Movie Review: Kirby Howell-Baptiste is our Tour Guide among “We Strangers”

A hint of the inscrutable can do service to any film in any genre, and it pays off some surprising ways in “We Strangers,” an oddball domestic dramedy about a “domestic” and the dizzy white folks who hire her.

Veteran TV producer (“Dropouts,” “Hardly Working”) and director (“A Man on the Inside”) Anu Valia’s feature film debut is about a Gary, Indiana housecleaner whose “business” takes off when the wealthy white women she works for learn that she “sees things,” that she’s a psychic.

But the more “jobs” she books. the more entangled in the messy lives of her clients she becomes. And her personal life — juggling single motherhood like her single-mom sister and transporting her single mom mother — kind of unravels in the process.

Kirby Howell-Baptiste of TV’s “Barry,””Sugar,” “The Good Place” and “Killing Eve” is Rayelle, “Ray” Martin, a housekeeper who stumbles into several well-paying jobs when her maid agency books her into cleaning a doctor’s office as he moves into new digs.

We meet her after she’s already started cleaning the doctor’s (Hari Dhillon) sububan home, having accepted the gig in a brief flashback. The weirdness begins almost immediately when a confused, almost distraught neighbor (Maria Dizzia) wonders what she’s doing there.

Neighbor Jean’s begging “Don’t SAY anything” to the doctor suggests messiness of the kind that Clorox can’t clean.

Cleaning for the doctor forces Ray into the confidences of the wife (Sarah Goldberg), who can’t believe the pretty 30something Black woman can’t help an upper middle class soccer mom pick out something to wear, and won’t accept the expensive, “cute” but bland and conservative fashions Tracy wants to give to her as Ray has given the thumbs down on that choice of what to wear to Tracy’s next event.

Their teen daughter Sunny (Mischa Reddy) is her own set of “issues,” childishly leaning on Ray for favors that Ray does — until she figures out she needs to be charging the kid for this nonsense.

The way Ray is hired-out to the weird neighbor is sketchy, “a gift,” the good doctor insists. Jean (Dizzia) is an unhappy housewife not getting what she wants out of marriage to dull U.S. Steel manager Ed (Paul Adelstein), whose racial politics are “those people” simplistic, and whose idea of a hobby is photographing U.S. flags flying over all 50 states — each flag indistinguishable from the next.

Yes, their doorbell chimes to the tune of “Dixie.” And yes, Jean’s fixation on a TV “psychic” opens her up to the idea of Ray saying “I see things,” as in dead people, fates, things to come. We get the impression that it’s just a hustle.

As word of this “gift” spreads, Ray’s reliability in her “real” life starts to bend and break as she starts oversleeping and failing in her family obligations.

And her efforts to monetize her work, her “gift” and her “favors” leave her vulnerable to what you’d call “bad karma.” Not that she isn’t owed the money or her share of good fortune.

Howell-Baptiste makes Ray hard to read, even as she’s a sort of Puck in this “Midsummer Night’s Dream” amongst white surbanites, facing proof after proof of “what fools these mortals be.”

The recurring and ever-changing image of a Caribbean volcano and various interpretations, misinterpretations and off-the-cuff BS attached to the jailed “lone survivor” of an eruption of Mount Peléeis the metaphor Valia tries to wrestle into this tale to give it “meaning.”

Characters confuse the “The Prisoner Dilemma” as they suggest the imprisoned man’s fated survival was blind luck, but also a double-edged sword. So it is with Ray’s “gift.” As rich and clueless as her clients are, is this self-interested world one that she should aspire to and mimic?

Howell-Baptiste makes a mesmerizing yet earthy and “real” tour guide through the meandering narrative of “We Strangers.” She’s the best reason to watch this inscrutable film that’s easy to take-in but tricky to decode, based on what’s included and what’s left underdeveloped or simply undeciphered.

Rating: 16+, alcohol abuse profanity

Cast: Kirby Howell-Baptiste, Hari Dhillon, Kara Young, Paul Adelstein, Sarah Goldberg, Maria Dizzia and Tina Lifford.

Credits: Scripted and directed by Anu Valia. A Quiver release on Amazon Prime.

