Laure Calamy and Olivia Cote co star with French speaking Brit queen Kristin Scott Thomas.
July 14, a mid summer vacation at the movies.
Laure Calamy and Olivia Cote co star with French speaking Brit queen Kristin Scott Thomas.
July 14, a mid summer vacation at the movies.



I wasn’t inclined to truth “Mrs. Chatterjee vs. Norway,” a somewhat soapy and heavy-handed drama about a child welfare case that turns into an international incident as it slow-walks towards the cliche that “No one can love a child as much as its mother” conclusion.
It’s a movie overrun with villainous archetypes — from an abusive husband to patriarchal in-laws, patronizing, sexist lawyers and smirking and inhumane Norwegian child welfare workers.
But it’s based on a true story, and if it’s told from an Indian perspective, its biases are understandable and defensible. If you’ve ever been a parent, it’s almost guaranteed to outrage you and sometimes tug at the heartstrings.
We meet Debika Bannerjee, played with great empathy and heart by Rani Mukerji, on her Worst Day Ever. She’s a traditional Indian wife who has made a life for herself in Norway with her shipping port executive husband Anirban (Anirban Bhattacharya).
And when we see them, their children are being spirited away by blonde Scandinavian welfare workers. Debika is beyond shocked and distraught, as most any mother would be.
The director and co-writer Ashima Chibber, a veteran of hundreds of episodes of Indian TV, then shows us how it came to this.
He works, she stays at home. He’s distracted by his job and the Norwegian citizenship he’s sought since he moved there long before marrying Debika. He dotes on his kids, but child -rearing, house cleaning and meal prep aren’t a man’s job, Anirban figures.
The social workers who spend months observing immigrant families notice that, and wonder if that is Debika’s “choice.” They hear that he has a temper and can see the house is cluttered with toys. And we see their noses turn up and the edges of their mouths turn down when they see Debika mix up some dairy curd dish with her fingers and feed it, with those same fingers, into her five year-old’s eager mouth.
The boy and their baby sleep in their bed with them. And when Anirban’s temper leads him and his wife out of the room to bicker, in Hindi (subtitled), about all the ways she hasn’t assimilated and is thus triggering much scribbling on clibboards by the Norwegian “Velferd” ladies, their kids are grabbed and hustled into a state-owned SUV.
Our jaws, as viewers, drop. But Debika flips out, chasing the car, pounding on windows, falling down in the street with those inhuman Norske automatons videoing her “unstable” and “unbalanced” behavior, which they’ll use against her in justifying this kidnapping.
The film proceeds from what looks like “just a misinderstanding” through the many months Mrs. Chatterjee fights this seeming injustice as her already-strained marriage unravels, she refuses to abide by Norwegian decorum in and out of court and takes extreme “Not Without My Daughter” and then international incident measures to retrieve her children when the system refuses to let them go.
In reserved, buttoned down and accept authority Norway, she has to seem like the hysteric they label her to be.
The seemingly “open and shut case” has all these revelations that turn a black and white story into shades of grey. When we see how her husband turns on her with a “This is all YOUR fault,” we can guess just how ugly things have been how much uglier they can get.
The system, which pays for foster care and pays for lawyers to supposedly represent those caught up in that “system,” is ripe for corruption. European Union laws and regulations may also come into play. Debika buys into the conspiratorial side of what is happening and as The State refuses to back down, listen to reason or have a heart.
“We want your children to have the best opportunities available to them in Norway” (in Norwegian, with English subtitles) gives voice to the implicit bigotry of a Western culture imposing its values on Easterners who believe in ancient homeopathic medicine, a more patriarchal society and feeding your child with your hands, which the screenplay suggest is what REALLY got the Norwegians’ dander up.
But a host country insisting that she “Be more integrated with Norwegian society,” is making a reasonable request. Debika is told this by the courts and chewed-out even by her own court-appointed lawyer (Jim Sarbh) when she protests at this injustice.
“Let’s just follow the rules,” her citizenship-obsessed spouse advises.
In Hollywood genre-speak, this is a “Stella Dallas” variation, a tale of how far a mother will go and just what she’ll sacrifice to make a better life for her child. And aside for that occasionally heavy-handed moment, and being a tad slow, with four or five musical flashback interludes that pad the running time, it’s not bad.
Mukerji and the screenplay let us consider this woman’s flaws, her humanity and her fury, and then upends our “close call” judgments as we learn more about her and come to see her point of view.
