Movie Review: “The Sleep Experiment” is almost a cure for you-know-what

What a dreadful bore “The Sleep Experiment” turns out to be.

A period piece thriller about a sleep deprivation study in Britain’s Porton Down government science park, it’s old fashioned and corny, bloody and — like life itself in more primitive times — “nasty, brutish and short.”

Writer-director John Farrelly takes a bit of lore about the secretive location and cooks up a tale of inmates recruited to go 30 days without sleep for a study tailor-made for disaster. Years later, a couple of cops (Barry John Kinsella and Anthony Murphy) talk the scientist in charge (Tom Kerrisk) to come in for “an interview” that will be, of course, an interrogation.

Tricky coppers. But the good doctor is a pyschologist and his “motives” were good. “Unethical” or not, pointless (my first thought) or not, these five “human guinea pigs” are locked up in a cell with books, food, a single toilet and a solitary sink.

These “volunteers,” who stood to have their sentences suspended, are an odd mix of “types” — the bullying Sean (Brian Moore), the “fish out of water” Eric (Steven Jess), the snide, canny and secretive Luke (Will Murphy), harder-to-pin down Patrick (Sam McGovern) and most dutiful diary keeper, the hulking elder of their ranks, Edward (Robert James Capel).

The idea is that we watch them meet, size each other up and crack up over time as they’re given orders via PA system — “Exercise begins now!” — manipulated in other ways, gassed with something that keeps them awake and monitored through a two-way mirror.

Farrelly fails to build suspense and tension in this ready-made pressure cooker situation. He turns the interrogation of the scientist in charge into something that the occasional threat and bit of shouting does nothing to animate the film. A couple of the characters are almost interesting, made somewhat less so by the perfunctory back stories given them.

The “explain it all” finale plays like something out of a 1940s B-movie.

And on and on it drones, with bloody meltdowns, inane crackups and flashes of savagery that never engage the viewer or come close to having a point.

Rating: unrated, bloody violence profanity

Cast: Brian Moore, Robert James Capel, Steven Jess, Sam McGovern, Will Murphy, Tom Kerrisk, Anthony Murphy and Barry John Kinsella

Credits: Scripted and directed by John Farrelly. A Red Water Entertainment release.

Running time: 1:21

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Review: “The Sleep Experiment” is almost a cure for you-know-what

Movie Preview: A weekend party with AI time travel? “Deborah”

This indie sci fi comic thriller is now streaming. Looks worth reviewing.

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Preview: A weekend party with AI time travel? “Deborah”

Will Ferrell and Ryan Reynolds address the “lip syncing” rumors re: “Spirited”

Yes, if it’s a holiday musical we expect Mr Funny or Die and his Canadian labradoodle to do their own singing, dammit.

Wait for it. Wait. Waiiiit.

Nov 11, in theaters, shortly thereafter on Apple TV+, not on that “Net” thingy everybody is bailing out of.

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Will Ferrell and Ryan Reynolds address the “lip syncing” rumors re: “Spirited”

Movie Preview: Gabriel Byrne may be Ferrari, but Frank Grillo is…”Lamborghini!”

Nov. 18, the movie about the guy who figured Enzo’s high maintenance automotive penile implants could be bettered opens.

Mira Sorvino also stars. Love Grillo’s Chico Marx Italian!

Atsa mi SPORTS car! Mama Mia!

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Preview: Gabriel Byrne may be Ferrari, but Frank Grillo is…”Lamborghini!”

Movie Review: There’s no “Missing” the twists in this Japanese Serial Killer Thriller

Wow, I did not see THAT coming. Or that. Or this other thing.

Shinzô Katayama’s “Missing” is a serial killer thriller that trips you up, bounces you around and repels and entertains you all along the way.

The assistant director of “Mother” doesn’t exactly play fair — shifting his narrative’s point of view, folding the story back in on its opening image, then cheating its way past it. But damn, it’s quite a ride.

