Charlotte and Stacy talk about sex and “Nymphomaniac”

ImageWhen an esteemed director refers to the movie he’s about to make as a “porn film,” he creates an interesting dilemma for those he’d like to cast.

“I was a bit, oh, hesitant,” admits Charlotte Gainsbourg, star of Lars Von Trier’s “Nymphomaniac,” parts I and II. The 42 year-old Anglo-French actress is no stranger to Von Trier controversy, having been in his “Antichrist” as well as “Melancholia.” But on hearing the subject matter of the new film and his flippant description of it — Von Trier is famous for his flippancy — she could have been forgiven for letting her cell phone go straight to voice mail.

“But I admire Lars very much,” she says.

So she read the outline of a script, the story of a self-loathing nymphomaniac who tells her sad history to a kindly stranger (Stellan Skarsgard) who rescues her from the gutter. And Gainsbourg was sold.

“It wasn’t going to be a porn film at all,” she says. She was struck by “what Lars put of himself in the characters, how honest he was.” And he educated her on the very illness the film is about.

“For me, nymphomania was, very stupidly I must say, this life of sexual pleasure — having sex all the time,” says Gainsbourg, best known for “21 Grams” and “Jane Eyre.” “Learning about its true nature, how sad it is, was eye-opening.”

She took the job. Actress-model Stacy Martin, a film neophyte, was cast as the younger version of Gainsbourg’s narrator character, “Joe,” the young woman having all the sex – explicit sex.

“I knew what the film was,” Martin, 23, says. “Before shooting, there this whole frenzy around it, and then press was all wanting to know ‘Who’s having sex with whom?’ Hilarious!”

The “Who’s having sex with whom” stuff spun around the romantic lead in the cast, American actor Shia LaBeouf. With Von Trier ready to cross ratings boundaries in the film’s depiction of intercourse, there’d be little left to the imagination in the clenches. Martin and LaBeouf would be nude and their copulation would be “Deep Throat” real. Or seem that way.

“We’d never call those (sex scenes) pleasant,” Martin says. “They were fine. Don’t get me wrong. We talked SO MUCH about them, days of this. ‘How would we do this? Should we use prosthetics?’ And positions and camera angles and all that.

Making the film, Gainsbourg focused on the character’s journey through “a life of suffering, the whole frustration of wanting something (love, romantic sex) she never can have.”

And Martin?

“At some point, you just want to get ON with it. It’s all technical and mechanical and professional and that makes it less tense than it would be while you’re there with no clothes. A very reassuring way to approach those scenes. You don’t want to feel used.”

Ask the actresses from last year’s equally explicit lesbian romance “Blue is the Warmest Color” about that. But with “Nymphomaniac,” there was one bit of insurance the actors leaned on more than others.

“At some point in those scenes, we go, ‘OK, time to get the porn doubles in!'” Martin says with a laugh. So no, they say. It’s not “really” them. Martin kept laughing all the way through the film’s reception at last year’s Cannes Film Festival, where catcalls did not quite drown out the cheers, but came close.

“They had no idea what was coming their way,” Martin says. “And when it was finished, there was another frenzy, because it was completely unexpected.”

Gainsbourg admits to having her second wave of doubts after shooting the movie and before it premiered. She’d made this very long, very sexually explicit film — Von Trier’s first cut was five and a half hours, and he ended up releasing it in two halves. Many scenes, and not just the flashbacks of Gainsbourg’s character as a libidinous teen and young adult, were “quite extreme” (Gainsbourg’s sex scenes are in “Part II”). And the stars didn’t know just what Von Trier would be showing to the public.

“It had gone in all sorts of directions, sexually,” Gainsbourg says. “I knew the scenes I had done and how extreme the film was going to be, I was even more nervous. And it took him a very long time to edit… Through that time, not seeing what he was doing to shape this — I was thinking, ‘What have I done? What IS this going to be like?'”

But Gainsbourg has been through the Von Trier shock cycle before, with his provocative “Antichrist.” She tempered her fears with that memory and found herself relieved when the finished film premiered.

“The extremeness of it was underlined with a lot of beauty,” she says. “And humor.”

The reviews were mostly kind, some enthusiastic, many of the “both dumber and more entertaining than anyone had a right to expect” (David Edelstein, New York Magazine). And the stars’ reaction?

“I still have nothing but admiration for Lars” Gainsbourg says.

Martin, whose career begins with this two-part cause celebre, is even more content with the finished film.

“To sort of launch yourself into this world by working with one of your favorite directors? I could retire very happily having just done this.”

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Charlotte and Stacy talk about sex and “Nymphomaniac”

Movie Review: “Divergent”

Image“Divergent,” the latest outcast-teen-battles-The-System thriller, is similar enough to “The Hunger Games” that hardcore Katniss fans may dismiss it.
But it’s a more streamlined film, with a love story with genuine heat and deaths with genuine pathos.
And director Neil Burger (“The Illusionist”, “Limitless”) inserts us into this world with a lack of fuss that the stiff, exposition-stuffed “Games” films have never managed.
So let’s skip past any suggestions of novelist Veronica Roth knocking off the formula of Suzanne Collins’ wildly successful “Games” novels. Remember, one has “Katniss” for a heroine, the other “Tris.” World of difference.
Tris Prior (Shailene Woodley) lives in a post-war future in the semi-ruined city of Chicago. Fenced in against the devastated outside world in battered but still habitable wind-generator equipped skyscrapers, the El trains still run and society still functions thanks to “factions.”
We have the Candor faction, famed for popping off without self-censoring, and Amity Faction, the earnest, workers and land-loving farmers. The Erudite, let by imperious Kate Winslet, are the scientific, smart class, and Dauntless is the reckless “soldier” faction of young fighters who dive off the El rather than waiting for it to stop.
And then there is Abnegation, which, if you look it up, means “self-denial.” They are the self-sacrificing public servants. Tris, or Beatrice, as her parents (Tony Goldwyn, Ashley Judd) know her, grew up in that class — redistributing food, governing by consensus, liberal. It’s an easy fit. Abnegations may “reject vanity” and wear drab clothes in shades of gray, but that doesn’t mean a girl can’t have makeup, lip gloss and high-lights, never a hair out of place.
When teens hit a certain age, they go through “The Test” and are told where their strengths lie. And like a college kid declaring a major, there is a “Choosing Ceremony” where you cut your hand and with a drop of blood, declare your faction — for life.
Tris is confused; empathetic but fearless, smart but earthy. Her “Test” doesn’t take. The tester (Maggie Q) tells her she’s “Divergent,” and that the other factions fear Divergents. So Tris has a secret she keeps as she declares “Dauntless” and undertakes Darwinian training with the leather-jacketed jocks, learning to fight with guns, knives and her fists, learning to conquer her fears.

Image
Woodley is a wonderful, transparent actress who lets us see her thoughts, especially when it comes to the hunky stand-offish Dauntless lad (Theo James) who trains her. No, she doesn’t have any memorable lines. And yes, she seems too dainty and fragile to be up to this soldiering thing.
Especially when you compare her to the raw-boned and gangly Jennifer Lawrence of “Hunger Games.” But Woodley makes Tris vulnerable and cunning as she is given drugs that play tricks on her mind to test her.
What novelist Roth was aiming for here was a parable about creating well-rounded, compassionate adults in a world where The System is literally inside your head. As science fiction, it’s no heavier than Stephenie Meyer’s “The Host,” or “Ender’s Game” or any of the other Young Adult fare in this genre — a world we recognize, sliced up into stark metaphors of social strata.
But “Hunger Games” fans shouldn’t feel superior in looking down on this sci-fi variation on a rebel teen theme. This latest franchise is not inferior. It’s pretty much the same “Games,” give or take a bow and arrow. And by not diverging from that simple formula for a Young Adult sci-fi hit, the author and filmmakers reveal the shallowness of both series.
Image

(Shailene, Ansel and Veronica talk “Divergent” in this interview with Roger Moore)
MPAA Rating: PG-13 for intense violence and action, thematic elements and some sensuality
Cast: Shailene Woodley, Theo James, Kate Winslet, Ashley Judd, Tony Goldwyn, Miles Teller
Credits: Directed by Neil Burger, written by Evan Daugherty and Vanessa Taylor, based on the Veronica Roth novel. A Summit release.
Running time: 2:15

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | 2 Comments

The New Big Screen “Peanuts,” sentimental, or cynical?

Unlike “Mr Peabody & Sherman,” the new “Peanuts” adaptation seems to be hewing closer to its TV roots — same Vince Guaraldi music, same SFX for Snoopy’s voice.
But what’s the story, and seriously, how good can it be? Every “Peanuts” movie that stretched the comic strip form longer than a 22 minute or so TV special was a groaner.
And it’s in 3D, why exactly? Money money money.
It’s due out next year, and Blue Sky (“Rio,” “Ice Age”) is the producing studio.

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on The New Big Screen “Peanuts,” sentimental, or cynical?

Movie Review: “Cheap Thrills” has its share of them

 Image

It starts with a trip to the bar to drown his sorrows, or at least steel his courage. Craig (Pat Healy) has been laid off. How can he tell his wife (Amanda Fuller) that they’re about to be evicted? How will he support her and their baby?

Before this night is through, Craig will have run into the wrong old pal (Ethan Embry) from his skateboarding days . They will have downed a few shots as they caught up, and attracted the attention of the wrong rich couple (David Koechner and Sara Paxton). And those two, looking for “Cheap Thrills” by paying them to do foolish, dangerous and increasingly deadly pranks on a dare, will push Craig to his physical limits and make him question his own boundaries between right and wrong.

“Cheap Thrills” is a nasty, elemental thriller, basically a four-character play with blood and guts and sex and drugs and dares — starting with the one that makes Vince (Embry) slap a waitress on the behind. They flee the bar, and Craig is left facing an irate bouncer.

“Five hundred bucks if you hit him first!”

Craig needs the money. Vince, a collector for a loan shark, could use some himself. And Colin (Koechner), who tosses cash around in a never ending effort to impress his dazed beauty of a trophy wife, Violet (Paxton), seems like the answer to their prayers.

Colin’s ethos, “C’mon, it’s her BIRTHDAY.” Colin’s promise? “You will never forget this night, or who you were with.”

As the evening rolls on, Craig, a starving writer who was moonlighting as a mechanic until that afternoon, wonders how far he will go and what’s worse, how far Vince will go, just to stuff their pockets and live to pay the rent another day.

Screenwriters David Chirchirillo and Trent Haaga have cooked up a violent and profane “Twilight Zone” episode, a realistic waking nightmare built around primal fears — personal injury, infidelity and financial ruin. It is a nerve-wracking and even gruesome affair with laugh-out-loud lines, a “midnight movie” that tilts toward the puerile and predictable.

Yes, the two old friends take stock of their lives, insult and hurt each other as things turn personal and ugly. Manhood will be measured in more ways than one, starting with Craig’s punchout with that bouncer.

“You drop like a souffle, dude.”

Healy makes Craig’s desperation palpable, Embry wears heavy boots to make himself tougher looking than he’s ever been on screen and Paxton wears a dazed malevolence as her “come hither” look.

And through it all, Koechner, with a resume of twisted, comically tortured losers stretching from “Waiting…” to “Anchorman,” is in his element. Colin is gross gaucherie incarnate, from his constant coke-snorting to his nauseating throat-clearing to the boundaries he not only crosses, but refuses to so much as recognize.

“Don’t be so LIMITED, bro! We’re just havin’ fun!”
He makes “Cheap Thrills” live down to its title, a darkly comic dare for filmgoers who refuse to avert their eyes, no matter how revolting things turn on the screen.  
Image

MPAA Rating: Unrated, with graphic violence, sex, drug abuse and profanity

Cast: Pat Healy, Ethan Embry, David Koechner, Sara Paxton, Amanda Fuller

Credits: Directed E.L. Katz, scripted by David Chirchirillo and Trent Haaga. A Drafthouse Films release.

Running time: 1:28

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Review: “Cheap Thrills” has its share of them

Movie Review: “Enemy”

Image Jake Gyllenhaal does tour de force double duty in the intimate thriller “Enemy,” a cryptic essay on identity.
He is terrific in both guises, but he is trapped in a frustrating puzzle without a solution. “Enemy” is a fever dream fantasy about a rumpled college professor with perhaps a taste for the kinky who discovers that he has an exact double — a bit player actor has the same voice, is wearing the same beard and has the same scars.
Professor Adam Bell drives his professorial Volvo home to a lovely blond (Melanie Laurent), his girlfriend. Antsy actor Anthony Claire takes his motorcycle home to his blond wife (Sarah Gadon), who doesn’t trust him.
Adam is semi-mindlessly going through his days, repeating the same anecdotes to class after class of bored Canadian college kids (this is set in Toronto). He seems depressed, in between rolls in the sack with Mary, a relationship sketched in tentative, empty strokes. Something’s missing, which might explain his opening scene visit to a twisted voyeur’s club of men watching naked women do things to spiders.
Spiders? That’s no help. Nor is the opening tease — “Chaos is order yet undefined.”
What is helpful is realizing this is based on a novel by the Nobel Prize-winning Portuguese writer Jose Saramago, whose “Blindness” was also cryptic, and something of an essay on human connection and how depriving a city’s residents of a single sense causes social breakdown.
A colleague suggests a movie to Adam, and in it, he spies a bellhop, played by a struggling actor who is a dead ringer for himself. Adam, with more energy than he brings to the rest of his life, methodically tracks down Anthony Saint Claire and nervously angles for a meeting. But not without upsetting Anthony and his very confused, very pregnant wife.
With identity and how we cling to it occupying center stage in this linked-in/identity thieving/NSA-monitored world, it’s no surprise that this lesser novel by Saramago would merit an adaptation by the Canadian director of “Incendies” and last fall’s “Prisoners.” It’s also not surprising that this isn’t the only identity-obsessed doppelganger piece to come out this spring, with Jesse Eisenberg seeing double in the dark comedy “The Double” from the director of “Submarine.”
But while it’s an idea on the tip of the zeitgeist and this film is layered in creepy, calamitous dread, it’s hard to say that Villeneuve and the screenwriter got a handle on anything resembling a point.
It’s David Lynch-lite, a 90 minute puzzle that might be decode-able by those willing to parse its clues obsessively. On a single viewing, though, we have Gyllenhaal’s simple but immaculate separation of the characters, and the time to wonder if it’s all just one man’s nightmare about the life he’s settled into. With spiders.
 Image
MPAA Rating: R for some strong sexual content, graphic nudity and language
Cast: Jake Gyllenhaal, Melanie Laurent, Sarah Gadon
Credits: Directed Denis Villeneuve, scripted by Javier Gullón, based on the Jose Saramago novel “The Double.” An A-24/eOne release.
Running time: 1:30

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | 22 Comments

Jeff Goldblum, charming the socks off fans, femmes and filmmakers since 1980

jeffJeff Goldman was leaning in decades before “Lean In” became a catch-phrase of the moment.
You can see it from his earliest movies and TV appearances, Goldblum’s angular frame and wide eyes tilting toward and drinking in whoever is opposite him. It can be flattering and flirtatious, or, as New York Magazine’s David Edelstein writes of his leaning-in turn in the new film “Le Week-End,” “creepily intimate.”
“Flirtatious” makes Goldblum laugh. Blame it on a persona that started forming when he played a journalist/classmate pick-up line specialist in the reunion dramedy “The Big Chill” thirty years ago. Blame it on “Jurassic Park,” where his “on-the-make” image was forever wedded to that “go-to-guy-for-explaining-big-science” in science fiction films (see “The Fly,” “Independence Day,” “Earth Girls are Easy,” etc). Goldblum himself has an even better answer, one linked to his study under the acclaimed acting teacher Sanford “Sandy” Meisner.
“He said, ‘You’re interesting to the extent that you’re interested.’ So it looks flirtatious, but what I think I’m doing is showing a real curiosity about and an appetite for and an appreciation of what’s going on with the other person, with whoever it is you’re with. Off camera, on stage, it doesn’t matter. Pay attention to who you’re talking to and the world around you. It’s life enhancing.”
Goldblum, 61, brings that charm to film, to the theater and to TV, as heroes, villains and victims. And he’s not shy about letting it spill into real life, and interviews.
“That’s the thing I’m attracted to in other people. If I see genuine interest — the way a baby or even a cat is fascinated by the things around them — if I see that in a person, it’s pretty intriguing.”
He’s had a recurring role on TV’s “Portlandia,” a natural fit for his quirky, dry humor. And he’s in two films at the moment, as a lawyer caught up in the intrigues surrounding a will that could determine who gets a great fortune in Wes Anderson’s delightful “The Grand Budapest Hotel,” and as a pop philosopher and ex-classmate of an academic (Jim Broadbent) who is in Paris in the throes of a marriage about to bust up in “Le Week-End.”
The latter role is a classic Goldblum part, a “Goldblum-esque blurter,” as Edelstein writes in New York, noting the actor’s famed line-reading style — a silky, hesitant baritone whose words come in a rush. It is a part Goldblum plays “with colorful relish,” raved Rex Reed in The New York Observer.

jeff2
“Paris is a very romantic place, and we get to see it, in this movie, through Jim Broadbent and Lindsay Duncan’s eyes. The Paris of their youth, and now they’re older and maybe about to split up. They watch this old 1960s Godard film, ‘Bande a part.’ What Godard had in that movie, the existential romanticism, or whatever you’d call it, they’re trying to achieve as a couple and that’s beyond all intellectual or emotional relationship connections. Pure play and joy and sport and love.”

(Roger Moore reviews “Le Week-End” here)
Goldblum sees Morgan, his character in that film, as “part of a strain of something that runs through my work, my ‘style.’ There, I’ve admitted it. I can see it.”
That’s something he can pass on. As the product of one of the last century’s great acting teachers, Goldblum does some teaching himself. And one of things he tries to teach his students is something he had to learn himself, the hard way. Let a little of yourself find its way into the performance.
“The first job I had on Broadway was a musical — ‘Two Gents’. John Guare adapted Shakespeare’s ‘Two Gentlemen of Verona.’ It was a multi-racial, diverse cast. And Alvin Lum, this wonderful Asian actor, was playing the part I was under-studying. He was sick one day, and I had to go on. I hadn’t thought about exactly how I was going to play the part, but I looked in the Yellow Pages — which you had to do in those days — and found a makeup specialist who could make me look Asian!”
In those pre-politically correct 1970s, Goldblum showed up on stage with tape to narrow his eyes, among other adjustments. And while no one criticized him at the time, “I realized RIGHT afterward that this wasn’t the smartest thing to do!” Find yourself in the part, he decided. And he has. His imitable speaking style, rightly compared to jazz (he fronts a jazz combo in his spare time), the intense, staring eyes, the blush-inducing familiarity, it turns up in almost every appearance.
He’s cultivated that charm off screen, as well. Wes Anderson has hired him more than once (“The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou” and “Grand Budapest”). It’s why Spielberg & Co. have never shied away from using him, why Phil Kaufmann remembered his turn in a small role in “Invasion of the Body Snatchers” and cast him in “The Right Stuff.” And it’s how “Le Week-End” came to be his second film with Roger Michell, who’d directed him in “Morning Glory” and found something even juicier for him in “Le Week-End,” one of the most critically acclaimed films of the new year.

All this “repeat business” isn’t just because Goldblum is on time and knows his lines, something he’s scrupulous about passing on to his acting students.
“Jeff Goldblum wants to work,” Michell says. “He doesn’t want to grandstand, play games, show off, look good or bad, be the star: He just wants to work. To be detailed, truthful, alive, in the moment, alive to the actors around him and the crew around them. Jeff is super-smart, funny, charming and also great at singing show tunes. ‘Dull’ is a word that is impossible to use around Jeff Goldblum. I love him.”

And he’s willing to improvise, make the lines better in the fashion of filmdom’s greatest improvisational director, Robert Altman.
“These folks all make shooting a movie a fun art piece, what Altman (“Nashville,” a VERY early Goldblum appearance) said — ‘It’s like making a sandcastle. No matter what it winds up being, the waters will eventually wash it away.'”
” The experience of MAKING the movie is the real joy. It’s ephemeral, and it doesn’t last. But while it does, I like having a good time.”

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Jeff Goldblum, charming the socks off fans, femmes and filmmakers since 1980

Movie Review: “Blood Ties”

Image“Blood Ties” is a cop-crooks thriller based on a French film, “Les liens du sang.” It’s a period piece set in 1974, when the lapels were wide, the cars were wider and pay phones were the cell phones of the day.
But thanks to its story — a lovesick cop (Billy Crudup) lives in awe of and beholden to his ex-con older brother (Clive Owen), it feels much older. It may not be the oldest story in the crime picture book, but it’s only a chapter or two away from it.
Frank is “the good brother,” but that’s a relative term. He pines for his ex girlfriend, Vanessa (Zoe Saldana). And when cops in the movies pine, they stalk.
“Oh, can you be seen with a colored girl now?” she snaps when she confronts Frank.
Chris (Owen) is just out of the joint, a career criminal whose earliest run-in with the law he still holds over Frank. Lili Taylor plays their sister, James Caan their sickly, dying old man, the guy who supposedly loves them all equally.
Chris left behind a junky/hooker (Marion Cotillard) when he went to prison, and their two kids. He wants to go straight, if only to see the kids and maybe rescue them from the lives he and their mother have sentenced them to.
Mila Kunis is Natalie, a cashier in the New York car lot/garage where Chris finds work. She is temptation incarnate, and tempted herself. If only she can trust him. Of course, she can’t.
Chris falls in with his colorful old crowd. Frank starts getting pressure from the higher ups (Noah Emmerich) in the police department.
“Your brother has a very LOUD reputation.”
Director co-writer Guillaume Canet, better known as a French actor, doesn’t do a particularly good job of hiding the novelty here. We’re meant to misjudge each character and have our opinions flipped. But Crudup’s Frank is obviously less “good” than we first think, and Owen’s Chris seems redeemable only until the first time he shoots somebody, which doesn’t take long.
Among the cast, the Oscar winner Cotillard acquits herself the best, bleary-eyed and bitter, a woman who knows just what to expect from Chris, no matter what appearances suggest. And the contempt is mutual.
“You’re trash to the core.”
Owen does well in a sort of Jason Statham hardcase role, but Crudup seems a little lost, playing a cowardly, lovesick cop still cunning enough cop to get the girl he wants by hook or by crook. The film refuses to judge him, but the viewer doesn’t have that problem. Kunis tries on a Brooklyn accent — for a couple of scenes, anyway.
You only notice those sorts of things in the first two acts, because the third act — with a high body count, a cascade of pitiless crimes, vast intervals of time and plot holes you could drive a ’72 El Dorado through — is simply risible.
Perhaps this played better in French. Subtitles, at least, tend to distract you from a story that was drawing a pension back when Bogart and Cagney were chewing up the silver screen.
 Image
MPAA Rating: R for violence, pervasive language, some sexual content and brief drug use
Cast: Zoe Saldana, Clive Owen, Marion Cotillard, Billy Crudup, Mila Kunis, James Caan
Credits: Directed by Guillaume Canet, scripted by Guillaume Canet and James Gray, based on the French film “Les liens du sang.” A Roadside Attractions release.
Running time: 2:08

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Review: “Blood Ties”

Movie Review: “Rob the Mob” aims for violent, tragic laughs — and gets them

mobTo topple the frightening and powerful, the first step is to make them look
foolish.
That’s the object lesson in “Rob the Mob,” a tragi-comic tale of a couple of
idiots who figured New York’s “five families” were just “greasy old guys
cruising on their reputations.” So this naive and clumsy “Bonnie & Clod”
proceed to rob the wiseguys, making them strip to their underwear as they
do.
And since this “true story” happened in the middle of the high-profile trial
of “The Teflon Don,” John Gotti, what can the mob do about it?
The Feds were watching and listening in. The press (Ray Romano plays a
newspaper columnist) was amused, and that amusement spread as the world came to
realize these pot-bellied thugs weren’t so scary and weren’t coated in Teflon
after all.

Michael Pitt (“Seven Psychopaths”) is Tommy, a crackhead who can’t even get
away with robbing a florist’s shop on Valentine’s Day. Nina Arianda (of “Tower
Heist”) is Rosie, the ditz who loves Tommy so much she drives the getaway car
her dad left to her when he died.

After Tommy does his time for that crime, Rosie dreams of them going straight
— staying off drugs, working at real jobs. She’s already a star at the
collection agency where she works. Tommy can join her, right?
“Everyone deserves a second chance,” her boss (Griffin Dunne, a hoot) croons.
But Tommy is instantly bored, given to advising clients on sneaky ways to avoid
paying their bills a little while longer. It worked for him.
What truly fascinates Tommy is the Gotti trial, with its the riveting inside
testimony of guys like Sammy “The Bull” Gravano. Where others are hooked on the
crimes, the violence and the slang, Tommy — who plays hooky, sitting in court,
doodling — is noticing important things. Like that the Mafia has all these
“social clubs,” where the made men gather and play cards and make deals and
count their loot. And these clubs? No guns allowed.

“Wise guys and guns,” Gravano (Garry Pastore) testifies, “it’s a bad
mix.”
Tommy, reasoning that the last guys to call the cops would be mobsters,
figures he’s got the perfect crime. And Rosie, whose reasoning is as
short-sighted and stupid as Tommy’s, comes along for the ride.

The F.B.I. (Frank Whaley) is listening in, incredulously, as Tommy pulls off
these inept, Uzi-fired heists. A newspaper columnist (Romano) gets wind of an
amusing side show to the Gotti trial.
And a culinarily-inclined mob boss, Big Al (Andy Garcia) and his lieutenant
(Michael Rispoli) cannot believe these brazen insults to their mafioso
manhood.
“I’ve been VIOLATED here!”
It’s all good fun, with Tommy waving a gun around and yelling, “You, goombah
— grab that spaghetti bowl. ALL the cash, inside!” But you just know somebody’s
going to get hurt.
The robberies are — to a one — impromptu and hilarious.
“C’mon. Gotti put you up to this?”
The aftermaths, less so.
Garcia’s “City Island” director Raymond de Felitta packs the screen with
veteran character actors and turns them loose on this Jonathan Fernandez script.
Garcia broods, and cooks, Dunne vamps and kvetches, Whaley and Romano play it
straight but with a twist.
And Pitt and Arianda utterly inhabit these dolts and their delusional dreams.
They’re careless and clumsy, never thinking things through, never seriously
considering the inevitable consequences of what happens when you poke the
bull.
And they poke. And poke. And humiliate. And tease.
And we grimace in anticipation. Because we know what Rosie and Tommy can’t
seem to grasp, that sooner or later, those fat “greasy old guys cruising on
their reputations” are going to poke back.
Image
MPAA Rating: R for pervasive language, some sexual material and brief drug
use
Cast: Michael Pitt, Nina Arianda,  Andy Garcia, Ray Romano, Cathy Moriarty
Frank Whaley, Burt Young
Credits: Directed by Raymond de Felitta, written by Jonathan Fernandez. A
Millennium release.
Running time: 1:44

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Review: “Rob the Mob” aims for violent, tragic laughs — and gets them

Shailene, Ansel and Veronica Roth talk about “Divergent”

