Movie Preview: Why make a “live” (CGI) action “Lilo & Stitch?”

Back in olden times, Disney would re-release its animated classics — in theaters, in new video and digital formats — every few years so that new generations of children could discover as parents who grew up on the films introduced their kids to a great memory from their youth.

Granted, they went about as far as they could go with that make-more-money-off-already-produced “intellectual property.”

But this nonsense of remaking “The Lion King,” et al with CGI and “real” settings is head-slappingly cynical, even by “We really need content for the ‘family’ audience in the second quarter” bottom-liners’ standards.

Pixar, Dreamworks, Illumination and Disney Animation have been market-testing their way into a “no new ideas” corner for years — sequels and prequels, each more exhausted than what preceded them.

With audiences slow to respond to the unfamiliar — the charming book adaptation “The Wild Robot” has taking forever to catch on and make money — the inclination is to play it safe — “Minions: The Next Generation,” “The Lion King as a Cub,” etc.

So here we are, remaking a sweet, funny, beautifully-animated action comedy, the high water mark of Disney’s long-closed Feature Animation Florida studio, a film that was a hit when it came out, that spawned a sequel, a TV series and theme park attractions.

May of next year “Lilo & Stitch” is reborn.

Unknown's avatar

About Roger Moore

Movie Critic, formerly with McClatchy-Tribune News Service, Orlando Sentinel, published in Spin Magazine, The World and now published here, Orlando Magazine, Autoweek Magazine
This entry was posted in Reviews, previews, profiles and movie news. Bookmark the permalink.