A motherless middle school girl (Aoi Itô) has to come down to a shop where her father (Jirô Satô) has tried to skip out on a bill. He seems drunk, distracted, and we get the impression that this isn’t his first run-in with the Osaka PD. We also get the impression that whatever happened to his wife/her mother might be behind it.

Kaede gets Dad off with an “As you can see, my dad’s not all there” (in Japanese with English subtitles). But we’ve seen the film’s opening image. And thanks to the news, we know what some people do with hammers like the one her father is seen staggering around with, confused and upset, in that moment.

Kaede should be obsessing over that boy at school who is determined to be her middle school beau. But no, her father — reduced to day work jobs — is a mess. And then he disappears.

“Don’t look for me. I’m fine” was his last text message.

The cops want to know if Dad drinks, if he’s in debt? The wrecking yard where he supposedly showed up for day work has another man with his name on the clock, a young, boy-band skinny nail-biter. Is that a clue?

Why yes it is. But not one Kaede shares with the police. We heard Dad mention that he’d seen a guy who appeared on a sort of “Japan’s Most Wanted” TV show on the train, a skinny, brooding nail-biter.

With Mr. I Wanna Be Your Boyfriend in tow, and later with a concerned teacher, Kaede travels far and wide in suburban Osaka in search of her father, or the serial killer who might know what happened to him.

Katayama makes Kaede’s share of the story entertaining by showing us a brave, furious child out to find a father who doesn’t want to be found. If something happened to him, so be it. She’ll find this “No Name” killer, whom the cops have named (Hiroya Shimizu).

When she stumbles into him in an abandoned building, what does he do? Kill her, because, you know, that’s what serial killers do? No. He flees.

We get it. She’s a teenage girl. Terrifying.

I like the way the story sort of hands off responsibility for Kaede from one character to another. And then, just as we’re settling in for a quest, Katayama changes points of view. We start following Dad and see what he’s been up to and how all this ties together.

The violence in this second half of the narrative is more explicit, the reasons for it deeply rooted in Japanese culture and altogether grimmer. And every time we think we have a handle on who’s doing what to whom, and how that works in this murderous puzzle, another wrinkle is added.

It can be a little confusing as we shift back to “three months ago” and then “13 months ago,” tying everything together, climaxing with a masterfully-conceived game of real-time ping pong that has a whiff of cat and mouse about it.

Katayama — he also wrote and directed “Siblings of the Cape” — announces himself as a Japanese thriller director to watch with this. “Missing” leaves nothing out, no mysterious stone unturned, no surprise twist un-attempted and little to chance.

Rating: unrated, graphic violence, nudity

Cast: Jirô Satô, Aoi Itô and Hiroya Shimizu

Credits: Directed by Shinzô Katayama, scripted by Shinzô Katayama, Kazuhisa Kotera and Ryô Takada. A DarkStar release.

Running time: 2:03

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Review: There’s no “Missing” the twists in this Japanese Serial Killer Thriller

Movie Preview: A Second Peek at “Disenchanted”

Love this idea for a sequel. Love Amy Adams, Idina Menzel, James Marsden and Patrick Dempsey…and they added Maya Rudolph.

Loved “Enchanted.” Let’s how “Happily Ever After” goes off the rails.

Nov. 18.

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Preview: A Second Peek at “Disenchanted”

Movie Review: Two Sisters, One Radicalized — “You Resemble Me”

“You Resemble Me” is a tale of two sisters, raised under abuse, cast out of their home and torn apart by The State.

A sometimes moving, always gripping story of a life on the streets, it’s also French account of how members of France’s immigrant communities — descendants of those who moved there from France’s many overseas colonies — become radicalized.

The directing debut of co-writer and star Dina Amer is a vivid portrait of the French underclass and one of the best movies to ever make us walk a mile in the shoes of someone we might not be able to identify with — someone radicalized — but who seems more relatable and understandable, the more time we spend with her.

