Movie Review: A Dying woman frets over past lives and the “Sarogeto” she hires to get through this one

“Sarogeto” is a cryptic, morose and meandering wander around grief, death and dying and “past lives” that’s only as mysterious as its title. Once you know what “Sarogeto” means in Japanese, it’s easier to understand that “icky” was probably not the intention of writer-director Nico Santucci.

Santucci made his feature directing debut with this Japanese-flavored fumble through big themes and weary tropes, projecting entirely too much of the “action” in voice-over-narrated slow-motion for his own good.

A little girl loses her mother and gets bawled out by her father when she spills mom’s ashes at the cemetery/shrine where she’s to be interred.

A poetic voice-over has adult Grace (Ikumi Yoshimatsu) questioning that father after his death, years later.

“How can I continue my journey without understanding the destination?”

Grace grew up to marry well and live in luxury in LA. But showing up at your doctor’s (Eric Roberts) office in a Rolls Royce doesn’t lessen the sting of “tumor next to your aorta” and “melanoma” death sentence.

Getting a second opinion from a retired Japanese doctor (veteran charater actor Aki Aleong) who was a friend of her late father’s is no help. Her “Maybe my past lives are catching up with me” joke lands flat. Dr. Tano’s “inner peace” speech is small comfort.

“A soul’s journey…is about the souls that surround it.”

Grace resolves to keep this secret fom her husband (Winsor Harmon) and little boy (Tyler Ghyzel).

“You’d think they’d have found a cure for asthma by now” is all she’ll say to them about her health. She resolves to hire a nanny to be her “sarogeto” (say it out loud), if only she can find one prospect who isn’t seriously put off by her extremely personal questions.

“Do you have a boyfriend? Do you want kids of your own? What is your emotional intelligence like?”

The much much younger Miki (Ruby Park) is who she hires to take over reading her little boy the battered old Japanese children’s book her mother left her, the tale of the kitten and the dragon.

The script is diffuse, unfocused, emphasizing the airy and the dreamlike. Slow motion shots of Grace walking on an empty beach or through a Japanese forest have her musing poetically and forgettably in voice-over about the past and the future.

Yoshimatsu, a bit player and stuntwoman getting a rare leading lady role, is only as good as the material, which has the consistency of vapor. Whatever the title, whatever lip service is paid to grief, past lives or facing one’s fate, Santucci has a hard time getting around to making a point. And when he does, it’s so dated as to play like a slow motion cringe.

Rating: unrated

Cast: Ikumi Yoshimatsu, Winsor Harmon, Ruby Park, Aki Aleong and Eric Roberts.

Credits: Directed by Nico Santucci, scripted by Nico Santucci and Timothy Michael Hayes. A Gravitas Ventures release.

Running time: 1:31

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Movie Review: A Dying woman frets over past lives and the “Sarogeto” she hires to get through this one

Documentary Review: Central and South Americans find they must fight for “Water for Life”

We’ve been warned for decades that the next “war” between the world’s haves and have-nots is going to be over water.

From hydroelectric dams pushed by outside profiteers to mineral interests that need water for mining to just plain “let’s buy up the rights to people’s drinking water” megacorporations, the threats have been piling up in much of the world since the 1990s.

It’s such a threat that even James Bond took on a villain with water control in his sights in “Quantum of Solace” some seventeen years ago.

“Water for Life” is a documentary account of this years-long struggle in the Americas. Filmmakers Will Parrinello and Sarah Kass take us to Chile, where the indigenous Mapuche people march, agitate and even sabotage companies their government has sold lumber and hydro power rights to, threatening “sacred” rivers they depend on.

We meet El Salvadoran farmers and others whose government made deals with a multi-national gold mining concern to dig and drain their rivers to do it.

And we go inside the fight against destructive hydro projects in neighboring Honduras, where the region’s history of poverty, violence and official corruption hangs over high-handed decisions, which can only be resisted at the risk of one’s own life.

Chief Alberto Curamil of the Mapuche complains about a Chilean government that refuses to recognize its Indigenous people, which is a handy stance to take when you want to exploit lumber and rivers in the nation’s “empty” interior, the very “lifeblood of our territory,” Curamil declares (in Spanish with English subtitles).

How Chief Curamil is treated is something of a template for corporate interests and governments determined to cash in on them in the Americas. He and his fellow protestors are labeled anti-progress “terrorists,” which puts anyone who takes part in a protests in danger. Over his years long fight, he is sent to prison on trumped up charges.

In El Salvador, farmer/protestor Francisco Pineda can opine that “all we need is clean water and clean air and land to farm,” but with China looking to sell dams abroad, and multinational mining interests with World Bank connections leaning on poor countries, that’s a big ask. Fighting back may be imperitive, but the game seems fixed against them.

When you name your company Pacific Rim, and you make your “suit” CEO named Shrake the face of the company, you’re all but giving away the supervillains-after-your-resources game.

In Honduras, the violence is more direct, the corruption more naked and the stain of U.S. interference in the region is harder to wash out as Indigenous activist Berta Cáceres takes up the cause of saving rivers from damming by local interests with Chinese ties.

“Water for Life” can be hopeful as it shows up people power standing up to Big Business and its over-compensated lawyers, bought-and-paid-for-politicians and “foreign” threats in an effort to save Indigenous people and beautiful natural spaces. The relentless nature of the threats and the chilling presence of the First World operated World Bank in all of these conflicts make one wonder how long the powerless can keep up the struggle.