Running time: 1:28

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Movie Review: Kirby Howell-Baptiste is our Tour Guide among “We Strangers”

Movie Review: Udo Kier is “My Neighbor Adolf”

As comedies about Hitler, the Holocaust and Nazis hiding out in South America go, “My Neighbor Adolf” is no “Mr. Kaplan.” One of the last films to star the late Udo Kier, it’s a curious, gentle and downbeat tale about old men, the lost world of pre-war European Jewry and the seemingly futile hope for justice or simple closure after surviving when so many others did not.

Kier, who played Adolf Hitler in the recent “Hunters” TV series, and “Sid & Nancy” veteran David Hayman give soulful, subtle performances that often undercut the comic intent of this Israeli-Polish production.

And after decades of thrillers like “Marathon Man,” “The Boys from Brazil,” “Apt Pupil,” “The Secrets we Keep,” “Remember” and “The German Doctor,” getting a “comedy” out of this subject is always going to be tricky.

A brief prologue set in 1930s “Eastern Europe” (Poland) shows Polish chess champion Marek Polsky (Hayman) grousing through a summer day with his extended family at their summer home. He and his wife fuss over their rosebushes, a daughter readies a camera and parents, grandparents and children pose for a family photo.

In a flash, that world was destroyed.

The year 1960 finds Marek a sullen loner living in a weathered house on the outskirts of town in “South America” (Colombia), an old embittered man rarely moved to change out of his pajamas, still obsessing over his black roses but closed-off from the world. Making inquiries about the house for sale next door to him is futile.

But the German lawyer (Olivia Silhavy) is persistent and and pushy. And next thing Marek knows, the house next door is being tidied up and moved into. The mysterious bearded man “who wears his sunglasses at night” arrives, with his Alsatian dog Wolfie, after dark.

Something about “Mr. Herzog” seems familiar. It’s the eyes. With newspapers trumpeting the Israeli kidnapping of Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann from Argentina, Marek starts to convince himself that the other infamous “Adolf” of that era is living alone with his dog in the house right next door.

I mean, he’s German. The guy paints. He’s left-handed. He has a short temper and is utterly intolerant of smokers. He’s got those piercing grey-blue eyes. And, you know, he PAINTS. Who else could he be?

Efforts to interest the local Israeli embassy’s security officer (Kinerey Peled) come to naught.

“Your neighbor is not Hitler because Hitler is DEAD!”

“Bloody amateurs” Marek barks (in Yiddish, then English). “Bloody amateur!” is what he mutters at the neighbor who sets up his chess board outdoors.

If Marek is going to “prove” and get evidence and convince Mossad agents to take action against “Mr. Herzog,” he’ll need to study up. A bookstore visit to stock up on Nazi and Hitler books earns a smirk from the clerk. Buying a Minolta camera, a tripod and big lens should help — if he can figure out the tripod.

The “bloody amateur” Nazi hunter underlines every trait he reads that Hitler had that Herzog seems to share. He ticks off the boxes and snaps surreptitious photos.

But to get really close to his quarry, he’ll have to dial down the feud that begins over the unruly, roaming dog, his prized black rose bush and which includes property line issues.

A little chess? Borrow some coffee? The two lonely old men play, with “Herzog” knocking over the board when he loses and brushing off compliments about his painting “hobby.”

“I started when I was very young, but I guess I was better at…other things.

The script that director Leon Prudovsky — he did the Israeli comedy “Five Hours from Paris” — and Dmitry Molinsky serve up is long on charm and almost amusing pregnant pauses. But Kier’s cagey performance doesn’t allow for anything broad and laughable. Hayman’s grousing and fumbling efforts at espionage (breaking and entering) come right up to the edge of funny.

The picture simply isn’t pitched in a light enough tone to work as comedy, and the “mystery” isn’t mysterious enough to come off either. A reach for “shared humanity” rings hollow.

Still, it’s rewarding seeing these two paired-up in “My Neighbor Adolf,” even if most of their scenes together leave us wanting more.

Rating: unrated, nudity, toilet trips and profanity

Cast: David Hayman, Udo Kier, Olivia Silhavy and Kinerey Peled.