If The System’s best evidence is video of someone freaking out because an uncaring, overreaching entity is grabbing her children, they’ve already lost. And if her own family can’t see that, they’re just as lost.
This Around the World with Netflix tale succeeds on the most basic level every imported international feature film must, by letting us see a story we can take sides on, and forcing us to see another culture’s point of view as we do.
Rating: TV-14, profanity, domestic violence
Cast: Rani Mukerji, Anirban Bhattacharya,
Balaji Gauri, Barun Chanda, Sara Soulié and Jim Sarbh
Credits: Directed by Ashima Chibber, scripted by Ashima Chibber, Rahul Handa and Sameer Satija .A Netflix release.
Running time: 2:13
Are they finally wrapping this decades-dominating franchise this time out? Because how do you top Jason Momoa, EGOT/Goat Rita Moreno and Her Majesty, Helen Mirren, all in the same film?
It opens Friday.

A lightly fiesty performance by Leslie Uggams in the title role and a general feel-good vibe are the chief recommendations of “Dotty & Soul,” a plucky but corny comedy from actor turned writer, director and star Adam Saunders.
The movie’s got some clever plot ideas and the odd moment of amusing sass from Uggams, a veteran of 1960s TV who’s had a career renaissance thanks to a killer recurring character in “Deadpool” and TV’s “Empire.” The reliably vile David Koechner makes an amusing fat cat villain. But the script doesn’t have much spark, and Saunders, writing himself a co-starrring role, never rises above “bland” as a screen presence and comic foil.
Saunders plays Ethan Cox, a hotshot Dallas tech entrepreneur whose Big Idea is a self-driving luxury car non-sharing ride-share company. Private Car will pick you up and deliver you in style in a Ferrari, a high end Beemer or in Ethan’s case, a vintage self-driving Bentley.
Now a big ride-share operator wants to buy him and his venture capital backer Brannigan (Koechner) out.
Uggams is Dotty, a 71 year-old vending machine franchisee and general fixer for her wide circle of mostly elderly, working class friends, including the residents of Creekside Nursing Home, where Ethan’s mom (dementia) lives and old Mr. Eichelbaum (M. Emmet Walsh) pushes her wheelchair and nurses his diabetes between Dotty’s snack-machine replenishings.
The great coup that makes Private Car so valuable and a company for “the future” is a local ordinance Ethan and Brannigan pushed through in a tony Dallas suburb, banning “public transportation.”
His high-end ride share service just might be the only game in town, thanks to that. And if that ordinance isn’t the most Texas thing ever, I don’t know what is. And like other legislation from that bad idea incubator state, it could catch on.
Dotty can’t get around without buses, and nobody in her income bracket could afford Private Car or any other pricy ride share alternative. She and her aspiring clothier daughter (Margot Bingham) are already way behind on the rent.
Not Ethan’s problem. He’s too busy wearing bedazzled cowboy pimpwear in the company of his influencer and “future trophy wife” (Alexis Ren), hitting the clubs, dropping the Benjamins.
Until, that is, a private party that he shows up for in Hammer pants sees him tempted to don blackface to complete the M.C. Hammer impersonation. He goes viral in a bad way, and could lose it all if he can’t find a “person of color” to be his “stooge” to front the company so that it can sell.
Hey Dotty, ol’ buddy, ol’pal!
She’s down to cover for his “tired ass white boy ignorance.” But it’s going to cost him.
And being a savvy businesswoman from an era when Black women didn’t get the same opportunities as Jewish frat-bros who change their name to “pass,” she’s got ideas and she’s not shy about shaking things up.


The banter here goes down easily — too easily.
“You’re faker’n a Chinatown handbag” is kind of “racist,” and worse, it’s as edgy as this thing gets. Even Koechner can’t kick things up to the notch they need to reach for “Dotty & Soul” (pun titles are almost always a mistake) to come off.
Saunders is never as colorful as his costumes and never lifts his performance to the height of his hairdo, making him the dead weight at the heart of a movie he wrote and directed as a stardom-making vehicle.
Which is a shame, because the movie has an earnest, class-divide/transportation “future” message. The packaging that message comes in is so watered-down it lands like a raindrop, not a comically cold ice bucket challenge shock.
Rating: unrated, PG-ish
Cast: Leslie Uggams, Adam Saunders, David Koechner, Margot Bingham, Alexis Ren and M. Emmet Walsh.
Credits: Scripted and directed by Adam Saunders. A Quiver release.
Running time: 1:28



A Bollywood-length comic satire, “¡Que viva México!” is not a film for those wholly unfamiliar with Mexico and its political schisms and their history, or for the faint of bladder.
Director and co-writer Luis Estrada gives us an immersion in the internal fissures in Mexican society wrapped in a sloppy, insanely-slow film that leans into almost every Mexican stereotype in the book.
Machete-wielding banditos who rob anybody foolish enough to get off the paved road and whose only excuse for not muttering “Badges, we ain’t got to show you no es-stinkin’ badges!” is the fact that they don’t hablo ingles.
A cop waiting for that next bribe, a judgementally unsavory Catholic priest, a rural province relative who “made it” by becoming a corrupt elected official, the callous and contemptous big city rich, the leeching, clinging, begging poor — they’re all here.
And always, the local mariachis, ready to enliven and render “authentic” every celebration or solemn ceremony with the second biggest musical cliche in Mexico — the song that comes AFTER a norteamericano thinks of “La Cucurcha.”
I gave serious consideration to just posting this much-repeated (in the film) brassy cliche of a video as my review of “¡Que viva México!” It gets the point of the movie across — repeatedly.
STEREOTYPES.
I mean, I watched it to brush up on my espanol. What’s your excuse, if you don’t live “South of the Border” and north of Nicaragua?
The story concerns a ruthlessly ambitious Mexico City factory manager (Alfonso Herrera) who is badgered by his aged father (Damián Alcázar) to come “home” to the mid-desert village of Prosperidad because his miner-grandfather (Joaquín Cosio) has died.
Pancho Francisco won’t go…until he’s shamed and shamed again…until he learns of an inheritance.
So, in the middle of eagerly carrying out layoffs at work, he begs for time off from his sexist, fat cat boss (José Sefami), packs the kids and upper class spendthrift wife Mari (Ana de la Reguera) into the Mercedes and sets off cross country, to a simpler place and simpler people.
And once there, as Pancho is welcomed and criticized for not visiting for 20 years and tapped for this or that funeral expense, as his father continues with the guilting and his salty grandmother (Angelina Peláez, the funniest character and performance) insults him and his “fifi” (old leftist slang for bourgeois conservative shill) lifestyle and politics, and curses her late husband — along with the rest of the family — at the reading of the dead miner’s will, maybe Pancho gets a clue.
After delays, as legal problems, vandalism and shootings add up and his hot sister-in-law Gloria (Mayra Hermosillo) takes shot after shot at getting her some of that and the financial stakes rise and competing agendas clash, Pancho and we get the idea that maybe this is all a peasant trap.
Fine. All well and good. But did we need almost 200 minutes of movie to get to that point? No. Estrada (“The Perfect Dictatorship” was his) is muy desdeñoso of the viewer’s time.
Is this some sort of leftist or rightest revenge on us for plunging into his latest “comedy?”
“¡Que viva México!” is a movie mired in controversy and burdened by wildly differing “takes” passing for “reviews.”
The director and Netflix had a falling out. That’s a fact. The film is an indulgent assault on the viewer’s patience. That’s my opinion of it.
The online troll-wars for the film have each extreme staking out turf.
The film is a parody of the shift in the battle lines of class warfare, finding “the poor” a rapacious, indolent lot who are holding the rest of the country back. Or is Estrada condemning the intolerant rich elite who have forgotten the poor majority, whom they have preyed upon for generations?
He’s skewering Eternal Mexico and its ever-insoluable class differences with a suggestion the country grapple with that which it seems to never come to grips with. Or is our intrepid filmmaker seeing his homeland as a basket case that cannot be saved?
He’s ridiculing “progressive” government and its naivete about the “lazy” rural poor! He’s eviscerating the corruption that has dogged the place since Montezuma tried to buy off the carnivorous Spanish!
“Luckily, in this country, there’s no problem that can’t be solved with a lot of money.”
It seems like such a simple story, but as actors play multiple characters and the number of characters continues to grow with the complications of this “trap” Pancho & familia are in, Estrada seems hellbent on ensuring it isn’t as simple as it seems.
But what he’s really doing is cluttering his narrative, watering down his message and billing Netflix by the minute, the best possible explanation for the wretched excess of it all.