But with the world’s politics devolving into might-makes-right and greed gets its way governance, it’s still encouraging to see those directly threatened uniting and rising to meet the challenge.

Rating: unrated

Cast: Narrated by Diego Luna, with Berta Cáceres Alberto Curamil, Francisco Pineda and others.

Credits: Directed by Will Parrinello, scripted by Sarah Kass. A release Mill Valley Film Group/JustFilms release on PBS “POV” beginning April 21.

Running time: 1:31

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Documentary Review: Central and South Americans find they must fight for “Water for Life”

Movie Review: An all-star Animated tale of “The King of Kings,” as told by Charles Dickens

“The King of Kings” is a compact, cute Life of Jesus served up in animated form for parents to take their kids to this Easter.

An all-star voice cast decorates a beautifully animated offering from Angel Studios, produced as the first animated feature film from South Korea’s Mofac Animation.

The clever conceit here is to frame this story within a tale told by Mr. “Christmas Carol” himself, Charles Dickens. Dickens’ children’s book “The Life of Our Lord” is the pretext for that, and the movie give us Dickens, voiced by Kenneth Branagh, setting a King Arthur obsessed son Walter (Roman Griffin Davis) straight about who the “true” “King of Kings” was — Jesus.

Dickens, Branagh and writer-director Seong-ho Jang take us from “swaddling clothes, lying in a manger” to “He is Risen” in a reasonably brisk and tidy 103 minutes, no small feat.

The impish kid Walter interjects everything from “Wait, what’s a ‘manger?'” to pleas of get to “the part where Jesus draws his sword and slays the mighty dragon” as he imagines himself and his pet kitty as eyewitnesses to all that his father and mother (Uma Thurman) narrate and act-out for him, the story that “inspired” the legend of King Arthur.

Birth to “fleeing to Egypt,” adolescent preaching to “40 days in the wilderness” on through cleaning out the business enterprises in The Temple to walking on the raging sea to Gethsemane, The Most Familiar Story Ever told is related in ways meant to appeal to small children. We meet Wise Men who alarm King Herod (Mark Hamill), Jesus (Oscar Isaac) recruiting his first “fisher of men” Simon Peter (Oscar winner Forest Whitaker), the threatened High Priest Caiaphas (Oscar winner Ben Kingsley) and Pontius Pilate (Pierce Brosnan).

Dickens and “King of Kings” hit the high points in a story with touchstone events, “miracles” and other feats achieved by a man “who didn’t need a (magical) sword.”

Isaac brings a refreshing casualness to the vernacular dialogue this Jesus delivers. No, he doesn’t need a boat ride across the Sea of Galilee.

“Go ahead,” he assures his disciples. “I’ll wait” until a storm comes to test them and he can walk out to them to challenge them further.

That adulteress you plan to stone?

“Fine. I tell you what. Anyone here who has NEVER sinned can throw the first stone!”

The villains are well cast and Branagh and Thurman are perfectly relatable as Victorian parents passing on their religion to one of their children (they had ten) via the story of “a king born in the lowest and humblest of places.”

The animation ranges from impressive to a tad plastic. That extra computing power, effort and expense it takes to make human facial expressions “alive” and mouth movements realistic isn’t in evidence here.

It’s inoffensive and not particularly challenging, and truth be told, “The King of Kings” drifts from “cute” to “cutesie” here and there. But as faith-based entertainment for children, you could do worse than having Kenneth Branagh summarizing the Old Testament (“Passover,” “Exodus”) and breezing kids through “no room” at the inn to Jesus delivering health care, feeding the hungry, staring down his fate on Palm Sunday followed by a betrayal, a crucifixion and resurrection.

Rating: PG

Cast: The voices of Kenneth Branagh, Oscar Isaac, Uma Thurman, Forest Whitaker, Pierce Brosnan, Mark Hamill, Roman Griffin Davis and Ben Kingsley.

Credits: Scripted and directed by Seong-ho Jang, with additional writing by Rob Edwards and Jamie Thomason, inspired by the Charles Dickens book “The Life of Our Lord.” An Angel Studios release.

Running time: 1:43

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Movie Review: An all-star Animated tale of “The King of Kings,” as told by Charles Dickens

Classic Film Review: Ferrer, Huston and the Can Can — “Moulin Rouge” (1952)

The American master John Huston was an Oscar winning director and screenwriter, and no slouch as an actor. A bon vivant, boxer, horseman and at his richest, a member of the Irish landed gentry, he became Hollywood’s most famous Renaissance Man.

But the one thing he studied, academically in Paris and not from watching his father and learning to act on-the-job appearing in plays with the old man, was painting. You can see that painterly eye in just a few of his films — “Fat City,” “The Dead,” “The Red Badge of Courage” and most famously “Moulin Rouge.” Most of his movies are best remembered for the casting, clever plotting and classic performances.

In “Moulin Rouge,” the French-trained painter turned playwright, writer, director and actor and his art director (Paul Sheriff) and production designer/set-director Marcel Vertès turned Technicolor loose on a tale of Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec, the brilliant painter and illustrator who documented Belle Époque Paris — its lurid street life and gaudy night life, most famously in posters and paintings of the notorious nightclub and its habitues.

“Moulin Rouge” (1952) is an adaptation of a fictionalized biography of Toulouse-Lautrec, a picture both hopelessly conventional in the ways of 1940s and ’50s bio-pics, and garishly and gloriously “painted” in strokes and colors the disabled, diminutive painter worked in.

