


His misses are so rare between his many hits that we don’t think of Ryan Gosling as ever taking an errant step on his rise ro stardom. But a “Gangster Squad,” “Song to Song” or “The Gray Man” turns up just often enough to remind us he’s human.
I am mystified about his need to dabble in “cutesie” with the sci-fi misfire “Project Hail Mary.” Yes, he’s got kids, and an alien stone-crab (literally stone) FX sidekick in a “Silent Running/The Martian” mashup from two filmmakers best known for getting their start as an animation directing team (“Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs”) seems almost understandable.
But I went out of my way to avoid adding “adorable” to the “alien sidekick” description. It’s not, no matter how many times the critter’s translated “Fist me bump” or “You are dumb” or “Do puppet show” burblings — James Ortiz provides the nondescript voice — aim for laughs.
I see a lot of lightweights and critic-come-latelys are endorsing this, and maybe I’m too reluctant to let go of my reactions to the first trailers for it. But “cloying” is a hard sell at 156 often interminable minutes.
Gosling plays a middle school science teacher who runs a fun and delightfully encouraging class. That’s not quite a running thread through the movie, but it has or had promise.
One day, the ex-college researcher/professor Dr. Ryland Grace (a tad on the nose, that name) is challenged by his students to talk about the “red dots” that scientists have announced seem to be eating the sun in a giant arc of a solar system buffet table that ends on Venus.
Even Grace isn’t convinced when he insists “They’re gonna figure this out,” “they” meaning the world’s best and brightest astrophysicists, biologists and the like.
Then he’s confronted by “they” in the form of scientist/project leader Eva Stratt (Sandra Hüller of “Anatomy of a Fall” and “Toni Erdmann”). Her bluntness gets right to the point of his one-time expertise. She will accept no argument from a teacher and onetime researcher who lost his career over his theory that “water is not necessary for life” in the universe.” She needs him and that’s that.
Her humorlessness is her humor. Yes, those black SUVs are full of guys who will kidnap him because that’s what she needs and orders.
And as we learn about that class, that school and this now-renewed research through flashbacks Grace experiences after waking up from cryo-sleep on a spaceship, we can guess how he ended up there, too, a turn of events as ludicrous and unlikely as a vacuum-of-space virus that is eating stars all over the galaxy.
Grace is all alone on a ship traveling over eleven light years to study a star that isn’t being eaten, or so everybody thought when he took off. That’s where he runs into an alien vessel also studying this star. And that’s how he meets just-as-lonely “Rocky.”
The science in this “sun is being eaten” story — such as it is — is a word salad of chemical elements grasped just long enough to let it slip into “fantasy,” with energy sources that seem more Tony Stark and “Avatar” “Unobtainium” than Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
The “learn to communicate” scenes involving a vacuum tube passed between spaceships, DIY models and yes, “puppet shows,” and are grossly inferior to earlier takes on that trope — “Close Encounters,” “Contact” and “The Martian.” Sci-fi films are readily referenced with “Shields’ UP!” the only joke that works.
The narrative’s “work the problem” business is flat-out gobbledegook, as the movie feels more production designed than Phd-in-chemistry approved.
And the pathos derived from the Big Themes of loneliness, sacrifice and fighting through fatalism left me cold –deep space cold. When even “Am I expendable?” is played for laughs, and lands with a thud, it’s not just gravity that’s to blame.
Gosling can be forgiven for taking the Bezos bucks, and he has earned such goodwill that he’s almost become bad-review-proof, especially since “Barbie.” But “Project Hail Mary” doesn’t make the pass, much less complete it in the end zone when time FINALLY expires.
Rating: PG-13, “thematic meterial” and “suggestive references.
Cast: Ryan Gosling, Sandra Hüller, Lionel Boyce, Ken Yeoung and the voice of James Ortiz as “Rocky”
Credits: Directed by Phil Lord and Christopher Miller, scripted by Drew Goddard and Andy Weir An Amazon MGM release.
Running time: 2:36


Pingback: Project Hail Mary: An Astrophysicist’s Science Reality Check - QuantoSei News
I feel like you watched only the first half hour of a different movie than the rest of us.
Oh? You’re thinking it got “better?”
this is exactly what I thought it was great out of the gate and your like wow this is going to be good…but within the first hour or when he met the rock, I was like is it me or is this cornball and silly? cant find anyone to agree with me even the husband .. everyone seems to just love this….
The trailers didn’t lie. But we don’t review movies based on their pitch. Still, some have been become quite taken with it, a few rapturous reviews I glanced over tickled me with their naivete. They were written by people who haven’t seen many movies made before 2000, and are experiencing the cinema like a puppy’s life of “firsts” in a fresh new world. That’s one perspective. I have a considerably more seasoned one.
I had the exact same response to the trailer. So, a week later, I watched it again. Then, I had my wife watch it with me. Same response: this thing looks idiotic. Did Ryland and Rocky do the ice bucket challenge together? Did Ryland teach Rocky to say, “6-7”? Did they plank? Sing “Sweet Caroline”? Good grief. lol
The movie had the cinematic timing of a straight-to-Netflix special. The Instagram reels have thoroughly won
Read the book, and you might better understand why many of the “whys” (which are covered in the book) aren’t included in the movie. They simply don’t make for an especially enthralling film. The “stone crab” also wasn’t CGI, although some CGI effects were added. For a modern sci‑fi movie, there was actually little CGI used overall.
Honestly, the length of the movie felt appropriate for conveying the book’s story in a way that most people (except for a few, it seems) would enjoy. They could have added all of the research Grace and Rocky do, and they could have included more exposition—but that would have increased the runtime considerably. At that point, it would likely cause you and others to complain that the movie was too long.
Much of your criticism seems to orbit (yes, I said it) around the lack of detailed scientific principles, while at the same time you argue that the movie drags. You can’t really have both. I think Andy Weir and the filmmakers did a solid job bridging the gap between unwatchable, science‑heavy exposition, the process of Grace and Rocky learning to communicate (which was already much shorter in the movie), and the shorter, high‑interest moments like acquiring the Taumoeba.
I am reviewing the film, not the novel. A movie has to stand on its own narrative legs. The book was niche popular. And from what I gather from online reviews, the “science” involved took a bit of slapping around even on the printed page. “Derivative” goes without saying.