Credits: Directed by Leon Prudovsky, scripted by Dmitry Molinsky and Leon Prudovsky. A Cohen Media Group release.

Running time: 1:36

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Movie Review: Udo Kier is “My Neighbor Adolf”

Classic Film Review: “Detour” (1945), still as Noir as Film Noir Gets

“That’s life,” the anti-hero of “Detour” growls in voice-over. “Whichever way you turn, fate sticks out a foot to trip you.”

Hardboiled, archetype-upending and gorgeous in its bare-bones minimalism, “Detour” is quintessential film noir.

“The Maltese Falcon” preceded it and “The Big Sleep” followed it — big studio productions with Bogie and Lorre and Bacall and John Huston conjuring up a genre that the French would later label “film noir.” But cheap, briskly-shot and briskly-cut “Detour” is the great primer on the genre.

Nobody in it got famous. And the director never shook his “B-movie” bonafides.

Even in this now-acknowledged classic, we see the sloppiness of low budget haste — images flipped to show cars going east instead of west, with the driver and steering wheel on the wrong side — and the crutch of “narration” was never more superfluous in a film that was voice-over narrated to death.

But this lean, blunt and talky thriller grew in stature over the decades. The lore attached to it was added to again and again, and was often wrong — “shot in a week” — and troubling when it wasn’t. Read boxer-turned-star Tom Neal‘s later life biography if you want to know what I mean.

In 1992 “Detour” was added to the National Film Registry by the Library of Congress, denoting it as essential cinema and one of the finest films to come out of that cynical, world-weary/underworld-friendly genre that took Hollywood by storm after World War II made the movies and America grow up.

I hadn’t seen it since its 2018 restoration. That’s as good an excuse as any to dive back into an all-time favorite.

Neal plays a rumpled, grimy hitchhiker when we meet him in a Reno diner late one night. Al Roberts has the haunted look of a man who’s seen things, done things and heard things.

He’s been west. He’s headed east. And that’s about all you’ll get out of him.

So whatever you do, don’t play the wrong song (“I Can’t Believe You’re in Love With Me”) on the jukebox.

“Wait a MINUTE, pal! That’s my nickel, see?”

As the lights in the diner dim around his stubbly face, Al’s interior monologue — the flashback of the life that brought him here — begins.

There was New York, a nightspot called the Break’O Dawn. And there was a dame — Sue (Claudia Drake) — the singer where Al played the piano.

“Let’s split this town,” says she.

“Next week we’re gonna make with the ring and the license,” he counters.

But “split” she did. And when the longing grows too much, Al takes a $10 tip, a “piece of paper covered with germs — it couldn’t buy me nothin’ I want” and sets out by thumb across country as “I’m Always Chasing Rainbows” wafts into the score for the first of many times.

“If only I’d known what I was getting into that day in Arizona,” when he thumbed that last ride to the left coast in the Lincoln V-12 convertible of a big-talking bookie (Edmund MacDonald).

A death will follow, one “nobody’ll believe” was an accident. And a brassy, bullying hitchhiker — Vera (Ann Savage) — runs into our guy Al in that high-end Lincoln and proceeds to guess what’s happened and work the angles, threatening her way into blackmail.

We don’t have time to wonder why this piano player would give an obvious femme fatale his real name. We’re dumped into this jam with him, wondering if she’ll rat him out, help him out or somehow manage to do both.

Continue reading
Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Classic Film Review: “Detour” (1945), still as Noir as Film Noir Gets

Movie Preview: Homer’s “The Odyssey” finally gets the Director — Christopher Nolan — and the Budget it Deserves

Christopher Nolan and Universal teamed up for the Original (Western Civilization) Epic.

Damon and Hathaway, Holland and Lupita and Charlize and Pattinson and Mia Goth and Bernthal and James Remar and Elliot Page and Leguizamo and Samantha Morton are the stars.

July 17 this hits theaters. Can any of us wait that long?

