Next interview: Got questions for James McAvoy?

ImageHis screen work in recent years has taken on a lot of different colors — conflicted guys, crooked guys, and in “Filth,” James McAvoy takes things even further afield as a devious, reprobate — a bad, bad cop.

 

“Trance,” “Welcome to the Punch,” he’s got another “X-Men” film due out after “Filth,” a turn in “Frankenstein” on its way. We’ve spoken a few times over the years, beginning with his break-out film, “The Last King of Scotland.” I think the last time we talked, he’d provided the title character’s voice in “Arthur Christmas.”

Got questions for James McAvoy? Post them as comments, and thanks for the help.

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Next interview: Got questions for James McAvoy?

Box Office: Will “Amazing” reach $100 million?

The reviews haven’t been generous. There’s the sense, among the cognoscenti, that this Sony “Spider-Man” beast is just too cynical, too generic, too lacking, to stand shoulder to shoulder with the Marvel marvels that “Captain America,” “Iron Man,” “The Avengers” and “Thor” have become.

But people will still flock to see it, right? Box Office Mojo is thinking it’ll do an eye-popping $91 million over this weekend. Reviews be damned.

Box Office Guru says $92.

My guess is that the reviews will suppress this one a bit, that word of mouth won’t help, and that it won’t hit $90.

If women are truly embracing the amusing-enough “The Other Woman,” this weekend will be the giveaway. If it does what the prognosticators are expecting it to do, it’ll only manage $13 million. I think it’ll hold more audience than that — $15-18. But we’ll see.

 

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Box Office: Will “Amazing” reach $100 million?

Weekend Reviews: “Spider-Man” fails to amaze, “Belle” dazzles

ImageThere are often course corrections by critics over the course of a director’s career, or over the path of a film franchise.

Maybe critics, like Siskel & Ebert at the start of the “Ace Ventura” era, will all of a sudden discover GRAND fun and GREAT art in a second film after audiences embraced a first film they so memorably and cluelessly trashed.

Maybe critics who wept tears of bitter joy over the silly “depth” of “The Tree of Life” go ahead and eviscerate everything Terrence Malick does afterward, rightly realizing — late — that he’s lost it.

Or maybe they ride the tide of “Amazing Spider-Man,” knowing how angry the killer bees of fanboydom will be if they don’t, even if they know it’s a heartless, cynical “product.” Still, nobody likes to be called an “easy lay” or a hack, even when it fits.

Thus, does “Amazing Spider-Man 2” fall into rotten territory on the Rotten Tomatoes tomatometer.

I dined out for months on the web traffic I got for being a lone voice in the wilderness saying “Amazing” wasn’t. Now, my middling endorsement of the second film — Garfield’s found a fun way to play the character, at least — may end up being in the minority as a huge section of the reviewing classes are panning it. I sat on the fence with this one, cut Garfield, if not the hack making the film, some slack. “Ordinary” it is. Let the killer bees be damned.

“Belle” is a splendid romantic lesson in history, art, slavery and class. Jane Austen meets “12 Years a Slave.” A star-making performance by Gugu Mbatha-Raw, a director (Amma Asante) now to be reckoned with. Go see it. A cluster of New York critics panned it, but they’re a circle jerk of hate, on most occasions.

Actual conversation I had with a publicist for the movie “Walk of Shame,” who refused to preview the film for critics. Including me.

“Listen, tell your boss that NOBODY is going to be talking about this movie THIS weekend of all weekends. NOBODY. You need people to review it.”

Wouldn’t listen. POS will be lucky to pull in 77 customers, nationwide. Utterly ignored, too.

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Weekend Reviews: “Spider-Man” fails to amaze, “Belle” dazzles

“Belle” director and star go where Jane Austen never dared

ImageFolding fans flutter, bosoms heave above Empire-waisted dresses and class distinctions get in the way of true love.

But in the 18th century romance “Belle,” the young British aristocrat trying to find her place, in society, and in love, is black, the daughter of a black woman and a white sea captain of noble birth. Still, try to find a review of the new costume romance “Belle” that doesn’t mention “Jane Austen.”

The comparison to the works of the author of “Emma” and “Pride & Prejudice” may be too obvious to avoid. However, “Belle” is about something Austen rarely came close to addressing, Britain’s contemporaneous debate on the financially important-morally indefensible slave trade.

