Movie Review: “One for the Money”

1starOn today’s edition of “Smart Women, Stupid Choices,” Katherine Heigl! She left a halfway decent medical soap opera for a string of of increasingly mediocre, decreasingly romantic “comedies” pairing her with increasingly bland leading men.

Continue reading →

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Review: “One for the Money”

Movie Review: “October Baby”

 ImageIt’s ironic that the studio founded by the son of Hollywood founding father Samuel Goldwyn should be the one releasing “October Baby.” Apparently, the acquisitions department never took to heart Goldwyn the elder’s most famous Goldwynism about what movies are supposed to do.

“Pictures were made to entertain. If you want to send a message, call Western Union.”

Continue reading →

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | 2 Comments

Movie Review: “The Green Lantern”

Well, “Green Lantern” isn’t “Jonah Hex” bad. But it’s silly enough to be part of the same “silliest Warner Brothers comic book summer movies of all time” conversation.

Continue reading →

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Review: “The Green Lantern”

Movie Review: “Moneyball”

“Moneyball” is a thinking person’s baseball movie, and a baseball fan’s thinking movie.

Sure, it’s based on the Michael Lewis book about Billy Beane, the ex-ballplayer turned Oakland A’s general manager who upended the game by rebuilding his team through cold-hearted statistical analysis called “sabermetrics.”  But “Moneyball” takes a dry story about numbers and no-name ballplayers and turns it into something funny, deep and illuminating.

And as Beane, Brad Pitt gives perhaps his smartest, subtlest performance ever. His Beane is a man at war with himself. He’s as superstitious as any baseball fan — he won’t watch his Oakland A’s play, even when a trip to the World Series is on the line. He may show a little of Brad Pitt’s swagger when he’s making a trade or imposing his will on the manager (Philip Seymour Hoffman) or the team. But in flashbacks, we see the Beane who once was a bonus baby, a promising prospect who spent years trying to break into the big leagues to make use of the prodigious talents all the scouts claimed he had. He knows, better than the crusty, contemptuous coots who are his team’s scouting corps that “confidence” is one thing all their hunches, gut feelings and stats-quoting can’t measure. And confidence just may be what’s holding Billy Beane back.

Stuck with a small-market club with a limited budget, a team that cannot hang onto its stars, this guy who “hates losing more than I love winning” tells his scouts, “You’re asking the wrong questions.” They grumble. They brush him off. They base decisions on a player’s look, how “ugly” his girlfriend is. And they’ve been doing it for decades.

But when Billy stumbles into a doughy young Yale economics grad named Peter (Jonah Hill) who has better questions, he’s ready to start a revolution. It’s not about batting average, it’s about getting on base. It’s not about defense, it’s about runs.

“We’ll find value in players that nobody else will see.”

I don’t know if director Bennett Miller (“Capote”) is much of a baseball fan, but this feels like a curious outsider’s view of the game and this “system” that exploded 100 years of accepted wisdom. And that’s a great thing. The movie dwells on few players (most were no-names, an “island of misfit toys” they’re called) but instead hangs with Beane as he and Peter struggle with rebellious scouts, a cheap owner, contemptuous peers, a defiant manager (Hoffman brings a glorious contained rage to Art Howe) and players — some of whom will have their hearts broken and their spirits crushed when they’re traded or sent to the minors.

“Just you and me, Pete. We’re all in.”

It’s a triumph of tone, and much of this spins off of Pitt, who plays a caring but absent dad, a distant boss who has to be ruthless and a thin-skinned ex-jock who is buried under a mountain of criticism when things go wrong. As they will.

I love the baseball stuff in this multi-writer script, but also the “Art of War” style maneuvering that Pitt’s Beane becomes known for, the pithy wisecracks that sum up how one plays the game — “When your enemy’s making mistakes, don’t interrupt him.”

Pitt makes this guy flawed, uncertain, temperamental and impulsive. His is a performance that makes this an inside baseball movie that even non-fans can understand and enjoy. And he plays this confidence-starved gambler with a verve that Oscar voters are almost sure to reward, sometime after the dust has settled on another baseball season.

 

MPAA Rating:PG-13 for some strong language.

Cast: Brad Pitt, Jonah Hill, Robin Wright, Philip Seymour Hoffman.

Credits: Directed by Bennett Miller, written by Steve Zaillian and Aaron Sorkin, based on the Michael Lewis book. A Columbia Pictures  release. Running time: 2:13.

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Review: “Moneyball”

Movie Review: “Mr. Popper’s Penguins”

 

“Mr. Popper’s Penguins” is precious, protracted and pleasant enough, if not exactly potty trained.

