Post 9/11, Congressional investigators uncover some of the things the Bush Administration was covering up, “Rendition” things.
Amazon has this one slated for Nov. Release.
Post 9/11, Congressional investigators uncover some of the things the Bush Administration was covering up, “Rendition” things.
Amazon has this one slated for Nov. Release.
The Hollywood Reporter says that “tens of thousands” of customers credit card info was was stolen.
MoviePass, the bust that keeps on busting.
https://t.co/vSc6qUUf9p https://twitter.com/THR/status/1164542000714133504?s=17

Nobody in it wears a cape. Well, OK. Maggie Smith MIGHT show up in one.
But her superpower is sarcasm.
Yes the “Downton Abbey” fanbase is ordering their tickets and making their plans to catch the Focus Features wide screen treatment of their favorite PBS show.
It opens Sept. 20, and tickets are pre-selling like Beluga caviar, M’lords and ladies.
So sayeth The Hollywood Reporter.

“On the nose” casting can be playful, or it can be a curse — a lazy form of screen shorthand that strips the mystery away from your thriller before the opening credits are finished.
So glancing at the names listed below, the ones that flash by in the opening moments of “Angel has Fallen,” you can probably guess from Danny Huston, Tim Blake Nelson and Nick Nolte, who might be the heavies and who might play the grizzled old mountain man who figure into the plot.
But that doesn’t ruin the movie. As Hitchcock always said, “Good villains make good thrillers” and Huston’s been working that side of the street for decades, now.
It’s a visceral experience — emphasis on “viscera” — with pulse-pounding action, gasping hand-held camera chases and hellacious gunfights.
The third film in the Gerard Butler super-Secret Service Agent series is a movie of big BOOMS, ECUs (extreme close-ups) and a truckload of F-bombs. And if it takes its action beats, plot points and politics from “The Fugitive,” “Shooter,” “RED” and Q-Anon, well that’s just madness to go along with the over-the-top B-movie mayhem.
Butler’s Mike Banning bonds a bit with an old Army buddy (Huston) who now runs a mercenary operation — Salient. “Contractors” they call themselves. Old buddy Wade needs a little help landing government work, and Mike’s in line for the top job at the Secret Service.
Wade doesn’t think either of them is cut out for desk jobs, though — “We’re lions. And that ain’t never gonna change!”
Mike? He’s got a wife (Piper Perabo), a toddler at home and pills for every concussion, neck, back and muscle injury he’s taken defending America’s presidents. He may have President Trumbull’s ear, but maybe that step up is not for him.
And then the most gonzo assassination attempt in recent screen history puts Trumbull (Morgan Freeman) in a coma, Mike in the crosshairs of the investigation (Jada Pinkett Smith is the FBI agent on the case) for colluding with the Russians, and a trigger happy vice president ready to strike back at those implicated in everything from election interference to pee pee tapes, and now a hit on a sitting president.
Mike must escape custody, finger the real culprits, clear his name and save the Republic. Again.
Stunt-man turned director Ric Roman Waugh (“Snitch,” “Shot Caller”) tops the epic (and digitally-augmented) assassination attempt with a kidnapping “hit” out on Mike, and an absolutely stunning, close-up and explosively violent escape, edited into a whirling blur of bodies, blows and bullets to the head.
Waugh isn’t much on subtlety or finesse. And as I say the plot here is a pastiche of other “clear my name” thrillers. But the man knows his meat and potatoes action beats.
Mike’s getaway includes a visit to a mountain and an emotionally overwrought Vietnam vet (Nolte), and getting and getting out of there, stuff blows up.
And no, that’s not even close to the last stuff that blows up, here.
The old man blasts the younger one with an epic speech about war, and an apology — “Me disappearing was the best thing that ever happened to you.”
Freeman gets a speech or two as well.
Mainly, though, “Angel has Fallen” (Secret Service agent as “Guardian Angel”) is about the fights, chases, shootouts and explosions. And insane lapses in protocol and logic and loony coincidences.
And Waugh makes those work, finding the odd laugh (NRA loons get what’s coming to them) as he does.
Butler wears the weary man of war thing well, and his stunt crew is aces.
Just don’t take any of the rest of this seriously. The Russian stuff is straight out of Fox News/QAnon apologia. Nobody evers uses the word “traitor.”
And try to forget every supervillain, mountain man or sniveling schemer the names in those opening credits have played, if only for two hours.
![]()
MPAA Rating: R for violence and language throughout.
Cast: Gerard Butler, Piper Perabo, Morgan Freeman, Jada Pinkett Smith, Tim Blake Nelson, Danny Huston and Nick Nolte.
Credits: Directed by Ric Roman Waugh, script by Matt Cook, Robert Mark Kamen, Ric Roman Waugh. A Summit/Lionsgate release.
Running time: 2:00
Feel free to sing along.
Lionsgate has a holiday movie that features Charlize Theron, Nicole Kidman and Margot Robbie
Think anybody will show up for this?
Should’ve gotten Russell Crowe to play sexual harasser news chief Roger Ailes. He’s good at it.