The emphasis is on the melodramatic arc of the Toulouse-Lautrec’s life — a child of privilege and nobility injured in a fall which, coupled with the fact that his “noble” parents were first cousins, left him with barely functional legs, stunted in their growth due to bone breaks that never “knitted.”

That marked him for life and in the script’s telling, left him a loner, an artist moved by the lives spinning around him, but bitter that the women who made time for him were almost certainly “using” him.

“Oh, Henri why can’t you be tall and handsome?”

One or two more drinks, Henri cracks, and “I will be.”

Jose Ferrer’s Oscar-nominated performance as Toulouse-Lautrec (and as Henri’s disapproving father) is mostly remembered for the little man stunt of it all — trick shots, walking in ditches, seen standing on his knees with his feet strapped behind his thighs. But nobody of his era managed oversized performances quite like Ferrer. His “Cyrano,” the towering defense attorney turn in “The Caine Mutiny,” the man’s florid baritone and steely gaze made him perfect for “larger-than-life.”

“Marriage is like a dull meal with the dessert at the beginning,” the sad but witty loner insists. “I have it on the very highest authority.

Colette Marchand plays the street-walker Marie, a woman who turns gratitude for his gallant “rescue” of her from the police into something resembling love. But muse or not, she’s almost certain to be faithless and sure to use him and leave him even more broken.

Suzanne Flon portrays a Myriamme, a more soulful and warm flirtation, but one treated by him with the same bitter cynicism that she’ll choose another, first chance she gets.

Huston treats us to the spectacle of Zsa Zsa Gabor as a beautiful, vain blonde chanteuse, a star of the Moulin Rouge (Red Windmill) club. Her character, Jane Avril, was famous for her Can Can. Here, she’s a singer, with her singing voice dubbed by dancer/actress Muriel Smith, whom Huston and Co. cast (along with an unnamed Black male dancer) to remind viewers that Paris nightlife was more integrated than it was in 1950s America.

The scenes in the club are the life of this movie, with Toulouse-Latrec at his customary table, effortlessly sketching the whirl of legs, petticoats and dancer’s bottoms, with various strata of Paris society ogling, whistling and caught up in the gay maelstrom kicking, splitting and spinning around the dance floor.

The first third of “Moulin Rouge” plunges us into this milieu, showing us faintly caricature-worthy faces (Tutte Lemkow, wearing prosthetics that make him almost grotesque) that the painter immortalized, introducing amazing dancers (Katherine Kath and Muriel Smith) and their petty, venal (and racist) rivalry.

The flashbacks to the artist’s childhood and domestic scenes of him drinking and bickering with Marie dominate the middle acts, overwhelming a brief encounter with his painting contemporaries (Christopher Lee plays the pointillist Georges Seurat) and the late-life breakthrough for the artist is lost in the lonely “dissipation” that is the film’s dominant theme.

“I drink. A little more each day. Thus, I forget my loneliness and my ugliness and the pain in my legs.”

Every scene in the club crackles with bawdy, PG-13 life, and the best hope for most of those scenes not set in the colorful chaos of what became — thanks to Henri’s posters (the movie insists) — the hottest club in Paris is that they be witty. About half of them rise to this challenge.

“The wise woman patterns her life on the theory and practice of modern banking. She never gives her love, but only lends it on the best security, and at the highest rate of interest.”

At some point, the generic melodrama of an alcoholic artist drinking himself to death fails to move, even if we sympathize with his plight, even if Ferrer gives us a glimpse of the despair and simple disappointment of being born rich and titled, finally earning fame on your own merits and not getting any satisfaction — romantic or otherwise — out of it.

But Huston and his production crew still managed to create a film of saturated colors that pops off the screen, with any given scene in the club worthy of a still frame all its own, suitable for hanging in a museum or in any chic home.

Rating: PG, prostitution, alcohol abuse

Cast: Jose Ferrer, Zsa Zsa Gabor, Colette Marchand, Suzanne Flon, Peter Cushing,
Claude Nollier, Muriel Smith, Tutte Lemkow and Katherine Kath.

Credits: Directed by John Huston, scripted by Anthony Veiller and John Huston, based on the book by Pierre La Mure. An MGM release on Tubi, other streamers

Running time: 1:57

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Classic Film Review: Ferrer, Huston and the Can Can — “Moulin Rouge” (1952)

Movie Review: Payback’s a B–ch in “Revolver”

“Revolver” is a Korean “Payback,” another version of the and the Lee Marvin/John Boorman thriller that’s based on, “Point Blank.”

Somebody went to jail, did the time. They get out. They’re owed money. They’re damned sure going to collect it.

The most interesting wrinkle in writer-director Oh Seung-uk’s variation on a theme is that the ex-con is a female detective, that the cops she was involved with are dirty, to a one.

The smartest thing Oh did was cast the star of his 2015 thriller “The Shameless,” the veteran actress Jeon Do-yeon, as the lead. She’s got the gravitas, carrying herself like an ex-cop, wearing boots because you never know when you’re going to have to step on somebody’s toes.

Less smart? Not paying attention to the pace and the violence that drives money-owed/vengeance thrillers like “Point Blank.” “Revolver” is slow, littered with characters, flashbacks and near-confrontations that delay and delay that moment when our anti-heroine turns violent and things get interesting.

Jeon plays Det. Sgt. Ha Soo-yeong, whom we meet the day she finishes her sentence. She shrugs off the scars and the fresh bruise near her eye. She survived two years of being a disgraced cop in prison. That’s enough.

