Movie Review: An Indian Woman stands up to a “Pinch,” and Faces the Consequences

Uttera Singh’s “Pinch” is a picture that runs on outrage. It shows us a sex crime and demonstrates how hard it is to get anyone — including women, her own mother and even herself — to take it seriously in a country where “women’s security” has been slow in coming.

A young Indian woman is “felt up” on a crowded overnight bus ride by an older “uncle” she knows. “Did you like that?” he leers, safe and comfortable in his entitlement and his reputation within the patriarchy.

She is shocked and shamed by this, and can’t bring herself to tell her mother. The “uncle” is emboldened enough to stalk her into the mobs at a Hindu festival that bus took them to. But as they’re all jammed up together, she sees her chance. She pinches the wife of a short-tempered wrestler, points her finger at the “uncle,” and Mr. Molester gets beaten to a pulp.

Fair enough. But outrage erupts in her small circle as the cops wonder what she’s not telling them, the man’s wife accuses her, her mother’s business is ruined, they’re threatened with eviction. Guilt eats at her over the rippling effects of her one moment of fighting back against a patriarchal culture where “women’s security” has been dismissed in the past, and cracking down hasn’t solved the problem.

Singh, who co-wrote, directed and stars as the victim, Maitri, frustrates the viewer with the injustice of it all, how this “uncle” Rajesh (Nitesh Pandey) seems immune to consequences for his actions as Maitri is shunned, badgered and even sent his hospital bill as he and his self-righteous wife (Sapna Sand) demand an apology and Maitri’s own mother (Geeta Agrawal Sharma) is inclined to provide one.

Maitri, an aspiring travel vlogger whose “feminist” mind was broadened during college in America, seethes with fury at all this, as will most Western viewers of the film. But “Pinch” is being received as a just deserts comedy in India, especially by women reviewing it. And you certainly see their point.

When Maitri is questioned about her “relative” Rajesh, she’s quick to correct that with a “No…he’s more of a ‘super friendly’ ‘uncle.’

A neighborhood in the small Indian city where Maitri lives is called “New York City,” and all around her are chattering mothers obsessed with bowel movements — “Happy tummy, happy life!” (in Hindi with English subtitles).

Other light touches include Maitri’s friend and much-more-successful online influencer Samir (Badri Chavan), host of “Samir Eats.” Yes, he’s a portly food vlogger, all about quality “content” and eating and eating. But is he an ally, or just another man outraged at what Maitri has done?

Singh, the embodiment of the “stubborn” daughter whose eyes were open and views were broadened by travel, is convincingly conflicted as Maitri. Behind the camera, she sets up expectations, and teasingly dashes them as she masterfully builds our indignation into a lather as Maitri faces further humiliation and more victimization after her “impulsive” act of revenge.

Because we all know who had it coming, even if most of those whining “just APOLOGIZE” do not.


Rating: unrated, violence including sexual assault, profanity

Cast: Uttera Singh, Geeta Agrawal Sharma, Badri Chavan, Nitesh Pandey and
Sapna Sand

Credits: Directed by Uttera Singh, scripted by Adam Linzey and Uttera Singh. A Budhratna Films release.

Running time: 1:23

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Movie Review: An Indian Woman stands up to a “Pinch,” and Faces the Consequences

Netflixable? A Monstrous Hit-man takes on Masked Mass Murderers in Japan’s “Demon City”

Movies like “Demon City” are why we pay extra attention to that one credit in an action picture’s production — “action choreographer” or “stunt coordinator.”

More that one actor I’ve interviewed over the years has mentioned he or she took on a picture because of who they had choreographing the fights to make them look “cool.” Jason Statham was the first I heard mention it. He took on “The Transporter” because Jianyong Guo was the hot stunt coordinator of the moment.

And somebody had to invent and stage that barefoot brawl where our hero snaps the toe-clip pedals off a racing bike, spills a barrel of motor oil all over a garage, and kicks ass while bad guys slip and tumble around him.

Takashi Tanimoto was stunt coordinator for the martial arts thriller “47 Ronin.” But what he does with Tôma Ikuta (“The Fallen Angel”) in this martial arts massacre is a wonder to behold, a next-level, “We’ve never seen THAT before” dance of violence and death-dealing.

“Demon City” is a Japanese “John Wick,” where our mysterious, seemingly unkillable “baba yaga” is a demonic hitman out for “Oldboy” styled revenge. The classic car is different — he drives a vintage Mach One Mustange — and there’s no dead beagle. But the story arc is the same and the mayhem just as spectacular.

Sanaka (Ikuta) finishes one last bit of mass slaughter in Shinjo City before retirement, hacking and kicking has way through legions of villains, in essence clearing out “the docks” for a new gang to move in.

Sanaka relies on his balance, his martial arts skills and his vast collection of knives, hatchets, machetes and what not, which he sharpens with care.

His middle-man (Tarô Suruga) has arranged this “job,” and for Sanaka’s comfy retirement with his wife and little girl. But that is not to be. Masked marauders have preceded him home and have his wife and daughter Ryo hostage. The Master in this killing cult of mobsters speaks of a “demon” who arises in their “demon city” every so often, and that’s who he figures Sanaka is.

The gangsters who hired him to clear the way for their rule over the city’s underworld cannot have such a “demon” amongst them. They kill his wife and child, and finish Sanaka off.

Ah, but “Demon City” is based on a manga. And you know how “death” works in comic books. Sanaka isn’t dead, merely reduced to a scarred, catatonic “vegetable.”

But twelve years later, when he is released from a prison hospital — speechless, blank-eyed, drooling in a wheelchair — dirty cops show up to finish the job. And Sanaka wills himself to his feet, and fights as he crawls. Because revenge is the great motivator in this narrative. And Sanaka has a lot of masked murderers to track down and hack, kick, choke or shoot to death.

Coordinator Tanimoto has Ikuta, with some digital assitance (sped-up movement, etc.), lurch and jerk about, using upper body strenght and balance to flip guys out of windows even as he struggles to move under his own power.

Even before his beat-down and hospitalization Sanaka is a fighter with moves that suggest every joint in his body is double-jointed. Every blow that lands sets up the next, every minion he faces provides the momentum for crashing into the next one.

Watch the way Sanaka slams one uniformed goon against a rough concrete wall and DRAGs the poor, underpaid punk’s face along that wall, leaving a bloody red streak in his wake. Note what he does to disrupt a drug lab/human trafficking/”recycling” warehouse business. Mere forklifts are no match for his moves.

The first big fight/ambush is in the prologue, an assault on a mobster’s Morocan style-beachside lair, a white house/fortress painted crimson, one slash and splatter at a time.

Sanaka has a mission, a threat to make good on. “I’ll kill ALL of you,” he vows, in Japanese or dubbed into English. Lunging, zombie-jerking about, kicking and flailing, is he still quick enough to fend off bullets with his machete blade?

Will a bow and arrow accomplish what firearms cannot?

You’ll want to watch this with subtitles, because their is no substitute for butch yakuza bellowing in a brawl, bad guy after guy shouting “SANAKA!” as if their physical rage alone isn’t enough.

The story is formulaic — yes, “John Wick” also hewed to a formula grounded in Japanese and Hollywood revenge fantasies. There are dirty cops and a “good” cop helper, twists aplenty because every time you’re sure that was a mortal wound, somebody comes back from the dead, back for more.

But the fights in this bad-boy-amongst-bad-boys butcher shop thriller have to be seen to be believed. “The Raid,” assorted blind swordsman tales, “Oldboy” and John Wickworld all are glimpsed in this slaughter in scarlet saga from Seiji Tanaka.

Some day, some generous minded filmmaker is going to give a Takashi Tanimoto a curtain call credit for a movie like this. Whatever else goes on behind the camera, he’s the one who makes this one and its anti-hero look cool.

Rating: TV-MA, graphic bloody violence, profanity and perversion

Cast: Tôma Ikuta, Tarô Suruga, Matsuya Onoe, Miou Takata,
Masahiro Higashide and Ami Tôma

Credits: Scripted and directed by Seiji Tanaka, based on a manga by Masamichi Kawabe.A Netflix release.

Running time: 1:41

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Netflixable? A Monstrous Hit-man takes on Masked Mass Murderers in Japan’s “Demon City”

Movie Preview: Duhamel’s a hit-man laying low, but with “London Calling”

On the run from a London job “gone wrong,” forced to babysit a mob boss’s son (Jeremy Ray Taylor) and make a (Murderous?) “man out of him.”

Aiden Gillen, EveryVillain Arnold Vosloo and Daniah De Villiers star in this Sept. 19 release, filmed in South Africa, where B-movies can be made for a bargain.

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Preview: Duhamel’s a hit-man laying low, but with “London Calling”

Classic Film Review: A Brit Baby Boomer lost in His Own World — “Billy Liar” (1963)

Falling into “Billy Liar” is no easy feat, even for a film buff, over sixty years after it was released.

It’s been included in more than one list of “the 100 Best British Films Ever Made,” albeit in the bottom quarter of that ranking, not far removed from a “Carry On” comedy. But its a story recognizable and “universal,” and stubbornly populated by unpleasant people behaving unpleasantly. There’s no easy “in” or character to connect with, even the ones meant to embody a generation.

Tom Courtenay of “The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner” stars in it, John Schlesinger directed it and it is based on the Keith Waterhouse novel and play (with Willis Hall) of the very late ’50s. All of that parks it firmly in the “angry young (postwar) man” “kitchen sink realism” dramas of that era. And the surrealism gives it a French New Wave twist, not something the director of “Midnight Cowboy,” “Darling,” “Marathon Man” and “Cold Comfort Farm” was ever accused of again.

But it’s a comedy, with more than touch of Thurber’s “The Secret Life of Walter Mitty” about it. And the first act, despite a boffo, fantasy sequence opening, is hard-pressed to find whimsy or charm in its anti hero or the grim, grey construction zone that was the northwest of England (Bradford, near Leeds, was the filming location) in 1963.

Billy Fisher is 19, a slacker at home and at work, a feckless lover juggling two fiances with one engagement ring between them and a dreamer who escapes his life by dreaming of Ambrosia. Not the drink, but the fantasyland of his own creation, where he is soldier, field marshal, dictator and king in a war torn land which pauses to celebrate his achievements, laud his speeches and give him parades which he both marches in and soaks up from the ruler’s viewing stand.

Billy stops daydreaming to squeeze in the day’s first lie — “Today’s a day of big decisions – going to start writing me novel – two thousand words every day, going to start getting up in the morning…”

In a Britain bubbling back to life after World War II and 1950s austerity, Billy is the slacker’s slacker, an only child as unpleasant as his disapproving Dad (Wilfred Pickles) and racist Granny (Ethel Griffies).

He dodges work at the office, and keeps a stash of the calendars from the funeral home where he works in a locked dresser at home, lest the owners (Leonard Rossiter and Finlay Currie) find out he’s pocketed the money he was supposed to use to mail them. His co-workers are louts, even Arthur, whom he claims to co-write songs with.

The thing about Thoroughly Unpleasant Billy is that he lies like he breathes — to his annoying fiances, the virginal and naive Barbara (Helen Fraser) and angry and brassy barmaid Rita (Gwedolyn Watts). His dad “lost a leg” in the war. He has a sister. He HAD a sister (“She died.”).

And he’s “going to London. Got an offer to write scripts for (the comic) Danny Boon (Leslie Randall).” Boon is in town for a market opening, but there’s no offer, no matter what Billy’s oft-started letter of resignation says.

A walk to work becomes an exercise in sleep-walking with his eyes closed, as Billy lies to avoid facing up to the obvious. He’s never made a real decision, never taken a stab at fleeing the conventional life which seems set up for him. He’s never actually “done” any of the achievements he claims for himself. And when he does, no one in his or her right mind should believe him.

All that lying and all that daydreaming is sure to be for naught, as we know a reckoning is coming for this pathological procrastinator, big talker and two-timer.

His mother (Mona Washburne) doesn’t “get” him, but at least she tolerates him as she dispenses advice he’ll never take.

“If you’re in any more trouble, Billy, it’s not something you can leave behind you, you know. You put it in your suitcase, and you take it with you.”

Things finally come to a head when Billy reconnects with his muse, his role model and his one true “love,” Liz.

Liz is played by Julie Christie in the role that would make her a star and one of the defining faces of the ’60s. She is both perfect in the part — from her fashion-forward mop of hair to her free-spirited “just GO” and figure out how to make a living “there” (London, etc.) later ethos, the embodiment of a restless youth-culture age — and the character who kind of derails the film.

If Billy “dreams” of anything, it should be her. If she says “Let’s GO to London,” he must. The dowdy virgin and dowdier trollop he’s passing an engagement ring to have no prayer in a conversation with Liz in it. She may be working class, a bit of a drifter, but she oozes glamour, worldliness and sex appeal. She even makes it seem plausible that she’d see through Billy Liar and yet “see something” in him.

Liz is the ultimate choice shoved in Billy’s face. He can dream rather than struggle to fulfill his “script writer” dream, without doing much to make it come true. Or he can chase a free spirit to the place that dream requires him to be.

“Billy Liar,” which later became a British TV series, is a fascinating moment-in-time tale that would be comical if Billy was more cocksure of himself or tragic if Billy was less unpleasant. There’s nothing charming about this dreamer and nothing plucky about this striver, even if we recognize the “type” — who gets trotted out with every generation that seems lost in dreams, lazy and irresponsible.

Somebody should take a shot at a Gen Z version of Billy. We’re already “judging” that generation. Why not give them and everybody who judges them a focal point for that angst, a personification of that daydreamy, rebellious impatience?

Because Billy and Courtenay keeps us watching even as we can guess which wheel will come off first and which choices Billy makes or simply cannot make. And Christie embodies that siren just beyond one’s reach, an end goal plainly in sight even if we, like our hero, can’t stop dreaming and “visualizing” what we want long enough to figure out how to get it.

Rating: TV-PG (approved), sexual situations, smoking

Cast: Tom Courtenay, Wilfred Pickles, Mona Washburne, Gwendolyn Watts, Helen Fraser, Finlay Currie and Julie Christie.

Credits: Directed by John Schlesinger, scripted by Keith Waterhouse and Willis Hall, based on the play by Waterhouse and Hall and the novel by Waterhouse. .

Running time: 1:39

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Classic Film Review: A Brit Baby Boomer lost in His Own World — “Billy Liar” (1963)

Movie Preview: “The Naked Gun” remake gets a full trailer

August 1, Danny Huston is a villain, Pamela Anderson is a “person of interest” (loooove interest) and Liam Neeson is the most Dangerous Drebbin of  them all.

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Preview: “The Naked Gun” remake gets a full trailer

Movie Preview: Malkovich and Fanny Ardant, “Mr. Blake, At your Service!”

John Malkovich acts in French?  He serves! He schemes! He shoots?

Mon dieu!

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Preview: Malkovich and Fanny Ardant, “Mr. Blake, At your Service!”

Movie Review: Julianne, Sydney and Domhnall know what goes down in “Echo Valley”

The questions pop to mind early and somewhat often in the new thriller “Echo Valley.”

Wait, how did that tiny young woman lift…Her 60something mother chose what to dump a body in a lake…So did the ex-husband take up with a much younger woman before his wife discovered she was gay?

Some mysteries are solved and some left hanging in this engrossing will-they-get-away-with-it mystery from the director of “Beast” and the writer of “Mare of Easttown.” But the one we’re left to ponder entirely to ourselves is “How could anmother capable of the sort of unconditional love we see here raise such a monster?”

Oscar winner Julianne Moore plays the mother, Kate, a widow still grieving the death of her wife, still living on the Chester County, Pennsylvania horse farm she kept in the divorce (Kyle MacLachlan plays the ex), still waiting to hear from her irresponsible, self-absorbed addict-daughter, played by “It” girl Sydney Sweeney of “Euphoria” and “Anyone But You.”

Things are bad enough enough, what with Kate canceling riding lessons in her grief, the farm running in the red and the ex fed up with writing checks. Then the headstrong addict Claire shows up, with her druggy beau (Edmund Donovan), empty promises — “I’m CLEAN, Mom! I’m good.” — and a need for cash.

There’s a dealer (Domhnall Gleeson) with news that Claire “betrayed my trust. Your junky daughter has two choices. Give it back or she can pay me my money.”

As the opening scene of the film is a body coming to the surface of a nearby lake, the questions begin. Who is it? Who sank it? And will she/they/etc. get away with it?

It’s all handled reasonably well, with just enough twists to hold the interest and just enough attention to the logic of it all for Brand Ingelsby’s script to make sense — more or less.

Moore is wholly believable as a woman gutted by loss, trapped by her devotion to a kid who’s just no damned good. Sweeney makes Claire recognizably lost, following her impulses, but cynically sure of one thing — her mother’s willingness to do anything to help her. It’s one of her best performances.

Gleason makes a sharp, sinister villain. And Fiona Shaw sparkles as that ride-or-die lesbian pal a gal needs to lean on in a pinch.

“Echo Valley” isn’t great, but it isn’t bad. And the fact that it’s on Apple TV means you don’t have to keep your questions to yourself. Shout at the screen as much as you like. I know I did.

Rating: R, violence, drug abuse, profanity

Cast: Julianne Moore, Sydney Sweeney, Fiona Shaw and Domhnall Gleason.

Credits: Directed by Michael Pearce, scripted by Brad Ingelsby. An Apple TV+ release.

Running time: 1:44

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Movie Review: Julianne, Sydney and Domhnall know what goes down in “Echo Valley”

BOX OFFICE: “Dragon” Flies High, “Materialists” cash in, “Stitch” clears the $800 million mark

Kids’ entertainment has been king of the box office this summer, as animated franchises turned into CGI assisted “live action” remakes have become the latest “sure thing” in that corner of the marketplace.

First it was cell-animated fare of the “Little Mermaid/Lion King” school that made the most money, then Pixar led everybody down the CGI animated primrose path. Three-D versions of such films had their time in the sun.

This summer, animated movies that produced sequels and/or TV series and seemed played-out have followed live action “Beauty and the Beast” and “Lion King” adaptations into the record books.

The live action remake of “How to Train Your Dragon” is the latest world-beater, opening at a “franchise best” $82 million, Deadline.com projects. As Deadline historically underestimates the Sat/Sunday draw for family entertainment, that puts $85-90 million on the table, certainly within reach.

The fourth best opening weekend of the year means it’s unlikely to ever reach the heights “Lilo & Stitch” has. That film cleared the $350 million mark in North America on Thursday ($800 million worldwide), while “Dragon” was earning $8.6 million on its opening night ($11.1 million if you count Wednesday “special access” previews at AMC theaters, etc.).

Will “Stitch” catch the world-beating “Minecraft” live action/CGI “Minecraft Movie?” Maybe. “Lilo & Stitch” is on track for a $14-15 million weekend, finally surrendering first place, but still marching ever onward towards the $1 billion mark. “Minecraft” has wound down its run having earned a whopping $951 million.

In third place is Celine Song’s anti-rom-com “Materialists,” which is on track to clear $12 million on its debut. Casting Dakota Johnson, Chris Evans and hot-ticket Pedro Pascal pays dividends as that one over-achieves on its opening weekend. Decent reviews boost this cynical take on modern its-money-that-matters romance. It’s not as emotional as Song’s “Past Lives,” I thought. A tad melodramatic. But good counter programming to much that’s out there.

The “John Wick” spinoff “Ballerina” is falling right off a cliff on its second weekend. It might clear $8 million and come in fourth, and if it makes any less it will drop behind “Mission: Impossible: The Final Reckoning,” which is also on track to earn $9 million on its fouth weekend of release.

That’s a 65% or so fall-off for “Ballerina” on its second weekend.

Both films are underperforming expectations, with Tom Cruise’s repetitive send-off to that series straining to stick around long enough to hit the $200 million mark, domestically. Adding $8 million this weekend will put it over $165 million by midnight Sunday, so that seems a long shot. “From the World of John Wick: Ballerina,” will be lucky to reach $75 million in North America (just clearing $40, and fading fast).

Those two pricey franchises are a tad gassed, to be honest. But if you thought “No Jay Baruchel, no Craig Ferguson, no ‘How to Train Your Dragon,'” you were mistaken.

“Karate Kid: Legends” and “Final Destination: Bloodlines” fall out of the top five, but not the top ten this weekend.

I’ll update these figures as Sunday numbers come in.

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on BOX OFFICE: “Dragon” Flies High, “Materialists” cash in, “Stitch” clears the $800 million mark

Movie Preview: Foxx and DeNiro go head to head, “Tin Soldier”

The “tell” in this trailer is Scott Eastwood’s presence, front and center, in a thriller that pits two Oscar winners on opposite sides of a…revolution?

Leguizamo and Rita Ora also star in this, which supposedly got a limited release in May and hits Amazon Prime any minute now.

Brad Fuhrman directed “The Lincoln Lawyer” and “The Infiltrator” and “City of Lies,” so maybe it’s not as bad as the warning signs slapped on it. Or maybe it’s worse.

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Preview: Foxx and DeNiro go head to head, “Tin Soldier”

Netflixable? Brazilians look for Grandma in Israel — “Cheers to Life” (“Vida a Vida”)

You can see, hear and feel the strain in the Brazilian comedy “Cheers to Life (Vida a Vida),” the great effort expended to achieve “cute.”

It’s sweet enough, and sweetly sentimental. But for a “finding your (living) roots” story that takes a couple of cousins to Israel to meet a granny they never knew, that’s never quite enough.

So we’ve got to trick granddad Benjamin, whom they’ve never met, lie to him and drug him for a “Weekend at Benjamins” bit. They’ve got to debate whether they’re kissing/copulating cousins, and be as dainty about that as possible. And they’ve got to see the historic sights — the Wailing Wall, Dead Sea, King Solomon’s Mines, etc. — on a Holy Land tour with cute nuns, other tourists and a comically flamboyant Portuguese speaking tour guide.

It’s a competently made film, with flashbacks from the distant past setting up a somewhat cloying story. But the laughs and delights are few and the sentimental finale is contrived and clumsy.

It’s about three heirloom “pendants”(lockets) that “only the bravest women in this family” wear. Decades after she was given one by her mother, who died young, orphaned Jessica (irrepressible Thati Lopes) stumbles across one to match the one her mother gave her.

That’s how she tracks down the “cousin,” Gabriel (Rodrigo Simas), a photographer in the process of being kicked out of his model-girlfriend’s (Aline Dias) apartment. He was selling jewelry, heirlooms included.

They didn’t know they were related, that they have a shared ancestor who fled an arranged marriage and ran off to Israel with her true love. But as both are broke — Jessica is broke enough to “borrow” and pawn jewelry from the antiques store where she works for plane fare — they’ll jet off to meet the mysterious Hava (Regina Braga) and her husband Ben, Brazilian-born tour business owner Ben (Jonas Bloch).

“They’ll think I came here for the money,” Jessica whines. As Jessica and Gabriel have haggled over “inheritance” percentages, “But you came here for the money” (in Portuguese, or dubbed into English) is the only response to that.

They will be fish out of water, trapped with tourists on a “Grandpa Ben” tour, guided by Ramirez Ramirez (Diego Martins), doing everything they can think of to draw the old man owner into the tour so that they can meet him, tell him who they are and meet grandma.

Nude bathing on a no nudity beach in Tel Aviv should do the trick. Ben has to show up to bail them out. But Jessica can’t bring herself to fessing up. Ben is sad. Hava? She’s left boring, trapped in routine Ben.

There’s nothing for it but to “help” Ben find Hava in Jaffa, Jerusalem, Eitat, the Dead Sea or wherever Ben figures she might be.

Lopes gets most of the funny lines — comforting a woman recovering in a hospital with “My dream is to get old and have as many plastic surgeries as you.” She’s a less-than-convincing saleswoman, selling articles in the antiques store by extolling “the nostalgia” of “the ’60s,” before admitting how that decade played out in Brazil.

“Set aside the dictatorship and the many being tortured and murdered” and it was a pretty stylish time, for sure.

There’s tentative chemistry between Lopes and Simas. But that requires us and them to get past the “cousins” thing, and to forget his previous lover was a model.

The movie peaks as Jessica finds herself getting the Bat Mitzvah she never had and learning that The Wailing Wall isn’t for weeping. It’s for “making requests.”

The picture blows the “fish out of water” element of this “journey of discovey,” with “a phony Jew” and a guy who only remembers the Hebrew he needed to get through his Bar Mitzvah finding Portuguese speakers every time they need one. And the travelogue part of the picture is pretty but over-familiar.

The best joke is the one “Palestinian” bit in the picture, the fear of being “sold to a sheikh” on camelback when they get lost near King Solomon’s Mines. But a few others pay off.

It’s still not much of a movie, because really, how many versions of “Hava Nagila” do we need to hear in 100 minutes?

Rating: TV-14, sexual situations, profanity

Cast: Thati Lopes, Rodrigo Simas, Diego Martins, Aline Dias, Regina Braga and Jonas Bloch.

Credits: Directed by Cris D’Amato, scripted by Natalia Klein. A Netflix release.

Running time: 1:40

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Netflixable? Brazilians look for Grandma in Israel — “Cheers to Life” (“Vida a Vida”)