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Preview: Homer’s “The Odyssey” finally gets the Director — Christopher Nolan — and the Budget it Deserves

Netflixable? Koreans face Doomsday — “The Great Flood”

Preppers, survivalists, Rapture fans and doomsday cultists may get a kick out of “The Great Flood,” a downbeat-to-the-point-of-bleak thriller about the End of Human Civilization.

A young Korean mother (Kim Da-Mi) carries her six year-old (Kwon Eun-sung) up several flights of their Seoul high-rise. They swim through rapidly rising waters, duck tidal waves, elbow past and around the shocked and the concerned but not panicked and the faithful re-assuring each other that the disaster around them is “God’s will.” She’s been singing along with undisciplined and on-the-spectrum-needy Ja-in as she tries to hide the terror in her eyes.

But that security guy (Park Hae-soo) from her workplace who called? The one looking for her so that she can be helicoptered off the roof? He doesn’t sentimentalize, soft-sell, sugar-coat or break-it-to-her gently.

“Humanity is doomed.”

Dogged determination in the face of hopelessness is the byword in writer-director Kim Byung-woo’s thriller, which is meant to be an action essay in the core compassion of humanity. “Abandon hope all ye who enter here” may suit the mood this film sets. But keeping calm and carrying on is a hard ethos to shake when the stakes are this high.

In cinematic short hand, “Great Flood” is a riff on Korea’s Oscar contender of a few year’s back, “Concrete Utopia,” mashed-up with the Tom Cruise-dies-again-and-again thriller “Edge of Tomorrow,” set in a present day end times of “2012.”

There are “Titanic” moments in the rising waters in confined spaces, the floating corpses and terror of those swept away, and grace notes of an elderly couple facing the end together.

But our writer-director (“The Terror Live” was his) pushes sentiment aside time and again, often to the film’s detriment. Because this disaster movie with a sci-fi subtext is about racing to make AI work as a means of humanity’s survival.

Our mother figure, Dr. Gu, has been researching, hard-wiring and programming the Emotion Engine. She doesn’t quite have it cracked, but in this “Edge of Tomorrow/Matrix” doomsday, she might break through as she tries thousands of ways to live this doomsday differently.

Will she save herself or not, save this child or others or not, help neighbors or not, fend off murderous looters rather than simply fleeing?

This cynical, unemotional, “just following orders” security guy will hinder, help, criticize and judge her efforts to cycle through every possible scenario, like the computer in “War Games” which has to try every version of tic-tac-toe to figure out if winning a nuclear war is possible. Her T-shirt changes numbers on its logo with every iteration she tries.

For all its stunning visuals — large scale disaster, vivid underwater survival scenes and grim flashbacks to a trauma from Dr. Gu and the child’s past — “The Great Flood” never crosses the threshold from watchable to relatable, a movie with characters we can identify with and an end goal that gives anybody hope.

The plot and performances are dispassionately rational to a fault. Kim might as well have made ‘We have to SAVE bit coin!” the big payoff.

That may just be a Western perspective on Eastern views of civilization, humanity and time. Or maybe I’m just not into “bleak” in humanity’s current timeline. But Kim creates an intentional emotional distance with his characters by dehumanizing them.

Odd moving moment aside, “Great Flood” is “Planet of the Apes” with a digital “Damn you all to hell” finality, “Titanic” without a Jack and Rose to root for, without Celine singing us into enduring the unendurable.

If the human heart can’t “go on,” what the hell’s the point?

Rating: TV-MA, violence, profanity

Cast: Kim Da-mi, Park Hae-soo and Kwon Eun-sung

Credits: Directed by Kim Byung-woo, scripted by Kim Byung-woo with Moises Velasco. A Netflix release.

Running time: 1:48

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Netflixable? Koreans face Doomsday — “The Great Flood”

Movie Preview: Jessica Chastain’s met the Dancer of her “Dreams”

An erotic thriller about a child of privilege, the rich director of the family foundation, becoming besotted with a charity case — an immigrant dancer from Mexico.

Oscar winner Chastain consistently makes some of the most interesting choices of any actress who got that “Oscar winner” cachet added to her resume.

Isaac Hernández plays the object of her obsession, with Rupert Friend also in the cast of this Feb. 27 release.