Two people greet her at the gate. Prosecutor Hong (Kang Eui-shik) reminds her that her mob and dirty cop accomplices “forgot you,” that her lover, the ring-leader, Capt. Lim (Lee Jung-jae) is dead. Good luck collecting that cash she must have been promised for her silence.

Flashbacks show Ha and Lim inspecting her new apartment, before prison. That was part of the deal.

The other person greeting her upon release is the bubbly mob-connected “hostess” who goes by Madame Hung (Lim Ji-yeon). As soon as Ha figures out she isn’t there to take her to her payoff, she gets out of her Land Rover and sets out to ensure payment.

But her old blackmailing “evidence” doesn’t work out, and she doesn’t even know who among the surviving members of this “slush fund” conspiracy owes her the money. She accepts a revolver from a broken down cop (Jeong Jae-yeong) and sets out to get some answers.

Veteran thriller fans know the drill. She’s got to go through Madame Hung to get to the manager of the Blue Oyster Club to find out who these “gangnam” (upscale neighborhood) Eastern Promises Ltd. folks are that arranged the payment. She has to deal with a punk (Ji Chang-wook) who made that promise to get to the People Higher Up with the Cash.

Matinee idol Ji and the mercurial Lim bring plenty of color to their characters. Jeon Hye-jin makes a creepy/scary impression as the late Captain Lim’s partner, who has a stake in all this. Leading lady Jeon establishes her character’s tough broad bonafides in the open scenes.

“What’s with your tone?”

“This is how I talk to thugs,” she growls, in Korean with English subtitles.

But waiting for all of this to pay off requires more patience than even Ha appears to have. Flashbacks muddy up the past and complicate the present.

And the viewer, remembering Chekhov’s Gun maxim, know that there’s a revolver, and a deadly retractable police baton that Ha carries with her. We keep waiting for her to use one or both.

The narrative never strays from the formula/quest that Ha is on. But writer-director Oh isn’t shy about boring us half-to-death as we wait for that inevitable connecting of the dots, resolution of the search and the inevitable brandishing of the “Revolver.”

Rating: unrated, violence, profanity

Cast: Jeon Do-yeon, Ji Chang-wook, Lim Ji-yeon, Jeong Jae-yeong,
Kim Jun-han, Jeon Hye-jin and Lee Jung-jae

Credits: Scripted and directed by Oh Seung-uk. A Well Go USA release.

Running time: 1:54

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Movie Review: Payback’s a B–ch in “Revolver”

Classic Film Review: Stoppard has His Way with “Hamlet” for laughs — “Rosencrantz & Guildenstern are Dead” (1990)

In search of some vintage laughs among the “classic” collections of my favorite streamers, I stumbled back into the great British playwright Tom Stoppard’s lone directing credit, his star-studded big screen adaptation of “Rosencrantz & Guildenstern are Dead.”

I saw this when it was in theaters, and I’ve seen it and a couple of Stoppard’s lighter plays (“The Real Inspector Hound” comes to mind) on stage over the years. I love Tim Roth, Gary Oldman and Richard Dreyfuss, and bits of droll dialogue getting at the existential/absurdist point of it all linger in the memory.

“What are you playing at?”

“Words!”

But the funny thing about it now is that, wordplay or not, it’s quite slow, almost cumbersome. Perhaps I’m conflating pleasant memories of it with brisk and bright stage versions I’ve seen, but the 1990 film is not subtle about underscoring why one of our great playwrights and screenwriters (“Shakespeare in Love,” “Brazil,” “Empire of the Sun,” “Enigma,” “The Russia House”) only stepped behind the camera to direct once.

On screen, “Rosencrantz & Guildenstern are Dead” is something of a drag. Stoppard could have used an editor who cut the film into something quicker and flashier. “Period detail” is nice, but lingering on shots of our tragicomic heroes in vast Elizabethan ballrooms and “Waiting for Godot” bleak exteriors slows the pace and waters down the wit.

But at least Dreyfuss seems to be having the time of his life, hamming it up and even adding tragi-comic depth to the leader of the troupe of players who figured in the Danish Prince Hamlet’s scheme to unmask his possibly murderous uncle, and who entertains and enlightens the doomed heroes of Stoppard’s career-making 1966 play.

“Generally speaking, things have gone about as far as they can possibly go, when things have gotten about as bad as they can reasonably get.”

Stoppard’s timeless conceit was in taking these peripheral figures from “Hamlet” and deconstructing the play, the plot, the themes and the psychology of it all through the eyes of two witty but not clever enough layabouts.

Hell, they can’t quite decide which of them is Rosencrantz (generally speaking, Oldman) and which is Guildenstern (Roth, mainly by default).

We meet them on Samuel Beckett’s existentially empty road, endlessly flipping a gold coin Rosencrantz finds, gambling on the stunning succession of “heads” that turn up and its relation to “the laws of probability,” “the law of diminishing returns” and “the redistribution of wealth.”

They have received a royal “summons,” and are making their way to Elsinore to meet with newly-crowned King Claudius (Donald Sumpter) and newly-married to Queen Gertrude (Joanna Miles), a wedding which has driven Hamlet (Iain Glen), her son by the newly-dead former king, mad.

Stumbling across a band of “tragedians,” our duo is subjected to a lot of banter of the “love, blood and rhetoric” in the hopes that they’ll pay for a performance — or a sexual dalliance, for pay — with a member of the single-sex cast.

