Classic Film Review: Cleese shows us Classic Comedy can be “Clockwise” (1986)

A person hellbent on maintaining his dignity in the face of everything thrown at him to deny it, and failing, is the essence of comedy. So it was with Keaton, and so it is with Cleese.

Somebody said that once. Maybe it was John Cleese himself, that paragon of British reserve, keeping up appearances, keeping calm and carrying on, and convulsing in barely-controlled fury when the world conspires to be uncooperative.

A tall, lean, business-suited sight-gag, Our Lord J.C. was long the tentpole who held up the canvas over “Monty Python’s Flying Circus” and the very picture of British reserve-upended as Basil Fawlty, hotelier from hell. And Torquay.

His greatest film outing, “A Fish Called Wanda,” illustrated this, with Cleese writing himself a posh upper-class barrister, stuffily-married, but outed as a man willing to throw character, ethics, morality and British reserve out the window the moment vamp outlaw Jamie Lee Curtis shows him a little leg.

But 1986’s “Clockwise” shows Cleese as his peers saw him. The English playwright Michael Frayn, hot off the success of the grand farce “Noises Off,” tried his hand at screenwriting a role tailor-made for Britain’s premier funnyman, still basking in the glow of “Fawlty Towers” himself.

Brian Stimpson would be the quintessence of Cleese, an officious, class-conscious over-achiever who runs Thomas Tompion Comprehensive School with a Big Brotherly iron fist. His eyes peering through all-seeing binoculars, his every bark betraying that he knows each and every student by name, his every utterance announcing their shortcomings.

“Right,” he snaps at each and every miscreant who isn’t toeing his narrow line. “9:20!”

That’s their appointment for a visit to his office for a very firm chewing out — “EXECUTION!” Because Stimpson’s every move is a “correction” aimed at turning out successful students destined to show-up the posh “elites” sent to the far pricier Eton, Harrow and Westminster.

On the day we meet him, Stimpson will lead the school through another singing of “He Who Would Valiant Be,” and then hop a train to Norwich for a meeting of the elite Headmaster’s Association. Brian Stimpson of downmarket Thomas Tompion is the newly-elected chairman of that group of his betters.

He’s a clock-watcher, scheduled down to the minute. His wife (Alison Steadman, who’d go on to glory in Mike Leigh’s “Life is Sweet” and “Topsy-Turvy” and TV’s definitive “Pride and Prejudice”) shows up early, and that’ll never do.

His tendency to snap “RIGHT” at the beginning of every sentence is about to be his undoing. A clock-conscious martinet is about to experience an existential crisis, a trip to Norwich that becomes a long, sunny stumble into tortured, tested tardiness.

He goes “RIGHT” when the rail ticket collector keeps trying to tell him “left.” A train is missed, his wife is off to give little old ladies (including Ann Way and future Miss Marple Joan Hickson) from the nursing home a drive in the country.

It’s 1986, when the film scores were synthesized and there was no cell service or cell-enabled ride-shares. Brian Stimpson, who left the “this is a historic day” speech he’d been rehearsing to give to the headmasters on the wrong train, sprints and scrambles and eventually arm-twists a star pupil (Sharon Maiden) into driving him 163 miles to Norwich.

“Call your parents,” before they set off in her family car, he orders. She doesn’t. She calls her beau to break up with him, leaving one and all in the dark.

Her parents panic at the stolen car, then at the missing daughter. Her “beau” turns out to be the creeper school music teacher (Stephen Moore of the BBC’s “Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy”). Stimpson’s neglected wife spies him chatting up student Laura as he fills up her parents’ Morris 1100.

All sorts of scandalous misunderstandings, threats of real justice and rough justice and reprisal pile up as our “couple” make their heedless, hapless way to scenic Norwich.

Parents, his wife, cops and that groomer-teacher are all in hot pursuit. But none of them, and no fender-bender, stuck car, smart aleck farmer, monastery full of not-utterly-silent monks, no Porsche-driving posh who resents being carjacked, British busybodies or a college girlfriend (Penelope Wilton, later a star of “Downton Abbey”) can keep Brian Stimpson from his date with destiny.

Cleese is marvelously self-absorbed as Stimpson, taking care to never show us the raging Basil Fawlty of his most recent series as Stimpson faces every fresh challenge with a panicked “adapt to our circumstances” logic. Brian is simply dismayed at each new obstacle to achieving his simple goal — that meeting, his speech and the glory and meaning it will give to his hyper-focused life.

“It’s not the despair, Laura. I can stand the despair. It’s the hope” that breaks him.

What Frayn, Cleese and director Christopher Moraham conspire to give us is the promise of a Cleese spitting, bug-eyed rage, looking for laughs in denying us what we crave — a meltdown for the ages.

This 90 minute picture is never rushed, ticking over clockwork fashion, logically and amusingly leading us from one barrier to the next, paying off with that big “meeting” with his more privileged (all white “old boys” of the original “Old Boys’ Network) where everything and everyone will come to a very English (reserved) boil.

The finale doesn’t wholly come off. But this picture plays, and Cleese sparkles in one of the only genuine big screen showcases he ever starred in, a slow-boil farce from a master at writing them paying tribute to an actor tailor-made to star in them.

Rating: PG, innuendo

Cast: John Cleese, Alison Steadman, Penelope Wilton, Sharon Maiden, Stephen Moore, Joan Hickson, Peter Cellier, Ann Way and Geoffrey Palmer

Credits: Directed by Christopher Morahan scripted by Michael Frayn. A Thorn EMI/Universal release on Freevee, Vizio, Mubi, Youtube, Amazon etc.

