Movie Review: A Master Mocks Yakuza Hit-Man Movies — “Broken Rage”

Leave it to Beat Takeshi to ridicule the cinematic elephantiasis that has even the Great Scorsese pushing the limits of how long a night out at the movies should last. And that Brady Corbet “Brutalist” guy? Three and a half hours? Who is he kidding?

And trust the often goofy Takeshi Kitano (his real name) to take down a whole genre of Japanese cinema that made him rich and famous — yakuza hitman stories — and do it in 67 minutes, including credits.

With “Broken Rage,” even the title’s a joke, as the director of “Outrage,” and “Outrage Coda” takes a shot at deconstructing the yakuza killer narrative in a self-aware, fourth-wall-breaking farce. He tells us a tidy, dumb geezer-gun-for-hire story, and then spends the second half of the movie lampooning the conventions, set-pieces, character “types” and ways the time-tested-plans of an elderly trigger man can and should go wrong.

The guy “they call Mouse” (Kitano) is a pot-bellied, bowlegged 70something lump who dresses all in black, picks up his assignments in an envelope left by a mysterious “M” at his regular dining spot, the Cafe Lake.

The proprietor (Takashi Nishina) always asks him who “M” is, and the cagey Mouse always answers “I have no idea.”

As you’d expect, thanks to 1467 hitman movies that preceded it, that envelope contains a photo and the routine of the intended mob victim.

So the wily Mouse dons his black jacket, pants and shades and walks right into a club to shoot up a table packed with young punks. He switches coats, adds a cap and pedals off into the night as the oldest delivery boy in Tokyo. Another guy, with bodyguards with him, must be surveiled at the gym and trapped when he strips to just his tattoo’d birthday suit for a dip outside the sauna.

Careful as he might seem, the Mouse is grabbed by the cops, ID’d in a lineup and beaten until he agrees to go undercover to entrap drug smuggling mobsters. How’ll he join the gang?

Simple. The old man will visit a bar a mob leader (Hakuryû) frequents and “handle himself” in a fight an undercover cop picks with him. Just like that, with not so much as a “check him out,” he’s a mob bodyguard, showing off his killer instincts to his new crew while baiting them into a trap.

Kitano skips over a vast collection of conventions and cliches of such movies, skipping past “wiring” Mouse up, etc., to pretty much wrap that tale up in half an hour.

The “joke” to the first half of “Broken Rage” is Beat Takeshi as a past retirement age “hard” man in the Liam, Bruce, Sly, Mel and Denzel mold. Yeah, he’s too old to be that quick, punch that hard and see danger in a dark parking garage at night whilst wearing sunglasses. It’s funny that we let our action heroes “sell” this lie well into their ’70s.

The second half of the film treats us to a counter-narrative where Mouse goes through the same hit-list and same routine, with one disastrous result after another. Even the cafe chairs collapse under him while he’s picking up his envelopes.

The entire deadpan affair is more reasonably amusing than hilarious, but the pauses in the action, with the screen going to black and “users” of this Amazon streaming movie commenting their complants– “That’s it?” “That’s not a movie” and “On this budget, this is what you get” — are laugh out loud funny.

Yes, movies are getting too long as they’re tailored for a home viewing audience used to binge watching streaming series. Yes, every filmmaker is pitching those streamers, or being lured by Amazon, Hulu or Netflix money.

Takeshi gets it. And when he got that Jeff Bezos money to deliver one of his patented serio-comic thrillers, guess who’s actually the butt of his jokes?

Rating: 16+, violence, drug content, nudity

Cast: Beat Takeshi, Hakuryû, Tadanobu Asano. Nao Ômori, Takayuki Asai and Takashi Nishina

Credits: Scripted and directed by Takeshi Kitano, aka “Beat” Takeshi. An MGM/Amazon Prime release.

Running time: 1:07

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Movie Review: A Master Mocks Yakuza Hit-Man Movies — “Broken Rage”

Classic Film Review: Hemmings and Redgrave, The Yardbirds and 1960s London — Antonioni’s “Blow-Up” (1966)

A young photographer is shaken to his core when he finally sees the beyond the Mod London surface gloss he so ably captures in “Blow-Up,” a vivid snapshot of a moment in time and a patient, chilling thriller about a murder and a generation unready to face such realities.

Michelangelo Antonioni (“The Passenger,” “Zabriskie Point”), adapting a Julio Cortázar short story, depicts a prelapsarian ’60s of “free love,” easy money, mod fashion, drugs, sex and rock’n roll.