Would they like to see “The Rape of the Sabine Women…or woman, or rather ‘Albert?‘”

Slipping away, they arrive at Elisnore and are given their charge by the king — renew their old friendship with the prince, find out what’s eating at him and let Claudius know what he’s planning.

Stoppard masterfully weaves this script into the Shakespeare play, with its scant Rosencrantz & Guildenstern scenes and their lone scene with Ophelia’s father, the faintly doddering Polonius (Ian Richardson). They watch the touring theatre troupe’s direction (by Hamlet) in their production of “The Murder of Gonzago,” transformed by Hamlet to play up what he suspects Claudius and his mother did to his father. And they’re even unwitting participants in the way Polonius meets his end.

The film may have a somewht lumbering quality, with even the smooth transitions feeling drawn-out. But the back-engineering of the play is brilliant, and forshadows Stoppard’s similarly clever touches in “Shakespeare in Love.”

And that wordplay tickles in every incarnation of this show.

“I think I have it! A man talking to himself is no matter than a man talking nonsense not to himself.”

“Or just as mad.”

“OR just as mad.”

“And he does both.

“So there you are.”

“Stark raving sane.

Oldman gives Rosencrantz depth beyond the befuddlement that seems his main character trait when first we meet him. And Roth quickly disabuses us of the notion that Guildenstern is the cagier, the more paranoid, “the smart one.”

And Dreyfuss, finishing up his peak years of stardom, leans into the theatricality of it all, and what grated in excessive performances such as his Oscar-bait turn in “Whose Life Is it Anyway?” is indulged to a delightful degree. He gets to sum up acting, Shakespeare and the theater’s obligations to audience expectations and whatever contrivances cooked up by the writer, reminding us “the play’s the thing.”

“We are tragedians, you see? We follow directions. There is no choice involved. The bad end unhappily, the good, unluckily. That is what tragedy means.”

The generations of horror stories writers tell of what a director, a studio or “Hollywood” did to one’s script explains Stoppard’s determination to get the play that made him on the screen the way he wanted it. But one cannot help but wonder if another set of eyes and ears — or two other sets — might have juiced the supporting cast, freshened the line readings (which can be perfunctory), tightened the transitions and given the players that most hated of stage and screen directions actors, but one which would have given this more pace, urgency and life.

“OK, let’s try that again. But FASTER.”

Rating: PG, bare bottoms, hither and yon

Cast: Gary Oldman, Tim Roth, Iain Glen, Joanna Roth, Ian Richardson, Donald Sumpter, Joanna Miles and Richard Dreyfuss

Credits: Scripted and directed by Tom Stoppard, based on his play. An MGM release on Tubi, other streamers.

Running time: 1:57

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Classic Film Review: Stoppard has His Way with “Hamlet” for laughs — “Rosencrantz & Guildenstern are Dead” (1990)

Netflixable? First Love faces the test of “arranged marriage” in “Promised Hearts (Niyala)”

One of the best reasons to take the occasional Around the world with Netflix trip is getting the pulse of another culture through its cinema.

It’s a great way recognize one’s own biases and Western ideas of “cultural progress” and see how the rest of the world lives, and how those lives are evolving, perhaps in part due to exposure to “foreign” ideas that much of the world takes as “modern.”

“Promised Hearts” is another tame, chaste romantic melodrama from Muslim Indonesia. It’s practically a faith-based film as characters counsel one another with suggestions of “prayer” and constant vocalized “by God’s grace,” “Did you tell God your problems” and mentions of the teachings/traditions of “The Prophet” in lives of varying degrees of religious piety.

A little of that counts as cultural seasoning in a movie. A lot of it turns the picture, its characters and its plots puerile.

But what this film, based on a novel by Habiburrahman El Shirazy, is getting at ever-so-cautiously is the notion that romantic love pays a price in a patriarchal world of arranged Islamic marriages, where dowries are openly discussed in the ceremony and where some men are still comfortable saying “Women, they’re nothing but commodities.”

Maybe arranged marriages aren’t the best way for college educated young people to pair-up for life counts as a pretty bold statement for an Indonesian film.

We meet Niyala and her closest friend Faiq as schoolchildren, with him protecting her from Roger, the school bully and middle schooler Niyala treating Faiq’s scrapes with first aid, a role she’s taken on at school.

Yes, she’s heading for a career in medicine, something the abrupt death of her mother underscores. Yes, her father sends her off with Faiq’s family to school in Jakarta, where they grow up as “almost siblings.” And yes, this screenplay (by Oka Aurora) is that contrived.

Years later, Niyala is working through med school in Jakarta as she says her good-byes to Faiq, who is going to Cairo to study whatever he’s going to need to know for his career. That’s practically the same moment doctor-to-be-Niyala learns that dad and her brother took on loads of debt to keep her in school, that setbacks have put them “millions” in the hole.

Embittered Herman (Imran Ismail) is the one who spits the news to her (in Indonesian, with subtitles, or dubbed).

Their debtor, the predatory entrepreneur Cosmos (Kiki Narendra) has given them one way out of this “debt or prison” trap.

“He wants you to marry his son.”

As that son is the same Roger (Dito Darmawan) who used to bully her as a child, Niyala is shocked. Her would-be husband’s assurances that “The Roger you knew has changed” notwithstanding, this wasn’t her plan. Not that she’d ever said anything to anyone about a “plan.”

And when Faiq at last comes home with a beautiful, sophisticated and worldly fiance, Diah (Caitlin Halderman), it really does seem Niyala has “no choice” or say in her future.