Running time: 1:36

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Classic Film Review: Cleese shows us Classic Comedy can be “Clockwise” (1986)

Netflixable? Black Women serve in WWII — “The Six Triple Eight”

The only all-Black Women’s Army Corps united to serve in World War II n Europe is fondly remembered in Tyler Perry’s “The Six Triple Eight,” a polished, sentimental and old fashioned picture that points out to the culture at large an important piece of African American history.

World War II was a turning point in American civil rights, as Black troops and Black pilots were reluctantly celebrated in a country slowly coming to grips with the idea of “equal rights.”

Black women making the mail run to and from the combat zones played their part. And if that seems lower stakes than the myriad other Black contributions to the war effort, Perry’s film tries to remedy that. It’s not wholly successful.

Ebony Obsidian (“If Beale Street Could Talk”) stars as Lena, a Philadelphia high school teen courted by a Jewish boy (Gregg Sulkin) as he’s about to enter the Army Air Corps. When he’s killed in 1943, she resolves to finish high school and sign up for the WACs.

That’s where she meets Black women from all over America anxious to serve. Shanine Shantay, Pepi Sonuga, Sarah Jeffery, Jeanté Godlock and Moriah Brown play Lena’s comrades in arms, put through their basic training paces by Lt. Campbell (Milauna Jackson) and the 3888 Batallion’s commanding officer, the accomplished and driven Captain Charity Adams.

She’s the one determined to prove her more cynical volunteers’ fears wrong, that “They ain’t gonna let no Negro women NEAR Europe, much less Hitler.”

Captain Adams (Kerry Washington) clasps her hands behind her back and reminds them “We have the most to prove” as she warns the recruits about all the racists, in and out of the Army, who “do not want us to succeed.”

They can’t even get themselves assigned anywhere after completing basic training in Georgia.

But the movie’s opening scene has hinted at a logistics problem the war effort has failed to master. A pilot is killed, strafing a battlefield. A GI who finds him takes a bloodstained letter out of his jacket. All sorts of mail, to and from the front, is not making it to the troops fighting or the folks back home anxious to hear from them.

That’s a crippling “morale” problem that comes to the attention of first lady Eleanor Roosevelt (Susan Sarandon), and to Mary McLeod Bethune (Oprah Winfrey) a member of President Roosevelt’s “Black Cabinet,” the civil rights advisors who bargained for racial equality through participation in the conflict.

That’s where the Six Triple Eight will make its mark, straightening out the mess with the mail under the thumb of racist white officers bent on ensuring their fail and a white general (Dean Norris) determined to let the world know when they do.

The script strains to make this part of the war effort’s importance known and felt. The film’s resemblance to “Hidden Figures” is most obvious in the ingenious ways the WACs reason out where assorted units are on the fluid front lines.

But “The Six Triple Eight” stumbles as the characters are often stock “types” — the sassy one, the preacher’s daughter, etc. Liberties are taken with the timeline of events and Perry’s inattention to the militaria of it all bites him in the bum time and again.

The opening combat scene is clumsily conceived and staged, and the narrative bungles events in the action, which is mainly confined to the last months or even days of the war. Lena’s Jewish pilot is shown shot down in a P-51 Mustang many months before they were in service. The cockpit instrument panel shown is plainly for a more more modern (swept wing jet) aircraft. A V-1 “buzz” bomb air raid is inaccurately timed, and myriad other events are packed into the mere days between President Roosevelt’s death and the war’s end in Europe.

Washington is good in a role that asks for little more than stern stand-offs and speechifying, Obsidian has a moment or two and Shantay (of TV’s “Perfect Harmony”) stands-out as the mouthiest, most short-tempered member of the battalion, whose commanding general refers to as a “company,” at one point. A war zone love story is treated as an afterthought.

“The Six Triple Eight” illuminates the barriers these women faced, confronted by outright racism on occasion and reduced expectations at every turn. Perry’s sympathetic treatment of this history — stay through the credits — is laudable, and no one can ever say he can’t turn out slick to the point of immaculate melodramas. These ladies are so smartly made-up and prepped for their closeups that it calls to attention how tidy and sterile this cinematic war is. It barely looks lived-in, much less fought.

The best scenes are a parade march through bombed Glasgow, and an elaborately staged USO dance, a blast of jitterbugging that would best anything filmed in the musicals of the World War II era.

But Perry’s growth as a filmmaker peaked with his adaptation of the celebrated play “For Color Girls” back in 2010. Here, he’s blessed with material just as dramatic and important, and you’d swear from the evidence that he’s never seen a WWII movie, much less gotten his co-writer to cross his T’s and dot his I’s researching it to get the details right.

Rating: PG-13, violence, profanity

Cast: Kerry Washington, Ebony Obsidian, Shanice Shantay, Milauna Jackson, Kylie Jefferson, Susan Sarandon, Sam Waterston, Dean Norris and Oprah Winfrey

Credits: Directed by Tyler Perry, scripted by Kevin Hymel and Tyler Perry. A Netflix release.

Running time: 2″07

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Netflixable? Black Women serve in WWII — “The Six Triple Eight”

Netflixable? Investigator meets a Murder Suspect and imagines herself “In Her Place (El lugar de la otra)”

The lone woman on a team investigating an instantly-notorious and very public murder finds herself understanding and even envying the murderess in “In Her Place,” a thriller with a message about the lot of women in 1950s South America, and the world.

