Movie Nation Interview: Helen Mirren on Hitch, Mrs. Hitch and “Hitchcock”

It’s been thirty years since Alfred Hitchcock died, and more than fifty years since his most famous film — “Psycho.” So while his name, reputation and image remain in the public consciousness, generations have grown up not knowing much more than that about him.

And if casual film fans don’t know Alfred well, they certainly know even less about his wife, Alma Reville. His one-time boss, his editor, confidante and sounding board, Alma steps into the spotlight in the glamorous form of Dame Helen Mirren in “Hitchcock,” the new film about Hitch (Sir Anthony Hopkins) and the making of “Psycho.”

“She’s not been forgotten by those who study Hitchcock intently,” Mirren says. “But the general public never knew of her role in his work, his career. They didn’t know her enough to make her the ‘forgotten heroine’ of his career.”

Stephen Rebello, in his book, “Alfred Hitchcock and the Making of ‘Psycho,'” calls her “the exacting Mrs. Hitchcock,” the first person Alfred had to impress and please with any film idea, the sharp-eyed editor who spied Janet Leigh taking a “gulp” when she was supposed to be dead in the shower scene in “Psycho.”

“She worked side by side with him for his whole career,” says screenwriter John J,. McLaughlin (“Black Swan”), who used Rebello’s book as the basis for the “Hitchcock” script. “It’s very common in this business to, if you have a spouse, you run your work or work you plan to do by them. You let them read the script before it goes out, you ask them questions as you’re editing. You want their feedback.”

Mirren, 67 and married to a famous filmmaker (Taylor Hackford) herself, knew “nothing of Alma’s importance to his creative process. Hitchcock undoubtedly was that brilliant auteur-ish filmmaker everyone says he was. But it would be interesting, don’t you think, to see what Hitchcock’s movies would have been like WITHOUT Alma. They might still have been wonderful, but certainly they wouldn’t have been quite as tight and smart as they were.”

McLaughlin can’t recall ever “seeing this sort of creative relationship before” on the screen. But Mirren can.

“I played Sofia Tolstoy (in ‘The Last Station’) and even in that art form, where the novelist is a singular voice, you can see that he benefited from that editor, that consistent editing voice who keeps the artist on message. Sofia did for for Leo and was incredibly influencial on his work And again, she’s been written out of history, like Alma.”

McLaughlin built Alma’s role up in the script for “Hitchcock” once Mirren was floated as a possible co-star, “and you’ve got to give someone of her stature something interesting to play.” Though the film takes liberties with Hitchcock’s battle with the flu during the filming of ‘Psycho’ and puts Alma on the set, directing in his stead, and invents a possible romantic dalliance of her own to match her husband’s fetishizing his blonde leading ladies, McLaughlin didn’t have to invent much to put the director’s “toughest audience” front and center in the film. And the relationship he captures can’t have been an easy one in real life.

“If I was a director, and I was constantly working with beautiful women, I think I know how my wife would respond — ‘Maybe you should do a film with an ugly little old man,'” McLaughlin laughs. “But Alma let him do his thing, even if it was hard for her to be two-steps back, out of the limelight. That’s to her credit, and why she deserves credit, too.”

A muse, Mirren says, “is person outside who inspires you. Alma was this hands-on partner in the work, an editor. Having done two films with women as the editors behind great men, I think that women, plainly, make very good editors — film editors and book editors. And since the success of a book or a film often comes down to judicial editing, that’s another endorsement.”

Mirren met the real Alfred Hitchcock back when he was casting one of his last films, “Frenzy,” a brief audition that did not go well thanks to Hitch’s pre-conceived casting notions and what Mirren describes as her young “arrogant and ignorant” attitudes about who constituted a great director – Fellini, Bertolucci, et al.

f the film sends people out to rent “Psycho” to try and recall what all the fuss was about with this ground-breaking/censorship shattering horror film was about, that’s to be expected, McLaughlin says. And if Mirren’s performance in it sends film buffs back to their Hitchcock libraries, maybe to re-read this biography or that one, that’s a good thing, too — Mirren adds.