“It wasn’t something polite people talked about,” Amma Asante, the film’s director says, explaining Austen’s omission of the subject, itself the topic of Austen studies and scholarly debate. .

“There’s even a breakfast scene in our movie that demonstrates that, where Lady Mansfield interrupts and says ‘This is a vulgar topic,'” Asante says.

“Austen’s world was more concentrated on the domestic,” adds Gugu Mbatha-Raw, the British actress of mixed race who plays the title role in “Belle.” “That’s what makes “Belle” so new. We still have Austen’s world, that domestic, marriage market life. It may have the familiar Jane Austen feel of it, but there’s something more at stake here than marrying well.”

Dido Elizabeth Belle grew up in the home of a very famous uncle. William Murray (played by Tom Wilkinson in the film) was Lord Mansfield and Lord Chief Justice. After raising Belle in his home, Lord Mansfield decided the pivotal case in the history of Britain’s early abolition movement — the “Zong Massacre” — in which an insurance company refused to reimburse a slave ship owner for the human cargo he tossed over the side in an effort to commit fraud.

“The Zong Case really does something that no Austen novel or film ever does,” Mbatha-Raw says. “It gives a political context, with the abolition movement as a big part of that.”

The title of Austen’s “Mansfield Park” may not just be a coincidence. As the literary critic Edward Said has pointed out, Austen’s only direct mention of the slave trade comes in the novel titled “Mansfield Park,” where character Fanny Price “reminds her cousin that after asking Sir Thomas about the slave trade, “there was such a dead silence”” that spoke volumes. The lively debate over Austen’s hidden or barely hidden attitudes on the subject has played out in such scholarly works as Gabrielle D. V. White’s “Jane Austen in the Context of Abolition.”

But “Belle” wasn’t filmed as an anecdote to Austen’s concentration on the domestic rather than the worldly. After all, Austen never mentioned the late-18th, early 19th century Napoleonic Wars, any more than the slightly earlier “Belle” focuses on Britain’s losing efforts in the American Revolution, which was going on as the Zong Case was decided and Dido Belle was coming of age and being presented to British society. Asante saw the film as a chance to “blend politics, art and history” into an Austenesque romance.

The film depicts Belle’s life, growing up with a cousin the same age, a white woman also being raised by her aunt and uncle. And it’s inspiration was a contemporaneous portrait of the two young women made by Johann Zoffany.

“The producer sent me a picture postcard of it, and it drew me in,” Asante says. “I knew how unusual that representation was. People of color were accessories in European portraits of that age. Pets, almost. They were always lower in the frame, looking up in awe to the white protagonist in the painting.

“Dido was higher in the frame, dressed in expensive clothes, grinning and pointing at herself. You ask questions when you see a painting like that.”

The portrait was the main thing the screenwriter, director and star had to go on in creating “Belle,” “a lovely starting point, for all of us,” Mbatha-Raw says. “It’s so unusual, seeing a black woman, of that time, in a painting with her white counterpart, Elizabeth, her status plainly equal in the composition of it. Her gaze is mischievous. There’s a brightness to her eyes, looking directly at the viewer.”

There’s documentation of how Dido Belle was not exactly treated as an equal in the household, an American businessman’s diary noting how she wasn’t allowed to dine with guests, but “he was ‘shocked’ to see ‘a black’ emerging, after dinner, to socialize with the family,” Mbatha-Raw says, with a laugh. But the Mansfields all left Dido money in their wills, “showing the degree of love and affection they had for her, “Asante says.

Asante, who uses lots of close-ups “as sort of my signature, taking you into the mind of the character,” knew she’d found her Belle when she met Mbatha-Raw, best known in this country for a supporting role she played in Tom Hanks’ “Larry Crowne.”

“She has the innate sense of grace that made her seem absolutely at home in this world,” Asante says.

“The corsets help,” jokes Mbatha-Raw. “Your posture, your movement, it makes you fit in.”

“Belle” is earning winning reviews, with Variety’s Justin Chang echoing many in calling the “Austen” and “Slave Trade” topic pairing “a surprisingly elegant and emotionally satisfying fit.”

The director and her star, both British and both black, say they were, in the end, most moved by their love of period romances and the lack of roles for women of color in them. As Asante puts it, “I made this for all the little girls like me, who love a costume drama, who get swept in the romance of it all, but never see themselves reflected on the screen as anything other than a servant.”

Image

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on “Belle” director and star go where Jane Austen never dared

Movie Review: “Decoding Annie Parker”

ImageIt’s easy to forget the dark ages — when women died in their thousands and the staid, male-dominated medical profession didn’t react with alarm and purpose in trying to figure out why, when geneticists wouldn’t roll up their sleeves to tackle something difficult and time-consuming that impacted mostly women, when computers took days, weeks and years to process data your laptop could crunch in a flash.
“Decoding Annie Parker” is about those dark years — the 1970s and early ’80s — when it took women, teams of them, to sort through medical histories, beg for funding and computer time and reach a conclusion that seems blindingly obvious, now.
Breast cancer is mostly genetic, stupid.
“Decoding” isn’t just a science biography and isn’t just “Breast Cancer: The Movie.” It tells the tragic story of a Canadian high school graduate who buried her mother and her sister, who knew her grandmother died from breast cancer, and couldn’t get doctors to admit that yeah, maybe she inherited the disease that takes her own breast years after she “knew this would happen.” The film tells Annie Parker’s story with heart and wit, and finds a few funny insights into the stubborn, brusque woman, Dr. Mary-Claire King, whose lonely quest to find proof would bear fruit.
Samantha Morton plays Annie, whose morbid sense of humor arrived at an early age.
“My life was a comedy. I just had to learn to laugh.”
She and her sister (Marley Shelton) grew up under a disease that dominated their youth thanks to their mother’s early death. They regard cancer as a monster, hidden in a room they never go into in the house they grew up in.
“Someday, he’ll get us, too.”
And when sister Joan dies of the same thing, Annie’s fears are confirmed. Her joyful, sex-filled “bad decision” life — she married a Toronto pool cleaner and musician (Aaron Paul, hilarious) — has a cloud hanging over it. She can find humor in funerals, but she is obsessed about what she knows is coming, not that the obsession makes that day she finds a lump any less wrenching.
King is a cold and charmless researcher who can’t convince donors to fund her search for genetic markers in breast cancer in 1970s Canada. Helen Hunt is perfectly cast, bringing the too-brilliant/too-impatient scientist to brittle life.
Kindly, patronizing male doctors tell Annie “Your family did have a bit of bad luck.” But she and Dr. King, whom she has never met, know better.
Eventually, a younger doctor and a sharply observant nurse (Rashida Jones, sassy-funny) join Annie in her quest to find clues, even as Dr. King finally gets together a team, the computer time and the money to crack this code. It takes years and years, with Annie going through the horrors of cancer and the nightmare of chemotherapy and surgery, never knowing when “the monster” will return.
Co-writer and director Steven Bernstein finds ways for Annie to lighten the glum mood this movie should have had, mainly through her wacky, sex-filled marriage. Aaron Paul, of “Breaking Bad” and “Need for Speed,” is an amusing essay in eye-linered, glam-rock slacker.
“Decoding Annie Parker” is an uplifting story, a generic medical drama that doesn’t transcend its TV movie “disease of the week” origins. But it does remember this history with wit, charm and heart. It’s “be willing to reject orthodoxy” ethos seems like a lesson that the medical profession needs to learn and relearn when dealing with patients. Unlike doctors, the sick take no comfort from the tried and failed orthodox way of treating what is killing them. They need people as desperate to find a cure as they are.
Image
MPAA Rating: R for language and some sexual content
Cast: Samantha Morton, Helen Hunt, Aaron, Paul, Rashida Jones, Alice Eve, Maggie Grace
Credits: Directed by Steven Bernstein, written by Adam and Steven Bernstein and Michael Moss. An eOne release.
Running

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | 1 Comment

Image

Image“Belle” is a movie that instantly joins the ranks of the screen’s great period piece romances.
Imagine a Jane Austen adaptation, with all its Empire waistlines and romantic longing, but a film in which the obstacles to love are far greater than mere social standing, a story that transcends its comedy of manners frame and is actually about something — slavery.
“Belle” is loosely based on the life of Dido Elizabeth Belle, the daughter of an aristocratic Royal Navy captain (Matthew Goode) and a Negro woman. That sort of thing happened in 18th century England, but polite people didn’t speak of it. And a child born of such a union faced a hard life of the same drudgery that faced England’s slaves and freed blacks — servants, as a class.
“I am here to take you to a good life,” her father says after her mother, whom he did not marry, dies. And so he does.
Belle, or “Dido,” as her new family calls her, comes to live at Kenwood House in Hampstead. She will be raised by her father’s uncle, Lord and Lady Mansfield (Tom Wilkinson and Emily Watson), and the Lord’s spinster sister (Penelope Wilton of “Downton Abbey”).
Her upbringing will be alternately kind and generous for its day, and circumscribed. “Papa” may say he is doing this “in accordance with your birthright,” but the Lord is keenly aware of his times. She will be companion to the other niece they’re raising, Elizabeth (Sarah Gadon) and enjoy all the education and privilege life has to offer.
But when company comes, Dido (Gugu Mbatha-Raw) will dine by herself. No sense shocking the proprieties of their guests.
“Too high in rank to dine with the servants,” Dido grows up to complain, “but too low to dine with the family?”
Hers is a future “without possibility of a suitable marriage.” Being smart, talented and unutterably beautiful, they may be writing Dido off a little too easily — even if this was the 18th century.
Tom Felton does a nasty Draco Malfoy-ish turn as a young swell who woos Elizabeth and disapproves of the attentions his brother (James Norton) is giving Dido. Sure, have your fun, he suggests, but one wants “a pure English Rose to decorate one’s home.” Still, Dido’s wealth has the boys’ snob of a mother (Miranda Richardson) seeing her with a more approving eye.
But Lord Mansfield has bigger things on his mind than mates for his nieces. He is Lord Chief Justice of the King’s Bench, and in 1783, all of Britain awaited his ruling on a case involving England’s “most important” business — the slave trade. And whatever tolerance he has developed raising the “cherished” Dido, the wrong ruling on an insurance claim for a cargo of dead slaves could be a bigger blow to the Empire than the recent loss of the American colonies.
Amma Assante’s film is very much a chamber piece, intimate and romantic, full of actors in beautiful period costumes requesting the pleasure of “taking a turn” about the grounds with one other. But it is breathtakingly ambitious for such a piece, taking us back to that age and letting us see slavery, in all its inhuman ugliness, through Mbatha-Raw’s huge, expressive eyes. She is a revelation, suggesting Dido’s curiosity and confusion at her odd station in life, and spirit that just wasn’t allowed in someone of her sex or race back then. Assante wisely keeps the camera close on Mbatha-Raw as Dido discovers what typically becomes of people of her skin color, and revels in Dido’s haughty dismissal of the passionate young abolitionist and would-be lawyer (Sam Reid) who sets off sparks every time they clash over class divisions, slavery and the Lord’s “duty.”
Misan Sagay’s script crackles with Austen-esque banter.
“Girls, will you REFRAIN from shrieking…like the blessed FRENCH!”
“Did you not listen to the rumors when you were spreading them, Mother?”
Beautifully cast, touchingly played and handsomely mounted, “Belle” is as close to perfect as any costumed romance has a right to be. This is a story Austen herself would have been proud to claim as one of her own, if polite young ladies ever talked of such things in polite company. And in its heartbreaking young star, the movies have a glorious new feminine ideal, as bedroom-eyed heart breaker or wide-eyed innocent, and an English Rose for the new millennium.

(Roger Moore interviews director and star about “Austen” and slavery and the portrait that launched the movie.)

MPAA Rating: PG for thematic elements, some language and brief smoking images
Cast:Gugu Mbatha-Raw, Tom Wilkinson, Emily Watson, Tom Felton, Miranda Richardson, Sarah Gadon, Sam Reid
Credits: Directed by Amma Assante, written by Misan Sagay. An Fox Searchlight release.
Running time: 1:44

Posted on by Roger Moore | Comments Off on Movie Review: “Belle,” an instant classic

Movie Review: “The Amazing Spider-Man 2” still fails to amaze

ImageIf there’s a tie that binds most of the characters of the Marvel Universe together, it’s the mutability of the supposedly immutable human body. Characters are poisoned by radiation, zapped by electricity, bitten by spiders or broken, crushed, ruined or whatever.
And as Spider-Man cracks in “Amazing Spider-Man 2,” just “shake it off. It’s just your bones, muscles…”
But the real world doesn’t work like that. That’s one reason this comic book world has such a lasting appeal. Bullies are foiled, criminals are caught and great wrongs righted with supernatural intervention by supernaturally augmented humans. Because “Stan Lee is for Real.”
“Amazing 2” is kind of about that. It’s a violent film, with blood and death in between the digitally-animated brawls. Human bodies are tortured and broken, and there’s not always a web slinger there to stop that flipping police car, that hurtling bus, that Russian psychopath or that jet that’s about to crash.
It’s not an altogether pleasant experience. There’s nothing “amazing” about that ultimate modern movie cliche, the montage of a character finding something out about himself in a sequenced edited to a hit pop tune. Terribly ordinary. Things tend to drag as director Marc Webb has problems with focus, keeping the many story threads straight and continuity (Watch Gwen’s outfits). Many otherwise faceless extras pop off the screen as if he’s about to give their nameless characters the same significance as Stan Lee himself — who always has cameos in these Marvels.
But Andrew Garfield finds his voice as the character, making his second try at Peter Parker a caffeinated wise-cracker, enjoying his notoriety, talking to himself just like the guy in the comic book. He’s funny.
Clueless Aunt May (Sally Field) wonders why he has soot all over his face.
“I was…cleaning the chimney!”
“We HAVE no chimney!”
“Whuuu–aaaat?”
Peter hums Spider-Man’s theme song and hurls himself into situations with a teen’s recklessness. He almost misses his and Gwen Stacy’s (Emma Stone) high school graduation, dealing with a villain named Aleksei (Paul Giamatti).
But even though he doesn’t carry the angst of Tobey Maguire’s Spidey, Peter has problems. He sees Gwen’s late dad (Denis Leary) everywhere he looks, and remembers his promise to the dead cop to distance himself from his daughter, due to the danger.
Peter hasn’t seen the opening scene in the movie, in which we flash back to Peter’s parents’ (Campbell Scott, Embeth Davidtz) grisly deaths. And Peter has no idea that his great chemistry with long lost rich-kid pal Harry Osborn (Dane DeHaan) will go nowhere, because some of us remember 2002’s “Spider-Man” and how Harry turns out.
Jamie Foxx is an ignored, humiliated electrical engineer who has an accident involving electric eels and power lines. That transforms him from a Spider-Man fanboy into a glowing blue guy in a hoodie. In the ethos of this movie, Peter/Spidey reasons with the tormented villains, trying to connect with this doomed rich kid (Osborn) or that this “nobody” engineer.
“You’re not a nobody, you’re SOMEbody!”
Except for the Russian. He’s just…bad.
Returning director Marc Webb relies, again, on the 3D ( and IMAX, in some theaters) flying effects to cover the rough patches — and there are many — in “Amazing 2.” While Garfield and Stone have a nice sass to their scenes, Webb can do nothing to give this relationship the longing and heat of the Kirsten Dunst/Tobey Maguire Mary Jane and Peter moments.
And Webb’s team of screenwriters don’t find any pathos in all this computer animated flying and fighting, not until the finale.
So while this “Spider-Man” is, if anything, more competent than the first film it’s still not one that demands that you stick around after the credits. There’s nothing there.

Image
MPAA Rating: PG-13 for sequences of sci-fi action/violence
Cast: Andrew Garfield, Emma Stone, Jamie Foxx, Sally Field, Dane DeHaan, Paul Giamatti
Credits: Directed by Marc Webb, scripted by Robert Orci, Alex Kurtzman, Jef Pinkner, James Vanderbilt. A Columbia/Sony Pictures release.
Running time: 2:20

 

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | 4 Comments

Today’s screening: “The Amazing Spider-Man 2”

Have to admit, I was underwhelmed with the re-booted “Spider-Man,” the cynicism behind doing it, the Tony Perkins-ish leading man, the whole emotionally sterile/bottom line nature of the thing. So it is with a modicum of trepidation that I approach today’s showing of the sequel. Will it provide an emotional lift, or simply be a “This Week’s Super Villain (Jamie Foxx)” rote affair? There are millions of eager beavers out there, drooling in anticipation for this — as they were for the latest “Captain America” movie. The films are always competently made, decently acted (as far as such things go), but the endless conveyor belt of comics has left me cold, longing for that out of body experience that popcorn films, even comic book ones, used to promise.
Perhaps this will break that rut — the medium’s, or mine. But we’ll see.

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | 1 Comment

Pssst, Disney’s “Frozen” just crossed $400 million in US box office

ImageIt happened Friday night.

It’s not on a lot of screens, and it only earned $39,000 nationwide all day Friday.

But for fans who won’t just “Let it Go,” Disney’s “Frozen” has passed a pretty big milestone.  Little girls, and little boys, latched onto it and wouldn’t let go.

That’s more than “Finding Nemo,” which topped out at $380 million.

It won’t catch “Toy Story 3,” which ended its run at $415 million. But that’s the thin air of animated film box office that they’re both playing in.

Pixar? Pixar who?

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Pssst, Disney’s “Frozen” just crossed $400 million in US box office

Movie Review: Tom Hardy, and a BMW with Bluetooth sell the minimalist “Locke”

ImageIvan Locke is organized. We can tell by the way he loads everything he’ll need into his BMW SUV. He’s a born manager, a gifted multi-tasker. Every call he makes or takes carries the tone of a man calming down this employee, that boss, this overly-excited son worked up over a soccer match or that hysterical woman waiting to give birth.
You’d never know — but you soon find out — that his world is coming unraveled, right over the Bluetooth he all but wears out on the way from a construction site in England’s Midlands to a hospital in London.
A woman, not his wife, is about to give birth to his child. His job, which has him supervising tomorrow’s “biggest concrete pour in the history of Europe” (outside of military or nuclear plant construction, the exacting Locke corrects), has taken a back seat. He’s going to be present for the birth.
“I’ve made my decision,” he says, calmly, to his furious boss.
“You will be fine,” and “don’t start drinking (cider) he tells his frantic and overwhelmed assistant, who will have to supervise the pour by himself.
“I won’t be home for the match,” is all he’ll tell his youngest son.
“I want to move on to a practical next step” is the wrong thing to say to his “distressed” wife, after he breaks the news.
And every few minutes, he refuses to tell his paramour that he loves her, or to reassure the doctor and nurse who call that she will have “family” there for the birth.
“I am the father,” he says, firmly and devoid of emotion. He will be there. He’s being responsible. To everyone.
“Locke” is a compressed, compact melodrama that is just actor Tom Hardy in a car, driving down the M6, meeting his mistakes and the people he has let down head on — the only way he knows how. It’s a measured, compelling performance that starts out quiet and works its way toward frantic, with Hardy never losing his Stiff Upper Lip reserve.
He just Keeps Calm and Drives On.
Hardy and writer-director Steven Knight keep this intimate story pretty close to riveting, as Locke ticks through calls to see to it that things at home are manageable, things in the distant hospital are under control and every T is crossed at a very complicated work site, where concrete has to be poured all at once, matching grades of foundation cement from multiple providers, with roads closed to allow the trucks through.
Even when things go sideways, or “pear-shaped” as the Brits put it, Locke tries to keep his cool. His fury at the assistant who starts hitting the cider despite specific warnings not to drink, his annoyance at cops who break their word, a town council member who won’t deal with a last minute hiccup because he’s “at an Indian restaurant,” the wife who keeps weeping and hanging up on him, the lover whose hysteria takes on a different tone when she’s sedated.
Hardy makes this guy a regular iceberg who only starts to thaw as we begin to understand why he turned out this way.
The obstacles that keep popping up seem melodramatic, and some touches — a man lecturing his dead father — don’t really work.
But “Locke” will hold your interest as it presents a side of the burly, bluff “Dark Knight” villain we have never seen before on screen.
Image
MPAA Rating: R for language throughout.
Cast: Tom Hardy, the voices of Olivia Colman, Ruth Wilson, Andrew Scott
Credits: Written and directed by Steven Knight. An A24 release.
Running time: 1:25

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Review: Tom Hardy, and a BMW with Bluetooth sell the minimalist “Locke”