Perhaps The Prophet’s seventh century words about “learning to love” that arranged spouse will comfort Niyala her and the Iman’s explaining to Faiq (and the audience) how “dating,” which is about physical love and is thus forbidden, is inferior to Islam’s emphasis on “Kafa’ah”  (compatibility), which is not just “traditional,” but the better way of coupling up for life will win him over.

Director Anggy Umbarara has made a fairly conservative movie that takes pains not to offend sensibilities within the Islamic world. But it’s a slow, ponderous and obvious affair, with even the ugly twists taking on an “Of COURSE that’s what happens” inevitability. And “inoffensive” is a pretty low bar to set for your movie.

If you’re unfamiliar with Islamic cinema, you might not know about”milk kinship” (riḍāʿa) as a melodramatic device sometimes used in such films for deciding who is actually related to whom. Breastfeeding/wet nursing matters.

The acting is reserved almost to the point of drab, although subtle moments peek through, and there’s something to be said for the stylish Asian version of the hijab, a tudong, for beautifully framing an actress’s face and allowing that subtlety, despite the “Handmaid’s Tale” look and implications of it.

“Promised Hearts” never for an instant lets us lose hope that true love will find a way, which is a universal message every romance hews to. But the film requires too much patience and relies on too many hoary plot devices to have a prayer of coming off, at least in much of the rest of the world.

Rating: TV-14, violence, crime

Cast: Beby Tsabina, Deva Mehanra, Caitlin Halderman, Imran Ismail, Kiki Narendra and Dito Darmawan.

Credits: Directed by Anggy Umbarara, scripted by Oka Aurora, based on a novel by Habiburrahman El Shirazy. A Netflix release.

Running time: 1:54

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Netflixable? First Love faces the test of “arranged marriage” in “Promised Hearts (Niyala)”

Movie Review: Pascal, Reaser, Sewell and Goggins as Hollywood “types” face their future and their humanity when they meet “The Uninvited”

Some indie films confound the viewer with a “What did these actors see in THIS?” connundrum. But not “The Uninvited.”

What looks like another onanistic Hollywood-skewers-Hollywood dramedy set in a tony Hollywood Hills party is actually a priorities-questioning, expectations-upending and surprisingly sentimental look at the 115 year-old Dream Factory and where even the young, the celebrated and the beautiful wind up when their moment in the sun has set.

First-time feature director Nadia Conners’ often sparkling and occasionally poignant script and the simple proximity of its setting ensured she’d land talent of the Pedro Pascal, Elizabeth Reaser, Walton Goggins and Rufus Sewell caliber. They were more than happy to play the Hollywood “types” whose take-stock moment is either confronted or avoided when a confused little old lady pulls her Prius up to the front gate.

A Hollywood agent (Goggins) and his actress-wife (Reaser) are prepping for a “fancy party” of his friends and clients, built around one who is more important than everybody else.

A bartender’s on duty. A “Spirit Photographer,” who ties into a just-finished film and a recent Hollywood fad, is here to capture everybody’s “aura.” Rose (Reaser), whose reputation was made on the stage, is dolling up for the one thing she’s been “good at” since giving up her career for marriage and raising their little boy, Wilder — “performing” the role of partygoer. And Sammy (Goggins) is scrambling to perfect his look and bracing himself to make a pitch to key client Gerald (Sewell), who has made them both rich and famous with some franchise he’s starred in.

Gerald might have the sexy starlet Delia (Eva De Dominici) on his arm, and that might further complicate a party where a big star (Pascal) who used to be Rose’s beau has also RSVP’d.

And then the 90something Helen shows up, someone who is still driving but certain that she “lives here” and who can’t understand why the gate won’t open for her. Screen veteran Lois Smith, a familiar face with over 150 credits from “East of Eden” to “Lady Bird” to “Law & Order” gives Helen a sauciness that comes and goes with her lucidity.

Does her license say Helen Hale?

“For goodness sakes, stop shouting my STAGE name!”

Rose talks to her, gets her to surrender her purse long enough to get that “STAGE name,” and finds an aged address book. A make-or-break party will begin at any moment, and she won’t finished getting dressed out of compassion, concern and a need to get this “problem” out the door for her husband’s big night.

“Call the police,” Sammy distractedly snaps over his shoulder. But Rose has “another stray,” “another project,” he fears. She’s taken an interest and wants to see that this 90something gets “home,” even if she thinks “home” is still at this address.

Helen? The babysitter thinks “she’s a witch.” Sammy considers her “some grave inconvenience.” But the nicely-turned-out little old lady has a few choice words for him, too.

“You swear too much. It cheapens life!” “You’re so angry. It will be the death of you!”

But Helen is just an occasional observer and commentator on the night, where Sammy will face his fears and test the waters of Big Change waters with his wife and his biggest client, where Rose will face the temptation of an old love, a recovering alcoholic all about “making amends,” and where their indulged, scene-stealing little boy (Roland Rubio) will warm to the grandmotherly old woman and insist Mommy tell him the same magical glowfish story she repeats every night

Not every direction taken here surprises, delights or touches. But more than a few do as characters take stock, sober up to unpleasant realities or decide to keep running, networking, drinking and snorting to avoid a reckoning that anyone paying attention is staring them in the face of a stooped and failing old woman sitting on their sofa.