“An awful lot of film critics ought to know more about Alma, I think. ”

(Roger Moore’s review of “Hitchcock” is here.)Image

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | 1 Comment

Dying reporter’s memoir goes to Universal — Who could play her?

A Palm Beach Post cops reporter who typed her bucket-list styled memoir on her iPhone with the one finger she still had command of in the later stages of ALS (Loud Gehrig’s Disease) has gone Hollywood before the book even comes out.

“Until I Say Goodbye” publishes, with a bang, in March. Universal has the film rights. Susan Spencer-Wendel’s story will be all over book stores, published in 25 languages — Harper is that confident in it.

She looks to be in her 50s. No, the profile of her in the Palm Beach Post leaves that detail out. With Universal shelling out $2 million for screen rights, who could play her? Sarandon and Streep, if they go older. Tomei or Bullock if they think “40s,” Jessica Chastain if they go younger.

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Dying reporter’s memoir goes to Universal — Who could play her?

Movie Review: “Killing them Softly”

Image“Killing Them Softly” is, in its own chatty and slight way, the “Unforgiven” of hit-man thrillers. It’s a gritty, riveting nuts-and-bolts-of-murder tale that vividly illustrates what it is that these much-glamorized thugs do, and the gruesome, agonizing fate of their victims.

Continue reading

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Review: “Killing them Softly”

Movie Nation Interview: Kelly Macdonald

 

To think it might take an animated film, with her playing a fiesty redheaded teenager, for the world to discover the wonders of Kelly Macdonald.

Image

The Scottish Macdonald, 36, is already on HBO’s “Boardwalk Empire,” and already known to discriminating film fans thanks to “Trainspotting,” and “No Country for Old Men,” and to kids from her work in “Nanny McPhee.” But the animated “Brave” brings with it Pixar fame, and Disney princess immortality.

Macdonald was a “Snow White” fan as a child, and remembers a cherished “Sleeping Beauty” coloring book, but Merida, her character in “Brave,” “is quite a change from the other Disney princesses, from what I can tell. She knows her mind, knows what she wants and she isn’t interested in finding a prince and singing a song about it.”

The Glasgow native joined her fellow Scots Billy Connolly and Craig Ferguson for “Brave,” and Oscar winner Emma Thompson, “who’s half Scottish,” Macdonald adds, plays the mother of Merida, an archer-princess who isn’t sitting still for her mother’s lectures about duty, and how she must marry a chosen member of one of the other Highlands clans to keep the peace.

“I was a disgruntled teenage girl, so I certainly have that in common with her, as will any girl,” Macdonald says of Merida. “Merida may be Scottish, but she could be from anywhere a girl can speak her own mind and determine her own destiny.”

And for the first time in her career, Macdonald, a mother herself, gets to play a genuine big screen role model.

“Merida’s an awesome role model,” she says. “She learns all her lessons by herself. She doesn’t need someone to lecture her, to tell her what to do. She makes some bad choices, but then she makes things better by correcting those choices. And all this learning she does makes her come out the other end stronger and more self-confident. She’s a great character.”

Macdonald first made her mark in “Trainspotting,” “where she brushes off [fellow Scot] Ewan McGregor with an almost lyrical delivery,” notes Reed Martin, author of the indie film production guide “The Reel Truth.” “She’s confident, self-reliant, unflappable, and adorable which gives her a strong and wide-ranging appeal. “

The Irish actor Cillian Murphy, an old friend, former London neighbor (Macdonald moved back to Glasgow after getting married) and her co-star in 2003’s “Intermission,” says “Kelly is the most honest of performers. It never feels like acting with her. She just ‘is.’She’s just luminous on screen. But there’s a warmth and vulnerability to her that you can see in her face and sense in her voice”

Macdonald is more modest about her range, referring to Merida in “Brave” as “probably tougher than any character I’ve ever played. More vibrant and vital and adventurous. She’s so physical that I never would have been cast if they’d shot this live action. They’d never think of me that way.”