And after slowly and deliberately setting all this up by following the life of rich, greedy, womanizing photographer Thomas — greedy for women (“models”), fame from his arresting images, money and real estate — Antonioni shocks our anti-hero. Thomas realizes, as he blows up a photograph of a couple’s assignation in a park, that he’s captured a murder or attempted murder with his SLR camera. It hits him square in the face that he lacks the ethical, moral and intellectual grounding to handle this awful truth.

He has no idea what the right thing to do is and no sense of responsibility to do it.

David Hemmings had his greatest film role in Thomas, an arrogant bully of a fashion photographer who callously preys on his subjects, and on too-eager wannabes who flock to his studio door. He’s even sleeping with his artist neighbor and pal’s girlfriend (Sarah Miles).

Thomas takes art shots in his spare time, because he wants it all — big paydays for photographing women in sexy poses, fame and “respect” as an artist published in a picture book.

He tools around a London of colorful street-protests carried out by a comical, carefree flash-mob in mime makeup in his new Rolls Royce Silver Cloud convertible — always with the top down, no matter how grey the day. Thomas parks it away from the factory where he’s posing as a worker just to get candid shots of London labor. And he abuses the flashy ride, because it’s come easily to him.

He’s even dabbling in real estate. He has his eye on an undervalued antiques shop in an about-to-gentrify neighborhood.

“Already there are queers and poodles in the area,” he crows to his business manager. This place is about to explode.

That goes for London as well. British youth born during and just after the war are celebrating their newfound affluence and influence. Thomas is cruising among them — clubbing where The Yardbirds (Jeff Beck, Jimmy Page, et al, pre Page’s Led Zeppelin) are playing, throwing away clothes he’s worn once or twice.

But hunting for other candid shots in a London park has Thomas spying on two lovers — a younger woman (Vanessa Redgrave) with an older man. She freaks out when she sees who he’s snapping.

“This is a public place. People have a right to be LEFT in PEACE!”

Not to Thomas. But as she goes to great extremes to procure those pictures, he prints the pictures and starts to notice background detail. Is that…a shooter in the bushes just to the right of them?

Antonioni doesn’t turn this into a detective story with Thomas as amateur sleuth. Our shallow anti-hero crows to his business manager what he’s snapped, that he’s “saved” the intended victim’s life. But Thomas takes no responsibility for showing what he has to the cops, even after it’s obvious that the worst has happened and the criminals are covering up their crime.

The amorality of all that hangs over “the scene” that Thomas still sees, but is no longer swept up in.

The plot of Antonioni’s film was so clever that Brian De Palma paid homage to it with his ’80s thriller “Blow Out.”

The time and place — mod, fashion-mad 1960s “Swinging London” — were so perfectly captured that Mike Myers made comic hay out of it for a string of “Austin Powers” farces.

Hemmings never again reached the level of fame “Blow-Up” promised. He’d enjoy a long career in support of bigger stars with “Crossed Swords,” “Islands in the Stream,” “Gangs of New York” and “Gladiator” among the jewels on his resume.

Redgrave and Miles would have bigger post-“Blow-Up” careers.

Seen today, one appreciates the patience of films from a more self-consciously artsy era, the slow boil Antonioni goes for in setting up his generational moment of judgement.

Modern viewers will raise an eyebrow and grimace at the sexism, ageism and homophobia glimpsed here.The fashions are peak “mid century mod” and kind of timeless when they aren’t hideous.

“Blow-Up” was made for the HDTV/high-resolution DVD/video era. I first saw it at a university film society projected on grainy 16mm. Much of the effect Antonioni was going for, forcing the viewer to only slowly “see” what Thomas’s trained eye eventually discerns in the background of those simple snaps taken in a park, has been lost to home viewers of this classic for generations.

But now this metaphor for a generation about to come of age can be appreciated for what it was, in all its Metrocolor glory. “Blow-Up was a film with something to say whose message resonates even today, over half a century removed from Swining London.

Rating: TV-MA, sexual situations, pot use

Cast: David Hemmings, Vanessa Redgrave, Sarah Miles, John Castle, Peter Bowles and The Yardbirds.

Credits: Directed by Michelangelo Antonioni, scripted by Michelangelo Antonioni, Tonino Guerra and (English dialogue) Edward Bond, based on a short story by Julio Cortázar. An MGM/Warner Bros. release on Tubi, other streamers

Running time: 1:52

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Classic Film Review: Hemmings and Redgrave, The Yardbirds and 1960s London — Antonioni’s “Blow-Up” (1966)

Movie Review: An Oscar-nominated animated “Incredible Journey” from Latvia — “Flow”

“Flow” is a futuristic Franco-Latvian fantasy, an animated sci-fi version of Disney’s classic animal odyssey, “The Incredible Journey.”