Continue reading →

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Review: “Mr. Popper’s Penguins”

Movie Review: Hyped “A Better Life” is just a pale imitation of “Bicycle Thieves”

2starsIn the early days of Italian neo-Realism, there was this little classic called “Bicycle Thieves,” a movie about a father struggling to support his adoring son in post-war Italy. When his bike is stolen, his ability to make a living is threatened. In desperation, the father does something that makes the kid see him in a new light. He steals a bike.

“A Better Life,” based on a story by the writer of “Enemies: A Love Story,” has pretenses of being the Mexican-American “Bicycle Thieves.” It’s about an illegal immigrant single dad struggling to raise a teenage son, hoping to provide a better life for him than the landscaping work he’s done since slipping across the border into the U.S. He buys a truck, that truck is stolen, and the son comes to see his father in a new light.

Continue reading →

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Review: Hyped “A Better Life” is just a pale imitation of “Bicycle Thieves”

The evolving vision of screen beauty now includes Gerwig, Emma Stone, Juno Temple and Zoe Kazan

You might have noticed her in “The Dark Knight Rises.” That’s Juno Temple, playing Catwoman’s confidante, second banana to the tall, dark and runway ready Anne Hathaway. It’s a small role in a very large studio summer blockbuster.

But you can’t miss Temple in “Killer Joe,” the ferocious and indie Southern Gothic drama in which she stars, playing a “Baby Doll” style sexual naif. Hollywood sees her one way — a supporting player. But Indiewood — the world of independent film — sees her as an object of desire, leading lady material.

“Hollywood does tend to see female beauty just one way,” Temple acknowledges. “If they need a high-cheekboned beauty, I’m probably not going to be cast.” She laughs. “If they’re OK with an English yam, I’m in.”

ImageIn major studio pictures such as “No Strings Attached,” indie “It” girl Greta Gerwig can be leading lady Natalie Portman’s pal. If Gerwig, who turns 29 Aug. 4, wants her shot at “driving the action” of her movies, she knows she’s got to go indie, as she did for “Lola Versus.”

“I did one ‘best friend,’ and that’s been it,” Gerwig says. “I may never have to play another. But we’ll see.”

There have always been commercial considerations that drive casting in movies, big and small. Big names and screen exemplars of beauty such as Cameron Diaz or Jennifer Aniston dip their toes in the indie-world, and that gets an indie filmmaker’s movie noticed. Independent filmmakers don’t often have that luxury of casting, which has long explained why unknowns get their big break in low budget films, why the words “indie” and “pixie” (Think Alison Pill, Kat Dennings, Zooey Deschanel) have been joined at the hip.

In a string of films, this summer has underlined the gap separating “Hollywood” screen beauty and independent film beauty. From “Lola Versus” to “Safety Not Guaranteed,” starring Aubrey Plaza, “Killer Joe” to “Ruby Sparks,” written by and starring Zoe Kazan, indie film’s idea of the cute young thing the audience and the leading man fall in love with has taken on its own model — still thin, but not supermodel thin — still pretty, but more cute and quirky than Vogue-cheekboned.

Zoe Kazan  “is such a gifted actress, but she doesn’t fit the type that Hollywood goes for,” director Valerie Faris (“Little Miss Sunshine,” “Ruby Sparks”) says. “She’s appealing and so smart. But Hollywood might not see that, but we do. Which is why we don’t make conventional Hollywood films with Hollywood-style leading ladies.”

ImageKazan, 28, is the granddaughter of famed filmmaker Elia Kazan. She says she doesn’t like thinking about where Hollywood might pigeonhole her — but looking at studio films from “It’s Complicated” to “Happythankyoumoreplease,” she’d have to notice that the Malin Akermans and Michelle Williams’ are getting the leads. She says she didn’t write “Ruby Sparks,” which has her playing a fictional character a lonesome novelist (Paul Dano) invents who then comes to life “as a vanity project, something for me to star in.” But like Gerwig and Jennifer Westfeldt (“Friends With Kids”), if it was ever going to happen, she knew she’d have to take a hand in it.

“The acting profession is this intense waiting game,” Kazan says. “I don’t like feeling helpless in my own life. Everyone wants to feel some sense of ‘agency’ in your own life. But it’s so much out of your hands. That will make you crazy.”

Kazan wrote a film that she and longtime boyfriend Paul Dano could co-star in and got the co-directors of “Little Miss Sunshine” on board. Gerwig has plans to direct a script she’s written, taking even more control of her screen persona and career path.

“If you’re more about acting than being famous, you really do need to take charge of what people see you in,” Kazan says. “I grew up admiring Ingrid Bergman and I really look up to Cate Blanchette. But I really love (character) actors like John Cazale and Thelma Ritter.”

ImageTemple, 23, the daughter of filmmaker Julien Temple (“Absolute Beginners”), is grateful to be trying to make her mark at this point in time, when definitions of screen beauty seem to be broadening.

