BOX OFFICE: How far will ‘Toy Story 4’ fall on its second weekend? Will ‘Annabelle’ eat Chucky’s lunch?

yes4

And will audiences long for”Yesterday?”

Those are the questions to be answered by this time on Sunday.

“Toy Story” movies historically lose under 50% of their opening weekend audience on their second weekend.

So even though Pixar’s latest underperformed against estimates — hitting $120 million when $140 to $200 was predicted — it should logically have a shot at close to $70 this weekend.

I am sensing lukewarm enthusiasm for this one and figure $60 will be closer to the mark.

Box Office Mojo says $68.

“Annabelle Comes Home” has a polish, suspense and fresher brand than “Child’s Play.” But being the second haunted doll movie of the month has got to hurt.

Reviews for both films were mixed. I preferred “Annabelle.” I still see $20 million as its ceiling, but you never know.

Box Office Mojo says $16 for the weekend. But The Hollywood Reporter passed on the fact that “Annabelle” picked up $7.2 million on a WEDNESDAY night opening, heading towards a $33 million five day take ($20 or so for the weekend alone).

“Yesterday” will be out there, hoping that people nostalgic for The Beatles will show up.

The movie’s weak tea, not one of Danny Boyle or Richard Curtis’s best.

And that Beatles audience is older and out of the movie going habit.

$12 million? Maybe.

“Avengers” is hoping added end credits footage will draw the drones in to push it past “Avatar,” “Aladdin” continues to make bank and “Child’s Play” looks to fall off a cliff this weekend.

 

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on BOX OFFICE: How far will ‘Toy Story 4’ fall on its second weekend? Will ‘Annabelle’ eat Chucky’s lunch?

Documentary Review: “The Queen” is a film about the “other” queens, just as historic

queen1.jpeg

“The Queen” is a fascinating film artifact, newly restored and re-issued this Pride Month to remind us how far the culture has come in the past 50 years.

Here’s a drag queen culture documentary that predates the also-restored and re-released “Paris is Burning” by decades, a less showy and yet more revealing film about the state of drag gay America, pre-Stonewall.

Of course it was “groundbreaking.” Here was straight America’s introduction to the world of drag queen competitions, with all the wigs, makeup, vamping, singing and shtick, the talent and the bitchiness on full display.

There are no shrinking violets in drag, honey. And little that you’d call “closeted” either. These contestants at the Miss All-America Camp Beauty Pageant in New York are frank about their sexuality, the world they live in and the subculture they thrive in.

Yes, they’re effeminate and funny, but rarely in that campy “Boys in the Band” way. They’re out there and outspoken, not demure beauty queens who will take the judges’ decisions at face value. And the names of those judges tells you just how “in” this world already was half a century ago.

Andy Warhol and his “star” Edie Sedgewick, the journalist and publisher George Plimpton, the writer Terry Southern and songwriter Jerry Leiber (of Leiber and Stoller) are among the judges. Famed photographer Jill Krementz was there, capturing the event.

Frank Simon’s film is quite well photographed and edited (It looks like grainy 16mm.), with a polish that few similar documentaries or reality TV shows of today could match.

We meet Jack Doroshow, on the phone encouraging his parents to come as he shaves and puts on his makeup and costume as “Sabrina.”

“I do this whole ‘bar mitzvah mother’ thing,'” Jack says, noting that when drag queens are asked about who they are, or were “before” putting on their war paint, they all respond the same way.

“There WAS no ‘before,’ darling!”

Jack is our narrator-guide (and on-stage MC) into this world, who points out that the queens he knows are “night people” who only know “their street corners, their bars, the nearest YMCA, and their bathhouses.”

Yeah, that was a LONG time ago. And yes, the implication that some of these performers “perform” the services of a hooker isn’t missed.

Organizers and contestants gather backstage and gossip and kvetch as they prep for the show, a Bette Davis poster in the dressing room of that rare New York hotel “hip enough” to host them and close to Brooklyn’s Town Hall, where they’d compete.

They’re lectured about the rules, “No ‘cruising’ in front of the judges” and Jack breaks down, for the competitors and the audience, how the judges will evaluate them.

“Five points for wawwwk, five points for tawwwk, five for bathing suit and ten for beauty.”

We meet Richard, a stylish Twiggy-thin slip of a thing, who looks so feminine a little resentment sets in among the others.

They make their excursion to “Mdme. Berthe Theatrical Costumes & Gowns” to try on outfits re-engineered for men who dress as women, totally a thing even back then.

We see them rehearse the chorus line numbers and hear bits of their acts, campy impersonations in song of everybody from Mary Martin to Carol Channing, giants of the Broadway stage of their day.

That’s one of the startling things I took away from “The Queen.” There’s a live band accompanying their singing in the contest, all set to play “A Pretty Girl is Like a Melody” as the winner promenades.

And plump and primped or thin and “NBW, a natural beauty wonder,” the queens are all very good. There’s no lip-syncing, no Spanx, no plastic surgery. The fakery is more honest, actual talent more obvious.

It’s also stunning to hear echoes of conversations only reaching the wider public recently, views expressed half a century ago.

One contestant recalls telling his draft board (they all refer to themselves by the gender they were born with) “My mother and father made me (this) way.”

An African American queen getting the same rejected “4F” designation from the draft, but mentions writing a letter to the president to complain. “I want to serve, protect my country…They wrote back and said ‘We understand…but maybe some day.”

Another contestant reveals that he has the money for a sex change, and a hospital that could perform it close by. “But a sex change…is the last thing I would want.”

“My husband is in the service– he’s in Japan now,” wouldn’t go for that.

queen2.jpeg

The frank conversations about the nature of their sexuality may be conducted in the dated terminology of the day, but these are timeless attitudes that otherwise sound as modern as whatever show RuPaul appears on these days.

“Camp” is a word that’s falling into disuse in these more tolerant times. But back then, that was the whole point, and full ownership of it was reflected in the name of the pageant. This was “camp” back when camp meant something.

And seriously, what else could you call a singing, dancing kick-line of drag queens performing “It’s a Grand Old Flag?”

3half-star

MPAA Rating: unrated

Cast: Jim Dine, Jack Doroshow, Bruce Jay Friedman

Credits: Directed by Frank Simon.  A Kino Lorber release.

Running time: 1:08

 

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Documentary Review: “The Queen” is a film about the “other” queens, just as historic

Documentary Review: The Artist Christo wants us to join him “Walking on Water”

water1

“Walking on Water” begins with old man in his studio, sketching with charcoal, drawing, painting and gluing together a piece of art that he promptly hangs on a wall when he finishes.

It is the artist in action.

Ah, but this is Christo. Anything he can hang on the wall is just the mock-up. This fellow is known for pieces with “SCALE.”

“Walking on Water” is about the Bulgarian artist Christo Vladimirov Javacheff, known to the world as “Christo,” famous for his imaginative environmental (as in out of doors) installations. These fanciful pieces are vast, site-specific, colorful and temporary works that he and partner Jean-Claude have decorated hills with umbrellas, wrapped islands and bedecked Central Park in New York with (“The Gates”) over the decades.

Now in his 80s, Christo had — the film tells us — “disappeared from public view” after the death of collaborator Jean Claude died in 2009. “Walking on Water” would mark his return to the game.

“All the projects are works of art,” he tells a class of school children. “And totally useless. We make them because we want to see them.”

“Art is not a profession. Not nine to five. You are artist and do art ALL the time.”

He talks the talk and in this case, and in every other one, he walks the walk.

The works are self-financed, ephemeral and often intrusive. For that reason, Christo and Jean-Claude were denied permission to follow through on their ideas more often than not.

“The Floating Pier” was to be a three kilometer long walkway on Lake Iseo in Italy.  In 1970, they had proposed doing this very project on the Rio de la Plata in Argentina “but we never got permission.” They tried again on Tokyo Bay decades later. Again, no dice.

But Christo never let go of the concept; a thin, fabric-covered floating walkway that would give those walking on its undulating surface the feeling of “walking on water.”

Filmmaker Andrey Paounov (“The Boy Who Would be King”) follows Christo through the months leading up to this installation in the summer of 2016.

We see an impatient, snippy and demanding artist, easily irritated — either in person or chewing out his production team via Skype.

“No No No No No! Later Later Later!”

There is no art, he suggests, without shouting.

“This ees HORROR story. HORROR story…My WAY. IDIOTS! Total idiots!”

His fixer, the guy that makes things happen, is Vladimir Yavachev. He’s the only one who gets to shout back. And as Christo pushes his idealistic idea forward — technology makes it a lot more feasible today — Vladimir is charged with making it work. Or telling him “No.”

“It’s NOT going to work…”Two kilometers of this? Chain? You might as well use rope.”

That was Christo’s idea for how to hold the chain onto the interlocking plastic floating blocks that are what make up temporary docks, piers and platforms that float in this day and age.

“Walking on Water” shows Christo selling drawings and conceptual paintings of his idea to finance it, and just what it takes to put a 50 foot wide (guessing) walkway in place, crossing two inlets on an Italian lake and surrounding a cute little island in the middle of it.

Christo pitches in, snapping the dock pieces together, shoving them in the water. It looks flimsy, his helpers tell him and we can see for ourselves.

He gives talks, meets with art collectors, pauses for a selfie with a cook and takes time off to do a commission for an African charity headed by Pope Francis.

It takes seamstresses, sewing machines, thousands and thousand of those snap-together block, a fleet of inflatable dinghies and a helicopter to put this thing together.

And on opening day, it rains.

The tantrums don’t stop when the 16 day installation debuts. The towns around the lake are flooded with people. An onslaught of paparazzi alone looks like it could sink the damned thing.

And as he watches CCTVs showing the crowd control and viewing/walking tide of onlookers, a sea of people, tens of thousands of them, Christo has another revelation.

“Eees madness. TOTAL madness! We can be sued. Can we be sued?”

He leaves it to Vladimir to deal with infamous Italian bureaucracy and its infamous practitioners.

“You are stupid,” Vladimir says, echoing his boss. “As stupid as is possible!”

water2.jpeg

But we’ve already seen what a rock star the octogenarian still is. Why is he surprised that tens of thousands have come and hundreds of thousands are expected?

Paounov’s film is so straightforward as to be the very definition of “documentary,” observing call, covering an event and what leads up to it like a dispassionate news reporter.

But “Walking on Water” not only shows the artist in action, it gets at why these gimmicky and despite what he says (“We never repeat ourselves!”) repetitive thematic artworks are so popular with the public, and have been since the 1960s.

Whimsy on this scale is hard to find.

2half-star6

 

MPAA Rating: unrated

Cast: Christo, Vladimir Yavachev

Credits: Directed by Andrey Paounov. A Kino Lorber release.

Running time: 1:40

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Documentary Review: The Artist Christo wants us to join him “Walking on Water”

Preview, “Midway” takes another shot at recreating America’s greatest naval victory on the big screen

Looks very…digital. Impressive, but digital.

A Jonas Brother is in the cast, and Patrick Wilson and Ed Skrein, Aaron Eckhart and Luke Evans are, too.

“Midway” opens Nov. 8.

 

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Preview, “Midway” takes another shot at recreating America’s greatest naval victory on the big screen

Idris Elba writes a villain’s song for his “Hobbs and Shaw” bad guy

idris.jpg

Lest we forget that Idris sings, there’s this news.

Via Entertainment Weekly

https://t.co/xr2tb1gmzO https://twitter.com/EW/status/1144218085647368192?s=17

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Idris Elba writes a villain’s song for his “Hobbs and Shaw” bad guy

Movie Review — “Spider Man: Far from Home,” still friendly no matter what locale

spider1

“Spider-Man: Far from Home” is so cute you want to pinch its cheeks and remind it to wear sunscreen before it goes out to play.

It’s a super-hero movie slapped on top of a teens-take-a-trip-abroad comedy, fizzy and funny and more than a little slap-sticky — emphasis on “sticky.” That’s a great use to make of Tom Holland’s version of the web-slinger, a kid anxious to grow up and be a “real Avenger” one second, a boy who just wants to have fun with his peers and make time with the snarky Goth-girl MJ (Zendaya) the next.

Jon Watts, the director of the latest incarnations of this venerable franchise, shows his comedy roots (He worked for Onion TV, for Peter’s Sake.) even more openly in this new outing, giving us more double-takes, more Samuel L. Jackson (single) eyerolls, and a goofier name for Peter Parker’s famed “Spidey Sense,” his ability to forecast danger.

“Peter Tingle” Aunt May (the effervescent Marisa Tomei) calls it. Avengers aide de camp Happy (veteran funnyman Jon Favreau) repeats it. Because it’s funny.

Peter is ready to tell MJ “How I really feel” on this summer class trip to Venice, Paris, etc., chaperoned by a couple of clueless teachers (Martin Starr and J.B. Smoove).

Pal Ned  (Jacob Batalon) is coming. So are MJ and their high school’s blonde class TV anchor Mary (Angourie Rice).

But Nick Fury (Jackson) is calling, and Peter is “ghosting” him. Happy’s not happy about that. Imagine how angry the guy named “Fury” gets.

There’s a new menace, these elemental monsters “The Elements” — versions of wind, Earth, water and fire that “have a face.” Fury, with so many Avengers lost in the mass die-off non-Avengers now jokingly call “The Blip,” needs a replacement. Peter will have to do. Only the kid is determined to have his vacation.

There’s a possible new recruit, Beck, or “Mysterio” (Jake Gyllenhaal), who seems up to the task of taking on the monsters. But like Captain Marvel, he’s not of this world, or this version of it.

“You guys DO have ‘sarcasm’ on this Earth, right?”

Better to rely on your Friendly Neighborhood You-Know-What when the Elements start acting up . A hormonal “16 year-old from Queens” is not the best choice to put the weight of the world on, but you play the hand The Blip gave you.

 

The series’ ongoing bout with Peter’s sense of responsibility isn’t new. And even as the effects grow bigger, they’re kind of senses-dulling as this stage of the superhero movie onslaught.

What makes “Far from Home” a winner is its sense of play. It begins, after a noisy action prologue, with a mocking “In Memoriam” for the superheroes lost (something a tactless teenager with a TV show and Edit Pro would do) and finds its laughs in relationships, high school “types” (Tony Revolori is back as rich-dope “Flash”) and one-liners.

“Bitch, please.”

Three guesses as to who gets to say that.

The love story lacks the heat or heartbreak of the first Peter/MJ pairing, Tobey Maguire and Kirsten Dunst. The only performance worth calling that, really, is Gyllenhaal’s.

The plot holds few surprises, the fan pandering so common to this genre is handled flippantly and the action is now so digital as to make one long for the more tactile effects and fights of those now-ancient Maguire/Sam Raimi  “Spider-Man” pictures.

But “Far from Home” gets that all-important “tone” just right, over-the-top silliness in which no one involved, from screenwriter and director to cast and crew, ever lets us forget that they’re in on the joke.

Maybe that’s why Spider-Man never wears out his welcome, either in his “friendly neighborhood,” or “Far from Home.”

3stars2

MPAA Rating: PG-13 for sci-fi action violence, some language and brief suggestive comments

Cast: Tom Holland, Zendaya, Jake Gyllenhaal, Samuel L. Jackson, Cobie Smulders, Jon Favreau and Marisa Tomei

Credits: Directed by Jon Watts, script by Chris McKenna and Erik Summers.  A Sony Pictures release.

Running time: 2:09

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Review — “Spider Man: Far from Home,” still friendly no matter what locale

RIP Billy Drago: ‘Untouchables’ Actor was 73

drago1.jpgSome guys just have the villain’s look. Robert Davi, Dennis Farina, Henry Silva and Billy Drago are among them. Ed Begley Sr., not Jr.

Billy Drago made a great heavy. He had the right name for a bad guy. Benicio del Toro dead eyes, the perpetually sweaty look of a killer.

I am digging through my archives to figure out which film I interviewed him about, because I ALWAYS set aside profile times for the great heavies.

Maybe “Mysterious Skin,” “The Hills Have Eyes” or “Mad Dog Time.”

Drago gave us all the creeps in all the best ways.

RIP

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/untouchables-actor-bill-drago-dies-at-73-1221296

drago2

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on RIP Billy Drago: ‘Untouchables’ Actor was 73

Netflixable? Orson Welles’ “The Other Side of the Wind”

wind4.jpeg

You cannot call yourself a movie buff without being a fan of the cinema’s greatest artist and original “enfant terrible” Orson Welles. It’s just not allowed.

So rather than lose my card-carrying-cinephile card, I finally got around to the last film of the director who gave us “Citizen Kane,” “Touch of Evil,” “Chimes at Midnight” and “The Trial.”

Filmed from filmed from 1970 to ’76, running out of money, time and luck all along the way, “The Other Side of the Wind” was rescued from storage and legal limbo, finished and released by Netflix in the fall of 2018.

Let’s give the proper due to the streaming service for performing this public service to the cinema, letting the world see a film that has been little more than legend and Peter Bogdanovich (and Rich Little, who appears and mentioned it to me once) cocktail party anecdotes for decades.

It is nothing short of glorious, seeing the all-stars in this “all star cast,” a movie about making a movie in the tradition of “Day for Night” or “The Stuntman.”

Here’s the ancient Edmund O’Brien (“The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance”) playing one last bellowing drunk, the AD/unit manager for legendary director Jake Hannaford.

There’s the late Austrian actress Lilli Palmer, listening to Welles (heard off camera as interviewer), weighing in on “Hannaford,” another version of Welles himself played by the only actor/director who rivaled Welles as “larger than life” — John Huston.

“Mr. Hannaford pretends to be ignorant,” Palmer purrs, speaking of the man she nicknamed “GF, God the Father,” resplendently made up and shot in black and white. “Men only like men.”

Yes, she could be talking about the filmmaker’s sexuality.

Welles acolyte Peter Bogdanovich narrates, his own career blowing up even as he was setting aside nights and weekends to help Welles with this one. He plays a filmmaker/producer disciple of Hannaford.

“The man is infested with disciples. I’m the Apostle!”

Huston’s Hannaford is “God the Father” in the flesh, booming, twinking, cigar at the ready, wearing his droll sarcasm like an ascot with his omni-present safari jacket wardrobe.

“I want a drink!”

Vaudevillian George Jessel toasts Hannaford on his birthday, “The Ernest Hemingway of the Cinema!” Directors Paul Mazursky, Dennis Hopper, Claude Chabrol and Henry Jaglom bicker over “meaning” in cinema.

And most gloriously of all, Paul Stewart, who was with Welles from his radio days on into “Citizen Kane,” strides through a backlot with Mercedes McCambridge (“Touch of Evil”), film crew in tow, boom microphone overhead, breaking down just what went wrong with “The Other Side of the Wind.”

Because something did go wrong. There was a car crash. Somebody died. The footage was abandoned. And now it’s been pieced together (there are missing bits) and presented to the world almost five decades after the project began.

The film within the film mimics the finished film we’re watching now (on Netflix) in that most important regard. And it’s a bit of a mess, too.

Here’s the familiar Wellesian banter of actors, overlapping their dialogue, talking about someone who isn’t “there” — on that backlot, in the screening room where a trusted aid is showing rushes to a moneyman who isn’t buying into this, on the drive to “The Ranch,” at the party there that follows and at a drive-in theater rented to show the movie when all other means fail.

That “Citizen Kane” (and later “Rashomon” and “The Third Man” and “The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance” trick of having EVERYbody talking about the protagonist, who isn’t in the frame, has never been more emphatically applied than here.

Max (Geoffrey Land): Jake is just making it up as he’s done before.

Billy (Norman Foster): “He’s done is before.”

The movie within the movie is an obtuse, dated dollop of pretense, Welles imitating the art cinema of the 60s — “Last Year at Marienbad” to “Zabriskie Point” — with an obscure, symbolic and largely nude coupling and existential wrestling match between a Jim Morrison look-alike (Robert Random) and the Object of Desire who Desires Him and Will Have Him, without ever saying a word. Inane.

That “character” is played by Welles’ longtime companion, the exotic, olive-skinned Oja Kadar, credited as co-writer of the script (Sure.) and nude in ways mainstream film actresses never acquiesced to in that era.

This 70th birthday party is, our narrator tells us, “the last day of (Jake’s) life,” and he is surrounded by friends, peers, fans and cineastes of the academic, biography writing, CBC documentary-filming persuasion.

The shots are fluid, everything and everyone always in near-breathless motion. There is little here one could call an “establishing shot.” We’re just stuffed into an over-crowded convertible with Jake, his “Apostle” (Bogdanovich) and a film crew frantically asking insanely inane questions.

The smoky jazz of Michel LeGrand fills the soundtrack as busloads of cast and crew (Susan Strasberg plays a much-derided “critic”) follow Jake to The Ranch.

Meanwhile, the screening of rushes continues and continues to go badly, despite the Yes Man reassurances of Billy about “when we get that shot” and “when he” (the missing leading man) comes back.

Despite the disorienting, breathless flurry of motion and the near blur of montage, Welles’ eye for screen composition and staging is evident in every single frame — candlelit or shadowed, sunlit or in a car in the decades before GoPro cameras or even Steadicams.

The parade of extreme closeups look “grabbed” as opposed to “staged,” which of course they were. The whole has the feeling of the student film of a pretentious and quite rich and well-connected grad student at USC.

wind6.jpeg

Huston has the odd post-“Chinatown” pearl of wisdom.

“Hemingway? That left hook of his…was over-rated.”

Only Strasberg and Gregory Sierra, a TV actor of the day (“Barney Miller,” “Sanford & Son”) give much of what I’d call performances. Still, Palmer, McCambridge and Stewart acquit themselves with honor. And O’Brien is always a film buff’s delight, no matter how over-the-top.

Bogdanovich, who taped and taped his conversations with Welles and turned them into a good biography of his mentor, cracks about having to “abandon” his own planned biography…of Hannaford.

A telling moment, when a character notes Jake’s declining fortunes as the party empties out. He pronounced “biographer” the way Welles himself, the subject of too many such books, jokingly did.

Movies and friendship. Those are…mysteries  Jake

“Five of our best BEE-ographers have gone over to Otto Preminger!”

As if that’d ever happen.

There’s a self-awareness to “The Other Side of the Wind” that is almost funny, an editor complains to a projectionist about what’s up on the screen.

“The reels are out of order? It doesn’t matter, I suppose.”

In those rushes, the “actors” act — a “steambath” orgy, an explicit-for-its-era sex in a moving-car scene, other encounters in the buff — with Huston as Hannaford, the Voice of God whispering stage directions to his nude actors, mid performance, through a megaphone.

“”Pure Hitchcock, if you’ll pardon the language.”

It seems as if almost everybody in this fascinating artifact has a megaphone at some point, even Bogdanovich, doing his Jimmy Cagney impression, maybe a little Tennessee Williams, quoting Welles’ beloved Bard in line that gives the entire enterprise its one truly poignant moment.

“Our revels now are ended.”

2half-star6

 

MPAA Rating: R for sexual content, graphic nudity and some language

Cast: John Huston, Oja Kadar, Susan Strasberg, Peter Bogdanovich, Lilli Palmer, Mercedes McCambridge, Cameron Mitchell, Edmund O’Brien, Paul Mazursky, Dennis Hopper, Claude Chabrol, Henry Jaglom, George Jessel, Bob Random, Gregory Sierra.

Credits: Directed by Orson Welles, script by Orson Welles and Oja Kadar. A Netflix release.

Running time: 2:02

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | 6 Comments

Directors Guild Will No Longer Consider Streaming and VOD films for its top prize

It’s theatrical release or bust for the DGA. Spielberg may not have gotten his way with The Academy, but the DGA has a huge hand in what gets nominated and what has a real shot at best picture. This is a serious pushback.

I wonder how Alfonso Cuaron and others who have been happy to make movies for Netflix, Amazon, et al, taking the easy money for projects that aren’t “commercial,” and where the measure of “success” is radically different from the Hollywood to theatrical release business and awards model, feel?

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/race/directors-guild-will-no-longer-consider-day-date-releases-top-prize-1221184

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Directors Guild Will No Longer Consider Streaming and VOD films for its top prize

Next screening? “Spider-Man: Far from Home”

Our July big screen vacation, Courtesy of your friendly neighborhood Spider-Man.

A winner, or another sequel too many from a summer of too many to count?

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Next screening? “Spider-Man: Far from Home”