Gints Zilbalodis’ film, an Oscar nominee as Best Animated Feature and as Best International Feature, is a dialogue-free travelogue that follows a cat through a post-apocalyptic landscape.

Setting aside, it’s a light, somewhat melodramatic adaptation of the joke that cats “don’t need us” and merely tolerate human. A coal-dust-colored cat faces perils and only survives them through the aid of a capybara, a stork, a Labrador Retriever and to a lesser degree, a ring-tailed lemur.

Humanity appears to have vanished. But buildings still stand, structures crumble and become overgrown and the cat still makes her home in a Latvian dacha, surrounded by feline statuary including two works in progress by the sculptor who used to live there — an unfinished carving on a desk and a towering Mount Pussmore monument that still has scaffolding around it.

The cat is feeding itself, but it runs afoul of a pack of dogs by stealing the fish they’ve been catching. Only the yellow Lab seems indifferent to this afront.

The dogs must be evaded when they give chase. And when they flee past the cat, a vast herd of deer are the next peril to dodge.

But that’s nothing compared to the flood that follows. The narrative has a touch of Antediluvian End Times about it as the cat sees its sylvan, verdant world buried under water. Climbing the highest landmark close to hand (paw) seems ironic — it’s the giant cat statue — and pointless.

Still, the dogs find a rowboat and float off in it, heedless of where it takes them. That passing dhow with the tattered sail that seems to be sailing itself? That’s better than drowning. And it’s not exactly sailing itself. A capybara is on board and may have an idea of what a tiller does.

The cat and the capybara re-encounter the dog, and a stork and even a vain, mirror-obsessed ring-tailed lemur as they drift through former forests and mountains, spy prehistoric whales and pass through what might have been Venice, Florence or many of the Great Cities of Europe.

The story and message are “cat video” simple — put the kitty in peril, sometimes comically learning to cope with “cooperation” and a water world where if you want to eat, you’d better be willing and able to adapt — to swim under water and fish. The animation is lovely, if perhaps a tad Pixar 2.0 in texture, color palette, complexity and “realism.”

“Flow” would be a worthy contender for Best Animated Feature most years. It might be better than a new “Wallace & Gromit” film or “Inside Out 2.” But only cat fanciers will be voting for this simple, picturesque odyssey over the smarter, warmer and wittier “The Wild Robot.”

Rating: PG, peril, thematic elements.

Credits: Directed by Gints Zilbalodis, scripted by Matiss Kaza and Gints Zilbalodis. A Janus Films release.

Running time: 1:25

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Movie Review: An Oscar-nominated animated “Incredible Journey” from Latvia — “Flow”

Movie Review: Home Invaders show up with an Agenda — “Everyone Is Going to Die”

“Everyone is Going to Die” is a generic home invasion thriller that clumsily struggles with the #MeToo “message” grafted onto it.

It opens with the usual “Funny Games/’The ‘Strangers’ franchise” franchise attack, serves up hints that this assault isn’t as “random” as it seems, lapses into ludicrous theatricality and then leans harder into inept self-awareness of the “I’m the director” giving “Don’t break the fourth wall” notes to her captive cast.

Things get rough before things get ugly — seriously ugly — in the latter acts of this British thriller written and directed by producer turned director Craig Tuohy.

Award winning builder/developer/architect Daniel (Brad Moore) is living large in a remote, designer mansion, enjoying a little S&M single life after splitting from his wife. He has a big deal about to go down.

But for this weekend, he’s back-burnering work and chasing away the bondage playmate (Tamsin Dean) because his teen daughter Imogen (Gledisa Arthur) is coming over for her birthday.

They don’t have five solid minutes to themselves to talk about how little he’s prepared for her birthday and how much trouble’s two-fisted Imogen is getting into at school.

“There’s someone in the garden.” Daniel isn’t finished shouting threats at this masked intruder when another has made her way into the house. Her “present” for Imogen? A shotgun in a box, ready for brandishing.

The women are armed with their faces hidden by DIY theatre masks. Jaime Winstone plays “Comedy,” and her fury and her ego and vanity means she will quickly doff hers. Silent “Tragedy” (Chiara D’Anna) is the other half of a couple Daniel quickly labels “man-hating lesbians.”

But are they? They know about his business, his “deal.” They know better than to steal his car. They have an idea he may have a safe. And if not, they’ve arranged where they want his accounts transferred.

As the violence and threat level ebbs and flows and the upper hand shifts hands, talkaholic Comedy gives away the larger point they expect this assault to achieve — lessons from “the theatre of life.”

“What we do is organize days you never will forget!”

Their aim? Daniel is to be broken and humiliated in front of his daughter.

