop. But when paired with painted, over-lit and altogether drab soundstage interiors in Rome, don’t match up.

Action beats suffer from limp noodle barrages of arrows fired by extras who’d never seen a bow before and catapults only tested by “We bring you BREAD!” — loaved half-tossed over castle walls — look like cheap, nonfunctionl props.

The ahistorical bastardized history the screenwriters consulted leads to a muddle of a movie about a warrior, canny psychological warfare student and opportunist of his age passed off as noble, a mythic model of chivalry. Rodrigo Diaz de Vivar switched sides between serving “Christian kings” of parts of Spain, and the dreaded Muslim Moor occupiers, whom those very same Moors dubbed “El Cid” to history.

Why wouldn’t they call Don Rodrigo “The Lord?” His impact on history has a “held the line — sort of” cast to it, seeing as how it took the Spaniards nearly 400 more years to unite and finally expel the Moors from Spain. Spaniards and Moors have reason to celebrate El Cid.

As the Moors, defined by history as North African Muslims of generally dark complexion, there’s something a tad racist in that the Moors that El Cid befriends in the movie are fairer skinned and played by the likes of Douglas Wilmer in light blackface. The “fresh from Africa Moors” are crazed zealots in their thousands, in black attire and blackface. The new threat to peace and religious freedom is led by future Inspector Clouseau foil Herbert Lom, furious and in far darker blackface.

The film, restored and briefly re-released in 1993-94, was an “event” picture of its era, a follow-up to Heston’s “Ben-hur” success and a precursor to the disaster that was “Cleopatra,” which at least was sexier and easier to follow.

They were long “road show” attractions,” with an overture and intermission with music making even “Chitty Chitty Bang-Bang” a widescreen “event,” at least in the eyes of the producers.

I remember it as a TV “event” some years later, and probably thought, for the first time in my then-young life, “This is what a 100 minute movie in a three hour package looks like.”

The “plot” has El Cid gain some measure of martial fame before being forced to kill The King’s Champion (Hurd Hatfield, older and unconvincingly a “match” for Rodrigo) in a duel over his father’s honor, a killing that all but ends Rodrigo’s wedding plans for that “champion’s” daughter, Jimena (Loren).

“The man you chose to love could do only what I did,” doesn’t lessen her hatred for him.

Years and kings pass, love waxes and wanes, battles are pitched but mostly a series of sieges, and El Cid doesn’t get any of the best lines.

“What a noble subject,” one admirer says of him. “If only he had a noble King.“

A gargantuan production like this one is a supreme test of an actor’s focus and a director’s (Anthony Mann, who made some Westerns, a few war movies and “God’s Little Acre”) ability to keep his and the film’s eye on the ball. “El Cid” fails at this.

Watching “El Cid” now, one’s mind drifts back to Heston’s autobiography, where he recalled his TV debut as a soldier in an adaptation of “Julius Caesar” on CBS. He blew his lone line “live.”

“Ahoy, Caesar!” he bellowed. There’s a lot of that here, dialogue delivered as if mistakenly chiseled in stone.

And more than once, characters bark out “We attack TONIGHT!” and we see processions of Medieval (11th century) soldiers, siege engines and the like, proceeding to battle, torches lit against the “night” when it’s plainly broad daylight or the worst “day for night” film processing in color cinema history.

The Middle Ages, the struggle between East and West for the future of Europe, castles and what not are kind of my thing. I’ve visited a few of the Spanish locations of this movie in the decades since its release. I’ve wanted to love “El Cid” as a “forgotten” classic, pretty much every time I’ve seen it.

And it just doesn’t measure up or hold up, no matter how cool that finale is.

Say this for Heston. Even as a corpse (you can kind of see him moving) nailed into the saddle, cut a helluva figure on horseback.

Rating: “approved,” violence

Cast: Charlton Heston, Sophia Loren, Raf Vallone, Geneviève Page, John Fraser, Gary Raymond, Douglas Wilmer, Michael Hordern and Herbert Lom.

Credits: Directed by Anthony Mann, scripted by Fredric M. Frank, Philip Yordan and Ben Barzman. An Allied Artists release on Amazon, other streamers.

Running time: 3:02

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Movie Review: Falling In and Out of Love, “In Spite of Ourselves”

It’s become a romance/romantic comedy cliche, that eager, disrobing, slam-your-partner-against-the-wall sex after the first date.

And if “In Spite of Ourselves” accomplishes nothing else, at least it sticks a skewer in that “let’s get this out of the way” movie and sitcom trope. Because the reasons it’s not a great idea may be dated in the post Grindr era, but they still apply.

Sweet, cute and sentimental to a fault, “In Spite of Ourselves” is a romantic melodrama set in scenic, trendy Portlandia — Portland, Oregon — in fall.

Writer-director Josh Loeb is apparently a rich restaurateur dipping his toes in movie making. As one of the young lovers in it is a pastry baker aspiring to chef status, getting the details of that world and that character’s background right, the film turns out to be less dilettantish and vainglorious than you might expect.

Conor Leslie of “Chained” and TV’s “Titans” stars as Hannah, thirtysomething and running her own bakery and gritting her teeth about her need for the approval of trendy Chef Jake (Ethan Ingle) if she’s to become his dessert-provider.

Brett Dier (TV’s “Jane the Virgin,” “Schooled”) is angsty stand-up comic Archie, someone people recognize thanks to his latest stand-up special. but who always answers “Don’t I know you?” with a curt “Ya DON’T!”

“Archie doesn’t like people,” he fellow stand-ups confirm.

Hannah and Archie “meet cute” in her bakery. He tries too hard to buy her last cinnamon off the kid who just purchased it, and tries and fails to not look at all creepy in doing it.

Hannah’s fellow baker Becca (Britain Seibert) recognizes him and gives a “not that funny” dismissal. But Hannah and Archie make entirely too much eye contact, so something’s happening.

She catches his act during a Portland residency and sparks lightly fly.

But he’s got issues — a father suffering from dementia in an L.A. nursing home. Dad’s capable of being difficult, if not outright violent and his son insists that he not be “medicated into a zombie.” The memory care director reminds Archie and the viewer that “Dementia is a one-way street.”

Hannah? She’s lost her hearing in one ear and afraid of the risks of surgery that might correct that.

“I could die!”

Can these two find love in the middle of career, family and health complications?

Writer-director Loeb is more at home in the kitchen scenes than he is in the clubs. But there are laughs in this script. Archie tries inviting Hannah to “my show.” What manner of show might that be, she blurts, disingenuously?

“You’re a…clown? Oh we have a HUGE clowning community in Portland!”

That’s straight out of “Porlandia,” or should be.

One puts a lot of stock in “chemistry” in such films, and Leslie and Dier have it, with able support from the following actors playing character tropes.

Seibert is the “disapproving friend.” Alyssa Limperis and Mo Mandel play comic pals who’re rooting, rooting SO hard for Archie not to “f— this up.” Both of them are more convincing stand-ups than Dier, although he brings some old pro physicality to the stage act, which never quite overcomes the low energy of his onstage-with-the-mike presence.

And Ingle is a lot of arrogant chef cliches boiled down into just the suggestion of loves-hearing-himself talk and the right pretentious “young” wardrobe. He likes Capri pants for men — “man-pris,” they’re called.

They make Chef Jake look like he’s had “a random late growth spurt” to Archie.

What Loeb has concocted here sticks rigidly to a time-proven recipe. It’s cinematic comfort food, a movie that some streamer or even The Hallmark Channel might pick up, if there was less stand-up comic profanity in it.

So no, don’t expect any surprises. But the laughs and the stars’ chemistry put it over.

Rating: unrated, profanity, sexual situations, drug abuse reference

Cast: Conor Leslie, Brett Dier, Britain Seibert, Glen Morshower, Alyssa Limperis, Mo Mandel, Zora Casebere and Ethan Ingle.

Credits: Scripted and directed by Josh Loeb. An LMNL release.

Running time: 1:40

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Leave a comment

Netflixable? Shailene’s on the hunt for the “Unabomber”

The difference between “a true story” and “inspired by a true story/true events” is laid bare in “Unabomber,” an account of the tail end of the hunt for mad mail bomber Ted Kaczynski.

The heroine, played by Shailene Woodley, is an FBI linguist brought in to analyze the writing style of the man who planted or mailed sixteen bombs, killed three and injured 23 others.

The unknown killer eluded capture for 18 years until the FBI caught a break. But there was no FBI “linguist” named Joanne Miller who parsed the perpetrator’s archaic and sometimes academic writing style, published in screeds culminating in “The Unabomber Manifesto.”

But damn, THAT would have made a fascinating movie and moviegoing thought exercise.

Kaczynyski, a onetime math prodigy and Harvard grad — he was enrolled at 16 — ranted about technology, “industrial society” and academia and sent bombs to airline and university faculty — “UN-A” bomber. He was only caught when his brother recognized the rants as in a style he knew all too well.

Knowing all this doesn’t mean you can’t get a surprising and riveting thriller out of the hunt for a cunning quarry who was every bit as brilliant as the most far-fetched “supervillain,” with a special talent for covering his tracks and living off the grid.

But what Danish director Janus Metz (“Borg vs. McEnroe,” “Armadillo”) and the two credited screenwriters of “Unabomber” serve up is a dull, under-detailed police procedural attached to a sort of “Beautiful Mind” mental breakdown of a madman who wanted to be an important thinker.

Jacob Tremblay of “The Life of Chuck” plays young, late 1950s Chicago-native Ted, son of a working class tyrant of a father who expected great things of him, but an impressionable kid too young to be subjected to CIA backed psychological experiments by a charismatic Harvard professor.

Oscar winner Russell Crowe was an Oscar nominee for his performance in “A Beautiful Mind.” Here, he ably plays a flawed manipulator.

He encourages the kid’s dreams of becoming a philosopher.

“It’s ideas that shape the world!”

But this series of wired-up and studied provocations with an argumentative foe only referred to as “Mr. C.” (Gus Halper) don’t so much sharpen young Ted’s arguments as gut him, psychologically. He learns to be as cruel, ruthless and personal in his vicious expressions of his views of society, “progress,” The Industrial Revolution and the like.

And from that, we infer, a callousness that crosses into mania festers.

Tremblay serves the externals of the character well enough, the meek “submissive” and rules-following Ted who devolves into a killer. But we sense no interior life, and the writings that came to define who this terrorist is aren’t sampled nearly enough to paint a more complete portrait. They’re barely touched on at all.

Crowe’s character is similarly sketched-in, an academic striver working for “The Agency” to see how brain washing works and how to identify those most susceptible to it. The personal conversations between the mentor/tormentor and his “subject” whom he convinces is a “protege” aren’t revealing because we don’t buy them as anything more than other forms of manipulation.

Woodley similarly has too little to play around with, just a fictional character who is always right while her colleagues doggedly go up more and more blind alleys at the direction of a flawed “profile” created by “Langley.”

“He thinks he’s smarter than everyone else,” is her insight. We don’t see or hear enough of the Unabomber’s writing to make that insight with her.

The movie’s revelations are few and far between, as the writings of Kaczynski aren’t used to flesh out what still play as troubling ideas — that a few powerful men are using technology and industrial “progress” to enslave everybody else.

That would be a daring approach for the film to take — that maybe Crazy Ted had a point before crossing this or that line. It’s dangerous point of view to let get around, considering what happened to the creep who ran United Healthcare.

Perhaps that’s why they avoided the rants and ramblings and philosophizing of their subject.

And lacking that dangerous edge, “Unabomber” just passes the time, another F.B.I. procedural with a couple of big names adorning the cast and classing the joint up, with neither their characters nor the screenplay illuminating it or its seriously sinister title character.

Rating: R, violence, profanity

Cast: Shailene Woodley, Jacob Tremblay,Annabelle Wallis, Alexander Ludwig, Matthew Kevin Anderson, Steven Ogg and Russell Crowe.

Credits: Directed by Janus Metz, scripted by Sam Chalesen and Nelson Graves. A Netflix release.

Running time: 1:40

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Documentary Review: Cinema as Seen from the Projection Booth — “Splice Here: A Projected Odyssey”

You probably missed this sprawling, feel-good-about-cinema’s-future Australian documentary “Splice Here: A Projected Odyssey” when it made the rounds of film festivals and earned a limited release a couple of years back.

Celluloid purists certainly wouldn’t have.

Australian projectionist turned doc-maker Rob Murphy takes us through the history of movie projection, the digital revolution and efforts to preserve not just old films, but to keep the novelty of the visually overwhelming, sharply-detailed, richly-colored and textured Big Screen experience alive.

The emphasis here is on the penultimate moviegoing cinegasm, Cinerama, immersive movies shown on huge curved screens via three projectors playing at once, creating a vast, deep and panoramic image that only the rarest cinema palaces — most famously LA’s CineramaDome — could accomodate.

Murphy spends much of the film speaking with his fellow (mostly Aussie) projectionists of prior generations, some of whom became celluloid movie print collectors/”hoarders,” with a few going so far as to rebuild tiny versions of the vast and complex analog projection system it took to show Cinerama.

The role of film print collectors in preserving a vanishing movie heritage is explored via a few eccentric collectors, professional archivists and others with horror stories of all that can go wrong when vast collections of film cannisters are stored safely until the person who knew how to store and preserve them aged out of being able to care for them.

Thousands of films, from the earliest silents to even more recent eras, have been trashed, recycled (for the silver nitrate in the prints), decayed or fast faded into unwatchable due to whatever flawed film process or stock (Eastman Color, take a bow) they were originally shot and shown on.

Murphy tracked-down the now-late director (“Silent Running”) and effects pioneer (“2001: A Space Odyssey”) turned heightened-cinematic-experience experimenter Douglas Trumbull to talk about his efforts to put the “wow” back into moviegoing.

His high-speed projection Showscan system was an abortive effort doomed by the ill-fated but startling to look at sci-fi film “Brainstorm,” most remembered as the movie Natalie Wood drowned before finishing. When Murphy caught up with him, Trumbull’s last sizzle in making and projecting bigger, brighter, sharper and deeper “like looking through a window” images, MAGI, was struggling to get on its feet.

Trumbull is the expert witness to the fact that digital projection, for all its benefits, is lower resolution, dimmer and duller than any of the premium 70mm celluloid projection processes.

Quentin Tarantino backed this up when he presented his generic Western ensemble piece, “The Hateful Eight,” in select cinemas able to still screen it in 70mm. The third act of “Splice Here” is taken up with Murphy’s efforts to help the art deco Sun Theatre cinema in Yarraville, Victoria (Australia) piece together the projectors necessary to show one of Tarantino’s better-looking lesser efforts in the format the filmmaker desired.

QT even showed up for the premiere!

But the engrossing stuff here is all the history, the archaic technology and the fact that if films are to be preserved, it’s the eccentrics still devoted to that form of projection who will be responsible. Because the ever-consolidating/ever-“trashing” old prints studios that made them haven’t made it their business to guard their old investments or their patrimony.

Murphy drops in on the American Library of Congress’s vast underground audio/video archive in Culpeper, Va., for the “Mostly Lost” Film Festival, an event where fragments of old films are screened for experts and buffs who shout out suggestions as to who might be in them, when they were made (automobile’s often give away the year) and what they might have been about.

Murphy is entirely too fixated on Cinerama here, for my taste. It was, when it was introduced (by American journalist and “Lawrence of Arabia” popularizer Lowell Thomas) in 1952, just a gimmick to set movies apart from TV.

“This is Cinerama” didn’t lead to a mass conversion of American cinemas, and only a handful of films were shot and shown in this three-projector super-widescreen format. “How the West Was Won” and “The Wonderful World of the Brothers Grimm” were the most famous narrative features made in Cinerama. It was outgrowths of that, 70mm films like “Grand Prix” or “2001,” that became more widely accepted.

I’ve seen one or two super widescreen movies at the CineramaDome, and once caught a showing of “The Wonderful World of the Brothers Grimm” in the basement cinema — furnished with abandoned projectors and screen and seating from closed movie theaters — of a collector in North Dakota.

As critic Leonard Maltin notes, it was a “novelty” way back when, and celluloid 70mm projection and its technical kindred are destined to be that now, as well. Until digital projection closes that visual experience gap.

The recent digital 3D film fad is presented as a possible stepping stone to vastly better digital theatrical projection, as its technology can be repurposed to something that won’t require wearing disposable glasses to view.

But I love the former projectionist’s affection for that skill and the people who ran projection booths, gigantic and tiny, over the decades. I have made it a point over the years to get to as many ancient movie houses as possible, as not all are in Hollywood and thus eagerly preserved by the locals.

I think the oldest cinema I went to is now gone, a 1914 vintage Madison, Wisconsin nickelodeon with wooden terraced floors and a screen canted to the left when you entered the venerable (smallish) auditorium, not directly in front of the rear exits.

Like Murphy and several of the folks he interviewed, movie projection was one of my first jobs, showing films in the absurdly-long-visual-throw-distance performance hall at my university via ancient Simplex carbon-arc (16mm) projectors. It was primitive, mechanical and all sorts of things could go wrong and did.

But I got to learn the job and hang around with the last colorful generation of projectionists in the first cities I lived in after school as I was starting my media career. It was a profession dying out in weeks, not years.

For my part, I spent too much time in the past avoiding movies at theaters that didn’t replace projection bulbs often enough, with scratchy prints and known for sloppy reel changes and crackling sound to ever want to go back to celluloid. But if they can make “premium experience” films with higher digital frame rates, brighter, deeper images and do it without seats that shake and blow wind or spray rain on you, I’m all for it.

Especially if the films that most merit “epic” treatment are the ones that deserve it;

Rating: TV-14, profanity

Cast: Rob Murphy, Douglas Trumbull, Quentin Tarantino and Leonard Maltin

Credits: Scripted and directed by Rob Murphy. A Gravitas Ventures release on Tubi, other streamers.

Running time: 1:57

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Movie Preview: The “Musk” documentary “They” don’t want you to see

The oligarchs in charge of Tik Tok, Facebook/Meta, Twitter and Youtube don’t want you to see the movie “Musk.”

Hell, the Zuckerberglings don’t even want you to see the TRAILER to this documentary by Oscar winner Alex Gibney, the most feared, unassailable FACT focused filmmaker on the planet.

We owe it to ourselves and to Bleecker Street to get the word out about the Oct. 9 release of this damning indictment of the best candidate for taxation into poverty and then deportation in America.

Pass it on!

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Leave a comment

BOX OFFICE: “Avengers,” “Resident Evil,” “Heart of the Beast” and “Primetime” are neck-and-neck over $20 million

Marvel wants to whet the appetites of filmgoers, to not leave less avid Avengers fans in the dark about the convoluted “history” they may have forgotten when “Avengers: Doomsday” lumbers into theaters in December.

And they’d love to add a pile of found-money to the books of “Avengers: Endgame,” which they’ve re-released this weekend for a “get reacquainted” “Encore” release. It’s paying off as the 2019 film collected a fresh $26 million which will move itself closer to $900 million, still well short of the Trumpflation era “Spider-Man: Brand New Day.”

That edged the second weekend take of the “Resident Evil” reboot, which faded to a $23.3 million weekend. That’s a whopping 70-Percent-Plus-“Tyler Perry” plunge from its heady $60 million opening weekend, which means its exhausted its franchise fan appeal and that few others give a hoot it.

A Brad Pitt-and-his-war-dog tale and Robert Pattinson’s best shot at awards season fanfare are dueling for third place, with both films set to collect $20 million+ on a weekend with a nor’easter rattling more populous movie-going corners of the country.