Reaser, a fixture of the “Twilight” movies and most dazzling in the indie “Sweetland,” anchors this cast. But Goggins gives new shades to his unfiltered “Vice Principals” a-hole-in-the-room persona. De Dominici walks a fine line between striving starlet and young woman just figuring out how Hollywood turns “young” into “old” in a blink the length of Rose’s once-promising career.

Sewell is amusingly insufferable and Pascal delights in sending up the “type” a “hot” actor like him could become, if he lets his guard down.

And writer-director Conners makes the most of her good fortune in casting. She has Smith be the grandmotherly gravitas at the center of this quiet storm, wise with her years and so old she’s aged into the truth teller so many need to hear, with only a couple daring to listen.

Rating: R, drug abuse, profanity

Cast: Elizabeth Reaser, Walton Goggins, Pedro Pascal, Rufus Sewell, Eva De Dominici and Lois Smith.

Credits: Scripted and directed by Nadia Conners. A Foton Pictures release.

Running time: 1:37

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Movie Review: Pascal, Reaser, Sewell and Goggins as Hollywood “types” face their future and their humanity when they meet “The Uninvited”

Movie Review: A writer, her mentor and “The Friend” Great Dane who takes over her life

You might have to be a dog lover to truly engage and “get” “The Friend,” a melancholy meditation on suicide, loss, character and our obligations to someone who has killed himself. And if you’re unsure about the depth of your connection to canines, there’s a scene early on in this downbeat dramedy that reunites “St. Vincent” stars Naomi Watts and Bill Murray that is your yardstick.

It’s the moment frustrated and “blocked” writer Iris meets the dog belonging to her late mentor, the famous writer Walter, who has just taken his own life.

Walter’s widow (Noma Dumezweni) has consigned the animal to a boarding kennel, talked up his civilized manners and good behavior, and played the “Walter wanted” “his best friend” to have Apollo card more than once.

Iris can’t have a dog in her rent-controlled apartment. She never knew Walter had a dog, something “his best friend” would have heard about. But Walter’s messy personal life — two ex-wives (Constance Wu and Carla Gugino), that widow, and a daughter (Sarah Pidgeon) who wasn’t the child of any of them — kind of explains that.

Iris might not even be a “dog person” herself. But she figures the widow’s something of a dog hater, even if she doesn’t guess that she lied about Apollo’s calm, apartment-friendly demeanor and probably made up the whole “Walter wanted you” to have the dog edict.

It’s not like that was in a suicide note.

And she should be insulted by the what widow Barbara figures were Walter’s “reasons” for wanting her to have the dog — “You don’t have kids or a partner” and her “job,” which isn’t going all that well, isn’t anything one couldn’t fit a dog into.

Still, all these other people the dog could go to, and “Walter wanted you” to have him?

But at the kennel, Iris sees what we see — a forlorn look in Apollo’s eyes. He is lost, bereft. The dog (named Bing) lets us in for that incredibly moving moment, and several almost-as-moving ones to follow.

That voice-over journal Iris keeps in her head ponders the imponderable in this.

“How can you explain death to a dog?”

“The Friend,” based on a novel by Sigrid Nunez, is about Iris coping with this enormous burden dropped into a life by a woman the viewer keeps hoping she’ll tell off, thanks to a dead guy who could also use a good dressing-down.

Did I mention the dog’s a Great Dane? He’s big enough to take over most apartments, even a roomy one that one and all describe to Iris as “tiny,” a flat she inherited from her father.

Co-writer/directors Scott McGeHee and David Siegel (“What Maise Knew” was theirs) deliver the obligatory big-dog-stuffed-into-a-small-dogless-life scenes — wrecking the apartment, taking ownership of the furniture. But the comedy here is in this is in the closed ecosystem of New York publishing, in the privileged writer-sentenced-to-academia teaching indulged, privileged students, younger reflections of herself, and in the “messy” love life of a writer-professor whom we soon learn slept with his students, in addition to the three wives he tallied.

Gugino is the long-divorced sage among the three wives, and even she is shocked to learn Walter has an adult daughter, one who joins Iris in the assignment of organizing and editing Walter’s correspondence — letters and emails — into a book. Wu is a hoot as “the irritating one,” the one the others don’t trust, even if she pays lip service to wanting the dog.

Josh Pais plays Walter’s faintly insufferable publisher, who wants that letters book finished, and who insists on reading pretentious poems at Walter’s funeral service and a later memorial scattering of the ashes.

Watts’ Iris copes with the rising threat of eviction, with efforts to “surrender the dog” to a Great Dane rescue group and with being “stuck” as she muses, in voice-over, about Walter, what he was like, what he was to her and what he had in mind sentencing her to take care of his dog.

It’s all a tad airless and comfortable, a tale too obsessed with its “Manhattan upper class problems” (beach houses, rented river tour boats, getting that “next book” out) to come to grips with the big theme hanging over all this.

The annoying aspiring writer college kids and even the Walter flashbacks and imagined “closure” encounters feel more like distractions than keys to the story.

Great Danes, like other very large dogs, don’t live long, Iris learns. What life, art and career lessons might Walter be passing on from beyond the grave by leaving stuck, blocked and yet comfortable Iris with this gigantic physical and emotional burden?

I liked the small moments of New Yorkers/Greenwich Villagers trying to hide their dismay, pity or amusement at the sight of the slight woman trying to get the big dog into an elevator or through a revolving door in a city that may be a lot more dog tolerant than it once was, but still is no place for a Great Dane.

“You must like’em big!”