But she’s still happy to have had the chance to play the tough teen, to star in a movie about a girl who fights to choose her own fate.

“I had my ‘choose your own destiny’ moment. I left home at 17 to become an actress. But I never had big arguments about that with my mom. She was always very supportive, determined to let me make my own decisions.

“I haven’t gone out of my way to avoid being typecast, but it’s just sort of happened. But being Scottish, it’s nice to play a redhead, every now and then. And if you’re doing it in a movie for Pixar and Disney, you know that’s how people are going to really remember you.”

 

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | 1 Comment

Movie Review: Gerard Butler’s career slide continues with “Playing for Keeps”

 ImageThe oddly unsatisfying big screen career of Gerard Butler takes another unfortunate turn with “Playing for Keeps,” a sexualized romantic comedy built around kids soccer. It makes its way into theaters as Butler’s last effort, “Chasing Mavericks,” beats a hasty retreat to home video.

Continue reading

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Review: Gerard Butler’s career slide continues with “Playing for Keeps”

Movie Nation Interview: Kristen Stewart on life after “Twilight”

ImageIt’s been five years since Kristen Stewart was plucked from supporting player/indie-film obscurity and thrust into the spotlight as the female face of the “Twilight” franchise. Five years, and as of this month, five films will have passed, as Stewart grew from someone the New York Times labeled “a sylph with a watchful, sometimes wary gaze” into the 22 year old Forbes named “the highest paid actress in Hollywood.”

“Those are pretty formative years,” the “Twilight” muse muses. “It is a little strange, if you think about it, growing up on camera like this. But I don’t think about it.

“Every single day on the set should help you become a better actor. If nothing else, I should have gotten better at picking up and putting down a lot of my inhibitions. It’s all about being impulsive and doing things that move you. I think I dropped a lot of fears over the course of these films. But I picked a few up, too. Maybe. And those new fears could be interesting to watch down the road. Or not interesting at all.”

She is guarded, as someone who has gathered the shrieks of teen-fan approval, and the condemnations of teen fans upset when she was caught cheating on her “Twilight” co-star and off-camera beau, Robert Pattinson, with the director of her first post-”Twilight” blockbuster (“Snow White and the Huntsman”) would be. The “characteristic hesitancy” that New York Daily News critic Elizabeth Weitzman noted in her acting is her off-camera persona as well.

But Stewart, who apologized to fans, and who is apparently re-united with Pattinson, is letting it all roll off her back — the fan sniping, the critical spanking the “Twilight” movies have endured, being the first actress of her generation to be widely impersonated in horror spoofs on TV and in movies.

Her goal, she says, is to avoid becoming a self-conscious actress, to keep the spontaneity in her work.

“Everyone deals with it differently,” she says. “I find that as soon as you start considering the fame thing, overthinking the career and all, you’re putting yourself outside of yourself and you start to worry about how you’re perceived. You worry about how some part you play or how something you say is going to land, and how that will affect other people.. I can’t do my job if I do that. But I definitely see other actors who love being famous so much that they do whatever it takes to stay famous…They’re able to turn on the charisma, the likability, when they have a movie coming up. I can’t. You’re going to be so disjointed if you start living through how other people perceive you.”

It pays to remember how young she is, that she grew up in the movies, making a mark as a child actress in “Panic Room” with Jodie Foster when she was 12. Like many a child actress, school was by correspondance course and college hasn’t figured in the equation. There’s acting to be done, and if she stumbles for words — confusing “tactfully” and “tactile” for “tactically” when talking about planning her career — there’s always time for college if and when she cools off.

Which won’t be any time soon. Ben Affleck just cast her as his novice con-artist sidekick in “Focus.” Filmmakers tried for over 50 years to turn Jack Kerouac’s “On the Road” into a movie. When Stewart signed on in a supporting role, director Walter Salles had his movie.

Stewart says she’s been in love with the idea of being an actress for hire, “of fighting for a part, convincing something that you’ve got something they need.” But now, being rich and famous with proven box office clout, she’s having to give some of that freedom up — taking control.