“Otherwise, what’s the point?”

The dialogue is closer to a monologue as Ray Winstone’s daughter chatters away with insults and threats delivered behind the barrel of her character’s gun.

“What have you got to lose? Aside from your daughter’s face?”

The bursts of violence never quite plant their feet in reality, and for such a short, compact, single-set thriller, the pace just drags.

Tying this all together with “Oh, that explains it” twists never quite comes off. And once you’ve been told “Everyone is Going to Die,” anything less is a bit of a letdown.

Rating: R, disturbing violent content, sexual assault, profanity, and sexual content/nudity.

Cast: Jaime Winstone, Brad Moore, Chiara D’Anna, Gledisa Arthur, Tamsin Dean and Richard Cotton.

Credits: Scripted and directed by Craig Touhy. A Saban Films release.

Running time: 1:22

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Movie Review: Home Invaders show up with an Agenda — “Everyone Is Going to Die”

Movie Review: Teachers Accuse, Debate and Judge a Mother and her Son named “Armand”

Something that happened at school is debated and “measures” are weighed and furiously argued and even experienced through interpretive dance in the challenging but slow feature filmmaking debut of Halfdan Ullmann Tøndel, the grandson of the great actress Liv Ullmann.

“Armand” thus immediately invites interpretation and appreciation as a sort of extension of Grandma Ullmann’s work as the muse of the Swedish master Ingmar Bergman. Quiet, deliberately pacing from emotionally repressed to potentially explosive, Norway’s official submission for the Best International Feature Oscar can be a frustrating and obscure essay on Scandivanian emotions and cinematic symbolism.

“Armand” didn’t make the Oscar cut, but Tøndel did earn a Director’s Guild nomination. And the film stands out as a fine example of a so-called “Cannes” film — obscure, novel and a beneficiary of the groupthink that sets in at film festivals and on festival juries.

Renate Reinsve of “The Worst Person in the World” plays Elisabeth, a parent urgently summoned to a parent-teacher conference at school.

The whispers among the faculty and staff are that “It’s Armand, again,” suggesting a problem child. Elisabeth has to be dealt with gingerly, as “she’s a public figure” (an actress). And her son’s young teacher, Sunna (Thea Lambrechts Vaulen) assures her principal (Øystein Røger) that she’ll approach this “diplomatically,” maintaining her quiet and “sober” composure.

And she assures Elisabeth accordingly, that this is no big deal, nothing urgent, nothing to worry about. She lies.

Elisabeth’s six year-old son did something to another boy in school. He used language beyond the knowledge of most six year-olds. And what he did was serious and sexual enough to suggest “measures,” child welfare and even police involvement.

We don’t meet Armand until much later. We never meet his alleged victim. And we don’t really know what happened, just what other teachers heard from the boys. We just puzzle over Norwegian protocols on such matters and how clumsy, clueless and out-of-their-depth almost everybody in this school is to deal with this — especially the older principal.

“We have to be tolerant of anything now,” he grouses.

What we learn — from the “meetings” between parent and the young teacher (Alone?!), then parent and a couple of teachers and eventually parent with teachers and the principal — is that Elisabeth went to school here. So did Armand’s father. So did a couple of the teachers regarded as witnesses, the first to hear of the incident from the victim and wonder about his bruises.

Most of them have known each other all their lives. There are relationships and relatives and grievances that extend beyond this shocking alleged assault, and they either “explain” it as a judgment on Elisabeth’s parenting situation, or undercut it due to old grievances.

Writer-director Tøndel’s approach is to tease this out and let it all unfold ever-so-slowly. Scene after scene drags, even when something dramatic is happening. Elisabeth cracks up, at one point, launching into a laughing jag that goes on an on.

And that’s before she imagines herself persecuted and touched and poked at in an interpretative dance take on her dilemma.

One staffer has stress-nosebleeds. Are they a “tell” about how out of her depth she is? Others have “complications” that point to motive.

“Armand” is entirely too grudging in letting slip the information that the viewer needs to form judgments and opinions that might later be undercut. A tale told under a cloud with unreliable witnesses, it’s a slow and soft spoken drama that too breaks the chilling spell Tøndel is trying to cast.

Rating: R, profanity and sexual content

Cast: Renate Reinsve, Ellen Dorrit Petersen, Endre Hellestveit, Vera Veljovic-Jovanovic, Thea Lambrechts Vaulen and Øystein Røger

Credits: Scripted and directed by Halfdan Ullmann Tøndel. An IFC release.

Running time: 1:57

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Movie Review: Teachers Accuse, Debate and Judge a Mother and her Son named “Armand”

Netflixable? Wedding Mayhem comes to a Swedish Couple promising to “Love Forever”

“Love Forever” is an overpopulated Swedish wedding farce that offers more possibilities than payoffs.

