The “Paranorman” and “Coraline” and “Kubo and the Two Strings” folks are having Annapurna distribute this comedy, featuring the voices of Hugh Jackman, Zoe Saldana, Zach Galifianakis, Emma Thompson and Stephen Fry.
Yes, there’s a hint of “Smallfoot” about it. Couple of Hugh and Zach titters in this trailer.
“Missing Link” opens April 19.
Committed runners talk about getting “in the zone,” the “zen” nature of the exercise, letting your mind go places unconnected to the path your body is covering one step at a time.
But can it lead to a higher consciousness?
That was the thinking behind guru Sri Chinmoy’s creation of the 3100 Miler Self-Transcendence Race. An avid sprinter himself, the late Indian mystic believed that “the inner life and outer life” come together when you’re running.
So he and his followers concocted a New York ultra-marathon, 52 days of covering at least 60 miles a day, “the longest certified road race in the world.” The idea was if you send runners onto a half mile circuit of part of the city, lap after boring lap, they’re going to figure out things about themselves, their bodies and their connection to the world in the process.
“Sometimes he will run to reach the goal, at times the goal will come to him,” Chinmoy preached.
I don’t know about that. But if you’re making a documentary — “3100: Run and Become” — about this annual race (the 2016 running of it is what is documented), you’re going to have to have “characters” you follow, interesting characters, preferably. And you have to find ways to open up the picture. Because a half mile circuit? That’s ridiculously boring, just reading about it.
Filmmaker Sanjay Rawal decided to focus on a a fellow who came to dominate the race over the years, a Finnish man who runs to deliver newspapers every day in Helsinki.
And when even that wasn’t enough, Rawal broadened the film and burned through Sri Chinmoy cash flying to the Kalahari Desert, where bushmen no longer allowed to chase down prey while hunting still run the desert, to Navajo country in Arizona to meet Native American ultra milers and to Japan to follow a Buddhist monk walking the 1000 day spiritual “walking race,” kaihgyo, around Mount Hiei in Japan.
Ashprihanal Aalto, 45, is the Finn, who has to talk himself into taking on the race again in the opening scenes of “3100.” I’ve run so much. I’ve run enough, you know,” he tells his mentor.
But he’s a devout believer and determined to participate in this annual marathon to honor his spiritual leader. If you’ve been given a new name that means “inspiration fire inside the heart,” you’ve got a lot to live up to.
We follow Aalto as he stands at the starting line with a couple of dozen other competitors — from all over Europe and America (all white, most over 40) — and gets the pep talk from race chairman Rupantar Russo.
“No matter how well you do…you will be changed, and changed for the better.”
And they’re off, in the middle of a heat wave, hoping to run through rain, blisters, chafing and cramps for 52 straight days, a few of them hoping to dethrone the race’s undisputed master.
“It exposes everything about you, whether you want it to or not — emotions, weaknesses.”
When that gets boring, we travel to Africa where Gaola and Jumanda Gakelebone talk about laws that changed their traditional way of life in the bush, but not their need to run.
Then we meet Gyoman-san in Japan, explaining the rituals, attire and spiritual benefits of his 1000 day quest.
Aalto recalls running in a Navajo marathon a while back, which was filmmaker Rawal’s introduction to this new culture and a chance to bring other mystical/religious connections to running into his film.
“Running is prayer you’re praying with your feet,” marathon organizer and distance-runner Shaun Martin tells the competitors. Stunning scenery awaits this crew as they cover 35 miles of breathtakingly beautiful high desert wilderness in this race.
The film, like the enterprise itself, can be a rather tedious affair, with proselytizing woven into the spiritual journeys all these runners take on different pieces of ground, and for different beliefs.
And we don’t know if this enlightenment/higher consciousness thing really takes root. The runners of the 3100 are generally focused on that latest blister, that next meal. Aalto, speaking mostly English but some Finnish here, comes off as a simple soul who’s found a religion and a guru he can work with.
But then again, he did that long before he ever came to the starting line of the 3100.
MPAA Rating: unrated
Credits:Directed by Sanjay Rawal. An Illumine Group release.
Running time: 1:20
Co-writer/director Steve McQueen doesn’t reinvent the heist picture with “Widows,” his follow-up to “Twelve Years a Slave.” But he does change the focus, the point-of-view, raising the stakes while piling on characters, subtexts and twists.
It’s as complicated as “The Departed,” which wasn’t a heist picture, and in spite of the fact that the phrase “mean and lean” was invented to describe this corner of the crime movie genre, he gets away with it with this well-cast, uncommonly well-acted sometimes pulse-pounding thriller.
A heist goes wrong in a hail of bullets and a torrent of fire in the film’s opening moments. Harry Rawlings (Liam Neeson) and his gang (Jon Bernthal among them) didn’t make it. All that’s left are ashes, and widows.
And a debt. Turns out Harry & Crew were robbing from the well-heeled gang leader Jamal Manning (John Tyree Henry), who just happens to be running for district alderman in this corner of Chicago. Jamal and his ruthless enforcer/brother Jatemme (say it like it’s French) want that money — $2 million — back. They need it to win the election.
As they’re battling Jack Mulligan (Colin Farrell), son of Tom Mulligan (Robert Duvall), whose family has owned that ward seat for decades, that further complicates matters.
And demanding the money, on pain of death, from the widows of the robbers, could be a non-starter. Just how many assets to the four women have? Even stripping teacher’s union lobbyist Veronica (Viola Davis) of her posh condo, swank furniture and Escalade won’t get them close.
She’s tasked with getting the other widows on board — bridal shop owner Linda (Michelle Rodriguez), blonde beauty with no visible job skills Alice (Elizabeth Debicki) are made aware of the dilemma. New mom Amanda (Carrie Coon) stays out of it. The others are close to broke.
Veronica, queen of looking the other way, has to figure this out with only her punch-drunk driver Bash (Garret Dillahunt), a retired accomplice of Harry’s, and this safe deposit box key.
That’s where her late husband kept his planning journal, research, logistics and scheduling for every job he ever did. And there’s this “next” job, with $5 million on the line, that could save them all.
McQueen never lets “Widows” descend into “Set it Off” or “Going in Style” absurdity, zeroing in on how hard achieving every little step that most heist pictures skim over actually is. Getting a van that can’t be traced? Police auction, fake name. Guns? Visit a gun show, find an overweight gun nut to help hook you up. Finding out where the “safe room” whose blueprints Harry had, the place they’re actually going to rob, actually is? That’s hard.
“How’m I supposed to know this?”
“By being smarter than you are right now!”
One inspired piece of casting — making Daniel Kaluuya of “Get Out” the heavy, Jatemme. McQueen’s camera circles him as he gets right up in the face of those he wants to intimidate, nose-to-nose. Yes, that action has purpose. But sometimes, he’s just getting his sadistic jollies out of somebody he expects to stab or shoot anyway. It’s a monstrous turn which should park Kaluuya on everybody’s “must have” list of actors you want in your thriller.
Davis suffers mightily, lets us believe she’s lost the love of her life (Harry/Neeson is in her dreams and flashbacks) and takes on her burdens with the stoicism that has become her trademark. One thing she doesn’t pull off is acting as if she’s had an adorable lap dog (bearded collie) in her life. She carries him like an ungainly sack of rice, as if she’s never picked up a dog or had one on a leash. Maybe she resents sharing the screen with the pooch, who is a scene stealer (as W.C. Fields warned us).
Rodriguez (“Fast and Furious,” “Girlfight”) has to hide the toughness she carries around as her screen baggage. Debicki, with her model’s looks, makes good work of the “one we’re supposed to underestimate” and Cynthia Erivo makes us forget her in “Bad Times at the El Royale” playing Belle, a late addition to the “gang” who is a walking muscle thanks to the multi-job schedule she keeps as an inner city single mom.
Duvall delivers his usual sound and fury, and Farrell easily suggests the cunning Jack Mulligan uses to get by, the act he puts on as a white politician trying to hold power in an overwhelmingly African American ward.
McQueen includes so many folks in his story (based on a Lynda La Plante novel) that many characters feel underserved and a few story threads lack the fulfilling payoff we want. Jacki Weaver plays Alice’s “use your looks to make money” mom, Lukas Haas is cast against type as a wealthy developer paying for Alice’s company and Kevin J. O’Connor, as a wheelchair bound bowling-alley owner no longer in “the life” so stands out in his couple of scenes that we crave more of his character.
The extra faces make “Widows” feel cluttered, and coincidences and the occasional jarring, illogical scene that comes out of nowhere show us some points on the steep learning curve he was on that he hasn’t mastered.
But he’s still made one of the best thrillers of the year and one of the best heist pictures since David Mamet made “Heist,” the modern benchmark for excellence in violent, complex cinematic capers.
MPAA Rating:R for violence, language throughout, and some sexual content/nudity
Cast: Viola Davis, Michelle Rodriguez, Daniel Kaluuya, Colin Farrell, Elizabeth Debecki, Robert Duvall and Liam Neeson
Credits:Directed by Steven McQueen, script by Gillian Flynn and Steve McQueen, based on the novel by Lynda La Plante. A Fox release.
Running time: 2:09
In 1999, on the war-torn, divided island of Timor north of Australia, some 1500 women and children were trapped and in danger of almost certain slaughter by invading Indonesian forces and their supporters.
American Marie Colvin was the only Western journalist on the ground there, and stubbornly refused to leave or stop reporting — doing interviews with media companies in the U.S., Britain and elsewhere — “bearing witness” to what was about to happen and warning the world of an atrocity in the making.
The Indonesians backed down.
In 2001, at the height of the Sri Lankan Civil War and the humanitarian crisis it spawned, her cries of “Journalist JOURNALIST” could not dissuade government forces from dropping one last mortar round on her, taking out an eye. She filed a 3000 word story, on deadline, while wearing an eye patch, the first of many.
And in February of 2012, she slipped into war-torn Syria and died in an artillery barrage of civilians by the army of genocidal dictator Bashar al-Assad.
“Bearing Witness” was Marie Colvin’s life’s work, and the title of an earlier documentary about her. “Under the Wire” is a fine new film about her, covering her full career and her death and timed to come out just before “A Private War,” the feature film about Colvin starring Rosamund Pike, hits theaters.
Colvin was a foreign correspondent who specialized in conflicts, showing up wherever fighting broke out — from Chechnya to Zimbabwe, Sierra Leone to country-by-country protests and insurrections of The Arab Spring.
Working first for U.S. wire services, and then for Britain’s “Sunday Times,” and appearing on TV in the process, she became a legend in her business — the first to talk to Gaddafi after U.S. air strikes failed to kill him, frequent interviewer of Arafat and other world leaders, but most importantly — as someone who did not lay back when the shooting started.
When the civilians who always come off the worst in combat zones would cry “Tell the World, TELL THE WORLD,” Colvin was their ally and their microphone.
“Under the Wire” uses archival footage of Colvin and extensive interviews with those who worked with her, including Paul Conroy, the British photographer/videographer who ventured into many a war zone with her over the years.
“But she was a complete and utter one-off,” Conroy says, always focusing on the human tragedy of war, brassy and brave and always “bearing witness.”
“It’s about what people, what people are going through” she said on one TV appearance.
Others echo Conroy’s “legendary” assessment of Colvin, called “one of the greatest war correspondents of our generation” by her Sunday Times editor, Sean Ryan.
Chris Martin’s documentary uses extensive footage shot by Conroy and others, and occasional recreatings, capturing not just Colvin in action but the chaos of any combat zone — jumpy hand-held footage of camera people running from gunfire or to a safer spot to ride out an artillery bombardment.
We meet their guide and translator for that fateful trip into Syria (Assad’s government didn’t want anyone “bearing witness” to the civilians it was slaughtering in the name of putting down an insurrection).
The harrowing nature of the work is the primary focus of this film and many others on this subject. But Colvin never comes off as the classic adrenaline junkie/Hemingway wannabe that too many of these films turn their heroes into.
She turned her lost eye and eyepatch into a trademark, her reputation into armor and a pulpit from which to warn the world about this genocide or that refugee crisis.
The most fascinating part of Martin’s biographical documentary is the detail — from interviews with survivors, found footage and recreations — we get about Colvin and Conroy’s most dangerous mission, which would turn out to be Colvin’s last.
Crossing the Syrian border with Lebanon in darkness on the backs of motorbikes, “a shadow gives you to another shadow” is the way Conroy described their trek.
Filing stories from the besieged towns of Baba Amr and Homs, appearing on TV with Anderson Cooper describing the “worst” slaughter she’d ever witnessed. Conroy and reporter Edith Bouvier remember death — a baby’s and later Colvin’s own, with grim audio of the moments just after the artillery round that fatally wounded her and French correspondent Remi Ochlik.
Fittingly, the film goes on after Colvin’s death as indeed the dangerous work does. One of the best things this History Channel produced film manages is take away the “They should never have been there” dismissal by the clueless who shrug every time a journalist dies. They have to be there because we need to know.
And the other is to strip much of the glamour off the profession. Nice hotels in places most people would be too frightened to visit aside, war correspondent is a grim, dangerous line of work that seldom allows for the peacocking we see such “characters” do in the movies. Far too often, they end up like Colvin, remembered but rarely living long enough to enjoy being labeled “a legend.”
MPAA Rating: R for language and disturbing violent images
Cast: Marie Colvin, Paul Conroy, Sean Ryan, Edith Bouvier, Williams Daniels,Wa’el
Credits: Written and directed by Chris Martin. An Abramorama release.
Running time: 1:40
Little late posting this Florida-centric trailer.
John Travolta seems a little long in the tooth to be tackling the role of Ben Aronoff, offshore cigarette boat racing champ, boat builder and supplier of the craft that got the coke into Miami.
Katheryn Winnick, Jennifer Esposito and James Remar also star in this “based on the incredible true story” thriller.
And Matthew Modine plays one of Aronoff’s friends, George Bush Senior.
“Speed Kills” earns limited release Nov. 16 here in the US.
Illumination is doing character-specific trailers for this sequel, and the one for Max, for instance, features a trip to the vet.
Coupla chuckles. Next summer, we’ll see if there are more.
Look at this wish-fulfillment holiday comedy trailer and tell me this doesn’t look like something Hudgens would have made six years ago.
Maybe every generation puts its unique stamp on “the romantic comedy,” but odds are that each new posse just figures out what Jane Austen knew 200 years ago.
Thus, “The New Romantic,” a thin collegiate romance hung on the “sugar babies” concept. You’ve almost certainly heard of this college-coed-seeks-sugar-daddy phenomenon. “New Romantic” summarizes its appeal and takes the most predictable path to showing our sugar baby the down side.
Blake, played by Brit actress Jessica Barden of “Far from the Madding Crowd,” is 21 and looks 14 — 15 tops. She’s a rising senior with a sex column in the school paper, and the most boring sex life on campus.
She knows that her dad met her mom without Googling her or finding her on Match.com with a “witty bio” attached to her picture. That fact and “an unhealthy binge of Nora Ephron movies” in her youth has her idealistically wondering “What would my love story be?”
Which is why her “Hopeless Romantic” column is about to be canceled.
“It’s time to say goodbye to ‘grand gestures,'” she narrates, presumably from her column. “The grandest it gets these days is swiping right or left.” Cynicism doesn’t sell or lure the lads.
Her “foosball meetups” with college guys “who don’t even know how to go on a date” any more isn’t finding readers. Roommate and best friend Nikki (Hayley Law of “Riverdale” and “Altered Carbon”) sums it up in a sentence.
“You write a sex column with no sex.”
Then a mix-up with driver’s licenses at the liquor store introduces her to Morgan (Camila Mendes, also of “Riverdale”). And Morgan — put together, well-dressed and plainly coddled, is her introduction to this life of well-heeled men looking for young (very young) women, sex and dates without complications.
Why? Have you priced a college degree lately?
Yes, “Young girls are prostituting themselves to pay for college,” but once Blake moves past judging, she gets an earful on the upside. Morgan gets jewelry, fashion and “gifts” to the tune of $67,000 from the man she’s seeing.
And Blake? She’s pretty and Morgan is sure she could handle this, should she want.
“Am I a prostitute? No. Am I a gold digger? Maybe.” Morgan huffs that she’s “having a better time than these girls who get nothing more from a one night stand than the occasional pregnancy scare,” and unlike them, she’s not graduating under “a mountain of debt.”
That’s how Blake meets Ian (Tim Sharp), a well-off college professor looking for a student (not in his classes) he can carry on with.
As “Pretty Woman” and Jane Austen references pile up, as the “chivalrous” older man bedazzles Blake’s life, she writes about it and rationalizes.
“Wealthy older people supporting struggling younger ones is nothing revolutionary. Read any Jane Austen novel…Why does our society hate ‘gold diggers?’ Maybe relationships aren’t supposed to be about love, but about survival.”
And maybe she’ll get a college journalism prize for her suddenly edgy and topical column, a prize coveted by the one classmate/school paper colleague (Brett Dier) to show a romantic interest in Blake, “prostituting” herself or not.
There’s wit and the spark of life in the relationships Blake has with her peers in this world, funny little lectures on journalism — “Follow the story, not your feeling.” — from her older classmate/editor (Avan Jogia). “It’s not ‘This American Life,’ but it’s something.
Law handles the laid-back, effortlessly cool BFF role with panache. Blake bicycles to her assignations with Professor Ethics Violation. He gives her alternate transportation.
“A sex moped?” “A HOped!”
Writer-director Carly Stone (she writes for TV’s “Kim’s Convenience”) delivers a few clever turns of phrase, the odd cute joke and a knowing connection to college life’s modern pitfalls, where getting “black-out drunk” leads to “one night stands,” hazards only combated with “study drugs.”
“Big gestures” might be dead, but the attempt is worth a new verb to these kids — “We’re ”Sleepless in Seattling!'”
But I could do without the cliche of older academic explaining why vinyl is better than digital to a coed.
And Ms. Barden, 25 now but still looking like high school freshman year is right around the corner, creates an obstacle at the center of “The New Romantic” that she has little control of. She looks like a child. And putting her in the arms of an over-30 actor is just plain creepy.
Thank heavens they had the good sense to not get the least bit graphic with this, despite the subject matter.
Kudos on the mastering the accent and all, and she and her castmates do all right by the few bits of biting banter they get to play.
But parking a woman who looks like a pixie in on her way to junior high Spanish Club hobbles the marginal film that “New Romantic” was always destined to be.
MPAA Rating: unrated, sexual situations, drug references
Cast: Jessica Barden, Hayley Law, Annie Clark, Eva Link, Darren Eisnor, Brett Dier, Greg Hovanessian
Credits: Written and directed by Carly Stone. An Orchard release.
Running time: 1:22
I wish to Blitzen Universal would leave “The Grinch” alone.
The 1966 TV special was compact perfection, a minor masterpiece to remember legendary animation director Chuck Jones by. You’re never going to improve on having Boris Karloff as your kindly-spooky-sweet narrator or Thurl Ravenscroft’s bone-tingling crooning of “You’re a Mean One, Mister Grinch,” by composer Eugene Poddany.
But “How the Grinch Stole Christmas” isn’t just a short film (based on a beloved book) American families are tickled and touched to the point of tears by every holiday season. It’s a property, part of a brand. And Universal has every right to try and wring more money and improvements to its theme park Seuss attraction out of the green furball every few years.
They go back to animation for this latest incarnation, a bright and shiny toddler-aimed bauble with slapstick gags, more characters, more “acting” than storytelling, updated rhymes to the songs and no emotional connection whatsoever.
It’s perfectly passable as eye candy and children’s entertainment, so long as you’re sure they have no memory of the Chuck Jones original. This one’s heart is three sizes too small.
Critics can embrace it as that rare chance to chew on Benedict Cumberbatch a bit. Brother Brit took a paycheck here and in a rare bad career move, has nothing to give to the part.
His Grinch has “Garlic in your soul,” but a more-explored connection to Who-Ville. He showers, dashes on a splash of Cold Spice and goes shopping there — even though it’s the holidays, because he’s eaten up all the food in the cave-home he shares with his puppy Max.
“How much emotional eating have I been DOING?”
This Grinch has an alleged friend (not reciprocated) down in Who-Ville. He’s voiced by “Saturday Night Live” mainstay Kenan Thompson.
And the new Grinch has a back story, a little Dickensian motivation for why he hates Christmas. Adults always inferred that in earlier versions, and kids who’d seen “A Christmas Carol” could make the same Scrooge connection that Dr. Seuss did all those decades ago. But here, let’s spell it out for everybody.
Who-Ville is a veritable gingerbread castle of a town, presided over by Mayor Angela Lansbury, who has decreed that this Christmas has to be “Three Times” bigger and better than the last.
And little Cindy Lou Who (Cameron Seely) is a sassy, sledding bundle of rambunctious wonder who needs to get an audience with Santa because she’s worried her single mom/working mother (Rashida Jones), a nurse, needs a break and won’t get one in the gig economy.
You know the rest, the story arc from “a heart, two sizes too small” has to be moved from cynicism over the grinding commercialism of the holidays to embrace “the True Meaning of Christmas,” thanks to the Whos’ devotion and unshaken faith.
Because, you know, he’s stolen everything Xmas related in that mission to “stop Christmas from COMING.”
A novel approach — The Grinch’s mathematical and technological way of ripping off every house in Who-Ville (he counts them, counts the hours he has to pull off the heist, etc.), The gadgets he and Max employ are Seussian whimsy incarnate.
Cute touches — having Thompson’s character introduced as he offhandedly sings “Have a Holly Jolly Christmas” from the “Rudolph the Rednosed Reindeer” Rankin/Bass TV special of the ’60s, letting The Grinch work out his loneliness at a Seussian pipe organ pumping out “All By Myself.”
There’s enough Christian Christmas music in this version to warm an icy Megan Kelly heart.
The Whos have their own expletives when The Grinch knocks over their snowmen or swipes that last jar of Who chutney from the grocery.
“Oh…Sugar plum!”
The updating of the narration works — “Safe in his cave and apart from the fray, he reminded himself ‘It is better this way.” But having Pharrell Williams narrate and sing the beat-boxed update of “You’re a Mean One” won’t warm anybody’s cockles.
It would have improved the film to ignore market research and hire grumbling, bemused and singing (sometimes) baritone Keith David to take over the storytelling narration. Williams is too light and ordinary sounding to make the “storyteller” work.
But this “Grinch” isn’t about aesthetics or shelf-life or making anything memorable, something Universal has managed with recent “Horton Hears a Who” and “Lorax” adaptations.
It’s as forgettable as the torn wrapping paper piled around the tree 15 minutes into Christmas morning.
MPAA Rating: PG for brief rude humor
Cast: The voices of Benedict Cumberbatch, Rashida Jones, Kenan Thompson, Cameron Seely and Pharrell Williams
Credits:Directed by Yarrow Cheney, Scott Mosier, script by Michael LeSieur and Tommy Swerdlow, based on the book by Dr. Seuss. A Universal/Illumination release.
Running time: 1:26
The safest way to review the new “Suspiria” is to remember the old “Suspiria” (1977) and bow out with an “It’s not really my thing.”
Cryptic, creepy, sexually asexual, gory and grotesque, it’s Reason One to back away — carefully, with an eye towards an exit — any time you’re cornered into a conversation with a Dario Argento cultist. The first film and the entire canon of Argento was and is most disturbing in the sorts of lost souls slavishly drawn to it and him.
The second tack to take is acknowledging that in poker, we call it a “tell.” In coal mines, it’s canaries who give away the game. And in movies, the presence of Dakota Johnson is the surest sign you’re in for something that grates and fails, a tease that renders the sexy off-putting, the potentially compelling dull. She’s uncanny for her knack of turning up in bad movies, made worse (usually) by her presence.
Luca Guadagnino (“Call Me By Your Name,” “I Am Love”) gives us a challenging puzzle of an indulgence that rattles on and on, like a hearse with blown shocks, well past its point of resolution. Those inclined to treat everything he does as The Italian Cinematic Renaissance will give him the benefit of the doubt — stunt casting, insert shots of eyes-averting gore interrupting the underlit perpetual gloom of Berlin in mid-Cold War.
It’s always raining in horror movies with this much pretense.
I cut no such slack. He’s always needed editing, never more so than in this time-suck.
“Suspiria’s” “Six Acts and an Epilogue” structure begins with an opening act that is more a prologue. Chloe Grace Moretz plays a manic/panicked dancer whose Jungian psychotherapist, Dr, Klemperer, lets her show up unannounced and bounce off his walls — sharing her mid-freak-out journal, her dreams and her fears that this Markos Dance Company she’s joined in Berlin is killing her and others who come into their clutches.
“There are WITCHES,” she insists, giving the game away in the opening ten minutes. “They’ve been underground since The War!” It’s 1977, and Germany’s Awfulest Generation hasn’t died out yet. There were witches in their ranks.
Patricia leaves the scene. Enter Susie Bannion (Johnson), a naive devotee of Viva Blanc, the genius behind the all-female company. She has no references, but her writhing, arhythmic dance — contortions, leaps and crawls — sells Blanc (Guadagnino muse Tilda Swinton) on her. She will replace Patricia in the company. And then Olga.
No, let’s not talk about “what happened” to them — terrorism, hijackings, bombings and kidnappings are all over the TV. Let’s assume it had something to do with that.
But as Susie half-innocently immerses herself in the womynist culture of the cultish company and Dr. Klemperer tries to get the police interested in what his missing patient said about the corps, the Ohio girl finds herself drawn into intrigues and wrestled to the floor by unseen, gnarled hands reaching up from “below.”
As the choreographer, assistants and matrons of the Markos cackle in their “Last Supper” staged meals that play like an infamous cooking scene in “Macbeth,” as cops are seen helplessly nude and humiliated, under a spell cast by the witchy women, Susie loses herself in the collaboration and the art which — as we’ve seen “The Red Shoes” and “Black Swan” — is what dancers do; lose control of their destinies and lives to The Dance.
I loved the chilling decay of the production design, calling to mind the great German cinema of the ’70s. The nightmarish fashions aren’t hurt by flashbacks of Susie’s Amish childhood — a brutally repressive farm life where she could only dream of travel and dance. The ’70s Amish here, with their tractors and what not, are more Mennonite, no matter what Susie says to Madame Blanc and her harem of harridans.
The Dance itself is striking, powerful. The rituals of “The Company” are even more fascinating with thi film’s “toil and trouble” subtext. Blanc kisses each dancer in greeting at every rehearsal, her directions to them are vague and yet specific enough.
But as Susie takes over “The Protagonist role” in “Volk,” the show the ensemble is reviving, noting that she memorized it by watching film footage (pre Youtube and pre-VCR) of it “over 100 times,” and the dancer she’s replacing in the role is seen shoved into an empty rehearsal studio where unseen forces drag, hurl, yank and tear her until she’s a bag of broken bones and meat, all carried out in time to Susie’s movements in rehearsal down the hall, as blood spurts and is spat out, as designer meat hooks drag the body away, the viewer is faced with a stark choice.
Stick with this and try to rationalize whatever “Suspiria” is saying about art and dance and witchcraft and feminism to justify two and a half hours of unerotic, opaque ickiness and puzzles we’ve worked out (Don’t look at Dr. Klemperer, listen to the voice).
Or do we join those who decide “This just isn’t worth the trouble?” Because it’s possible to “get it” and enjoy the (brief) challenges of Guadagnino’s vision and wish somebody would challenge him in the scripting, shooting and editing stages, to get to the damned point, and once he’s made it, move on.
MPAA Rating: R for disturbing content involving ritualistic violence, bloody images and graphic nudity, and for some language including sexual references
Cast: Dakota Johnson, Tilda Swinton, Chloe Grace Moretz
Credits:Directed by Luca Guadagnino, script by David Kajganich, based on the Dario Argento film’s characters. An Amazon Studios release.
Running time: 2:32