I like the women’s world this picture creates, with Sue Jean Kim cast as a Columbia U. colleague and Ann Dowd as the sympathetic support-system neighbor. But “The Friend” is an uneven, not wholly satisfying experience in most ways.

Watts is mainly the underreactor at the center of all this in a performance that could have used some lighter touches. And Murray — whose casting got the movie made — is almost an afterthought as a character, a bit of a cad, disgraced, but with the saving grace of having saved and loved a dog.

One can’t help but think of that famous W.C. Fields quote about never working with “children or dogs,” because of their inate ability to upstage the ostensible “star” in any given scene. Because there’s nothing like a melancholy Great Dane with big, camera-friendly eyes for grabbing attention and drawing it away from everyone and everything surrounding him.

Every scene Apollo isn’t in we miss him, proving Fields’ point.

Rating: R, discussions of suicide, profanity

Cast: Naomi Watts, Bill Murray, Sarah Pidgeon, Constance Wu, Noma Dumezweni, Josh Pais and Carla Gugino.

Credits: Scripted and directed by Scott McGehee and David Siegel, based on the novel by Sigrid Nunez. A Bleecker Street release

Running time: 1:59

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Movie Review: A writer, her mentor and “The Friend” Great Dane who takes over her life

Movie Review: “A Minecraft Movie,” whether we need it or not

Say this much for Warner Brothers. They got the tone for “Minecraft” right.

The studio that turned Scandinavian Lego building block toys into blockbuster animated movies goes all juvenile in adapting Sweden’s biggest gift to pop culture since ABBA, and the video game adaptation “A Minecraft Movie” hits its demographic sweetspot — 12-year-olds — hard.

They gave the directing job to Mister “Napoleon Dynamite,” Jared Hess, and cast human plush toy Jack Black as the cuddly, whooping and riffing lead and paired him up with Jason Momoa, basically a plush toy that hits the gym. Or has.

They threw five credited writers at a cutesie, formulaic quest comedy set on the gamescape of the world’s most popular video game, and if it weren’t for Jack Black parade of “WoooHOOOOOs” and Man Mountain Momoa’s comically cowardly “You go first, I’ll cover your six'” to a nerdy/shrimpy teen, they might not have managed to cook up a single memorable line of dialogue.

The “story” is overwhelmed by pages and pages game-explaining exposition, which considering its pre-sold nature to hundreds of millions who have played and loved the world-building game, whose ethos is “creativity over (mining for) gold),” seems pointless.

But here is game avatar Steve (Black), trapped in an alternate Overworld reality with his trusty dog Dennis send back to Earth through a portal in the hopes that someone will find the magic orbs the dog took with him and return to free Steve.

Momoa plays Garrett, the greatest gamer in the world in 1989, now broke and running the Game Over World video game store in Chuglass, Idaho. That’s where Nathalie (Emma Myers) and her quirky, creative younger brother Henry (Sebastian Hansen) relocate, and where Henry starts to stand out for all the worst reasons among his dull classmates, standing up for “the math” that makes jetpacks possible.

“My Dad says math has been DEBUNKED!”

Henry finds himself begging Garrett to be a mentor, and pretend to be his guardian when the kid’s jetback experiment is sabotaged by bullying morons.

Finding Overworld orbs, they run off to an abandoned mine where they tumble into a portal, and sister Natalie and real-estate-agent/petting zoo operator Dawn (Danielle Brooks) tumble with them.

They find themselves in a world of block creatures, block people and block construction generated by tokens, talismen and the like in what dopey Garrett realizes is a game setting before everybody else.

A quest gets underway, Steve is freed and before you know it, he’s leading them far afield and referring to his now-sidekick Garrett as “Gar Gar,” which rhymes with Jar Jar as they try to evade zombies and pig minions of the evil Malgosha (voiced by Rachel House).

Black and Momoa and Jennifer Coolidge, playing another variation of her oversexed MILF persona as the school principal, commit to the their roles and raise the bar for how hammy and over-the-top this picture will be performed. The energy level these three bring to this picture is one of the great endorsements of Screen Actor’s Guild professionalism and a testament to Hess’s probably enthusiastic encouragment off camera.

Yeah, the script is crap-by-committee, but there’s no sense in us cashing our checks like we know that.

Chases, explosions, diamonds and this or that accessory/magical token or what have you pop up, no doubt delighting fans as much as the news that a wrestling match involve Garrett has him facing a “Chicken (looks like a duck) Jockey.”

That arrival brought a roar from the crowd I saw the film with.

And I don’t doubt the film’s sparkling “Labryrinth” and “Lego Movie” meets “Pixels” candy coored production design, the B-52s “My Own Private Idaho” comical needle drop in the middle of the Mark Mothersbaugh (of course) score and the many, many inside-the-game references and the constant mugging and whooping by the leads will appeal to some of those who’ve enjoyed the game.

There’s validation in wringing a “movie” with a “story” out of a video game, but that’s mainly in the eyes of the devotees of Sonic or Steve.

Harmless nonsense this may be, but if you’re under the impression it does a wildly popular, award-winning “creativity” game justice, you’d have to be right on the demographic money in terms of who the picture is pitched to — 12 years-old.

Rating: PG

Cast: Jack Black, Jason Momoa, Emma Myers, Sebastian Hansen, Jennifer Coolidge and Danielle Brooks

Credits: Directed by Jared Hess, scripted by Chris Bowman, Hubbel Palmer, Neil Weidener, Gavin James and Chris Galleta . A Warner Bros. release.

Running time: 1:41

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment