Mark Wahlberg plays a college professor with a near-suicidal addiction to gambling in his new film, “The Gambler.” While he knew moviegoers would have little trouble buying into him as a guy with an obsession for blackjack, the “day job” side of his character would be trickier. The Boston native, famed for his “blue collar types” on the screen, is “no viewer’s idea of a professorial type,” Justin Chang complained in Variety.
“You need to challenge yourself and surprise audiences,” Wahlberg says in his own defense. “People have me figured out? Mix it up on them. I jumped at this chance. That meant committing to being the most prepared I’ve probably ever been on a set. I had to, just to be believable. I mean, me as a college professor? I read with some professors, went to lectures, got a taste of how they hold a class. ”
Jim Bennett, his character, teaches literature and quotes Shakespeare. He once published a novel, but now he’s lost, sure of only one thing — that he’s headed for mediocrity. Wahlberg knew he’d have to master screenwriter William “The Departed” Monahan’s dialogue to have a prayer of being convincing in the part. Whatever other prep he did would not matter as much as having Monahan’s lines “trippingly on the tongue,” as Shakespeare’s Hamlet put it.
“The first lecture alone was 14 pages, basically just a long, long monologue,” Wahlberg recalls. “I had to know that, inside and out, because I couldn’t be referring back to the script. Know that scene, all those pages, and you know the character. That was key. And we shot that scene first, the first day of filming. I ‘knew’ him by the end of that day. We just dove right in. That’s the hardest scene for me in the film, but why not? Let’s get the heavy lifting out of the way.”
The actor loved “the way the script sounds. Monahan writes scripts that are ‘writer’s piece’ movies. Everybody in the movie –John Goodman (as a quotably clever loan shark), all of us — got drawn in by that.”
Wahlberg, who only finished up his high school degree last year, insists that the real “stretch” for him in “The Gambler” is the actual gambling. Whatever you might guess about the muscular movie star, rolling the dice in Vegas with his “Entourage” is not his thing.
“I try to refrain,” he says. “I do. I try to make the only times I bet be when there’s a repeat of a fight on TV, and I can talk one of my friends into betting on the loser. I like sure things, knowing I’m gonna win.”
He waxes poetic on the subject.
“But I DO gamble on myself every day in my career. I make the wrong bet and lose, I have nobody to blame but myself.”
Sweet. But hey, what about that $45,000 you dropped in a Macao casino recently? “For the movie,” he laughs.
And there was the time we spoke as he and his posse were on the golf course and he said, “Wait a minute. I gotta make this putt. Lotta money riding on it.”
Wahlberg laughs loud and hard at that.
“Oh, that’s another situation where I KNOW I’ve got a sure thing! It’s not like I’m in Vegas, throwing it all away. I don’t do the Vegas thing.”
He gets why people gamble, “the thrill. You know, in the original version of ‘The Gambler’ (1974) Jimmy Caan’s character only feels alive in that instant, waiting for the dice to stop rolling, the roulette wheel to stop, for that last card to turn over.”
But there’s another way the addiction manifests itself. Jim Bennett “is trying to strip himself of everything positive in his life…He’s not the kind of guy who will do himself in. But he’s not bothered all that much about putting these loan sharks in a position to do some harm to him.”
Critics are collectively undecided about Wahlberg‘s work in the film, though Todd McCarthy of The Hollywood Reporter says he “carries off the central role with what could be called determined elan.” And with awards buzz for the remake fading, Wahlberg is already focused on a couple of other William Monahan projects — “Mojave,” which he has filmed, and “American Desperadoes,” a period piece about the “Cocaine Cowboys” of Florida’s drug trade in the 1980s.
And then there’s the thing that has put Wahlberg in the headlines over the past month, his efforts to be pardoned for his criminal record, assault and other crimes he committed in Massachusetts in the 1980s when he was a teenager. He caught some flak for asking for the pardon, but got a break when his most prominent victim, a man named Johnny Trinh, came out in favor of the pardon. Wahlberg had allegedly blinded Trihn in an assault in 1988, but Trihn told The Washington Post Wahlberg “was not responsible for that…My left eye was already gone.”
Wahlberg takes a deep breath and sighs.
“What a weight lifted off my shoulders, to realize that I didn’t cause this horrible injury to him,” the actor, now 43, says. “I have carried that guilt for years and years and years. That is such an act of graciousness, him saying that.
“But look, I’ve lived my life ever since trying to better myself as a person, to do right, knowing that I’ve caused pain and grief. That’s what I will continue to do whether I receive a pardon or not. I teach my kids, it’s about giving back until you get a second chance. I got my diploma, just so I could show my kids that self-improvement never stops. You stick with it. So, pardon or not, I’m in a good place.”
Top Posts & Pages
- Movie Review: A "Disappearance at Clifton Hill" leads to a lifelong obsession
- Movie Review: Let's head down the rabbit hole of "The Mandela Effect"
- Netflixable? Finding the girl "Perdida" (Lost) in Patagonia
- Movie Review: "En Brazos de un asesino" (In the Arms of an Assassin)
- Movie Review: Can Kevin James resist the fury of "Becky?"
- Movie Review: The answers to a murder mystery lie "Beneath the Leaves"
- Movie Review: "M.O.M. Mothers of Monsters"
- Movie Review: What might be out there in "The Vast of Night?"
- Netflixable? Don't fall into the "Timetrap"
- Movie Review: Ozark legend conjures up a "Lost Child"
Find a Movie Review