Writer-director Staffan Lindberg throws in lots of tropes and “types” and reaches for plenty of low-hanging fruit in this comedy about city Swedes shoehorned into a country wedding, where “It’s a tradition” trumps pretty much all other considerations.

The tone is jovial and comically irritating in the right ways, but so much and so many are shoved in that this tame tying-of-the-knot tale never quite consummates.

Hanna (Matilda Källström) loves “celebrity chef” Samuel (Charlie Gustafsson) so much that she’s said “Yes” (In subtitled Swedish, or dubbed).

We catch up with her as her Stockholm friends, led by her bestie Linda (Doreen Ndagire), are taking her out for a bachelorette party (a “hen do”).

Samuel’s talked his assistant chef Marco (Philip Oros) into joining him for the jaunt to the quaint island of Gotland for the wedding. Others from the happy couple’s inner circle have booked flights and ferry passage for the weekend ceremony

But Hanna’s rich, self-absorbed jerk Dad (Kjell Bergqvist) and bullied Mom (Anja Lundqvist) won’t be joining one and all the day before to help with any last minute prep. Real-estate broker Dad is too self-important to change his routine. And he’s dismissive of his daughter’s choice for a husband.

And that opens the door to Samuel’s provincial parents to taking over. It starts with complaints about “How can we get to know” the bride’s parents if they don’t come early, and mushrooms into a parade of wedding rituals that dismay the Stockholmers.

Hanna’s sleek designer dress must be shelved, as her future mother-in-law (Barbro ‘Babben’ Larsson) has altered her “traditional” folk costume wedding dress, which “three generations” of brides in their family have worn.

A planned “intimate” wedding is ditched, without the bride and groom’s consent, because his parents “feel sorry for you, having so few friends.”

They’d love to get a preacher to do the “traditional” ceremony, but Hanna and Samuel stand firm on their “civil ceremony” desires. Even when mishaps start piling up on this and other best-laid-plans for the two days and just getting a sane, sober civil servant to officiate seems a lot to ask.

Martin and Helene, the bride’s parents, pay the price for Martin’s haughty refusal to lift a finger to help get them there.

As Marco and Linda — who used to be a couple — cope with that awkwardness and Samuel reveals himself to be a “Mama’s boy” and his older, jealous brother (Vilhelm Blomgren) and his mates kidnap the groom for a rough and tumble “stag do,” we wonder how long this “happy” couple will remain happy, and if they’ll ever tie the knot.

Writer-director Lindberg (“Once Upon a Time in Phuket,” “Love is a Drug”) fills the 90 minute screenplay with complications, coincidences and conflict — handy obstacles standing in the way of “true love.”

But to a one, they’re under-developed, half-baked and left dangling without a decent payoff.

One expects “the last rental car on the island” to be a late model Tercel debacle and a simple punchline. But the many efforts to get someone to officiate at the ceremony waste promising supporting characters and a nice third act twist.

The narrative loses track of the couple and arbitrarily escalates their unhappiness out of turn. Hanna’s fury at her groom’s spinelessness should build into a fury, not simply arrive there.

Supporting cast and throwaway characters and random bits here and there work. But the “Love Forever” whole never gels into anything more than a tiny taste of Swedish “traditions” and an Around the World with Netflix trip that never gets off the ground.

Rating: TV-MA, profanity

Cast: Matilda Källström, Charlie Gustafsson,
Kjell Bergqvist, Anja Lundqvist, Doreen Ndagire, Philip Oros, Claes Malmberg and Barbro ‘Babben’ Larsson

Credits: Scripted and directed by Staffan Lindberg. A Netflix release.

Running time: 1:30

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Netflixable? Wedding Mayhem comes to a Swedish Couple promising to “Love Forever”

Movie Review: Sexually-attracted StepSiblings in a Rich New Setting — “My Fault: London”

Argentine-born Sevillian novelist Mercedes Ron has made a pretty good living off her rich-stepsiblings-incest intellectual property, the “Culpables Trilogy” — “Culpa Mia,” “Culpa Tuya” and “Culpa Nuestra,” which translates as “My Fault,” “Your Fault” and “Our Fault.”

Being young and affluent and sexually transgressive, these books have been cranked out as streaming service cinema for Amazon and Netflix. The latest adaptation of this material Anglicizes it for MGM/Amazon.

“My Fault: London” makes the heroine a Floridian surfer who gets a “fresh start” in London thanks to her mother marrying a genuine “Daddy Warbucks.”

Mimicking the plot of the first novel, Noah (Asha Banks) loathes the “spoiled Daddy’s boy” Nicolas (Matthew Broome) at first sight. He may be rich and hot, but they’re “complete strangers living together,” albeit in a roomy mansion where they can “stay out of each other’s way.” And he’s just as rude as can be.

“How the lowly have risen,” he smirks.

Their parents (Eve Macklin, Ray Fearon) try to remedy that by throwing them together on social occasions and forcing rideshare app developer Nick to take Noah wherever he’s heading in his McLaren or that hot modified Japanese street racer he likes taking out.

Because Nick is a “bad boy” partyer, a down and dirty street drifter, hanging with a Fast and Furious crowd. And he’s a bare knuckle brawler, risking his pretty face to prove his worthiness among the hoi poloi.

“Any other ‘bad boy’ cliches,” Noah rightly asks?

Did I mention Noah’s the estranged daughter of a race car driver, with quite a bit of NASCAR and Kart training under her belt?

That’s sure to be catnip to Nick, who’s soon all about what’s under her belt.

Yeah, that’s a tacky and trashy way of putting it, but that’s this movie in a nutshell — long, leisurely and louche. What its most sorely lacking is what it sort of aims to be — lurid.

They’re turned-on by their shared sexiness and common pursuits. But the overheated payoffs are tame and tepid — nothing like the build-up.

The melodramatic additions to the plot include the reasons the father (Jason Flemyng) is estranged, the ex-con street-fighter/street racer (Sam Buchanan) who has it in for Nick, Nick’s semi-estranged Mum and the kid “sister” he’s just starting to know, all of which is a lot to lay on a story about two horny young people acting on their impulses, despite the marriage of their parents.

The Brit Banks (of TV’s “A Good Girl’s Guide to Murder”) does a decent job portraying an unimpressable American stuck in London, living in a mansion, weekending in Ibiza, attending charity galas thrown by her stepdad, wondering about acccess to stepdad’s exotic-car-filled garage.

Broome (of TV’s “The Buccaneers”) carries himself like a convincing insolent rich lout.

And the car chases and brawls pass muster, even if the plot turns too-predictable-to-tolerate early on.

But the slick, shiny and cliche’d “romance” they’re trapped in is more “trash” than “pulp,” a story that’s so worn — the played-down “incest” labeling included — as to feel as if we’ve seen other versions of this on Netflix or Amazon Prime. Which we have, or could have sworn we have.

Rating: TV-MA, violence, sexual content

Cast: Asha Banks, Matthew Broome, Enva Lewis, Kerim Hassan, Sam Buchanan, Eve Macklin, Ray Fearon and Jason Flemyng.

Credits: Directed by Charlotte Foster and Dani Girdwood, scripted by Melissa Osborne, based on a novel by Mercedes Ron. An MGM release on Amazon Prime.

Running time: 2:01

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Review: Sexually-attracted StepSiblings in a Rich New Setting — “My Fault: London”

Movie Review: A Scatological Parable where Nothing is Wasted — “Okiku and the World (Sekai no Okiku)”

Attention to detail is one thing we typically celebrate in a cinematic period piece, a movie meant to transport us to a particular corner of the past. But when it comes to the Edo Period Japanese romance “Okiku and the World (Sekai no Okiku),” we acknowledge the limits of such celebrating.

This mostly black and white drama is “Seven Samurai” serious, right down to the scent. A tale of a samurai’s daughter’s attraction to a manure man, you can almost smell the excrement, recreated in diarrhetic detail, right down to the texture.

Writer-director Junji Sakamoto’s 19th century parable is about the real “circle of life” — eat, excrete, fertilize food to eat, repeat — and how that relates to people and class near the end of “feudal” Japan. Shoguns ruled through samurai, schools were run by Buddhist sects and in or outside of those classes, everybody was locked in a world of feces.

That’s what Yasuke (Sôsuke Ikematsu) traffics in. He is recognized by his “stink,” tolerated and accepted within his world, because everybody needs to hit the outhouse on a regular basis. The cesspool needs to be cleaned, and money changes hands — although not necessarily directly “hand to hand.” “Washing” those hands doesn’t go nearly far enough.

Feces, which one and all more bluntly label as “sh*t,” is a going concern (ahem) in an isolated culture lacking other sources of fertilizer. Yasuke buys and hauls, on foot and boat, human waste from temple toilets, tenement outhouses and samurai mansion sh*tters and delivers it for sale to farms on the outskirts of pre-Tokyo Edo.

One and all may look down on Yasuke. But when we meet him, he’s not having that from young Chuji (Kan’ichirô Satô), who collects and sells scrap paper for recycling. He can’t support himself on that, and Yasuke quickly talks him into becoming his new partner. Because his old partner’s sick.

Scooping, toting, storing and spreading human waste is a good way to get sick. A lot.

The two are at their most delicate when they’re stuck in the rain at an outhouse where teacher Okiku (Haru Karoki) takes shelter.

If she has to “go,” they’ll leave. Oh no no, it’s raining, she insists (in Japanese). She’s just taking shelter like you guys. Well, OK. Yes yes. I DO have to. Please PLEASE go.

The humor here never quite descends into the juvenile. But when “poop” is not just your business, but everybody’s business — “We’re SAMURAI! We eat better! Our sh*t is WORTH MORE!” — one and all can have their junior high school sense of humor moments about it.

Okiku is the daughter of an ostracized samurai and any attraction she feels for a kindly manure man will have to transcend more than mere scent.

But as the two dung dealers collect, store — “Just like miso paste, sh*t’s better if you let it age a little.” — and spread their wares, Okiku faces tragedy and the loss of her father (Kôichi Satô) and her voice. The lowly manure men are destined to play a bigger role in her life, if she’s fated to survive and carry on.

Writer-director Sakamoto pays homage to the films of Kurosawa, especially “Rashomon,” in his ode to excrement. Compositions, settings and even the opening scene in the rain intentionally bring that film to mind.

This world is grim, Medieval black and white — sparing us endless sights of crap in living color. But as tiny glimpses of hope and romance are woven in, scenes shift to color, the best way to appreciate Okiku, her pink kimono and her slim hopes for a better life.

Sakamoto needlessly and tediously breaks Okiku’s story into “chapters,” which do little to distract us from the main thrust of the film — waste, not wasting waste and finding the zen nobility in even the lowliest labor and most easily discarded lives.

The world Sakamoto brings back to life — tenements where the residents gripe about the landlord’s more private and thus less likely to overflow in the rain toilet, tale telling told to ease bowel movements, classist bullying met with laughter — and flinging feces — is as vivid as any saga of samurai, shoguns, ronin and clans.

Because at the end of the day, the basest of human needs is not just a great fertilizer. It’s the greatest equalizer.

Rating: unrated, scatological humor, profanity

Cast: Haru Karoki, Kan’ichirô Satô, Sôsuke Ikematsu and Kôichi Satô

Credits: Scripted and directed by Junji Sakamoto. A Film Movement+ release.

Running time: 1:30

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Review: A Scatological Parable where Nothing is Wasted — “Okiku and the World (Sekai no Okiku)”

Documentary Preview: Andy Kaufman, you think we “get” him yet? “Thank You Very Much”

March 25, a lot of folks who remember, puzzled over and were impressed by Andy K. weigh in.

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Documentary Preview: Andy Kaufman, you think we “get” him yet? “Thank You Very Much”

Classic Documentary Review: Essential Herzog, Werner and Klaus Kinski, “My Best Fiend” (1999)

In Billy Wilder’s “Sunset Boulevard,” the deluded, forgotten silent film star Norma Desmond lamented a lost and very different era in cinema — silent films.

“We didn’t need dialogue,” she bellows. “We had FACES!”

It’s a line that comes to mind when considering the quixotic, bug-eyed fury that was Klaus Kinski, a German actor with one of the most expressive faces of the sound film era.

Kinski appeared in some 130 films, and earned a measure of fame in just a few of them — a couple of tiny but memorable parts in the spaghetti Westerns of Sergio Leone, a searing, stand-out turn in a single scene in David Lean’s “Doctor Zhivago.”

But Kinski’s best showcase, he was certain, was as a monologist. Just him, a “role” and a spotlight — always ready for his closeup.

A World War II Wehrmacht veteran, his early post-war acting career established a pattern of firings from theater companies, but “success” doing one man shows. He toured as a largely unscripted, ranting Jesus in such shows in the early ’70s.

His acting career was well-established, if mostly German, by the late ’60s.

But the one filmmaker who truly indulged that need to be seen in camera-dominating closeups playing figures larger than life was the then-young German director Werner Herzog. They did five films together, with the first — “Aguirre, the Wrath of God” — making both men world famous in the mid-70s, formally launching Herzog’s half century career and re-launching Kinski as a star level international talent.

Legends grew up around their hate-love relationship, of violent tirades and threats with firearms, arranged murder and the like, with the actor embellishing this professional feud in his memoirs and Herzog allegedly helping Kinski come up with more “vile expletives” for Kinski to use in referring to Herzog in the book.

That’s helpful to remember in approaching Herzog’s mid-career summary documentary “My Best Fiend,” ostensibly about his relationship with his bug-eyed muse. It’s also an appreciation of Herzog’s epic undertakings with Kinski — movies shot in impossible locations with impossible tasks and impossible budgets, dangerous films where people got hurt and Kinski became one more obstacle to overcome to get “Aguirre,” “Nosferatu,” “Fitzcarraldo” and “Cobra Verde” made.

“Woyzek?” That Czech-filmed period piece, tucked into the end of production on “Nosferatu,” was a piece of cake compared to everything else they achieved together.

Herzog has long made documentaries, and became an Oscar-nominated/Directors Guild of America award winning doc maker after Kinski’s death in 1991. “My Best Fiend” was the world’s introduction to Werner as a top flight documentarian and narrator (in German here, with English subtitles) extraordinaire.

In the years since this film came out in 1999, more has been made of Kinski’s mental illness, his raging narcissism and megalomania. He’s been credibly accused of attempted sexual assault of a leading lady by one director he worked with and accused of molesting his oldest daughter in her memoirs, published years after his death.

Herzog refers to Kinski’s memoirs as “lies” in “My Best Fiend.” But in watching this film anew, I found it helpful to think of Herzog himself as an unreliable narrator. I’ve interviewed him several times over the years, and found him nothing but credible, every time out. But he is a “story teller,” after all. He helped Kinski come up with sorry names to call him on his book? A little self serving, even if it’s true.

There’s lots of on-set footage of Kinski flipping out, and the film begins with a long snippet of Kinski melting down, not wholly in character, in his “Jesus” touring show, before he and Herzog became a team. But Herzog, everybody’s favorite doomsaying German philosopher on film, comes off as more than a little disengenuous in this fond remembrance of his most important collaborator.

Herzog put huge crews and huge populations of Native extras at risk and under hardship making “Aguirre” and “Fitzcarraldo.” More than a few people got badly hurt, something emphasized by using lots of footage from one of the best “making of” documentaries ever, Les Blank’s “Burden of Dreams,” about Herzog filming and endangering himself and everybody else on “Fitzcarraldo.”

The shots of that river boat — NOT A MODEL — careening down a raging river in Amazonia, with a few camera folks and Herzog and crazy Kinski on board, are stunning to this day.

Herzog gives his version of the “getting my rifle” story from “Fitzcarraldo,” threatening his star with “eight bullet holes” before he could get away if Kinski followed-through on his latest threat to quit the film shoot. One bullet, Herzog intones, was saved for himself. Because if this movie — which had already lost original stars Jason Robards and Mick Jagger to sickness and the elements — was not finished, Werner would take his own life, too.

Or so he says. This Indian chief or that producer who offered to “kill” Kinski for him adds to the mythic lore of this relationship. And plans to “firebomb his house” when they got to Germany seem like a grand embellishment.

“We belonged together,” seems more to the point of their psychic connection. “We were ready to go down together.”

They were two crazy guys involved in all those high-degree-of-difficulty projects. And Herzog, the younger man, could call Kinski a bully and a coward once he was dead and gone. But footage on set shows him allowing his volatile star to berate “victims” on the crew without the director intervening.

You were going to fire bomb Kinski’s house? Sure you were, Werner.

Herzog has lived and worked and achieved enough to become cinematic royalty, a beloved figure as a character actor — more sinister than cuddly — lionized “Grizzly Man” documentarian and Grand Old Man of International Cinema, someone famous actors flock to the moment he calls. This documentary reminds us of what he went through to get there.

“My Best Fiend” thus builds two co-dependent legends, with Herzog revisiting their distant past, sharing a boarding house together (the one Herzog grew up in) and recalling the first time he was mesmerized by Kinski’s presence in a movie (sharing scenes with Maximillian Schell in 1955’s “Sons, Mothers and a General”). And Herzog’s tribute film sort of explains himself as he accepts his role in Kinski’s “all used up, spent” demise — at 65 — by refusing to work with him after their last collaboration, another agonizing jungle tale, “Cobra Verde” (1987).

The generous clip samples of their films together make “My Best Fiend” the best primer on prime Herzog, even if he has made Oscar-worthy documentaries and a decent thriller (“Rescue Dawn”) or two since, with new films in the works even today, twenty-five years removed from this revealing and riveting non-fiction film about his years spent managing a madman on the other side of the camera.

Rating: unrated

Cast: Werner Herzog, Klaus Kinski, Eva Mattes and Claudia Cardinale

Credits: Scripted and directed by Werner Herzog. An Anchor Bay release on Tubi, Amazon, other streamers.

Running time: 1:39

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Classic Documentary Review: Essential Herzog, Werner and Klaus Kinski, “My Best Fiend” (1999)