“Heart of the Beast” is a quite-conventional surviving the Alaskan wilderness thriller, and is earning decent enough reviews for Pitt and the German Shepherd named Uber. It ended up earning $20 million, according to Paramount.

That edged A24’s Pattinson in “Primetime,” co-starring Merritt Weaver, Anna Faris and Skyler Gisondo, with former NBC News chief Jeff Zucker shamelessly appearing as himself. It earned $19.2 million, and is also earning mixed-to-positive notices.

Fifth place will go to another new release, Dreamworks Animation’s non-franchise, girl-centered tale “Forgotten Island,” which is on course for a very humbling $12.8 million opening weekend, chicken feed by big animation house standards.

It’ll be interesting to see if “Avengers: Endgame” will hasten the falloff of “Spider-Man: Brand New Day,” ($4.1, in seventh place) which dominated the summer and has steadily closed-in on the $1 billion mark at the domestic box office (over $950 million+ by weekend’s end)

“Practical Magic 2” ($5.4, sixth) steers clear of “Brand New Day” and “The Odyssey” ($3.7, eighth place).

“Coyote vs Acme” clings to ninth by selling another $1.9 million in tickets. A $50 million dollar negative pickup for Ketchup Entertainment from Warner Bros. that will clear the $60 million mark this coming week.

The Biblical semi-sleeper “Daniel and the Fiery Furnace” ($1.514) outlasted “Insidious” and “Runner” the top ten in tenth.

A pretty good Japanese ghost story tale in limited release, “Never After Dark,” won’t crack the top ten.

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Movie Review: A Haunted Japanese Inn’s Worth Visiting, just “Never After Dark”

It’s rare that even a casual horror fan doesn’t greet a new Japanese ghost story with the words, “I LIKE IT already!”

Even if the film is made by Tuscon-born one-time Mormon missionary (how he got into Asian culture and cinema) Dave Boyle.

The first time our heroine, ghost whisperer/ghost buster Airi sees her older sister in the rear view mirror of her ancient Volvo wagon hooked me on this one. The sister (Kurimi Inagaki) is only seen in mirrors or reflected in windows. She’s a ghost.

They can chat all they like — about “Mom,” the woman who passed this ghost-seeing business down, about Airi’s (Moeka Hoshi) new client, the owners of an old inn in the forest. But the only time they see each other there’s glass involved. Even when an insult’s called for.

“You suck (in Japanese with English subtitles)!”

New inn owner Teiko (Tae Kimura) insisted on hiring some supernatural help with a problem she thinks the place has. Her son Gunji?

“I don’t believe in this stuff.”

As soon as Airi banishes them from the property over their “But we paid good MONEY” to watch protests, she figures out what the mother was seeing and hearing.

A bloody-faced man, tall and thin, comes and goes. Staticky phone calls give her and us the chills. And as Airi starts poking around for clues as to who or what is causing this, her dead sister starts with the warnings, which grow more dire the deeper our investigator/ghost-banisher goes.

Every filmmaker has her or his own take of the “rules” and “realities” of their cinematic afterlife. Here, Boyle’s heroine speaks of a “veil” between the living and the dead. She uses a magic mirror with a zoetrope wheel that spins around its frame, and an enchanted candle to dip into the netherworld and dig up what this troubled ghost is after.

The devil is in the details in genre films of this sort, and Boyle comes up aces in his world-building and sense of cultural traditions dropped in on and sampled.

Our villain (Mutsuo Yoshioka) is creepy as all get out. But the other performances are more somber than riveting, empathetic or fear-inspiring.

I found the third act’s requisite sake-hits-the-fan mayhem more conventional and the “resolution” less interesting, frightening and moving than I was expecting.

But there’s entertainment value and no dishonor in this worthy homage to J-horror and the uneasy dead or about to die.

Rating: unrated, graphic violence

Cast: Moeka Hoshi, Kento Kaku, Kurumi Inagaki, Mutsuo Yoshioka, Bokuzō Masana and Tae Kimura.

Credits: Scripted and directed by Dave Boyle. A Magnolia release.

Running time: 1:45

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment