Classic Film Review: Not all Hackman “classics” are created equal — “The Domino Principle” (1977)

Some vintage cinema you begin watching with the idea that you’re to see a “classic” featuring an Oscar winner, a famed producer/director and a handful of legends of the big and small screen. And some of those movies remind you that the legal definition of a “classic” car in any state is any vehicle that’s over twenty-five years old.

That’s it. It’s just the age, not the quality, that denotes “classic.”

The passing of screen legend Gene Hackman just before this year’s Academy Awards ceremony added poignancy to that event’s annual “In Memoriam,” and sent a lot of cinephiles out beating the streaming service bushes for titles he starred in that we’d missed.

Hackman made a lot of servicable thrillers and dramas over the decades, and a couple of decent comedies. And, as those of us who check in on “Company Business,” “Split Decisions,” the later “Superman” films, “Lucky Lady,” “The Chamber” or “Welcome to Mooseport” can attest, he took on a lot of work that paid well, but which was never going to come off.

Crusading producer-director Stanley Kramer was the conscience of Hollywood for much of his career, touching on race (“The Defiant Ones,””Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner?”), American nativism and backwardness of the anti-science variety (“Inherit the Wind”) and the dangers of nuclear war (“On the Beach”).

It’s safe to say that by the time Kramer produced and directed “The Domino Principle,” he’d lost his fastball and maybe his changeup. A deathly dull post-Watergate “Big Conspiracy” thriller about how “they” find and control assassins and manipulate regional and world events through murder, it’s “Winter Kills” without the satiric laughs, “The Conversation” without suspense.

And Hackman, playing Tucker, aVietnam vet/sharpshooter in prison for murder, is at something less than his best in a creaky, corny, old fashioned riff on the paranoia that was rampant in the cinema of the ’70s.

Tucker apparently killed his wife’s ex and is facing 15 more years in prison for it, locked up with a veteran con (Mickey Rooney), trying to “read” his nervous warden (Ken Swofford) when he’s told he must take a “little talk” with this fellow “who might be able to help you.”

Tucker is wary of the suited Tagge (Richard Widmark), who is full of questions about his crime, his service, etc., and not forthcoming with many answers to Tucker’s queries. By the time he’s chatting with Tagge’s subordinate (Edward Albert), Tucker’s a tad testy.

“They,” as his cellmate refers to such men, offer to get Tucker out. What they “want” in return is something he can’t get out of them.

They do get him out, reunite him with his wife (Candice Bergen) and set them up under new identities in Central America. And then “they” come calling again. And this general (Eli Wallach) who works with them is all business.

The film’s most chilling scene comes when Tucker, throwing his leverage weight around one last time, tries to get out of whatever “deal” they have in mind. He’s dropped at a police station, only to have an LTD barrel past him with the muffled screams of his wife, her terrified face staring at him through the rear window as it shoots off into the night.

But “chilling” moments are few and far between, and that signature scene comes over an hour into this 100 minute thriller. From the get-go, Kramer gets it wrong.

The film opens with a creakily old-fashioned news photo/footage montage narrated by a stentorian voice who references Franz Kafka and conspiracies and asks “Who’s BEHIND them?” Kramer is hell-bent on throwing subtlety to the wind for this sermon on how “the world” really works.

“You’re a pair of hands” to wrap around a rifle, Rooney’s Spiventa warns. “They OWN you.”

Everything about the film feels studio system antiquated — from the canned sound effects to the looped dialogue of conversations filmed at a slight distance to theatricality of the performances.

Rooney’s presence parks the picture in an earlier epoch, but the actors alone cannot give it the grit and nervous energy of the great cinema of the ’70s.

The third act action features some pretty serious stunts and explosions, but Kramer dawdled away more than an hour to launch into the thrills, and by that time the viewer’s already called a code on this corpse.

Hackman did action pictures into his ’60s, and almost all of them were better than this. Curiously, he worked with the almost-as-tall-as-him Bergen three times, on “The Hunting Party,” “Bite the Bullet” and this one. Those are among Hackman’s worst reviewed outings.

Even the title of this adaptation of an Adam Kennedy novel seems ill-considered. It’s a clumsy variation of Cold War era “domino theory.”

“The bigger the stink, the more there is to cover up,” Widmark’s Tagge explains, rationalizing assassinations for those who want them to happen. “And the man who worries the most is the man who gave the original order. If he panics, the dominoes start to fall.”

If you want to see Big Conspiracies rendered in broader, more entertaining strokes, watch “Winter Kills.” And if you want to see the late great Gene Hackman in a prime part, pick another movie — almost any other movie — instead of “The Domino Principle,” which is one of his worst.

Rating: R, violence, profanity

Cast: Gene Hackman, Candice Bergen, Richard Widmark, Edward Albert, Eli Wallach and Mickey Rooney.

Credits: Directed by Stanley Kramer, scripted by Adam Kennedy, based on his novel. An AVCO Embassy release on Tubi, other streamers.

Running time: 1:40

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Classic Film Review: Not all Hackman “classics” are created equal — “The Domino Principle” (1977)

Movie Preview: “A Nice Indian Boy” just wants to meet another “Nice Indian Boy”

Mindy Kaling produced this April 4 (Wayfarer) release about a gay Indian doctor who meets his dreamboat — a white man adopted by Indian parents.

This is a culture clash comedy STUFFED with POSSIBILITIES — Indian diaspora attitudes towards homosexuality, gay marriage, “cultural appropriation” issues with the new beau, the works.

Karan Soni and Jonathan Groff star in what looks to be a sweetheart of a rom-com.

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Preview: “A Nice Indian Boy” just wants to meet another “Nice Indian Boy”

Movie Preview: The Inner Life and Trials of a mild-mannered Librarian — “Darkest Miriam”

Britt Lower stars in this account of the loneliness of a profession which entails a lot more than just books.

Any public librarian in any town or city of any size deals with the cranky, loud elderly, unruly youth, the crazy, the homeless and the homeless and crazy.

What happens when a librarian finds love, just as she’s facing threats from some nut she deals with on her job?

Oddball Charlie Kaufman (“Adaptation,””I’m Thinking of Ending Things”) thought it was worth producing.

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Preview: The Inner Life and Trials of a mild-mannered Librarian — “Darkest Miriam”

Movie Preview: Crispin Glover takes on a Lon Chaney silent classic — “A Blind Bargain”

Paul Bunnell directed and co-wrote this “reimagining” of a horror silent film from 1922, starring Lon Chaney then, Crispin Glover today.

It was about a doctor who experiments on a man in exchange for giving medical care to the “subject’s” mother.

It’s not a “lost” film, but Glover is well cast for this remake, which should hit the festival circuit momentarily.

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | 1 Comment

Movie Review: Keaton, Lulu and Hodge taste the benefits of “Arthur’s Whisky”

Of all the “Mad Money,” “Poms” and “Book Club” trifles that Oscar winner Diane Keaton has made since stardom faded, “Arthur’s Whisky” might be the most trifling.

But this British nothing of a “fountain of youth” comedy manages to go down easily, despite or even thanks to its triviality.

Patricia Hodge, a mainstay of British TV (“All Creatures Great and Small,” the latest version), the singing sprite Lulu (“To Sir with Love”) and Keaton play three longtime friends who benefit from an elixir invented by Joan’s (Hodge) husband, who was promptly struck by lightning in his “Eureka!” moment.

How convenient. The entire screenplay’s a set of such conveniences.

We never learn how the three mismatched personalities met, never “get” the connection, for instance. It’s just there.

And when they drink this “whisky” that makes them young (Emse Lonsdale, Hannah Howland and Genevieve Gaunt give their all to impersonating Hodge, Lulu and Keaton in the bloom of youth), their “bucket list” of things they’d like to manage before they die, things they can survive that they’re young again, is inane and banal when it isn’t bathetic.

Hodge’s Joan doesn’t seem to miss her newly-dead husband (Ossian Perret) that much when he goes. There’s a reason for that. The American Linda (Keaton) has an ex she’s determined to get even with. Susan (Lulu) never married. Perhaps that’s something she can pull off once she’s a younger version of her cute self.

They stumble across the whisky and immediately set out to avail themselves of all the perks of youth — slang, clubbing, coffee shop hangs where they quaintly order Earl Grey tea, flirting and um, waxing — “Brazilian, Hollywood, Bikini or ‘landing strip?'”

Joan resolves to revisit an affair of her youth. Suze meets a handsome Venezuelan food truck owner (Adil Ray, not the most convincing “Venezuelan”). Linda wreaks havoc on her cheating ex’s new romance.

They travel, check off items from their “bucket list,” and manage all this even though this “whisky” has effects that wear off quickly.

The extent of the “message” to all this is “You’re never too old to become young.”

Cute bits include a vicar who can’t be bothered to get details right at funerals and the various eternal pick-up lines the ladies hear when they decide to “club” with the kids.

“Here I am. What’re your other two wishes?”

A bucket list trek to Vegas is an excuse to visit a drag revue that hosts a Boy George concert.

Lulu steals the picture — petty theft, in this case — and Gaunt gives us a fun, younger take on Keaton.

And that’s kind of how all this goes — “surprises” that aren’t, “bad news” that is almost expected and a tinkerer’s de-aging “whisky” which they never bother to investigate or try to replicate because who’d be bothered with a little thing like finding the formula?

Despite all that, the cast is pleasant and the Walton-on-Thames locations pretty. Of all the bad movies Keaton’s kept active with over the past 20 years, this may be the least of the lot. It’s certainly the least grating.

Rating: 16+, adult themes

Cast: Patricia Hodge, Lulu, Emse Lonsdale, Hannah Howland, Genevieve Gaunt, Boy George, Adil Ray, and Diane Keaton

Credits: Directed by Stephen Cookson, scripted by Alexis Zegerman. A Sky Original/Vertical release on Amazon Prime.

Running time: 1:34

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Review: Keaton, Lulu and Hodge taste the benefits of “Arthur’s Whisky”

Movie Preview: Band’s music video becomes “found footage” in this creepy “Director’s Cut”

And you thought “Found footage” horror was dead. Silly you.

This thriller makes its way into public view (streaming) Mar. 18.

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Preview: Band’s music video becomes “found footage” in this creepy “Director’s Cut”

Netfixable? Beware of anything the Germans deem “Delicious”

Writer-director Nele Mueller-Stöfen’s “Delicious” hides its secrets well. But if you’re observant, the clues pile up long before the thriller’s too-patient build-up drops its big revelations on you.

She’s tapping into international inequality in this horrific tale of German “haves” who have gained the notice of pan-European have-nots. And as we see and hear a group of employees at a posh French hotel ponder if they’re “rich enough” to be worth their trouble, we develop expectations about what’s to come.

Is this a “Parasite” variation, with the working class/working poor simply pilfering from and squatting on the rich? Is it another “Funny Games,” where they’re punished for their greed-gotten affluence? A Baader Meinhof kidnapping? Or is it something worse?

You have no idea. But you will once you start looking at that occasionally glimpsed “gang” and the predelictions and manipulations of its cunning Spanish housekeeper/leader, the obvious becomes obvious.

Valerie Pachner stars as born-rich corporate IT guru who brings her husband (Fahri Vardim) and children (Naila Schuberth and Caspar Hoffman) on vacation to her family’s villa in the south of France.

But to get there, they have to be driven through the latest notorious round of French street protests, this time over income inequality and soaring food costs.

“Those people don’t care about us,” biologist-dad John tells the kids. If “care” broadly means “notice” in this case, John could not be more wrong.

Because when they arrive, unpack and go out to dinner at the restaurant of a swanky local hotel, some of the staff raises its eyebrows. Once enough conversations — including high-pressure business cell calls — have been overheard, the die is cast.

“A drink, for the road, on the house?”

That “innocent” offer sets a whole plot in motion that involves intentionally gashing ringleader Teodora’s (Carla Diaz) arm for the “accident” they let tipsy John think he’s driven into in the family’s Jaguar.

“No hospital” will be necessary, take-charge wife Esther says, when the panic subsides and she’s gotten her “This is why you shouldn’t drink and drive” (in German with subtitles, or dubbed) judgement snipe in.

Yes, and who got into the car with their KIDS after he’d been drinking, eh?

Esther’s band-aid first aid for an injury that A) needs stitches and B) which obsewrvant eleven year old Abby says “looks like a cut” by a knife, and a few hundred euros “bribe” sends Teodora on her way.

But she comes back. Of course she comes back. And as she’s noticed how sloppy the family is, with their villa housekeeper out of town, Teodora makes them a deal. She’ll be their housekeeper and cook, which gives her a place to stay as she was “let go” from her hotel job because of her “injury.”

“The long con” here has Teodora corrupting and winning the trust of the kids and working herself into a position where she can exploit rifts in this marriage of unequals. “Secrets” play to her advantage, as her seldom seen accomplices watch and wait.

The pacing here is somewhat ponderous as actress-turned-writer/director Mueller-Stöfen takes her sweet time setting her up “surprises.”

But the foreshadowing gives a lot away, and once you’ve gotten past “No, she wouldn’t” yes she will. And the only shock in that is elementary and generic.

Diaz makes a cryptic but not-exactly-compelling cunning planner/manipulator/seducer, and the rifts in the family are obvious to the point of melodramatic, with some so poorly set-up that they have to be explained away.

“Delicious” is creepy enough. The character flaws — obvious or occasionally subtle — intrigue.

But Mueller-Stöfen loses track of the “politics” of this variation on “The Menu,” and the picture has too little else going on that surprises or wins us over. The “battle of wits” is pretty one-sided. We end up investing in a slow-moving, low-heat thriller that never really comes to a boil.

Rating: TV-MA, violence, sex, alcohol abuse, profanity

Cast: Valerie Pachner, Carla Diaz, Fahri Vardim, Naila Schuberth and Caspar Hoffman.

Credits: Scripted and directed by Nele Mueller-Stöfen. A Netflix release.

Running time: 1:42

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Netfixable? Beware of anything the Germans deem “Delicious”

Series Preview: Seth Rogen runs “The Studio,” and famous faces fill this series about Making Movies

Catherine O’Hara and Martin Scorsese, Olivia Wilde and Ike Barinholtz and Kathryn Hahn and Zac Efron and Anthony Mackie and Bryan Cranston and Paul Dano and Nicholas Stoller are on the cast list — some have cameos, playing themselves — and most of them pop up in this trailer to Rogen’s riff on Hollwood where the movies are a business, first and last, and God help you if you decide to make “art.”

A couple of REALLY good shots at Roman Polanski and Woody Allen in this trailer, I might add.

This series premieres on Apple TV+ March 26.

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Series Preview: Seth Rogen runs “The Studio,” and famous faces fill this series about Making Movies

BOX OFFICE: “Mickey 17?” “$19.” Bong Joon Ho and RPatts deserve better

A robust but hardly dominant Thursday afternoon and evening launches the new Bong Joon Ho sci-fi satire “Mickey 17” to what looks to be a healthy if not remotely “blockbuster” opening weekend.

Deadline.com reported that a $2.5 million Thursday folded in to create a $7.7 million “opening day” (Friday) and that led to a $19 million opening weekend, which sweeing aside the humorless/joyless attempted sci-fi satire “Captain America: Brave New World,” which dominated most of February.

If “Mickey 17” movie cost $120 million+, well that’s not great news.

Adapted from a novel by Edward Ashton, “Mickey” i’s a cutting, comic commentary on work, circumscribed lives of limited expectations facing younger generations, politics and the involvement of crazy, dim-witted robber barons in space exploration. It’s daring and new and thus not a “franchise” or automatically presold product to a fanbase that should probably be more eager to “see what the deal is” with this new Robert Pattinson vehicle.

Pattinson moved on from “Harry Potter” and “Twilight” with challenging films like “Cosmopolis,” “Good Time,” “High Life,” “The Devil All the Time,”“The Lighthouse,” “Damsel,”and “The Rover” before taking on the guise of the latest “Batman.”

He’s worked with many of the most challenging filmmakers — Cronenberg, Claire Denis, Nolan, Robert Eggers — taken chewy supporting roles (“The King,” “The Devil all the Time,”“Waiting for the Barbarians” and “Tenet”) and worked in most every genre there is.

Honestly, if you’re not at least curious about any film that has RPatts’ name above the title, you’ve been missing out. A lot. It’s a stunning body of interesting, divergent work.

I’d like to think that $20 million estimate for the wildly ambitious, pointedly political, uneven and anti-climactic in the end “Mickey 17” is low. But pre-sold franchises are safer bets than formerly presold genres like sci-fi and horror. Word of mouth will be mixed because this isn’t as familiar, dumb or easily grasped as a comic book or horror movie.

“Captain America” Brave New World” tailed off but held onto second place with an $8.5 million weekend.

“Last Breath” did better last week than one might expect, and the weekend produced another $4.2 million.

“The Monkey” and “Paddington in Peru” should ended the animated “Dog Man’s” run in the top five, with each of those hitting $3.–$3.9, and “”Dog Man” clearing $3.5.

“Anora,” re-released after its five Oscar wins, added another $1.8 million and probably clear $20 million by next weekend.

Angel Studios’ “Rule Breakers” cracked the top ten, as did Viva Pictures’ animated “Night of the Zoopocalypse.”

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on BOX OFFICE: “Mickey 17?” “$19.” Bong Joon Ho and RPatts deserve better

Series Preview: A rimshot sitcom tailor-made for Nathan Lane — “Mid Century Modern”

“Will & Grace” producers, Linda Lavin as the mother and Nathan Lane as mother hen/mother superior and host to a couple of old friends (Matt Bomer and Nathan Lee Graham) in a gay sitcom for a gay bashing era.

This one looks a tad obvious, from the decor pun title to the set-up/punchline rhythms to the “Hot in Cleveland” casting of sitcom veterans in supporting and bit parts.

March 28, Hulu gives us a “Love, Sidney” hug.

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Series Preview: A rimshot sitcom tailor-made for Nathan Lane — “Mid Century Modern”