There are several common problems that come with the territory when a challenging film from abroad is remade and given “a Hollywood ending.”
The remake is inevitably neat and pat, some nuance is lost as the remaking filmmaker seems in a rush to a conclusion that seems forgone. And that’s not just something viewers who remember the original film experience.
I reviewed Susanne Bier’s “After the Wedding” when it came to the U.S. in 2007. All I clearly remember about it was the Danish star Mads Mikkelsen was the Indian orphanage manager shocked at who he meets at the wedding of a possible benefactor of the orphanage. The genders have been changed for the Bart Freundlich remake.
The memory of the rest of the first film is fuzzy, but watching the remake, reveling in the performances of two great actresses in all their glory, that whole “neat and pat” thing dulls some of the impact. The twists are so big and yet muted that you wonder if they ever shocked, even way back when.
Michelle Williams is Isabel, the devoted manager of an Indian orphange that is forever short of funds. She dotes on the children, one little boy in particular, as they play and learn and even partake in their own charitable work — helping feed the hungry outside their gates.
A chance for “a suitcase full of cash” puts Isabel on a plane to New York to meet with an advertising mogul, Theresa (Julianne Moore). “She is very impressive,” Isabel is warned, as she’s fetched from the four-star hotel suite where she’s been parked.
Indeed she is. Theresa is high-powered, rich, used to getting things done and having schedules bent to meet her needs.
Isabel is rushed into a meeting, and barely has time to reiterate the data on child prostitution, the hundreds of thousands of kids who are malnourished “dying of minor illnesses” when Theresa’s endless interruptions reach a crescendo.
This “very busy time” for her is consumed with the showcase wedding she’s throwing for her daughter Grace. Isabel is taking body blows due to the disconnect between acquisitive, status-grabbing affluence and someone, like her, simply trying to feed the hungry, and the patroness who summoned her for this audience is...distracted.
“My work is all consuming” is followed by a hint of judgement. Theresa has “leaned in” to get where she is — a multi-million dollar “landscape changing” media (ad sales) company, two little boys, an estate in the suburbs. And Isabel? No husband? No children of your own?
No matter. “Very very impressive, the work you’re doing.”
The woman with her hand held out has to tamp down the fury as she is all but blown off, her time discounted by the rich woman who “has it all.”
“Come to the wedding. I’ll get to know you better.”
Williams has several such scenes in “After the Wedding” — knocked back on her heels, in need, forced to swallow her bile at the rudeness, tactlessness and judgementally direct questions Theresa, her sculptor-husband (Billy Crudup) and the daughter getting married (Abby Quinn) fire her way.
The four-time Oscar nominee lets us see each fresh wound, Isabel’s deflated recovery, the tactful “I still need a check from these awful rich people” response to every blow.
Because there are surprises at that wedding — shocking ones. And Isabel, out of place at the lavish meal, the shallow guests talking “paleo” diets and “training for a tri…in Hawaii,” tone deaf and hitting on her, or catty other guests gossiping and questioning the groom’s devotion, physically shrinks before our eyes.
And it’s not just the experience of all this free-flowing cash, that “I think we could get 100 beds for what they’re paying” for her hotel suite.
Isabel knows Oscar (Crudup), the father of the bride. Or knew him in a previous chapter in her life.

Crudup and Williams have a “Who can look more shocked?” face-off, and that’s just for starters. Bring Moore into the mix, perfectly cast as a control freak used to bossing others around, getting her own way and “damn your inconvenience” as she does, and you’ve got the makings of great drama.
Or, well, melodrama. Because the further this picture plows along, the more “Isn’t that convenient,” in terms of plot twists, comes into play.
The scenario takes on complications, too many of them humiliating to poor Isabel, as one and all engage in the pop psychology that gives them their understanding of what has happened, why, and how those involved evolved after it did.
Williams makes us weather these slings and arrows with her. Moore’s ironically-named boss and “mother,” Theresa, even at her most “considerate,” is brittle and demanding and controlling, making one long for a catfight as Isabel gets her back up.
And Crudup makes us grasp the logic of Oscar’s actions, feel just a pang of empathy (he makes a good heel) for his situation.
Quinn’s performance cleverly includes hints of the personalities of every person who had anything to do with her being there, on this day, getting married.
Perhaps its not the movie that will win Williams her Oscar, and perhaps it was wisest to park this solid but flawed melodrama as summer counter-programming, sparing it competition with the true awards contenders of the fall.
It’s still worth seeing for the clinic its dazzling cast puts on, the bite they bring to their showdowns and the heartbreak Williams lets us see — judged, hurt, insulted and tested — time and again, “After the Wedding.”
![]()
MPAA Rating: PG-13 for thematic material and some strong language.
Cast: Michelle Williams, Julianne Moore, Billy Crudup, Abby Quinn
Credits: Written and directed by Bart Freundlich, based on the Susanne Bier, Anders Thomas Jensen script for the 2006 Danish film of the same title.
A Sony Pictures Classics release.
Running time: 1:52
This look more conventional than the film the first trailer promised.
We are a month from finding out the truth.

“Ms. Purple” isn’t a movie you review. It’s a character study you put on the psychoanalyst’s couch.
Justin Chon’s tender, intimate followup to his bracing, gritty and sometimes funny “Gook” shows us the shattered remains of a Koreatown family and makes us ponder what broke them.
Kasie (Tiffany Chu of TV’s “Artificial”) is a pretty 20something whose almost expressionless face might crack if she ever managed a genuine smile. She is a karaoke hostess, a “doumi,” piling into a van every night, just another pretty-enough face in a little black dress. At the bars where they work, they are lined up — “Turn around!” — and selected by groups of men out for a night of drinking, singing and pawing.
Judged (harshly), used, misused and sometimes cheated, it is a particularly degrading line of work. It’s prostitution by almost any definition of the word. And every now and then, that last sexual line is crossed.
What put her here? The desperation becomes clearer when she gets home. Her comatose father (James Kang) is in home hospice care, waiting to die. Flashbacks tell a story of fatherly love, an obligation passed down. When their mercenary mother fled, he dutifully raised Kasie and her brother, soldiered on.
The crisis that begins “Ms. Purple” is one any American can relate to — healthcare. The soul-crushing work of bathing, monitoring and changing IVs on her father has also broken his nurse, Juanita (Alma Martinez). “I can’t do this any more. When’s he going to die? He needs to be in a hospice!”
Kasie loses her poker face in this argument. She’s desperate enough to beg nurses, in the parking lot, going into the nearby hospice to take on the job she can’t handle on her own. And there are no takers, only “Do yourself a favor, put your dad in hospice” advice.
This is as sad a scene as you’ll see in a movie this year.
Kasie’s last hope is the brother she’s still close to, but who won’t return her calls. Carey (Teddy Lee) has the same emotionally-drained visage. He has no visible means of support, only an addiction. He can’t stay away from the PC Bang a den of multiplayer gaming sin.
Kasie needs to hear from him, needs his help or at least support. Carey surprises her by finally returning a call, and then shocks her, and maybe himself, by saying he will watch their father, take care of him while Kasie works the bars and, crossing one more line, takes up with a rich, callous and yet generous client (Ronnie Kim).
Kasie has a sugar daddy, someone to be arm candy for when he attends functions — weddings, etc. But it’s a loveless, cruel arrangement.
The one break in her life of misery might be Octavio (Octavio Pizano), the valet at one of the bars where she works. He’s not much on first glance — broke, bottom-tier job, over-eager. But he is everything important that her life lacks — kindness, a young man happily ensconced in an upbeat, loving family.
Carey, who stormed out of their house as a teen, is atoning for his broken relationship with Dad. But his “care” includes sneaking him out, in his hospital bed, to rooftop sunbathing sessions, even into Carey’s favorite PC Bang.

That impulse is underscored with The Proclaimers’ “500 Miles,” and it is a jarring moment in a movie that is otherwise forlorn, set to weepy strings or plaintive Southwestern guitar music. It’s seriously off key.
But that one scene highlights how drained of energy Chon’s film is. The arguments (often in Korean with English subtitles) have heat. The sister-brother dynamic, re-established when Carey moves back in, has a teasing charm. They never grew out of razzing and calling each other “Dude.” But most of what we’re shown by the characters is the exhaustion that comes after brooding, endlessly, on an overwhelming problem that is devouring every life it is allowed to touch.
The singular vitality of Chon’s work is as a tour guide to this undiscovered culture admidst the roiling, multi-cultural life of L.A. He’s almost a throwback to regional filmmaking, specializing in a small corner of America, directors like Victor Nunez (“Ulee’s Gold”) and Leslie Harris (“Just Another Girl on the I.R.T.”).
That Koreatown Travelogue is still in evidence in “Ms. Purple.” And the performances work, despite their requisite flatness. It’s just that the few flashes of heightened drama and the gentleness of the Kasie/Octavio scenes aren’t enough to lift the weight these characters and this story carries.
It’s almost relentlessly downbeat.n “Ms. Purple” can’t help but leave you a little blue.
![]()
MPAA Rating: unrated, violence, sexual situations, nudity, smoking.
Cast: Tiffany Chu, Jake Choi, Teddy Lee, James Kang, Octavio Pizano
Credits: Directed by Justin Chon, script by Justin Chon, Chris Dinh. An Oscilloscope Labs release.
Running time: 1:27

They bought Fox so they could retire the X-Men and revive them under their own banner.
They own the box office like no studio that has come before. And they are plainly irked at goosing Sony’s Spider-Man in Avengers movies only to have him earn a billion that Disney wants for itself.
No more “sharing” the Marvel Universe with Spider-Man. Whatever deal that allowed Tom Holland to play an Avenger, financial and otherwise, is kaput.
It is interesting to note that Disney has gambled its entire film slate on Marvel, “Star Wars” and inferior remakes of animated hits of the past. All about brands, and original content be damned. What happens when audiences reject one or two or all three legs of this tripod?
The greed is showing, and this could be the hastening of a general fatigue in the whole comic book movie enterprise. Or not.
Via THR
“Sony Pictures is vowing to carry on the #SpiderMan franchise without Marvel Studios’ involvement, placing the blame on Disney for cutting the successful inter-studio co-operation short” https://t.co/DGNmZHURGS https://twitter.com/THR/status/1164021312999890944?s=17