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Preview: Jessica Chastain’s met the Dancer of her “Dreams”

BOX OFFICE: “Avatar” owns the Weekend, but “David” and “Housemaid” find their Audience

A $12 million Thursday preview and $25 million+ Friday adds up to a blockbuster start for “Avatar: Fire & Ash,” James Cameron’s third film in his planned five or six film exercise in Pandora fantasy world-building.

Deadline.com thought it might hit $90 million over three days leading into Christmas week.The Numbers confirms that it earned $88 as of Sunday night.

What Deadline doesn’t mention is that “Avatar” opened at a pre-Trumpflation $77 million back in 2009. And they sure as shootin’ don’t mention that “Avatar: The Way of Water” did a boffo $134 million on its opening weekend in 2022.

As the first film opened big and then steamrolled into a culture-shifting blockbuster that owned the winter of 2009-2010 on its way to $785 million domestic box office take and the second film fell off from that, are filmgoers waiting to see what their friends say about this latest film before seeing the third one?

Or is the falling off from “Avatar” to “Avatar 3” just a sign of audience fatigue? Any way you count it, that’s millions fewer tickets sold, and as “The Way of Water” ended up earning $100 million less than the original $688 in North America), the ceiling’s closing in on Cameron and Disney/20th Century’s golden goose.

Reviews — aside from those of a few bandwagoner cowards — have been indifferent to dismissive. I found the falloff between the second and third films’ novelty more pronounced than that of the first to the second. “Dazzling tedium” is what you get when the ideas behind your Big Ideas are thin in the first place, and your sequels don’t speak to our world as it stands today. Dull between the CGI brawls.

For whatever reason — broke filmgoers or wary ones — it’s opening big, but not big at all by “Avatar” standards

It’s also big news that the last weekend before Christmas has a tight race for second place.

The Biblical hero cartoon “David” from Angel Studios had a middling Thursday but robust Friday ($8 millon Thurs./Fri.) and cleared $22 million this weekend..Reviews have been mixed on that one, butI thought it worked and played as their animation — as it was in “King of Kings” — is on a par with the Big Boys.

Paul Feig’s latest women-powered thriller,“The Housemaid” is “David’s” rival for second place. I may have seen that one in an empty theater for a Thursday preview, but it picked up the pace to manage around $8 million for its “opening day,” was projected to clear $20, but only earned $19, either thanks to or in spite of mixed reviews. Not sure what other folks are seeing in this clumsily structured, almost suspenseless thriller.

Sydney Sweeney fanboys? Fangirls?

The latest“Spongebob Movie” didn’t make much of a mark Thursday and won’t really gear up until Saturday and Sunday (families with children) ticket sales are tallied, but good reviews (most discriminating critics don’t bother with these films) won’t hurt its chances of settling into the top five for the weekend. It cleared $16. Meh.

It won’t catch“Zootopia 2,” but it will finish ahead of it this one weekend as Disney’s latest manasted $14.5 million on this, its fourth weekend of release.

“Five Nights at Freddy’s 2” is fading fast. Very fast. “Freddy’s” just cleared the $100 million mark and added $7. “Wicked the Last” is well over $300 million and will add $4.

“Hamnet” is still in the top ten.

But “Eternity,”  the re-release of “How the Grinch Stole Christmas” and the repackaged “Kill Bill” saga and “Ella McKay” and “Now You See Me Now You Don’t” exited the top ten forever and ever.

Timothee Chalamet’s “Marty Supreme” did well enough in limited release to crack the top nine (barely).

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on BOX OFFICE: “Avatar” owns the Weekend, but “David” and “Housemaid” find their Audience

Movie Review: “Avatar: Fire and Ash” and Dazzling Tedium

James Cameron was very much running out of interesting things to say and show in his “Avatar” franchise with the second movie, “Avatar: The Way of Water.”

The third film, “Avatar: Fire and Ash” confirms that fear and adds on a dose of dread for good measure. On no, the 70something sci-fi impressario has two more “Avatars” in the works?

And as often as the latest film pauses to show us this or that mode of travel — riding Pandora’s version of pterodactyls through the skies over this lush lunar ecosystem, clinging to the fins of sentient, hunted Pandora whales under the sea — will Disney be able to make rides simulating the experience that would be a draw?