“It’s important that young girls who might want to be actresses to see all different types of women, women of all different builds and physical calibers, having success,” Temple says. “Because it’s not just the tall, thin runway models who can do this.”

 

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on The evolving vision of screen beauty now includes Gerwig, Emma Stone, Juno Temple and Zoe Kazan

Cinemark stumbles by inviting families of those killed in Aurora to “Grand Re-opening”

On its surface, it seems innocuous, sympathetic. Then you think about it for, oh, a second or so.

Cinemark, a pretty well-run theater chain, operates the theater in Aurora, Colorado, where an over-armed nut killed a bunch of fans at a “Dark Knight Rises” screening last summer. They invited, over the holidays, the survivors of those killed to the theater, the last place they’d want to be on the first Christmas they spent without their loved ones.

The intention was OK, well, in a corporate sort of way. But people don’t like a company to suggest that business goes on while they’re still grieving. Bad move, Cinemark.

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Cinemark stumbles by inviting families of those killed in Aurora to “Grand Re-opening”

Movie Review: “Promised Land”

Image“Promised Land” is an engaging and entertaining — if preachy —  look at Big Energy and fracking – the land-and-water-wrecking practice of drilling and pumping water and chemicals into the ground to extract natural gas from shale.

To Steve Butler (Matt Damon), a “consultant” who came from farm country himself, farming and the small farm town lifestyle are “delusional self-mythology” believed by simple people living in the past. His “money for nothing” offer – underground leases – is “the only way [embattled, indebted small farm owners] have to get back.”

He’s just gotten the big promotion with Global Cross Power Solutions. But dropping into an Anytown, USA named McKinley with his partner, Sue (Frances McDormand) is a sobering come down. Renting an ancient Bronco II and buying flannel at Rob’s Guns, Groceries, Guitars & Gas won’t be enough this time. It may be a one-bar/one gas station town, but the locals are going to make him work for this.

Hal Holbrook is the high school science teacher who has Googled “fracking.” And as willfully uninformed as some of his shortsighted, let’s-cash-in neighbors might be, the teacher gets things called to a vote.  Bribes to the local board of supervisors won’t be enough.

To make matters worse, a slick “hippie environmentalist” (John Krasinski) shows up with posters of dead cows and poisoned farms. You almost start to feel sorry for the fracking folks as public opinion shifts.

Damon and Krasinski co-wrote the script, and they set up a fairly predictable war of wills – rivals trash-talking each other, both flirting with the cute age-appropriate schoolmarm (Rosemarie DeWitt). Who will win?

Image

But we already know that, don’t we? The movie is a stacked deck of cards. Back when they filmed the play “Other People’s Money,” the idea was to surprise the audience by making both the populist side and the Big Business side of an argument compelling, rational and reasonable. Not here.

McKinley – the movie was filmed near Pittsburgh – really is dying. We see desperation in the eyes of the first farmer (Tim Guinee of TV’s “Revolution”) we meet. Others, such as a rube played by Lucas Black, just envision dollar signs. But in either case, their way of living is going extinct. “Promised Land” pulls its punches in making that counter-argument.

Damon the Oscar-winning writer does something nobody else in Hollywood would – write a dumb character for Matt Damon to play. Steve is blindsided by the old science teacher, humiliated and silenced in a way no sharp salesman would be. He’s been working in this business for years and never let himself see or believe the consequences of his actions?

Krasinski has the “cute” role here, and he and Damon make well-matched rivals. McDormand’s Sue is the flinty, no-nonsense sell-out who refuses to learn what Steve is finding out. DeWitt’s performance is limited to flashing her pretty smile and biting her lip as she flirts. Director Gus Van Sant captures bucolic nature, lands the jokes and does well by the bar scenes – making a Krasinski vs McDormand karaoke contest work.

But more needs to be made of the “They still need the money,” debate. And we needed to see a lot more conflict within Damon’s character. You can’t play “dumb” and “morally compromised” when you can’t say “I’m a good guy” like you don’t quite believe it.

MPAA Rating: R for language

Cast: Matt Damon, Rosemarie DeWitt, Frances McDormand, John Krasinski, Hal Holbrook, Lucas Black

Credits: Directed by Gus Van Sant, written by John Krasinski and Matt Damon. A Focus Features release.

Running time: 1:46

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Review: “Promised Land”

Movie Review: “Albert Nobbs”

ImageGlenn Close is very still in her latest film — quiet, never cracking a smile. Playing a member of the staff of an upper crust Dublin hotel in the late 19th century, the idea was to be invisible. Think “Downton Abbey” or “The Remains of the Day.”

And since Albert Nobbs, the title character she plays, has a secret as obvious as “his” name, the need to be invisible is compounded, even more important than the husky voice she affects every time she opens her mouth.

Continue reading →

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | 2 Comments