ImageThe young actor Ansel Elgort has worked with Shailene Woodley in two films, now. And he has a suggestion for anyone meeting her.
“My advice to people, when they’re first meeting Shailene, is to HUG HER BACK,” Elgort says, laughing. “You are going to be hugged, so be ready.”
“I do love a good hug,” admits Woodley, whose work on TV in “The Secret Life of an American Teenager” led to break-out film performances in “The Descendants” and last summer’s “The Spectacular Now.”
Critics and her peers noticed right away her open-eyed, open-hearted transparency, the way any film she takes on instantly feels more real just because she’s in it.
“‘Authentic’ is the right word for her,” says author Veronica Roth. Roth wrote the “Divergent” series, the sci-fi novels that Hollywood is predicting could become the next “Hunger Games” when the first film hits theaters Mar. 21. “Shailene’s not afraid to go places, playing it from the gut. Vulnerable.”
Elgort, who plays Woodley’s character’s brother in “Divergent” and her love interest in this June’s “The Fault in Our Stars,” agrees. “It’s science fiction. You need somebody as real as her to make it real.”
For her part, Woodley doesn’t consider that acting, “not so much a skill as just how I am.” Maybe it’s something she picked up. Maybe she was born with it.
“I’m astrologically a triple water sign (Nov,. 15, a Scorpio), so I’m basically an emotional watery mess,” Woodley jokes. “But I grew up with two psychologist parents, which explains a lot. They established feeling and compassion in me in a very young age. I wonder if that helped me connect, emotionally, with someone really easily.”
“Divergent” depicts a dystopian future where teens choose their lifelong career path, their tribe or “faction”, whether they’ll be warriors or rulers or thinkers or laborers, based on their true natures — nurturing or brave, imaginative or cogs in the agricultural or manufacturing faction that makes this world work. Roth admits to being fans of “The Hunger Games” novels and owns up — a little — to the resemblance between the two series.
But “Divergent,” to be followed by “Insurgent” and “Allegiant” as Woodley’s character, Tris, finds herself and sets herself up in opposition to the rigid social structure she’s born into, has the best “Young Adult” bonafides of any book turned to film series in that genre. It’s not just the stars who are young — Woodley is 22, Elgort just turned 20. Roth, the novelist, is only 26 herself.
“The choices real teenagers have to make at 16, 17 or 18, feel like these life and death decisions,” Roth says. “It’s their emotional reality. I felt that at 16, this pressure to get it right the first time. People change majors, change colleges, change jobs. But when you’re 16, 17, you don’t have that perspective yet.”
Woodley felt that herself as she pondered whether to tackle her first “franchise.” She’s spent a couple of years as a “critic’s darling,” making movies that did not become the sort of life-altering blockbusters that “The Hunger Games” did. That film series changed “Winter’s Bone” starlet Jennifer Lawrence into the hottest acting property in Hollywood, and a tabloid favorite.
“I had to decide if I wanted something this big in my life,” Woodley says. “I’m grateful that I did, because I have no regrets and I know that thinking about it more made it easier to see was the right decision.”
To ease her into “Divergent,” “Spectacular Now” co-star Miles Teller took a supporting role. And after working with Elgort in “Divergent,” Woodley was happy to co-star with him in “The Fault in Our Stars,” a romance about two physically damaged teens who fall in love in a support group for cancer patients.
“It’s very comforting,” Woodley says, “to have friends with you on the set when you’re trying something new or scary. I loved having Miles in Chicago, for ‘Divergent.’ And having a prior relationship with Ansel made playing these really vulnerable characters in ‘Fault in Our Stars’ easier.”
And it’s got to be a help, knowing that when you hug somebody on that first day on the set, they know what to do in response.
“Oh yeah, they know they’d better hug back.”
 Image

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Shailene, Ansel and Veronica Roth talk about “Divergent”

Box office: “Veronica Mars” respectable, “Single Moms” not, “Budapest” rises

veronicaSaturday’s box office numbers solidified the hold “Mr. Peabody & Sherman” has on the top spot for St. Patrick’s Day weekend. Over $21 million in its second week. It will be lucky to get in the ballpark of $100 million, with Disney’s “Muppets” taking away its thunder next weekend.

“Need for Speed” tailed off considerably on Saturday and now looks to make about $18 million this weekend, or just north of it.

“The Single Moms Club” tumbled as well and won’t do much better than $8 million, thus the wisdom of Lionsgate getting out of the Tyler Perry business.

“Veronica Mars”, fan financed and fan pandering, may hit $2.2 million on 291 screens. It’s in the black and will be even more so thanks to the kickstarter financing, sale to Warners and Warners giving it just enough screens to pay for itself.

“Frozen” is very very close to $400 million, but may not make it as home video takes the last of its money and it loses screens next weekend.

“Monuments Men” hangs around the top ten.

But “The Grand Budapest Hotel” is well within the top ten, on a fraction of the screens that “Mars” is.

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | 2 Comments