Estrada is sticking it to “El hombre,” and in this case, “The Man” is Netflix. After sitting through “¡Que viva México!” the viewer is entitled to think she or he is “The Man” he’s sticking it to as well.
Rating: R, violence, sex, nudity, profanity
Cast: Alfonso Herrera, Damián Alcázar, Ana de la Reguera, Angelina Peláez, Mayra Hermosillo, Joaquín Cosio and Zaide Silvia Gutiérrez and many others
Credits: Directed by Luis Estrada, scripted by Luis Estrada and Jaime Sampietro. A Netflix release.
Running time: 3:12

“Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3″ had a steep fall-off on its second Friday, a 70% plunge to around $15 million. But as a lot of that is attributable to the Thursday “previews” that boosted opening weekend, it’s still on track to clear $50-54 million this weekend, according to Deadline.com.
Middling Thursday night and Friday numbers don’t tell the story of the biggest wide release opening opposite the comic book movie this weekend.
“Book Club: Chapter Two” expects to make a lot of money on Mother’s Day, being a mom/grandmom sort of movie, starring Fonda and Bergman and Steenbergen and The Devine Ms. Keaton. It’s headed towards a $7 million+ weekend, good enough for third place.
“Super Mario Bros. Movie” is still raking it in, with $13 million or so giving it a second place finish. The animated “Road Rally Racers” pic won’t put a dent in it.
“Evil Dead Rise” is adding another $3.5-4 million.
“Are You There God? It’s Me, Margaret” won’t rise much above $2 million, which will put it in a dead heat with the Robert Rodriguez/Ben Affleck thriller “Hypnotic,” which could hit $2.3 million.
As always, I’ll update this as the weekend progresses and more data becomes available.







The truly revolutionary films hit you with how ordinary they can seem on first glance. But that’s just how much they changed the cinema that followed. What they did transformed the way people watched, considered and made movies, rendering all that followed some sort of imitation of what they accomplished.
“The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner” is a drab looking artifact of 1962 Britain, a black and white film of shades of grey telling a penny-plain story of one working class lad’s limited life and the release that running gives him in the Borstal school where “troubled” youth heading towards lives in the criminal classes were kept in line and “reformed.”
It’s got the conventions of “prison” and reform school films — fights, a rigid heirarchy, a mess hall riot and an idealistic psychotherapist who hopes to “help” these boys and the warden (“guvner”) who sees sport as a way out for a “promising” young runner.
The cinematography is stark, with bits of pre-Steadicam hand-held footage — on the run — that call attention to themselves thanks to their gritty shakiness. It’s only shaken out of its ordinariness in its extraordinary, still jolting third act and climax.
But it was a groundbreaking film about the post-war “decline” of Britain and the prospects of working class life in a hidebound, class-organized society, and the generation coming up that wasn’t going to take that, or so they hoped.
Now it’s seen as “angry young men” British film of the French New Wave style, flirting with the fringes of “kitchen sink realism” of British theater and cinema.
But back then it was a looking glass for the United Kingdom, kids growing up in a Cold War that Britain wouldn’t be a chief protatogonist in, no matter what Mr. Bond’s exploits might suggest, a society where money and prospects were limited for everyone but those who’ve always enjoyed them.
Director Tony Richardson and young star Tom Courtenay came over from the English theater to tell this story of a teen, delivered in chains to Ruxton Towers prison-“trade school,” who shows extraordinary talent in sports, especially running.
Michael Redgrave plays “The Govenor,” the warden who sees that talent and envisions reform school “Chariots of Fire” Olympic glory for this model of the English reform school way. Colin lets us see and hear the impertinence that underclass kids like him and The Beatles would make famous.
“Running’s always been a big thing in our family, especially running away from the police.”
The film shows us the drudgery of his fenced-in existence, the freedom he experiences while running to train for their big “sports day” meet with the poshes of Ranley School, a so-called “public school” open only to the wealthy and the elite, kids quite unlike young Colin Smith.
But running also gives Colin the escape of remembering the life he was living and the events that brought him here.
However useless his session with the new school counselor (Alec McCowen) went, we and that psychotherapist picked up on the fact and Colin just lost his father. As the flashbacks make clear, it isn’t grief for lost affection that Colin took from that experience. It’s rage.
His factory laborer Dad, barely glimpsed, fought against “hospitals” and treatment, bedridden at the end. His mother (Avis Brundage) barely cared and had a man lined-up for when the breadwinner and father of three passed.
Colin sullenly accompanies her to collect the death benefit from the factory, and he and his younger siblings go with her as she sees how much of this 500£ windfall she can blow through at once. That new man shows up with the TV she’s bought.
Colin burns the banknote she gives him in silent protest.
In between fights at Ruxton Towers he remembers taking up with his mate Mike (James Bolam), stealing a car for a joyride, double-dating (Topsy Jane, Julia Foster) at a Nottingham pub, taking an excursion to the sea shore, which was at good as it got for kids in his circumstances.
A Tory politician lectures the plebes on the telly, urging them to keep the “faith” in their unjust system. Colin’s brief flash of cash hasn’t blinded him to the inequities that hem him in.
And we see, bit by bit over several flashbacks, the crime Colin and Mike committed and the way they are hassled and targeted by the cops until evidence turns up that jails them.
Many of these memories come up in the reveries of running, all in prep for that coveted race against the rich boys (future star James Fox is their tall, well-bred ideal).
Screenwriter Alan Sillitoe, adapting his own short story, has Colin give voice to generational, economic and existential angst in a few symbolic moments, and just a few flashes of dialogue.
“Do you know what I’d do if I had the whip hand? I’d get all the coppers, governers, posh whores, army officers and members of parliament and I’d stick them up against this wall and let them have it ’cause that’s what they’d like to do to blokes like us.”
Courtenay, in his break-out role, broods and gives-as-good-as-he-gets in brawls, and doesn’t let us see the wheels turning in this despairing, possibly even enraged young man trying to decide whether to fit into the role society has assigned to him (menial work, low pay, patriotic obedience to queen and country, even in sport) or rebel.
Courtenay would go on to a long career that produced a couple of Oscar nominations in films as beloved as “Doctor Zhivago” and “The Dresser,” and delightful turns in the most fun versions of “Nicholas Nickleby” and “Little Dorrit.” He was just in “The Railway Children Return.”
Cinematographer Walter Lassally had a kind of era-defining style that he took to his black and white filming of “Zorba the Greek,” and enjoyed a career that carried him into the Golden Age of posh color period pieces (“The Bostonians”).
And director Tony Richardson had already made “A Taste of Honey” in this “kitchen sink” style. He collected Oscars for producing and directing the bawdy period piece “Tom Jones” and was making layered dramas (“The Border,” “Blue Sky”) and dramedies (“The Hotel New Hampshire”) all the way to the end of his career. His daughter with his then-wife Vanessa Redgrave, the late Natasha Richardson, was a great actress tragically killed in a skiing accident, leaving her husband Liam Neeson widowed.
But the movie that truly put Richardson and Courtenay on the map lives on, especially in the British cinema. Every working class screen tale that followed, every realistic depiction of those on the losing side of the ongoing class war, owes something to “The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner,” a classic that only truly found its audience when critics and scholars realized just how different it was from almost everything that had come before, and how much it impacted so much of the cinema that came after it.
Rating: unrated, violence, smoking
Cast: Tom Courtenay, Avis Bunnage, James Bolam, Alec McCowan, Topsy Jane, Julia Foster, Dervis Ward, James Fox and Michael Redgrave
Credits: Directed by Tony Richardson, scripted by Alan Sillitoe, based on his short story. A on Tubi, Amazon, etc.
Running time: 1:44
There have been two Nia Vardalos movies based on this family, that wedding, and the love that blossomed under the dolmades and retsina.
There was a TV series.
Nia V. did a movie playing a tour guide in Greece, “My Life in Ruins.”
And yet let’s take the Big Fat Greek family– minus Michael Constantine, because he was an adorable and very old geezer in the FIRST “Big Fat Greek” movie, which premiered 20 YEARS AGO and he’s since died — to Greece?
I’ve interviewed Nia, who seemed delighted at the kick the original films gave her career, and Tom, who loved cashing those checks for producing her movies. But that “Greek” ship, Nia V’s One Big Idea, sailed before Obama’s second term.
Realizing that just because somebody’s done all this before is no disqualifier in the movie biz, this still seems a somewhat pointless enterprise.
Does Nia “have something” on Tom Hanks and Rita Wilson (friends and producers of these movies). Because this trailer makes me wonder.
Sept. 8.
Our performative “Attention Culture” didn’t begin with Youtube. Actually, it pretty much did.
Winter did great explainer docs about Blockchain and The Panama Papers.
This looks like another winner from the Bill to Keanu’s Ted.