The three-hour-plus spectacle of “Fire and Ash” trips over itself, start to finish. Our killable villains (Stephen Lang plays their leader) keep surviving in Avatar form, keep catching “Sully” (Sam Worthington, who hasn’t gotten better with the years) and ineplicably letting this “traitor” Marine who’s “gone native” escape.

There’s still more mineral and animal exploitation by the corporate “Sky People” from Earth who mine it, hunt its whales and are building a bubble city as a colony, since no one on Earth can breath the planetoid’s poisonous atmosphere. But the villains (Giovanni Ribisi, Edie Falco and Lang) seem kind of half-hearted about their efforts this time.

The marine biologist (Jemaine Clement, never worse) who warns of the complexity of the eco-system they’re pillaging is no more convincing this time.

Jake Sully and his tall, thin and ferocious Na’vi “woman” (Zoe Saldaña) are still mourning their lost son, half-blaming their surviving son and somewhat appalled that the orphan Sky People lad (Jack Champion) they’ve taken in, the weakest link in their family (he’s short, human and has to wear an oygen mask) is magically enabled to breathe Pandoran air.

If humans can breathe, it won’t be long before they overpopulate and pollute that air and kill off the natives.

And there’s a new Na’vi tribe lead by a warrior/conjure woman (nepo baby and grandbaby Oona Chaplin) who hunts humans and weaker Na’vi alike.

“Show me how to make THUNDER,” she demands of the Earthlings and their automatic weapons.

Yes, there are chases and firefights and battles, captures and escapes. No, there’s no allegory connecting all that to the awful state of the Earth right now save for the fuzzy environmentalism being ignored.

“World building” is the priority here. Think VR marketabilty. Think Disney World. That certainly figured into the screenplay.

The mystical Authurian mumbo jumbo about the people, the plants and the planet being “one” is hinted at time and again, mostly in the filler scenes between brawls. The eco-system fights back theme is more overt, as are calls for pacifism.

But “Avatar” wouldn’t be much of an action movie if pacifism caught on. It’s not much of one as it is.

The novelty of Signourney Weaver playing a teenage-voiced CGI version of herself as a Na’vi/human clone wears off quickly. But the CGI blends so much more smoothly in this film that Champion — as a human only seen in human form — is plainly acting and interacting with the CGI/motion captured players he shares scenes with so naturally that we don’t notice the technology.

It’s just that the performances have run out of human and digital gas. Even the over-acting is wooden, and bits intended as humorous suggest that Cameron’s been on the soundstage and mo-cap green screen stage too long to remember what funny looks and sounds like out in the real world.

The story is boring, and dragging it out for over three hours will only make it tolerable when it hits streaming.

“No dear, don’t pause it while I duck into the kitchen to whip up some Eggs Benedict. I’m sure I won’t miss anything.”

I’d suggest waiting until this streams, or becomes a theme park ride. All this world-building is pretty much coming to naught in movie form.

Cameron’s run out of interesting things to show and tell us, and Goddess Eywa knows I’ve run out of things to say about “Avatar.”

Rating: PG-13, violence, nudity, profanity

Cast: Sam Worthington, Zoe Saldaña, Stephen Lang, Cliff Curtis, Sigourney Weaver, Jemaine Clement, Jack Champion, David Thewlis, Giovanni Ribisi, Kate Winslet and Oona Chaplin.

Credits: Directed by James Cameron, scripted by James Cameron, Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver. A 20th Century release.

Running time: 3:17

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Movie Review: “Avatar: Fire and Ash” and Dazzling Tedium

Movie Review: Seyfried’s the House Mistress, Sydney Sweeney’s “The Housemaid”

Sydney Sweeney’s fans will come to the “The Housemaid” for the nudity and the explicit sex. Or so the cleavage-crammed advertising for this thriller would suggest the studio believes.

But they’ll stay for the violence, the twists, the climax and anti-climaxes spoiled by redundant voice-over-narration for dummies?

That said, I wouldn’t be shocked if this Paul Feig thriller — he did the scheming women “Simple Favor” pictures — touched a nerve and found an audience, any more than I wasn’t shocked at the sight of co-star Amanda Seyfriend acting circles around last year and this year’s “It” girl.

Sweeney, playing an unemployed young woman living in her car and desperate enough to endure a job that features humiliation and the threat of worse from the rich, privileged pricks who hired her, brings everything but “desperate” to her performance. Her bland wariness gives away the suspense this picture needs almost as much as a better title.

Letting actors/actresses read to the very end of the script isn’t always the best idea.

The job interview with Mrs. Winchester (Seyfried) makes it seem like a done deal. Nina even confesses to job prospect Millie that the one child she’d be expected to care for, along with cooking and cleaning and errands, will soon be joined by another. She hasn’t even told her husband, she confesses with widened eyes.

But hell, she hasn’t finished interviewing job prospects either. And when husband Andrew (Brandon Sklenar of TV’s “1923”) walks in, he’s surprised about the whole “live in” housemaid thing.

Something’s a little “off” in eager-to-confide Nina and “hot mess” doesn’t begin to do it justice.

Millie? She’s got secrets, and that appointment she isn’t allowed to miss tips us off. It’s with her probation officer.

The mystery unravels as a “Who’s playing with whom” tale, with testy Nina flipping out over perceived failings and hurling blame for everything that goes wrong at Millie, who — being “desperate” — just has to take these mind games and manipulations.

He’s awfully nice to her, but Millie should also be wary of the hunky, rich husband of the manor. If he’s seducing her in her dreams, that’s fair warning.

She opens up about her predicament in the voice-over narrated diary her probation officer insists she keep. No, not one line of that narration– which runs the length of the movie — is pithy enough to be quotable.

As the script (based on a Rebecca Sonnenshine novel) gropes around for suspense it stumbles through deliberate blind alleys and assorted “surprise twists.” The whole second half of this long-film-that-plays-longer is so clumsily structured that it generally spoils the vengeful fun.

Seyfried takes up the challenge of pairing-up with Sweeney with a manic bravado that overwhelms Sweeney’s perpetual poker face. Elizabeth Perkins might have taken a few sips of battery acid between takes to dial up the cruel, imperious, judgmental mother-in-law whom nobody in the house, except for her son, can please.

Indiana Elle plays Cece, the snotty little girl of the house who channels her granny as she holds “the help” to her seven year-old standards, even when it comes to morning orange juice.

“Juice is a privilege. Not something you drink out of a dirty glass.

There’s promise to this or that character and in the twists that almost certainly played better in the novel than Feig manages on screen. Anything promising is squandered in a pokey, obvious movie that stumbles towards stupid in the anti-climactic latter acts.

As star vehicles go, “The Housemaid” doesn’t do Sweeney any more favors than the flops “Eden,” “Christy” or “Echo Valley” did. Two years into top billed stardom, and her best work is still the TV series (“Euphoria,” “White Lotus,” “The Handmaid’s Tale”) that first made her a sex symbol, star and allegedly a name you can market your movie under.

We’ll have to wait and see if this sells tickets. But in the meantime, our workaholic star should take a minute, eyeball her bland performance(s) and hunt up some coaching. Her resume is lengthening — for now — but her range and craft aren’t growing. And sex appeal in the movies has a very short shelf life.

Rating: R, violence, explicit sex, nudity and profanity

Cast: Amanda Seyfried, Sydney Sweeney, Brandon Sklenar and Elizabeth Perkins

Credits: Directed by Paul Feig, scripted by Rebecca Sonnenshine, based on the novel by Freida McFadden. A Lionsgate release.

Running time: 2:11

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Movie Review: Seyfried’s the House Mistress, Sydney Sweeney’s “The Housemaid”

It’s an “Avatar” afternoon

Let’s see if there’s anything to see or make a fuss about.

Interesting way for James Cameron to spend his filmmaking capital and his last years as a major director, in any event.

As the pre show ads are playing on a blank screen, it’s not looking good.

Oscar winner Zoe Saldana, the hardest working woman in show business, is why we keep coming back.

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on It’s an “Avatar” afternoon