Chile’s submission for the Best International Feature Oscar is based on a true story about a shooting in a swank hotel where Chile’s aristocracy gathered, a case that made headlines as a novelist faced prison for killing her lover, seemingly mimicking a more famous crime years before.

Elisa Zulueta plays Mercedes, a secretary to the judge (Marcial Tagle) charged with investigating this case and passing judgement. Mercedes is a wife and mother and the engine that makes that judge’s office run, a smart cookie in a patriarchal time in a very sexist culture.

Every man who calls her “Mechita” and “Mecha,” from her piggishly traditional husband (Pablo Macaya) to Judge Veloso is diminishing her and her status with a mere nickname. She must wait for the judge to leave his “club” before giving him his messages. “No women or salemen allowed.”

She keeps their cluttered, down-market apartment together and finishes each day by doing all the cooking while her failing portrait photographer spouse can’t be bothered to lift a finger, and her older teenage sons couldn’t imagine themselves pitching in.

The son who refers to her as “judge,” as if recognizing her career talents and importance, aspires to go to law school, become a lawyer and then a judge. But even he laughs when his sibling cackles “Mom could be your secretary (in Spanish, or dubbed into English).”

Something about this “crime of passion” that the judge seems inclined to minimize gets under Mercedes’ skin. She knows her boss has a “type,” rich, pretty women who do little time for their crimes. But she sees this case resembling one from years before.

She’s seen the suspect, Maria Carolina Geel (Francisca Lewin), her face covered in blood, led out of Santiago’s Hotel Crillón. She’s taken notes on every interrogation the judge conducts about the case, learning why that face was so bloody that the press has taken to nicknaming her “The Vampire.”

And whatever the judge and his aide Domingo (Gabriel Urzúa) think, whatever counter-arguments the persistent defense attorney (Pablo Schwarz) makes, in or out of the judge’s chambers, Mercedes sees clues that point to the “art” of it all.

Geel insists on going by her pen name and not her legal one, which might point to a dissassociative personality disorder that the male doctors who conduct her psychological evaluation could flag in her defense. The various witnesses, relatives and friends of the deceased paint a dark portrait.

The suspect treats the one other woman in all this, Mercedes, as a natural ally, but not one of the same class with the same privileges. Mercedes is the one sent to fetch Geel clothes and toiletries, to be delivered to her cushy incarceration in a convent. And in the suspect’s posh apartment, Mercedes tries on her lipstick, dabs on her perfume, and allows herself to sample this life of wealth, quiet contemplation and art.

Two-time Oscar-nominee (for best documentary) director Maite Alberdi immerses us in this world and underscores the sexism of that era, and even the patronizing benefits of it. No mere woman accused of such a “crime of passion” could possibly face the severest penalties. Especially a member of the elite.

Zulueta’s performance is a subtle transformation, from a functionary taken for granted by literally every man in her life to someone more made-up, better-dressed and more confident in the world thanks to her access to all the trappings in Geel’s apartment and the comfort of her life.

We feel little pity for the husband who apparerntly isn’t even as good a photographer as Mercedes. He’s using her inherited cameras to take these bridal photos, and can’t get the exposure time or the lighting right without her gentle manipulations.

Her “manipulations” of the judge are just as overt.

But much in this drama is left unsaid, so it’s up to Zulueta (“El fantasma”) to let us see what she’s feeling and thinking with just her eyes. She does.

It’s a terrific piece of work, and she and Alberdi and fellow screenwriters Inés Bortagaray and Paloma Salas have created in Mercedes a grand fictional conceit. This is a woman in man’s world who “gets it” and through her, we see this case as the prism it was, breaking down Chilean and Latin American society and sexism and illuminating a whole gender being ignored, past the moment a heinous crime was committed and into the “justice” that might be delivered by the men who ran that world, or thought they did.

Rating: PG-13, violence

Cast: Elisa Zulueta, Francisca Lewin, Marcial Tagle and Pablo Macaya

Credits:Directed by Maite Alberdi, scripted by Inés Bortagaray, Paloma Salas and Maite Alberdi, based on a book by Alia Trabucco Zerán. A Netflix Release.

Running time: 1:30

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Netflixable? Investigator meets a Murder Suspect and imagines herself “In Her Place (El lugar de la otra)”

Classic Film Review: Cary Grant Saunters into the Sunset, in his boxers — “Walk Don’t Run” (1966)

There’s an inspired silliness to the Technicolor bon bon “Walk Don’t Run,” the final film in Cary Grant’s legendary Hollywood career.

Surely a mere screenwriter — TV veteran (“Bewitched”) Sol Saks in this case — can’t have been the one to dream up tis all by his lonesome. The mere logistics of the picture hint that somebody or somebodies a lot higher up at Columbia Pictures had to be involved even before the pitch. There’s a bit of a “brain trust” feel to it.

Studios were remaking intellectual properties that they own the rights long before the phrase “intellectual property” was born. Columbia Pictures filmed and released the 1943 classic “The More the Merrier,” a rom-com where two-guys-and-a-woman are thrown together in a WWII housing shortage, with the older man matchmaking for the younger two. IThat story was always ripe for remaking.

But doing it in the more overtly sexy 1960s, setting it during the housing crunch at the 1964 Tokyo Olympics? Shooting sequences during those Olympics? Folding in the silliest track and field event of the games, the butt-twitching 50 km Race Walk?

Mocking British prudery, American provincialism, Soviet paranoia, apologetic Japanese manners and the cute culture shock of modern Westerners exposed to modern Japan, and ancient Japanese customs, mores and cuisine was merely a collection of clever finishing touches.

And trotting out Grant one last time, not destined to “get the girl,” but fit and over 60 and showing off comic timing polished during the Golden Age of Screwball Comedies is the cherry on top of it all. That was just the right level of “cute” and “quaint” this featherweight comedy needed. A very funny man lifts an amusing conceit into something that actually plays.

Grant is Sir William Rutland, an impatient industrialist who shows up at his regular Tokyo hotel, but not at the reserved time.

“Two days early” one clerk, then another and then a manager apologize, each bowing as they do. “OLYMPIC, you know,” they repeat, one after the other after the other. “Very sorry!”

Pinched for a place to stay, Rutland hits up the British embassy, gets the brush-off from a functionary with the too-too-British name Julius D. Haversack (John Standing), but then he finds an offer the share an apartment on the embassy’s bulletin board.

Next thing we know, he’s chauffered to this tiny upstairs flat with several tiny rooms and opaque paper walls. Next thing she knows, our young room-renter (Samantha Eggar, fun) is utterly buffaloed into letting him rent and stay there. With her.

One running gag begins. She simply can’t have this. Well, she needs the cash. So long as they leave “seperately.” So long as they have an understanding.

“You’re married?” she’s shocked/relieved to learn.

“Why not? I’m old enough!”

A second running gag, he drops this detail on his wife, by long-distance, and repeats it to business folk that he meets about this arrangement with “a young lady…a very attractive young lady.”

Everybody asks, “Relative?” As if Cary Grant didn’t have a shot.

Jim Hutton plays a long, lanky architect who has qualified for the Olympics in a sport he dares not mention by name. He, too, showed up early. He, too, has no place to stay.

Rutland makes the mistake of taking an interest in him — “You remind me of myself a few years ago. Well, quite a few years ago.”

We’re treated to the spectacle of the younger man buffaloing the older one into letting him share his “half” of the already crowded flat.

Christine may be engaged, to a stuffy fellow Brit — guess who? But all the brusque Yank and too-proper Brit need to make their love connection is Cary Cupid.

Grant is a delight all the way through this — scrambling up a (soundstage) gutter to get back into the apartment after he’s locked out, turning up unshaven, befuddled and annoyed, even stripping to his boxers and T-shirt to join in the Olympic 50 km Race-Walk to try and finish the (matchmaking) job in the film’s most famous scene.

One-liners are repeated as characters switch places, Hutton’s Steve Davis cracking “You remind me of myself a few years from now,” Grant’s Rutland turning Christine’s “I don’t think I LIKE tricky people” on Steve when the roles are reversed.

The picture’s a bit slow by modern standards. All this stuff about “bathroom scheduling” bogs down the opening act, and there’s a little too much of Rutland’s ongoing effort to distract Christine’s fiance so that Steve can make time with her.

But cute scene follows cute scene, many of them throwing “foreigners” into what had to seem exotic to audiences not that far removed from World War II — a bustling, modern Japan, a taste of Japanese dining out here, a visit to a public bathhouse there.

A WWII joke lands, the Russian Olympic Team’s easily fooled KGB man (Ben Astar) doesn’t. George Takei plays a Tokyo policeman trying to get to the bottom of Russian suspicions.

By this stage of his career, Grant had legions of comic impressionists joking about his suave accent, exaggerated phrasing and always-worth-a-laugh TIME-ing. He doesn’t make every line funny, but he gives it the Old Hollywood try. And that’s enough, in this case.

Director Charles Walters also helmed “The Unsinkable Molly Brown.” He didn’t take the right lessons from his best comedy, “Lili” (1953). It’s a half hour shorter than these later efforts, and pace is paramount in comedy, even when the comedy’s Columbia’s intellectual property.

Rating: TV-PG, innuendo

Cast: Cary Grant, Samantha Eggar, Jim Hutton, and George Takei.

Credits: Directed by Charles Walters, scripted by Sol Saks, loosely based on the script to “The More the Merrier,” by Frank Ross and Robert Russell. A Columbia Pictures release on Tubi.

Running time: 1:53

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Classic Film Review: Cary Grant Saunters into the Sunset, in his boxers — “Walk Don’t Run” (1966)

Netflixable? Life’s Losers hit the Big-time at “Hotel Bitcoin” — they think

“Hotel Bitcoin” is a screwy Spanish variation on the well-worn “We’ve got the winning lottery ticket” formula. Broke people — the more careless and impulsive the better — find themselves theoretically flush, for once. The “fun” is in seeing how wrong they are and how badly they handle this.

The laughs here come from the usual places — clumsy, chatterbox dummies who can’t hide “We’re RICH!” as they evade family, mobsters and opportunists. But this time the payoff is in crypto currency.

We laugh at the many “How could they BE that stupid?” indiscretions and stumbles, or rather we’re meant to. We ignore the patchwork plotting and cardboard character “types” and giggle away at the reckoning we figure is coming for our four heroes, lifelong pals who have passed themselves off as “The Fantastic Four” since long before Marvel’s many attempts to turn that comic book into a movie.

It doesn’t work, but yes, those involved in comedy have hit on a great hook.

Alejo (Alejo Sauras) narrates this saga about the lifelong friends who have followed him off other financial cliffs before. Burly Tano (Pablo Chiapella) is “the tough one,” Pascual (Mauricio Ochmann) is the guy born in Mexico, still trying to just “fit in” all these years later. They’re all single.

Lucas (Canco Rodríguez)? He’s got a wife (Leonor Lavada) and two kids, so naturally he’s the “henpecked” one in their foursome.

Alejo is in deep with a rich mobster/loan shark, so deep he’s got to flee the country. But when Pascual pops open an old laptop left over from a previous failed business venture, he finds a stranger loaded all this Bitcoin on it years ago. And now it’s worth over 100 million Euros.

OK. Sure.

Alejo, “thinking” fast, insists they grab the laptop and dash off to the nearest high-end hotel, a five-star place in Mirasierra, one of Madrid’s toniest districts. They’ll get by for the weekend on the few Euros they have in their pockets, and on the biggest limit credit card among them until Monday, when they’ll track down a broker who can turn their Bitcoin into real cash and make them all rich.

What could go wrong? Who will screw up first? Whose unwanted attention will these loud louts grab?

The problems pile up like bodies in the bathtub, or out-of-their-league babes who get their attention in the nightclub. Could they be sex workers? Even Mar (Marta Hazas), the one who says she “knows” Alejo?

Is that cocaine? What’s the dumbest way a screenwriter ever introduced a pistol into a narrative? A nosy bellhop (Antonio Gómez), a wedding they might crash, a poetry convention as cover and a too-curious, permanently-depressed former classmate (Sergio Bezos) figure in all this.

They’re mostly blown opportunities in a comedy that never gets up a head of steam.

There’s almost a laugh in how the script, by co-directors Manuel Sanabria and Carlos Villaverde, with screenwriter Ángela Obón, evades “explaining” crypto to the four dopes who stumble into it and, by extension, to the audience. There’s a good documentary about it, and of course the steady stream of scandals, schemes, fortunes lost, etc. in the news is out there for anybody who wonders where the next Great Depression will begin.

Yeah, crypto bros bet BIG on the con artist in chief.

The “Oh no they DIDN’Ts” are in so many scenes that it’s a pity they’re rarely worth a giggle. The dimwittedness undercuts any credibility in the “cunning” the quartet is meant to suddenly acquire later on.

The few possibly-funny characters don’t have enough to work with, the violence is treated like a glib (and blood and brains-spilling) afterthought.

All of which underscores the sad truth about “Hotel Bitcoin.” The comic possibilities are here. They’re almost never allowed to pay off.

Rating: TV-MA, violence, drug abuse, sexual situations.

Cast: Alejo Sauras, Pablo Chiapella, Marta Hazas, Canco Rodríguez, Leonor Lavado,
Mauricio Ochmann, Sergio Bezos and Antonio Gómez

Credits: Directed by Manuel Sanabria and Carlos Villaverde, scripted by Manuel Sanabria, Carlos Villaverde and Ángela Obón. A Netflix release.

Running time: 1:40

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Netflixable? Life’s Losers hit the Big-time at “Hotel Bitcoin” — they think

Movie Review: A French prison break that involves “Hunting with Tigers (Tigres et Hyenes)”

“Hunting with Tigers” is a heist picture with two heists — one involving cars and motorcycles, the other a boat. The second heist is a prison break from a heavily-guarded courthouse.

The script checks-off the requisite boxes of the genre — “assembling the team,” “casing the joint,” procuring the vehicles and puzzling over possible double-crosses as “the kid” trains with firearms.

“If you keep up the Dalai Lama act, we’ll never get anywhere!”

Our anti-hero is troubled by flashbacks to the afternoon his life was saved as the man he owes a debt to mowed down mobsters to do that saving.

And “Tigers” is French, so we expect the action beats to pop, the editing and the acting to pull us into the plot and the sizzling chases and whatnot.

But it’s a bust. The build-up is desultory, the payoff laughably French. There’s nothing funnier than a shoot-out involving hundreds of rounds punctuated by a screenwritten cop shouting “Don’t shoot, they’re unarmed!” (in French, or dubbed) when the murderous villains run out of bullets and options.

The occasional flashy shot or trunk-lid cam race through Paris doesn’t make this thriller make more sense or even engage the viewer.

The handsome Waël Sersoub (“MILF”) stars as Malik, who dashes home from Spain in his BMW convertible to be by his mother’s side for his stepfather’s trial. Serge (Vincent Perez) was in a gang that attempted a heist that went wrong and turned deadly. Malik, we learn, is also working the illegal side of the tracks.

A more famous armed robber, Chérif (Omar Salim) is implicated in Serge’s plot. But his lawyer insists he’s being railroaded. That lawyer (Géraldine Nakache) summons Malik to her office witn an offer and a taunt.

He can “help” his stepdad by delivering a message, in Spain, to another gangster. That made man might be able to bust Serge and Chérif out. If Malik had his dad’s bravery and genes, she implies, he’d do it.

Besides, she knows what’s in those flashbacks Malik is having. He was a kid, got into a deadly jam and Serge got him out of it.

Malik meets Avi (Sofiane Zermani), who owes Chérif, and Avi adds older hardcase Ange (Olivier Martinez, whose credits go back to “The Horseman on the Roof” and “Unfaithful”) and reformed-crook turned sofa-salesman Azzedine (Samir Guesmi) to their gang.

Because Malik is now a lot more than an errand boy.

Their “payment” and financing for this will come after they pull off the robbery of an armed convoy delivering a mountain of kickback-cash to a soccer star’s agent. Once they do that, it’s on to court, where the trial of the several suspects is underway.

The first gambit makes (a little) more sense and has more action to it — hiding within an upscale Arab wedding party car convoy, then shutting down a busy tunnel. The second seems somewhat suicidal, only because it is. We can tell that even the screenwriters throw up their hands and shout “WhatEVER, they GET AWAY!” at several points.

There’s nobody to truly empathize with and fear for, as Malik is too passive to care about and other characters are even more thinly drawn. Still, he’s pretty enough to have a gorgeous girlfriend (Cassandra Cano) willing to stick with him through thick and thin. And maybe a cut of the cash.

French thrillers are generally closer to the cutting edge than whatever comes out of Hollywood. The coolest stuff we see in heist pictures from major American studios is often cadged from a recent French film, or directed by a Hollywood-hired French director.

Director and co-writer Jérémie Guez shows more flashes of competence than inspiration here. His film is slow and clunky, beginning with promise, ending with the last of a string of third act let-downs. Hollywood may wait a bit before luring him West, because he’s got to show us more than this.

Rating: TV-16, violence

Cast: Waël Sersoub, Géraldine Nakache, Sofiane Zermani, Samir Guesmi,Vincent Perez, Omar Salim, Cassandra Cano and Olivier Martinez

Credits: Directed by Jérémie Guez, scripted by
Jérémie Guez and Louis Lagayette. An MGM release on Amazon Prime.

Running time: 1:49

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Movie Review: A French prison break that involves “Hunting with Tigers (Tigres et Hyenes)”

Classic Film Review: Chaplin’s ode to a Dying Corner of Comedy — “Limelight”

Memory is a merciful thing when it comes movies. We remember the grand moments in films, the signature bits, and much of what’s less moving, entertaining or important just drifts away.

Charlie Chaplin had become Charles Chaplin long before “Limelight,” a grand old man (he was over 60) of silent and sound comedy, of vaudeville before that and of the English music halls which gave him his start and first taste of fame that was to grow until his was the most recognizable face and mustache in the world.

But he’d followed his father, a somewhat famous British singer and mimic, into those music halls. And he’d seen what changing tastes, declining status and obscurity did to show people. Crushed pride was the least of it, and alchoholism was often a consequence.

“Limelight” is a somber, sentimental and seriously old-fashioned melodrama, a lumbering, under-edited meander through the English music hall life of the early 20th century, when cinema first showed up to announce its eventual death.

But what we remember about it is the magic of the two greatest silent film comedians, Chaplin and Buster Keaton, sharing a few scenes late in the film, recreating a little of the earlier slapstick and mimed magic from their days treading the boards, living out of a trunk before the movies and Hollywood lured them West.

Chaplin’s movie is a literal relic, a far less edgy, dynamic and cinematic experience than “The Entertainer,” a blast of the new “kitchen sink realism” that scorched some of the same ground less than a decade later, and more sentimental and far less amusing than “Stan & Ollie,” the most recent film to reach back into that world.

The camera is anchored and static, with pristine, lifeless Hollywood backlots doubling for London streets, and mostly spare sets (and painted backdrops) for scenes often allowed to play out in a single long take.

That was a remarkable trait of Chaplin’s silent classics, as we see the clockwork comedy of a genius of the pratfall and near-pratfall dodge blows, gigantic machinery and automobiles and show off just how completely he’d mastered roller skates. But editing is what animates cinema, and “Limelight” only allows it when the star needed another take on that last bit, or decided a close-up is necessary.

He’d mercifully turn away from the hokey suicidal-dancer-who-won’t-dance plot to deliver entire music hall routines, corny songs, understated dances and dated monologues that preserve the institution he was celebrating — in amber.

But as the melodrama progresses and ballet-with-slapstick moves center stage, as the faded “star” Calvero’s “comeback” begins, “Limelight” livens up. By the time Keaton shows up we get why this picture, which earned plenty of indifferent reviews upon release, has come to be celebrated as Chaplin’s last “great” (almost) movie.

Calvero used to be a top-of-the-marquee “tramp act” in the music halls. We meet him drunk, having whiled away a night in his cups with his fellow unemployed old timers in 1914 London.

He smells gas upon finally making his way past the lock on his apartment house’s front door. And after elaborately checking his shoes to ensure he hasn’t stepped in something, spies a downstairs flat with towels stuffed under the door.

The gamine (Claire Bloom) has tried to kill herself — drinking poison, turning on the gas. Calvero rescues her, fetches a doctor and even talks the unsympathetic landlady (Marjorie Bennett) into letting her stay with him to recuperate, something the doctor ordered.

Thereza or “Terry” is broke, a dancer who can’t dance thanks to a bout of rheumatic fever. The doctor sets Calvero straight. She probably didn’t have rheumatic fever. This “can’t use my legs” thing is all in her head.

“Are you in pain?” Calvero asks. If not, “the rest is fantasy.”

It’s hopeless, she insists.

“Then live without hope. Live for the moment. There are still…wonderful moments!

He dreams of a stage collaboration between them, but once awake he has accept the honesty in her “No one would ever think you’re a comedian.” He’s not funny, not while sober, anyway.

His agent (Barry Bernard) insists his name is “poison” to theater bookers. But as Calvero reaches his low ebb, at least he’s encouraged Terry to begin anew. She joins a dance company, and her director (Hitchcock favorite Norman Lloyd) and the producer (Nigel Bruce, Watson to Basil Rathbone’s Sherlock Holmes) have a ballet in mind, a “harlequinade,” that requires clowns.

Maybe Terry knows someone? And if she freezes up before dancing onto the stage, he’ll be right there to slap her back into reality. (Ouch)

Chaplin’s direction seemed more and more old-fashioned and lackluster the longer he directed and the more the cinema “grew up” and grew more visually sophisticated around him. The best images are in his real-time treatment of the ballet, as he uses crane shots to show the silent, efficient bustle of scene-changes in a theater.

Chaplin won his only competitive Oscar as a very old man, as “Limelight” wasn’t properly released in the U.S. under Academy rules, and the Best Original Score Academy Award (1973) came to the film after its “official” L.A. release in 1972. “Terry’s Theme,” also known as “Eternally,” is one of the most recognizable melodies in screen score history.

His acting was always presentational, closer to mime than “Method.” But the performances surrounding him here are pretty good, with Bruce, Lloyd and other veterans in top form and relative-newcomer Bloom holding her own and Chaplin’s son Sydney Chaplin not bad as the composer/love-interest who might turn Terry’s head away from the elderly savior she’s “fallen in love” with (Um, ok).

The real magic here is where it always was, putting two legendary troupers together in a dressing room, on a music hall stage, performing shtick (not exactly hilarious). They remind us of the nerve and craft that it takes to do it and that while tastes in comedy change, old tramp comics never die. Not while there’s a film camera around to catch them at their peak.

Rating: “approved” (G)

Cast: Charles Chaplin, Claire Bloom, Nigel Bruce, Sydney Chaplin, Norman Lloyd and Buster Keaton

Credits: Scripted and directed by Charles Chaplin. A United Artists release on Tubi and other streamers.

Running time: 2:17

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Classic Film Review: Chaplin’s ode to a Dying Corner of Comedy — “Limelight”

Movie Review: When the End Comes, Survivalists rally around “Homestead”

By turns paranoid and pollyanna-ish, “Homestead” is a conservative Christian survivalist wish fulfillment fantasy about living through “The End.”

The studio that brought us the controversial “Sound of Freedom” serves up an almost bipolar picture packed with MAGA virtue signaling — gun fetishizing, “authority” defying, law-ignoring, a might-makes-right mindset fueled by Black Rifle Coffee, the unofficial brew of Jan. 6.

This theatrical-release pilot to an Angel Studios series covers the same ground that many a post-apocalyptic thriller before it does, leaning more into a “Trigger Effect” and “The Day After” debacle than anything brought on by zombies.

But I was reminded of “The Walking Dead” in the drab, soap operatic way this extraordinary situation — a “bomb” that exploded off California — leads to a normalizing of societal breakdown and bunker mentality. Just hole up in a compound with family and ex-military folks and the rich oligarch who “hired” them until the dust clears, FEMA shows up or, wettest wingnut dream of all, civilization has to be rebuilt along their ways of thinking and on their blood-lines.

No, it’s not helpful that this wingnut agitprop comes out mere weeks after the non-fiction thriller “The Order,” where an earlier generation of cultish “preppers” tried to trigger the sort of social collapse that “Homestead” whitewashes.

The Christian messaging that Angel Studios is famous for is almost an afterthought — a furtive blurt of prayer as a mother (Susan Misner) and her kids fleeing the West Coast abandon their car and steal a van at a mobbed gas station, “Why did we buy a Tesla?”

When the message becomes more overt later in the film — Christian compassion, “loaves and fishes” for the hungry, “Are we building an ark or a fortress?” By that time it’s as if the screenplay is trying to paint a TV preacher’s optimistic grin on the grimness that “preppers” figure they alone deserve to survive. As if anybody could “prep” their way out of this.

The Big Bang explodes off of Los Angeles, sending assorted families fleeing East, towards this “Homestead” mansion/compound in the heart of The Rockies. Billionaire (we assume) Ian Ross, played by veteran movie heavy Neal McDonough, bought and built and stocked it. There are vineyards and orchards and a garden and a granery.

Part of Ian’s prep was to hire a cadre of combat vets who convoy in via SUVs and military-decorated pick-ups. Bailey Chase hit the gym and grew the requisite stubble to play Jeff Erickson, tactically-trained leader and “realist.” Jeff’s brusque to the point of bullying, a guy who sees their weaknessness and envisons a stronghold that their arsenal and training others there, including his almost-rebellious son (Tyler Lofton), can defend.

Ian’s compassionate conservative wife (Dawn Oliveri) figures they can feed the starving masses outside their razor wire fences. Jeff’s combat-zone veteran wife (Army logistics?), Tara (Kearran Giovanni) is a pragmatist and a problem solver.

Not that Ian hasn’t thought of “everything.” Even his ecologically-minded daughter Claire (Olivia Sanabia) is wholly on board. They’re raising peaches for peach wine, as in olden times that was the safest, surest path to “preserving calories” — turn your harvest into alcoholic drinks.

But as matters quickly settle into an uneasy routine — hunkering down, keeping the gates closed and identifying possible threats (local authority) and rumors of FEMA salvation — “Homestead” grinds pretty much to a halt.

Screenwriters Jason Ross, Joseph Snyder, Leah Bateman and Philip Abraham don’t such much “build” this universe as “cast” this “ark.” They fall straight into the fallacy of men and women with “particular skills,” geared-up soldiers who are in less danger and are inherently less interesting in this scenario than ordinary souls hurled into chaos.

The Baumgartner clan (Jarret LeMaster and Ivey Lloyd Mitchell play the parents, Summer Sadie Mitchell is their teen daughter) are hurled into this nightmare under-“prepped,” “camping” at home, going on the run towards Homestead, connected by charity work they did with the Rosses at some point in the past.

That sort of story, fleeing and surviving on the run, has been covered in scores of earlier films for a reason. It’s just more dramatic and a lot more interesting.

The coup coffee caps and T-shirts aren’t the only identity politics flags flying around here. There’s California bashing, Utah-praising, ridiculous assertions about “militia” defeating National Guard units, a supernatural premonition, the conspiracy nut podcaster who takes to short wave radio to advise everybody to put their cash in “bullets and beans” and um, “crypto.”

Not sure how that will work when the POWER GRID that’s been strained by the electronic, digital Ponzi scheme is down with no prospect of coming back up. But that’s the Neverland we’re visiting here. Crypto will almost certainly cause the next Great Depression, and gun nuttiness is already killing thousands while cultists pray for the day when the social order is upended and they can live out some lawless modern Old West fantasy with themselves on top.

The acting isn’t awful and the production values are passable. McDonough makes a much better villain than anybody shoved into that sort of role here.

This is an origin story that lacks anything in the way of a “hook” to whet the viewer ‘s appetite for a series. Even the “Christianity” angle is soft-peddled.

We may be closer to WWIII or some other calamity that knocks American society off its feet, judging by the past incompetence of those about to take power. But you’ve got to shove more entertainment value in The End than this.

Because the “You were right to fill your bomb shelter with canned beans” crowd is a much smaller audience than the “child traffickers are EVERYwhere” fanbase on Angel Studios’ lone blockbuster.

Rating: PG-13, violence

Cast: Bailey Chase, Dawn Oliveri, Kearran Giovanni, Tyler Lofton, Susan Misner, Emmanuel McCord and Neal McDonough

Credits: Directed by Ben Smallbone, scripted by Jason Ross, Joseph Snyder, Leah Bateman and Philip Abraham, based on the TV series created by Jason Ross and Ben Kasica. An Angel Studios release.

Running time: 1:52

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Movie Review: When the End Comes, Survivalists rally around “Homestead”

Netflixable? Megan Fox, robotic in her “Subservience”

Saying Megan Fox is well cast as a robotic household “helper” in “Subservience” seems kind of mean. And one really should avoid using the phrase “human sex doll” in describing her role here, or her screen career in general.

“Subservience” is another attempt at a cringey, cautionary and harrowing account of the Future that Awaits Us, if we let AI run our lives.

The trouble with a century of such films, from “Metropolis” to the endless “Terminator” franchise to “Her” to “M3GAN,” is that we never listen. The AI singularity is upon us and we keep acting as if we’ve never “seen this movie before.”

Michael Morrone of the even cringier “365 Days” stars in “Subservience,” portraying a Colorado contractor facing mass robotic replacement of his high-rise building workforce, but who really needs help around the house and two kids after his wife (Madeline Zima) has a heart attack.

A “SIM” might be just the ticket.

Fox plays the short-skirted, fake-skin bombshell SIM who wins the job when she tracks down and cares for Nick’s wandering daughter (Matilda Firth) when she gets lost at the SIM shopping fare they visit to check out their replace-mommy-for-a-while options.

“Daddy, can we GET her? Pleeeeaaase!”

“Alice” they name their SIM, after “Alice in Wonderland.”

She is “strong, obedient, and I have no desires outside of fulfilling yours.”

Is she still talking about “cooking, cleaning and childcare,” though?

As wife Maggie awaits a heart transplant, Alice with the simulated heartbeat finds way to “look after” Nick, every day and in every way, in case “the worst happens,” something Maggie foolishly tasks her with doing. Looking like Megan Fox and as programmed to be as compliant as a sex worker, we know where that’s going.

The Will Honley/April Maguire script does zero intellectual heavy lifting as it touches on common fears of machine “replacement” of wait staff and other blue collar workers, and of caregivers and homemakers.

I’d no sooner muttered “Why are their AI in-home housekeeping robots but none in construction, etc.?” when that coming transformation hits Nick’s worksite. The “world building” here isn’t complete enough to recognize there’d be no need to make these welding, wiring, pipe-fitting, concrete-pouring and I-beam bolting machines look like humans, or give wy you’d give such machines nights off.

That’s for the series spun out of this, I guess.

SIM bartenders, nurse’s assistants and the like need the deluxe human covering “package,” sure. But who would dare make a home-use robot line that looks like Megan Fox, “anatomically correct,” and given to wearing lingerie — functional or otherwise?

Fox is OK as the lead and the villain, and we forget that she’s rarely worse than “adequate.” But the movie isn’t all that.

The latter acts of “Subservience” play out like assorted “Terminators” and “M3GAN,” as if there’s only one way to end a cautionary thriller like this. There’s nothing witty about the dialogue, and the plot is just as perfunctory, functional and here’s that word again, and it’s not a compliment — “robotic.”

Rating: R, violence, sex, nudity, profanity

Cast: Megan Fox, Michele Morrone, Madeline Zima and Andrew Whipp.

Credits: Directed by S. K. Dale, scripted by Will Honley and April Maguire. An XYZ/Millennium release on Netflix.

Running time: 1:45

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Netflixable? Megan Fox, robotic in her “Subservience”

Documentary Preview: Phil Collins, a pop star in winter, “Drummer First”

OK, not your normal platform — Drumeo, a drum-centric site selling lessons, etc. is offering this. Not sure why that is (probably not a feature length doc).

But in the ’80s and ’90s, Collins was as omnipresent as any balding Brit pop star has ever been. At his peak, he was doing music videos, cranking out hits and even doing movie songs and film scores.

His first one for Disney was the animated picture “Brother Bear,” which brought him to Orlando where I interviewed him. He joked about how “Even I got sick of me” being all over the radio, and how Sting and Disney didn’t get along when The Police singer/songwriter was commissioned to do the tunes to a Disney animated film.

Great that Phil’s still around, kind of hard to see him infirm like this.

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Documentary Preview: Phil Collins, a pop star in winter, “Drummer First”