Hasna and Mariam (Lorenza Grimaudo, Ilonna Grimaudo) could not be tighter. They’re about 9 and 6 when we meet them, adorable urchins who make their own fun together and run around, free range kids on the tourist-packed streets of Paris.

Their favorite game is their “You resemble me!” (in French with English subtitles), no “You resemble ME!” “You have the same MOUTH as me,” “You have the same BEAUTY marks as ME.”

They don’t have to dress alike for them to say it or for us to see it. But on Mariam’s birthday, they do dress alike. Somehow, streetwise Hasna has found them matching dresses.

Getting home, brother Yousef has other presents. But their celebration is cut short when they awaken their mother (Sana Sri) with the noise. Mom, who has four kids ranging in age from tween to toddler, hasn’t just forgotten Mariam’s birthday. She starts gathering up presents Yousef has given her.

“We could sell this in Morocco.”

She wants to know where Hasna got the money for the dresses, and wants whatever cash she has on her. And then she wants the dresses, which she is sure she could also sell in her native Morocco.

Mom is abusive, and plainly mentally ill. One near-brawl later, captured by a frenetic hand-held camera, Hasna and her inseparable sister are on the streets, stealing from the homeless, shoplifting food and sundries from street market vendors, keeping it together no matter how perilous their circumstances.

But the words “Have I ever let you down?” have barely crossed on Hasna’s lips when an irate vendor grabs them and they find themselves in child protective services.

And this time, they won’t be going home. They won’t be “placed” together. For “your own good,” they’re being separated.

“You took half of my life away!” the older sibling screams.

Placing Hasna with a wealthy French family doesn’t mollify her. When they insist on serving her pork at Christmas dinner, she’s back on the lam with her cowboy hat and a lifetime of brutally hard lessons ahead of her.

Years later, cowgirl-obsessed Hasna (director and co-writer Amer) is still on the streets, in the clubs, procuring drugs and using sex to pay for them, only living a “normal” life when she’s babysitting for an old friend, who lets her crash at her place.

She reaches out to her sister, but Mariam won’t answer the phone. Hasna tries to hold down a job, but her street life makes her recognizable and her short temper won’t let her keep it. Her story seems one insurmountable impasse after another.

Amer frames this personal saga with events closer to the present day, as adult Hasna narrates her gripes about being brought up French when the French won’t accept her and her kind as they are.

“Do the French think I’ve come to slit the throats of their wives and daughters?”

It’s a rhetorical question.

Amer’s brisk script keeps many of the ugliest events in Hansa’s life off camera. But we see enough to fear for her safety and fret over her more violent impulses. By the time she’s an adult, she is certainly tough enough to take care of herself even if she’s too unschooled for even the Army.

The child actresses have no trouble making themselves appear vulnerable, at risk and yet essentially happy, so long as they’re together. The adult Amer gives a searing portrait of just how lost someone who went through all this might be, how belligerent she is about insisting that others hear her story and what she’s survived.

Amer handles the action beats with skill — hand-held camera fights and chases — and does a great job of hiding the story’s revelations, stringing us along, pointing us this way when she knows things will go that way.

French police aren’t portrayed as racists here, even if they are sticklers about enforcing the country’s no hijab policy. And when Hasna and we first open the online “recruitment video” of an Islamic extremist relative, we see how it plays and how it might appeal to someone as disaffected as Hasna, even if we see the holes in its arguments.

“Our religion and their culture are not compatible.”

Perhaps so, we think. But as we’ve watched this troubling, engrossing and empathetically-rendered story unfold and noted its many way points, one can’t help but feel we and the filmmaker are as at a loss about what could be done to alter such life paths, and their outcomes, as France herself.

Rating: unrated, violence, drug abuse, sexual situations, smoking, profanity

Cast: Dina Amer, Lorenza Grimaudo, Ilonna Grimaudo, Sana Sri, Agnès de Tyssandier and Alexandre Gonin

Credits: Directed by Dina Amer, scripted by Dina Amer and Omar Mullick. A Dedza release.