“It’s strange to have the roles reversed, where I can be in control of what I get to make. One thing that I love about the job is having NO control.” But expect her to initiate her own pet projects in the very near future.

She says she didn’t realize the extent that “Twilight” would shake up her life, not even after landing the role of Bella.

“There was no expectation that would even get to finish the whole series when we did the first ‘Twilight.’ On the set, it felt like we were making another independent movie.” She and the rest of the cast had decided to be “religiously faithful to the novels,” not knowing how that might look and sound on the screen.

Then the cast made its famous pre-release appearance at San Diego’s ComicCon fan convention, “and we were hit by this wave of energy, that was really BAFFLING…It was a totally contagious experience, feeding on itself. That hall, jammed with 6,000 people, reacting that way, made me think ‘This is NOT normal.’”

Stewart says she’s “relieved” that the five film series is finally over. “If I say I’m excited the experience is complete, it’s only because I don’t have that responsibility weighing on me any more. A typical movie, you’ve got a five week or even five month commitment. This was five years. I’m going to miss that ‘I wonder how the wedding will look,’ or ‘I wonder what I’ll have to do in the birth scene.’ Hopefully, I will find that feeling in other projects.”

Part of that feeling, she says, is the “Twilight” “tone, the vibe.” The films changed directors and changed locations, but even just gathering for interviews with the press in a hotel “gives it this ‘Twilight’ vibe — surreal.”

But what will she not miss?

“Oh God, I will not miss having to be so…perfect. I mean, these vampires are just so…perfect. I won’t miss the contacts, and I don’t think anybody in the cast would disagree with me there. And the face paint! To look like marble, we just cake this stuff on. I’m not sure that panned out, and I am more than happy to leave that behind.”

 

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | 2 Comments

Movie Review: “Anna Karenina”

3starsThe new “Anna Karenina” is as regal, romantic and tragic as ever. The Tolstoy tale of a bored wife and doting mother martyred by her scandalous love for a rakish cavalry officer in Imperial Russia is a perfect period vehicle for Keira Knightley, who always brings a chest-heaving sexuality to such pieces — even the austere understated romances of Jane Austen.

But her reunion with her “Pride & Prejudice” director Joe Wright has been stage-managed by the great playwright and screenwriter Tom Stoppard. And he’s given Tolstoy something no earlier screen version could claim — playfulness.

Continue reading

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Review: “Anna Karenina”

Movie Review: “21 Jump Street” is in on the joke, and how

2half-starIt was a simpler time, when Johnny Depp was new to Tiger Beat, when hair metal still ruled the airwaves and when Fox was an infant TV network with a bare handful of series  — “The Simpsons,” “America’s Most Wanted” and this silly cop confection called “21 Jump Street.”

Now, that teen friendly cop show has been updated and unleashed in the post “Hangover” era — when no joke is out of bounds, no language is too profane, no riff on drugs or sex is too extreme.

You’d expect a big screen version of “21 Jump Street,” the TV series that made Johnny Depp famous, to be a joke. And it is, a raunchy, violent and potty-mouthed farce that straddles the middle ground between “Starsky & Hutch” and “Superbad.” It’s “Project X” with pistols.

Continue reading

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Review: “21 Jump Street” is in on the joke, and how

Movie Review: “Journey 2” goes all silly like

ImageCast and crew err on the side of silly in “Journey 2: The Mysterious Island,” the amusingly childish sequel to that unlikely 2008 hit “Journey to the Center of the Earth.” They’ve rendered Jules Verne’s novel into a jokey lark, with broad, corny wisecracks, comic sidekicks and everybody riffing on the gi-normous lizards, humungous spiders and the like.

Continue reading

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Review: “Journey 2” goes all silly like

Movie Review: Why “John Carter” of Mars won’t be a franchise

Image“John Carter” is a bloated sci-fi epic made watchable by swell effects, passable performances and those little dashes of humor that reassure us that the filmmakers know this is all a lark — no matter what the budget.

Continue reading

Posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news | Comments Off on Movie Review: Why “John Carter” of Mars won’t be a franchise