Running time: 1:31

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Review: Two Sisters, One Radicalized — “You Resemble Me”

Movie Preview: Tilda Swinton is “The Eternal Daughter”

Swinton is both mother and daughter in this ghost story from director Joanna Hogg, a real tour de force that could park her in the best actress field — or best supporting actress — depending on the breaks.

Dec. 2, from A24.

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Preview: Tilda Swinton is “The Eternal Daughter”

Classic Film Review: Essential cinema for the college bound kid — “Educating Rita (1983)”

Taste is the most subjective thing in film criticism. It’s a deeply personal thing, built on background and core beliefs that direct how a given person responds to a given moviegoing experience.

I think about “Educating Rita” several times a year, pretty much every year since this 1983 jewel came out. I think of it whenever someone mentions another grand Michael Caine performance, as friends prep children for the Big Adventure of university, and urge them to watch it with their kids before they depart. I couldn’t help but think of it watching “Tár,” which is all about Mahler, at least as a subtext.

That line, “Wouldn’t you just die without Mahler?” from “Rita” is amusing, ironic and aspirational. A pretentious but fragile young aesthete bubbles it to our title character more than once.

Working at a classical music NPR station at the time “Rita” came out, my friends on the staff and I just snorted at the reference, sort of a variation of the way Woody Allen used Mahler as shorthand for “See how smart I am?” himself and how cultured any of his characters who dropped the name were meant to be viewed.

And I recall how this movie changed my life. Whatever the critics at the time thought — and Roger Ebert rather missed the boat on this one — it was plain to me at the time that the upper-middle to upper class backgrounds of that generation of reviewers kept them from “getting” a movie that can be summed up with a few words from Willy Russell’s play that spoke to college professor Dr. Frank Bryant (Caine) as well, the reasons this hairdresser and “Open University” student he was tutoring wanted to go to college.

Rita (Julie Walters, in a career-defining performance) was down’ta pub with her family. Everyone was swilling beer, young and old, singing along to some inane Brit-pop on the jukebox. And Rita noticed her Mum weeping.

“Why are you crying, Mother,” she asked?

“There must be better songs to sing than this,” her despairing mother answered.

That’s the play. That’s the movie. That’s why you show this film to your kids, in high school or as they’re college-bound, especially if they’re not to the manner born. College is an expensive gamble, adventure and ordeal. And why do you go? To learn how other people see the world, to meet people from cultures outside your social or work circle, to expand your mind, to learn that there are “better songs to sing.”

Caine plays “Frank,” as Rita calls him, first scene to last, with a mix of burnt-out dipsomania and long-dormant idealism. He is the teacher, the mentor who relishes the “unspoiled” working girl of 26 who presents herself to him to be taught.

Dr. Frank Bryant has a roomy, book-stuffed office, with bottles hidden behind some volumes. “The Lost Weekend” hides one, because he’s witty that way. But his classes have noticed the sleepy eyes and boozy, distracted slur of his lectures.

“You don’t really expect me to teach this sober?”

Frank is a published poet who teaches literature, 50ish and past caring. And then this blowsy spitfire shows up, an empty vessel who wants him to “change” her “from the inside,” expose her to the wider world, “better songs” and real literature.

“Devouring pulp fiction is not being ‘well-read,,'” he tells her, words I’ve parroted to too many comic book addicts to count. “You have to be selective. Discipline your mind!”

Rita, whose real name is Susan but who changed it to be more colorful — like her bleached blonde with pink highlights hair — will journey from uncultured naif to collegiate sophisticate. She will do this over the objections of her working class bloke husband (Malcolm Douglas) who doesn’t approve of anything that takes her away from him, their home, the pub and his zeal to become a father, of anything that “changes” her.

She bubbles over with enthusiasm after seeing her first play (“Macbeth”), develops a sharp outsider’s take on Chekhov and Ibse and, learns how to write scholarly essays as she prepares for final examinations. Walters makes every moment feel like a discovery, one we’d want to make ourselves.

Rita is a walking, talking accidental pun, especially concerning E.M. Forster’s most famous novel and one of the many British euphemisms for one’s buttocks.

“‘Howard’s End?’ Sounds disgusting!”

Frank will find himself traveling from tuned-out, burn-out case to someone who at least has one thing a week to look forward to, an eager pupil whose journey he watches with a mixture of awe, joy and horror. Pupils are destined to outgrow their teachers. And Frank, being pretty far gone, needs “a shock to the system” (another Caine gem from this period in his career) if he’s ever going to crawl out of the bottle, out of a failed love affair and out of (it is implied) the cycle of taking up with female students who flatter him and keep him stuck in one place, tipsy, preserved in amber, bitter about what might have been.

Watching the film anew, prompted by Cate Blanchett’s “Wouldn’t you just die without Mahler?” “Tar” performance, I was struck by its relevance to our moment. People hellbent on preserving the cocoons they live in are on the warpath against the Ritas who left their social, familial and geographic bubbles, who dared to broaden their experience of the world, who are willing to expose themselves to alternate points of view and who develop depth, sophistication and empathy for others simply by breaking out of their provincialism.

The only thing that “dates” “Educating Rita” is the period-correct but insipid synthesizer score, which not only dates movies of that era, but grates in virtually every film that made that fateful musical choice back then.

Director Lewis Gilbert was best-known for making Michael Caine’s breakout, “Alfie,” and three James Bond films. He also directed the adaptation of Willy Russell’s other famous play from that era, the similarly-themed (a woman “changed” by a mind-expanding experience — travel) “Shirley Valentine.”

“Educating Rita” was nominated for three Oscars. It won none. Caine would have to wait for his, and became a Grand Old Man of the Cinema, celebrated in blockbusters, indie films and Oscar bait pictures for the rest of his days.

Walters became a character actress and mainstay of Brit film, a delight in the “Mama Mia!” movies, and a beloved member of the Harry Potter Universe.

Me? I saw “Educating Rita” from the perch of a public radio job at a university. Within three months of seeing it, I had enrolled in grad school, studying English/criticism, finding a mentor and starting the part time job of reviewing films for a North Dakota newspaper.

Maybe Roger Ebert didn’t like it. Sometimes he’d do that just to have something to argue with Siskel about on TV. I thought “Rita” was a wonderful character piece that spoke to people who could relate to working class upbringing aspiring for something greater. For years, I’d write columns on how this should be shown to teenagers — cussing included — who might pick up on its messaging and aspire to bigger, finer things.

Now, I still see it as a true classic, one of the finest films of the ’80s, a high point for Caine, Walters and Gilbert and a movie I think about all the time because it literally changed my life.

Rating: PG, some profanity

Cast: Julie Walters, Michael Caine, Maureen Lipman, Malcolm Douglas, Michael Williams

Credits: Directed by Lewis Gilbert, scripted by Willy Russell, based on his play. A Rank/Acorn release, on Youtube, Amazon and many free streamers.

Running time: 1:50

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Classic Film Review: Essential cinema for the college bound kid — “Educating Rita (1983)”

Movie Review: Odd Phenomena convince LA oddballs there’s “Something in the Dirt”

You’ve got to be on their wavelength to “get” the latest strange, dry and deadpan sci-fi venture of “Synchronic” and “The Endless” creators Justin Benson and Aaron Moorhead.

“Something in the Dirt” is about two oddly-mismatched, reasonably compatible Angelinos who stumble into some bizarre phenomena that they set out to study, film and stream-of-consciousness “explain” in a DIY documentary about what’s going on.

For me, it was a droll reminder that I’m not so much on their wavelength as wavelength-adjacent. Their movies have a questioning and curious high-mindedness and intention that isn’t exactly something that one warms up to, or anything that provokes empathetic, fearful, awed or amused reactions.

You don’t leave one of their films saying “I laughed, I cried.” Well, I don’t, anyway.

“Dirt” begins when an itinerant LA bartender Levi (Benson) moves into a dumpy apartment on a flightpath to LAX, a place at the base of a (Laurel) canyon-side that seems consumed with ugly brushfires in the background of most every exterior shot we see of it.

John (Moorhead) is a long-time tenant, a former math teacher and church photographer who followed his husband to LA, and now makes ends meet by gathering and charging city scooters.

The first “joke” here might be the huge, unexplained blood stain on the religious gay man’s shirt when snorkeling buff Levi meets him.

Levi bums a smoke, provides a sort of cut-quartz ash tray for their shared enjoyment. And something — or some entity — makes the damned thing levitate in Levi’s overheated apartment.

Their jaws drop — a bit. The more articulate John notes that “We just saw something profound, and we have to show it to the world,” something “that’s like book deals and like movies and like TV shows and religious views and…”

Levi? They’ve just seen what happens when you “take too many edibles (while) watching ‘Unsolved Mysteries.'”

I mean, they’re both amazed and nonplussed. And yes, the “edibles” analogy is funny.

They and we take note of the formulae, equations, refraction diagrams and the like that cover the walls in Levi’s apartment, which had been vacant for a decade. There’s something “off” about his closet door.

And again, that ashtray-looking rock levitated and as the light passed through it, patterns emerged on the walls that has John musing over “ghosts” and “gateways” and light, and Levi wondering if they’re having some “Dan Brown” (“Da Vinci Code”) response to what’s going on.

“If you’re a ghost, DO something…different. Do something DIFFERENT.”

John talks Levi into making a documentary about this phenomenon, which multiplies into phenomena as he muses about the “cosmic puzzle” and the “music of the spheres” that seem connected with what they’re seeing (“Ode to Joy,” pop culture shorthand for “deep”).

Snippets of home movies of childhood (a NASA visit) and hints of the secrets each man is keeping from the other are blended into esoteric discussions of the light spectrum, time travel, “Jerusalem Syndrome,” TED talks, cats as a possible source in a spike in schizophrenia (“You can look it up!”), “The X-Files” and the characters “Dana Fox or Mulder Scully,” and “Something in the Dirt” half-morphs into a mocumentary.

A chemist, a geologist and assorted film editors weigh in about whatever is going on in this corner of Laurel Canyon for the “film.”

“How much you think Netflix pays for something like this?”

Benson and Moorhead posit two incompatible but somehow sync-able ways of looking at the world in showing us two out-of-their-depths stumbling into something extraordinary and then struggling to find ways to “show it to the world” and cash in on it, and maybe understand it as they do.

Levi, like us, may wonder if it’s “possible this is extremely dangerous and we just overlooked that part?” But there’s a heedlessness borne of John’s Internet and TED talk hubris, the idea that if you’ve trawled the web enough, you’re qualified to look for answers and reach conclusions, even if you’re plainly not, like say almost everybody making movies about UFOs, ghosts and “unexplained phenomena.”

“What’s crazier, believing every single coincidence you see, or just ignoring them?”

The presence of peripheral characters doesn’t alter this film’s two-hander nature, and fortunately for the leads, one is a perfectly convincing “surfer, dude” and the other could pass for a lapsed gay Mormon missionary who swears and smokes.

The jokes are desert Southwest dry — Levi complaining about how hard it is to get a bartender job in LA, John quoting a fear-of-flying friend that “You can only fall so fast” and begging Levi to watch him for signs of a “psychotic break.”

What Benson and Moorhead have conjured up here is their oddest, most esoteric dramedy yet, a tale quirky and weird, more serious than silly and certainly worth a look just to pick through the torrent of references herein. You’ve just got to be on their wavelength to get anything more than passing pleasure out of it.

Rating: R for language and a brief violent image.

Cast: Aaron Moorhead and Justin Benson

Credits: Directed by Justin Benson and Aaron Moorhead, scripted by Justin Benson. An XYZ release.

Running time: 1:55

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Review: Odd Phenomena convince LA oddballs there’s “Something in the Dirt”